ϟ
 
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12565
¤ OpenAccess: Gold
This work has “Gold” OA status. This means it is published in an Open Access journal that is indexed by the DOAJ.

Association of Histologic Disease Activity With Progression of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

David E. Kleiner,Elizabeth M. Brunt,Laura Wilson,Cynthia Behling,Cynthia D. Guy,Melissa J. Contos,Oscar W. Cummings,Matthew M. Yeh,Ryan M. Gill,Naga Chalasani,Brent A. Neuschwander‐Tetri,Anna Mae Diehl,Srinivasan Dasarathy,Norah Terrault,Kris V. Kowdley,Rohit Loomba,Patricia Belt,James Tonascia,Joel E. Lavine,Arun J. Sanyal

Medicine
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Internal medicine
2019
The histologic evolution of the full spectrum of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and factors associated with progression or regression remain to be definitively established.To evaluate the histologic evolution of NAFLD and the factors associated with changes in disease severity over time.A prospective cohort substudy from the Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN) NAFLD Database study, a noninterventional registry, was performed at 8 university medical research centers. Masked assessment of liver histologic specimens was performed, using a prespecified protocol to score individual biopsies. Participants included 446 adults with NAFLD enrolled in the NASH CRN Database studies between October 27, 2004, and September 13, 2013, who underwent 2 liver biopsies 1 or more year apart. Data analysis was performed from October 2016 to October 2018.Progression and regression of fibrosis stage, using clinical, laboratory, and histologic findings, including the NAFLD activity score (NAS) (sum of scores for steatosis, lobular inflammation, and ballooning; range, 0-8, with 8 indicating more severe disease).A total of 446 adults (mean [SD] age, 47 [11] years; 294 [65.9%] women) with NAFLD (NAFL, 86 [19.3%]), borderline NASH (84 [18.8%]), and definite NASH (276 [61.9%]) were studied. Over a mean (SD) interval of 4.9 (2.8) years between biopsies, NAFL resolved in 11 patients (12.8%) and progressed to steatohepatitis in 36 patients (41.9%). Steatohepatitis resolved in 24 (28.6%) of the patients with borderline NASH and 61 (22.1%) of those with definite NASH. Fibrosis progression or regression by at least 1 stage occurred in 132 (30%) and 151 [34%] participants, respectively. Metabolic syndrome (20 [95%] vs 108 [72%]; P = .03), baseline NAS (mean [SD], 5.0 [1.4] vs 4.3 [1.6]; P = .005), and smaller reduction in NAS (-0.2 [2] vs -0.9 [2]; P < .001) were associated with progression to advanced (stage 3-4) fibrosis vs those without progression to stage 3 to 4 fibrosis. Fibrosis regression was associated with lower baseline insulin level (20 vs 33 μU/mL; P = .02) and decrease in all NAS components (steatosis grade -0.8 [0.1] vs -0.3 [0.9]; P < .001; lobular inflammation -0.5 [0.8] vs -0.2 [0.9]; P < .001; ballooning -0.7 [1.1] vs -0.1 [0.9]; P < .001). Only baseline aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were associated with fibrosis regression vs no change and progression vs no change on multivariable regression: baseline AST (regression: conditional odds ratio [cOR], 0.6 per 10 U/L AST; 95% CI, 0.4-0.7; P < .001; progression: cOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5; P = .002). Changes in the AST level, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level, and NAS were also associated with fibrosis regression and progression (ΔAST level: regression, cOR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.6-1.2; P = .47; progression, cOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.6; P = .02; ΔALT level: regression, cOR, 0.7 per 10 U/L AST; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9; P = .002; progression, cOR, 1.0 per 10 U/L AST; 95% CI, 0.9-1.2; P = .93; ΔNAS: regression, cOR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.6-0.9; P = .001; progression, cOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5; P = .01).Improvement or worsening of disease activity may be associated with fibrosis regression or progression, respectively, in NAFLD.
Loading...
    Cite this:
Generate Citation
Powered by Citationsy*
    Association of Histologic Disease Activity With Progression of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease” is a paper by David E. Kleiner Elizabeth M. Brunt Laura Wilson Cynthia Behling Cynthia D. Guy Melissa J. Contos Oscar W. Cummings Matthew M. Yeh Ryan M. Gill Naga Chalasani Brent A. Neuschwander‐Tetri Anna Mae Diehl Srinivasan Dasarathy Norah Terrault Kris V. Kowdley Rohit Loomba Patricia Belt James Tonascia Joel E. Lavine Arun J. Sanyal published in 2019. It has an Open Access status of “gold”. You can read and download a PDF Full Text of this paper here.