ϟ
 
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.325
¤ OpenAccess: Green
This work has “Green” OA status. This means it may cost money to access on the publisher landing page, but there is a free copy in an OA repository.

What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs.

Kennon M. Sheldon,Andrew J. Elliot,Youngmee Kim,Tim Kasser

Psychology
Deci-
Social psychology
2001
Three studies compared 10 candidate psychological needs in an attempt to determine which are truly most fundamental for humans. Participants described "most satisfying events" within their lives and then rated the salience of each of the 10 candidate needs within these events. Supporting self-determination theory postulates (Ryan & Deci, 2000)--autonomy, competence, and relatedness, were consistently among the top 4 needs, in terms of both their salience and their association with event-related affect. Self-esteem was also important, whereas self-actualization or meaning, physical thriving, popularity or influence, and money-luxury were less important. This basic pattern emerged within three different time frames and within both U.S. and South Korean samples and also within a final study that asked, "What's unsatisfying about unsatisfying events?" Implications for hierarchical theories of needs are discussed.
Loading...
    Cite this:
Generate Citation
Powered by Citationsy*
    What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs.” is a paper by Kennon M. Sheldon Andrew J. Elliot Youngmee Kim Tim Kasser published in 2001. It has an Open Access status of “green”. You can read and download a PDF Full Text of this paper here.