ϟ
 
DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200410
¤ OpenAccess: Bronze
This work has “Bronze” OA status. This means it is free to read on the publisher landing page, but without any identifiable license.

Diagnosis of breast lesions: fine-needle aspiration cytology or core needle biopsy? A review

Stefan M. Willems,Carolien H.M. van Deurzen,P. J. van Diest

Medicine
Radiology
Biopsy
2011
Diagnosis of breast lesions is routinely performed by the triple assessment of a specialised surgeon, radiologist and pathologist. In this setting, fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and core needle biopsy (CNB) are the current methods of choice for pathological diagnosis, both with their specific advantages and limitations. Evidence-based literature discussing which of both modalities is preferable in breast lesion diagnosis is sparse and there is no consensus among different specialised breast cancer centres. This study reviews FNAC and CNB for diagnosing breast lesions, comparing methodological issues, diagnostic performance indices, possibilities for additional prognostic and predictive tests and cost effectiveness. Overall, CNB achieved better sensitivity and specificity especially in those lesions that were not definitively benign or malignant, non-palpable and/or calcified lesions. Although FNAC is easier to perform, interpretation requires vast experience and even then, it is more often inconclusive requiring additional CNB. The authors conclude that overall CNB is to be preferred as a diagnostic method.
Loading...
    Cite this:
Generate Citation
Powered by Citationsy*
    Diagnosis of breast lesions: fine-needle aspiration cytology or core needle biopsy? A review” is a paper by Stefan M. Willems Carolien H.M. van Deurzen P. J. van Diest published in 2011. It has an Open Access status of “bronze”. You can read and download a PDF Full Text of this paper here.