ϟ
 
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djn326
¤ OpenAccess: Hybrid
This work has “Hybrid” OA status. This means it is free under an open license in a toll-access journal.

Pivotal Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Biomarker Used for Classification or Prediction: Standards for Study Design

Margaret S. Pepe,Ziding Feng,Holly Janes,Patrick M. Bossuyt,John D. Potter

Biomarker
Context (archaeology)
Medicine
2008
Research methods for biomarker evaluation lag behind those for evaluating therapeutic treatments. Although a phased approach to development of biomarkers exists and guidelines are available for reporting study results, a coherent and comprehensive set of guidelines for study design has not been delineated. We describe a nested case–control study design that involves prospective collection of specimens before outcome ascertainment from a study cohort that is relevant to the clinical application. The biomarker is assayed in a blinded fashion on specimens from randomly selected case patients and control subjects in the study cohort. We separately describe aspects of the design that relate to the clinical context, biomarker performance criteria, the biomarker test, and study size. The design can be applied to studies of biomarkers intended for use in disease diagnosis, screening, or prognosis. Common biases that pervade the biomarker research literature would be eliminated if these rigorous standards were followed.
Loading...
    Cite this:
Generate Citation
Powered by Citationsy*
    Pivotal Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Biomarker Used for Classification or Prediction: Standards for Study Design” is a paper by Margaret S. Pepe Ziding Feng Holly Janes Patrick M. Bossuyt John D. Potter published in 2008. It has an Open Access status of “hybrid”. You can read and download a PDF Full Text of this paper here.