ϟ
 
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015142202
¤ OpenAccess: Green
This work has “Green” OA status. This means it may cost money to access on the publisher landing page, but there is a free copy in an OA repository.

Metrology Standards for Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers

Daniel C. Sullivan,Nancy A. Obuchowski,Larry G. Kessler,David Raunig,Constantine Gatsonis,Erich P. Huang,Marina Kondratovich,Lisa M. McShane,Anthony P. Reeves,Daniel P. Barboriak,Alexander R. Guimarães,Richard L. Wahl

Terminology
Medicine
Medical physics
2015
Although investigators in the imaging community have been active in developing and evaluating quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs), the development and implementation of QIBs have been hampered by the inconsistent or incorrect use of terminology or methods for technical performance and statistical concepts. Technical performance is an assessment of how a test performs in reference objects or subjects under controlled conditions. In this article, some of the relevant statistical concepts are reviewed, methods that can be used for evaluating and comparing QIBs are described, and some of the technical performance issues related to imaging biomarkers are discussed. More consistent and correct use of terminology and study design principles will improve clinical research, advance regulatory science, and foster better care for patients who undergo imaging studies.
Loading...
    Cite this:
Generate Citation
Powered by Citationsy*
    Metrology Standards for Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers” is a paper by Daniel C. Sullivan Nancy A. Obuchowski Larry G. Kessler David Raunig Constantine Gatsonis Erich P. Huang Marina Kondratovich Lisa M. McShane Anthony P. Reeves Daniel P. Barboriak Alexander R. Guimarães Richard L. Wahl published in 2015. It has an Open Access status of “green”. You can read and download a PDF Full Text of this paper here.