ϟ
 
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.1591
OpenAccess: Closed
This work is not Open Acccess. We may still have a PDF, if this is the case there will be a green box below.

Screening by Chest Radiograph and Lung Cancer Mortality

Martin M. Oken,William G. Hocking,Paul A. Kvale,Gerald L. Andriole,Saundra S. Buys,Timothy R. Church,E. David Crawford,Mona N. Fouad,Claudine Isaacs,Douglas J. Reding,Joel L. Weissfeld,Lance Yokochi,Barbara O’Brien,Lawrence R. Ragard,Joshua M. Rathmell,Thomas L. Riley,Patrick Wright,Neil Caparaso,Ping Hu,Grant Izmirlian,Paul F. Pinsky,Philip C. Prorok,Barnett S. Kramer,Anthony B. Miller,John K. Gohagan,Christine D. Berg,for the PLCO Project Team

Medicine
National Lung Screening Trial
Chest radiograph
2011
The effect on mortality of screening for lung cancer with modern chest radiographs is unknown.To evaluate the effect on mortality of screening for lung cancer using radiographs in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.Randomized controlled trial that involved 154,901 participants aged 55 through 74 years, 77,445 of whom were assigned to annual screenings and 77,456 to usual care at 1 of 10 screening centers across the United States between November 1993 and July 2001. The data from a subset of eligible participants for the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), which compared chest radiograph with spiral computed tomographic (CT) screening, were analyzed.Participants in the intervention group were offered annual posteroanterior view chest radiograph for 4 years. Diagnostic follow-up of positive screening results was determined by participants and their health care practitioners. Participants in the usual care group were offered no interventions and received their usual medical care. All diagnosed cancers, deaths, and causes of death were ascertained through the earlier of 13 years of follow-up or until December 31, 2009.Mortality from lung cancer. Secondary outcomes included lung cancer incidence, complications associated with diagnostic procedures, and all-cause mortality.Screening adherence was 86.6% at baseline and 79% to 84% at years 1 through 3; the rate of screening use in the usual care group was 11%. Cumulative lung cancer incidence rates through 13 years of follow-up were 20.1 per 10,000 person-years in the intervention group and 19.2 per 10,000 person-years in the usual care group (rate ratio [RR]; 1.05, 95% CI, 0.98-1.12). A total of 1213 lung cancer deaths were observed in the intervention group compared with 1230 in usual care group through 13 years (mortality RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.87-1.22). Stage and histology were similar between the 2 groups. The RR of mortality for the subset of participants eligible for the NLST, over the same 6-year follow-up period, was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.81-1.10).Annual screening with chest radiograph did not reduce lung cancer mortality compared with usual care.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00002540.
Loading...
    Cite this:
Generate Citation
Powered by Citationsy*
    Screening by Chest Radiograph and Lung Cancer Mortality” is a paper by Martin M. Oken William G. Hocking Paul A. Kvale Gerald L. Andriole Saundra S. Buys Timothy R. Church E. David Crawford Mona N. Fouad Claudine Isaacs Douglas J. Reding Joel L. Weissfeld Lance Yokochi Barbara O’Brien Lawrence R. Ragard Joshua M. Rathmell Thomas L. Riley Patrick Wright Neil Caparaso Ping Hu Grant Izmirlian Paul F. Pinsky Philip C. Prorok Barnett S. Kramer Anthony B. Miller John K. Gohagan Christine D. Berg for the PLCO Project Team published in 2011. It has an Open Access status of “closed”. You can read and download a PDF Full Text of this paper here.