ϟ
 
DOI: 10.1002/ana.20903
OpenAccess: Closed
This work is not Open Acccess. We may still have a PDF, if this is the case there will be a green box below.

Trial of celecoxib in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Merit Cudkowicz,Jeremy M. Shefner,David Schoenfeld,Hui Zhang,Katrin I. Andreasson,Jeffrey D. Rothstein,Daniel B. Drachman

Celecoxib
Medicine
Placebo
2006
Abstract Objective To determine whether chronic treatment with celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase‐2 inhibitor that has been shown to be beneficial in preclinical testing, is safe and effective in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Methods A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, clinical trial was conducted. Three hundred research subjects with ALS were randomized (2:1) to receive celecoxib (800mg/day) or placebo for 12 months. The primary outcome measure was the rate of change in upper extremity motor function measured by the maximum voluntary isometric contraction strength. Secondary end points included safety, survival, change in cerebrospinal fluid prostaglandin E 2 levels, and changes in the rate of decline of leg and grip strength, vital capacity, ALS Functional Rating Scale‐Revised, and motor unit number estimates. Results Celecoxib did not slow the decline in muscle strength, vital capacity, motor unit number estimates, ALS Functional Rating Scale‐Revised, or affect survival. Celecoxib was well tolerated and was not associated with an increased frequency of adverse events. Prostaglandin E 2 levels in cerebrospinal fluid were not elevated at baseline and did not decline with treatment. Interpretation At the dosage studied, celecoxib did not have a beneficial effect on research subjects with ALS, and it was safe. A biological effect of celecoxib was not demonstrated in the cerebrospinal fluid. Further studies of celecoxib at a dosage of 800mg/day in ALS are not warranted. Ann Neurol 2006;60:22–31
Loading...
    Cite this:
Generate Citation
Powered by Citationsy*
    Trial of celecoxib in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis” is a paper by Merit Cudkowicz Jeremy M. Shefner David Schoenfeld Hui Zhang Katrin I. Andreasson Jeffrey D. Rothstein Daniel B. Drachman published in 2006. It has an Open Access status of “closed”. You can read and download a PDF Full Text of this paper here.