ϟ
 
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.160614
¤ OpenAccess: Bronze
This work has “Bronze” OA status. This means it is free to read on the publisher landing page, but without any identifiable license.

Relationship Between <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT Scans and <i>KRAS</i> Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Kenji Kawada,Keiichi Toda,Yuji Nakamoto,Masayoshi Iwamoto,Etsuro Hatano,Fengshi Chen,Suguru Hasegawa,Kaori Togashi,Hiroshi Date,Shinji Üemoto,Yoshiharu Sakai

KRAS
Colorectal cancer
Medicine
2015
Several studies have shown that <i>KRAS</i> mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC) result in the lack of response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor–based therapy; thus, <i>KRAS</i> mutational testing has been incorporated into routine clinical practice. However, 1 limitation of this test is the heterogeneity of <i>KRAS</i> status, which can be either intratumoral heterogeneity within an individual primary CRC or discordant <i>KRAS</i> status between a primary CRC and its corresponding metastases. We previously reported that <sup>18</sup>F-FDG accumulation was significantly higher in primary CRCs with mutated <i>KRAS</i> than in those with wild-type <i>KRAS</i>. However, the clinical utility of the previous report has been limited because endoscopic biopsy for testing <i>KRAS</i> status is safe and feasible only in primary CRC. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether <i>KRAS</i> status is associated with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG accumulation in metastatic CRC and whether <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT scans can be used to predict the <i>KRAS</i> status of metastatic CRC. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis was performed on 55 metastatic CRC tumors that were identified by <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT before surgical resection. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>max</sub>) of the respective metastatic tumor was calculated from <sup>18</sup>F-FDG accumulation. <b>Results:</b> From the analysis with the 55 tumors, no significant correlation was found between SUV<sub>max</sub> and <i>KRAS</i> status. We next analyzed only tumors larger than 10 mm to minimize the bias of partial-volume effect and found that SUV<sub>max</sub> was significantly higher in the <i>KRAS</i>-mutated group than in the wild-type group (8.3 ± 4.1 vs. 5.7 ± 2.4, respectively; <i>P</i> = 0.03). Multivariate analysis indicated that SUV<sub>max</sub> remained significantly associated with <i>KRAS</i> mutations (<i>P</i> = 0.04). <i>KRAS</i> status could be predicted with an accuracy of 71.4% when an SUV<sub>max</sub> cutoff value of 6.0 was used. <b>Conclusion:</b><sup>18</sup>F-FDG accumulation into metastatic CRC was associated with <i>KRAS</i> status. <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT scans may be useful for predicting the <i>KRAS</i> status of metastatic CRC and help in determining the therapeutic strategies against metastatic CRC.
Loading...
    Cite this:
Generate Citation
Powered by Citationsy*
    Relationship Between <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT Scans and <i>KRAS</i> Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer” is a paper by Kenji Kawada Keiichi Toda Yuji Nakamoto Masayoshi Iwamoto Etsuro Hatano Fengshi Chen Suguru Hasegawa Kaori Togashi Hiroshi Date Shinji Üemoto Yoshiharu Sakai published in 2015. It has an Open Access status of “bronze”. You can read and download a PDF Full Text of this paper here.