ϟ
 
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1719-1
¤ OpenAccess: Green
This work has “Green” OA status. This means it may cost money to access on the publisher landing page, but there is a free copy in an OA repository.

Comparative release of growth factors from PRP, PRF, and advanced-PRF

Eizaburo Kobayashi,Laura Flückiger,Masako Fujioka‐Kobayashi,Kosaku Sawada,Anton Sculean,Sandrine Benoit,Richard J. Miron

Platelet-rich fibrin
Growth factor
Platelet-rich plasma
2016
The use of platelet concentrates has gained increasing awareness in recent years for regenerative procedures in modern dentistry. The aim of the present study was to compare growth factor release over time from platelet-rich plasma (PRP), platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), and a modernized protocol for PRF, advanced-PRF (A-PRF). Eighteen blood samples were collected from six donors (3 samples each for PRP, PRF, and A-PRF). Following preparation, samples were incubated in a plate shaker and assessed for growth factor release at 15 min, 60 min, 8 h, 1 day, 3 days, and 10 days. Thereafter, growth factor release of PDGF-AA, PDGF-AB, PDGF-BB, TGFB1, VEGF, EGF, and IGF was quantified using ELISA. The highest reported growth factor released from platelet concentrates was PDGF-AA followed by PDGF-BB, TGFB1, VEGF, and PDGF-AB. In general, following 15–60 min incubation, PRP released significantly higher growth factors when compared to PRF and A-PRF. At later time points up to 10 days, it was routinely found that A-PRF released the highest total growth factors. Furthermore, A-PRF released significantly higher total protein accumulated over a 10-day period when compared to PRP or PRF. The results from the present study indicate that the various platelet concentrates have quite different release kinetics. The advantage of PRP is the release of significantly higher proteins at earlier time points whereas PRF displayed a continual and steady release of growth factors over a 10-day period. Furthermore, in general, it was observed that the new formulation of PRF (A-PRF) released significantly higher total quantities of growth factors when compared to traditional PRF. Based on these findings, PRP can be recommended for fast delivery of growth factors whereas A-PRF is better-suited for long-term release.
Loading...
    Cite this:
Generate Citation
Powered by Citationsy*
    Comparative release of growth factors from PRP, PRF, and advanced-PRF” is a paper by Eizaburo Kobayashi Laura Flückiger Masako Fujioka‐Kobayashi Kosaku Sawada Anton Sculean Sandrine Benoit Richard J. Miron published in 2016. It has an Open Access status of “green”. You can read and download a PDF Full Text of this paper here.