ϟ
 
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.581
¤ OpenAccess: Bronze
This work has “Bronze” OA status. This means it is free to read on the publisher landing page, but without any identifiable license.

Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: survey of five common health topics

Heinke Kunst,Diederik Groot,Pallavi Latthe,Manish Latthe,Khalid S. Khan

Credibility
The Internet
Dissemination
2002
The internet provides an easily accessible forum to disseminate both accurate and inaccurate health information—so it has the potential to facilitate but also to jeopardise healthcare provision. 1 2 Many criteria have been alleged to capture the quality of health websites, 3 4 but the validity of these criteria needs to be examined.5 The source, currency, and hierarchy of the evidence posted on a website may be used to judge its credibility—that is, the power of inspiring belief. If these criteria were fulfilled, the contents of the website would be expected to be accurate. We determined whether websites that seem to be credible provide accurate health information. We determined the relation between credibility features and accuracy of contents of 121 websites that provided information on five common health topics: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease …
Loading...
    Cite this:
Generate Citation
Powered by Citationsy*
    Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: survey of five common health topics” is a paper by Heinke Kunst Diederik Groot Pallavi Latthe Manish Latthe Khalid S. Khan published in 2002. It has an Open Access status of “bronze”. You can read and download a PDF Full Text of this paper here.