ϟ
 
DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208904
¤ OpenAccess: Bronze
This work has “Bronze” OA status. This means it is free to read on the publisher landing page, but without any identifiable license.

The accuracy of pleural ultrasonography in diagnosing complicated parapneumonic pleural effusions: Table 1

Philip Svigals,Amit Chopra,James G. Ravenel,Paul J. Nietert,John T. Huggins

Medicine
Parapneumonic effusion
Chest radiograph
2016
We compared the accuracy of pleural ultrasound versus chest CT versus chest radiograph (CXR) to determine radiographic complexity in predicting a complicated parapneumonic effusion (CPPE) defined by pleural fluid analysis. 66 patients with parapneumonic effusions were identified with complete data. Pleural ultrasound had a sensitivity of 69.2% (95% CI 48.2% to 85.7%) and specificity of 90.0% (95% CI 76.3% to 97.2%). Chest CT had a sensitivity of 76.9% (95% CI 56.3% to 91.0%) and specificity of 65.0% (95% CI 48.3% to 79.4%). CXR had a sensitivity of 61.5% (95% CI 40.6% to 79.8%) and specificity of 60.0% (95% CI 43.3% to 75.1%). Pleural ultrasound appears to be a superior modality to rule in a CPPE when compared with chest CT and CXR.
Loading...
    Cite this:
Generate Citation
Powered by Citationsy*
    The accuracy of pleural ultrasonography in diagnosing complicated parapneumonic pleural effusions: Table 1” is a paper by Philip Svigals Amit Chopra James G. Ravenel Paul J. Nietert John T. Huggins published in 2016. It has an Open Access status of “bronze”. You can read and download a PDF Full Text of this paper here.