ϟ
 
DOI: 10.1177/0146167298245010
OpenAccess: Closed
This work is not Open Acccess. We may still have a PDF, if this is the case there will be a green box below.

Not all Personal Goals are Personal: Comparing Autonomous and Controlled Reasons for Goals as Predictors of Effort and Attainment

Kennon M. Sheldon,Andrew J. Elliot

Volition (linguistics)
Goal Attainment Scaling
Psychology
1998
Even when goals are self-generated, they may not feel truly "personal," that is, autonomous and self-integrated. In three studies (one concurrent and two prospective), we found that the autonomy of personal goals predicted goal attainment. In contrast, the strength of "controlled" motivation did not predict attainment. Studies 2 and 3 validated a mediational model in which autonomy led to attainment because it promoted sustained effort investment. In Study 3, the Goal Attainment Scaling methodology was used to provide a more objective measure of goal attainment, and additional analyses were performed to rule out expectancy, value, and expectancy x value explanations of the autonomy-to-attainment effects. Results are discussed in terms of contemporary models of volition and self-regulation.
Loading...
    Cite this:
Generate Citation
Powered by Citationsy*
    Not all Personal Goals are Personal: Comparing Autonomous and Controlled Reasons for Goals as Predictors of Effort and Attainment” is a paper by Kennon M. Sheldon Andrew J. Elliot published in 1998. It has an Open Access status of “closed”. You can read and download a PDF Full Text of this paper here.