ϟ
 
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx258
¤ OpenAccess: Bronze
This work has “Bronze” OA status. This means it is free to read on the publisher landing page, but without any identifiable license.

Comparison of Neoadjuvant Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin vs Nab-Paclitaxel+Gemcitabine in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Randomized WSG-ADAPT-TN Trial Results

Oleg Gluz,Ulrike Nitz,Cornelia Liedtke,Matthias Christgen,Eva‐Maria Grischke,Helmut Forstbauer,Michael Braun,Mathias Warm,John Hackmann,Christoph Uleer,Bahriye Aktas,Claudia Schumacher,Nikola Bangemann,Christoph Lindner,Sherko Küemmel,M Clemens,Jochem Potenberg,Peter Staib,A Kohls,Raquel von Schumann,Ronald Kates,Johannes Schumacher,Rachel Wuerstlein,Hans Kreipe,Nadia Harbeck

Gemcitabine
Paclitaxel
Carboplatin
2017
Pathological complete response (pCR) is associated with improved prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The optimal chemotherapy regimen is unclear. Weekly nab-paclitaxel vs conventional paclitaxel or addition of carboplatin to anthracycline-taxane results in higher pCR rates with uncertain survival impact. We evaluated carboplatin vs gemcitabine with a nab-paclitaxel backbone as a short 12-week A-free regimen with a focus on early response.Patients with TNBC (estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor < 1%, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, cT1c-cT4c, cN0/+) were randomly assigned to A: nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2/gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 d1,8 three times weekly (q3w); vs B: nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2/carboplatin AUC2 day 1,8 q3w. The trial was powered for a pCR (ypT0/is ypN0) comparison by therapy arm and early response (defined as Ki-67 decrease >30% or < 500 invasive tumor cells in the three-week serial biopsy). All statistical tests were two-sided.A total of 336 patients were enrolled (48 centers, arms A/B: n = 182/154). The median age was 50 years. At baseline (A vs B), 62.6% and 62.9% had cT2-4c tumors; 86.8% and 90.9% completed therapy per protocol, respectively. pCR favored arm B (28.7%, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.36, vs 45.9%, 95% CI = 0.38 to 0.54; 95% CI(dBA) = 6.2% to 27.9%, P = .002) and was lower in nonresponders than in early responders (19.5% vs 44.4%, P < .001) or in patients with unclassifiable early response (50.0%). The nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine was associated with more frequent dose reductions (20.6% vs 11.9%, P = .04), treatment-related serious adverse events (11.1% vs 5.3%, P = .07), grade 3-4 infections (7.2% vs 2.6%, P = .07), and grade 3-4 ALAT elevations (11.7 vs 3.3%, P = .01).This first large randomized trial suggests high efficacy and excellent tolerability of a neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen, superior to nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine in TNBC. De-escalation of further chemotherapy in patients with early pCR after a short anthracycline-free regimen is a promising field of future research. Early necrotic morphological changes and/or proliferation decrease after the first therapy cycle seem to be associated with subsequent pCR.
Loading...
    Cite this:
Generate Citation
Powered by Citationsy*
    Comparison of Neoadjuvant Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin vs Nab-Paclitaxel+Gemcitabine in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Randomized WSG-ADAPT-TN Trial Results” is a paper by Oleg Gluz Ulrike Nitz Cornelia Liedtke Matthias Christgen Eva‐Maria Grischke Helmut Forstbauer Michael Braun Mathias Warm John Hackmann Christoph Uleer Bahriye Aktas Claudia Schumacher Nikola Bangemann Christoph Lindner Sherko Küemmel M Clemens Jochem Potenberg Peter Staib A Kohls Raquel von Schumann Ronald Kates Johannes Schumacher Rachel Wuerstlein Hans Kreipe Nadia Harbeck published in 2017. It has an Open Access status of “bronze”. You can read and download a PDF Full Text of this paper here.