Patricia Schetter

This study examines how system-wide (i.e., region, district, and school) mechanisms such as leadership support, training requirements, structure, collaboration, and education affect the use of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in schools and how this affects the outcomes for students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Despite growing evidence for the positive effects of EBPs for ASD, these practices are not consistently or effectively used in schools. Although special education programs are mandated to use EBPs, there are very few evidence-based methods for selecting, implementing, and sustaining EBPs. Research focuses primarily on teacher training, without attention to contextual factors (e.g., implementation climate, attitudes toward EBPs, resource allocation, and social networks) that may impact outcomes. Using an implementation science framework, this project will prospectively examine relations between system-wide factors and teachers’ use of EBPs and student education outcomes. Survey data will be collected from approximately 85 regional special education directors, 170 regional program specialists, 265 district special education directors, 265 behavior specialists, 925 school principals, 3538 special education teachers, and 2700 paraprofessionals. Administrative data for the students with ASD served by participating teachers will be examined. A total of 79 regional-, district-, and school-level personnel will also participate in social network interviews. Mixed methods, including surveys, administrative data, and observational checklists, will be used to gather in-depth information about system-wide malleable factors that relate to positive teacher implementation of EBPs and student outcomes. Multi-level modeling will be used to assess system-wide malleable factors related to EBP implementation which will be linked to the trainer, teacher, and student outcomes and examined based on moderators (e.g., district size, Special Education Local Plan Area structure, teachers’ ASD experience). Finally, a dynamic social network approach will be used to map EBP-related connectivity across all levels of the system for selected regions. Dynamic network analysis will be used to gauge the degree to which and ways that EBP trainings, resources, and interventions are shared (or not shared) among school staff. Results are expected to inform the development of system-wide interventions to improve the school-based implementation of EBPs for students with ASD.

The California Autism Professional Training and Information Network (CAPTAIN) is a statewide interagency collaboration with the goal of scaling up the use of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). CAPTAIN began as a clinical initiative then further developed under the influence of implementation science methodology. The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment framework (EPIS) has impacted targeted strategy use for this statewide scale-up of EBPs by informing the development of key partnerships, implementation goals, and collaborative processes within CAPTAIN. Currently, CAPTAIN has over 407 members representing 140 school and community agencies who provide training and coaching in EBP and meet regularly with regional teams. Outcome data indicate 51.9% of the members provide training and coaching to more than three direct service providers/programs per year. Primary barriers to implementation of EBP were time for training (25.6%), lack of substitute teachers (16.5%), and staff lacking foundational skills (11.5%). Facilitators of implementation and sustainment of the CAPTAIN model include active participation in effective dissemination practices, creative funding and leveraging of local resources, development of the regional collaboratives with an active membership, member commitment to EBP for ASD, and use of implementation science to identify and overcome barriers. The purpose of this paper is to highlight CAPTAIN as a model for statewide scale-up of EBP in schools as well as other community agencies. Although these efforts have focussed on EBP for ASD, the concepts, partnerships, and procedures will likely be transferable to other focal issues and may be generalized across service sectors.

The Authors. Acknowledgments. Foreword. Introduction. 1 Questions About Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). 1 What Is ASD and How Do the Core Areas of Impairment Affect Students in a Traditional School Setting? 2 Is There Peer-Reviewed Research That Supports Homeschooling for Students with ASD? 3 Why Do Some Families of Children with ASD Consider Homeschooling? 2 Questions About Homeschooling. 4 What Are the Different Types of Homeschooling? 5 How Do Parents Choose the Right Type of Homeschool Program for Their Child? 6 What Are the Reported Advantages of Homeschooling Children with ASD? 7 What Are the Challenges of Homeschooling Children with ASD? 3 Questions About Resources for Homeschoolers. 8 What Supports, Resources, and Curricula Are Available and How Can Families Access Them? 9 What Special Education Services Is My Child Entitled to If I Choose to Homeschool? 10 How Should a Family Get Started with Homeschooling? 4 Questions About Teaching Strategies. 11 How Should the Core Defi cits of Social Skills and Social Thinking Be Addressed? 12 How Can Social Opportunities Be Incorporated into the Homeschooler's Day? 13 How Should the Core Defi cits in Organizational Skills and Thinking Be Addressed? 14 How Can Interests Be Incorporated into Instruction? 15 How Should the Daily Schedule Be Designed? 16 How Can Parents Address Behavioral Issues? 17 How Can Parents Determine the Appropriate Accommodations and Modifi cations That are Necessary for Curricular Success? 5 Questions About Transition. 18 When Should Parents Consider a Transition Back to Traditional Educational Settings or Programs and How Is This Done? 19 How Should a Family Plan for Transition to College? 20 What Are Other Postsecondary Options Besides College? 6 Questions for Homeschooling Parents. Interview with Janelle Lewis. Interview with Karen Crum. Interview with Connie Ajay. Interview with Michelle King. Interview with Ann Coe. 7 Questions for Homeschooled Children on the Autism Spectrum. Interview with Ben-Age Eleven. Interview with Bobby-Age Thirteen. Interview with Katie-Age Fifteen Interview with Ian-Age Seventeen. Glossary of Terms and Acronyms. Notes. Index.

Background The increase in the number of autistic children being identified has led to increased demand on public schools to provide high-quality services. Effectively scaling up evidence-based practice (EBP) use for autistic students is challenging, given the complicated organization of special education. Teachers have significant challenges implementing autism EBP with fidelity. Factors such as implementation leadership and climate and attitudes toward EBP are linked to successful EBP use and may vary at different levels of the education system. Examining mechanisms of successful implementation is a critical step to support scale-up. Method In this observational study, conducted from September 2018 to March 2020, California school personnel ( n = 2273) at multiple levels of the system completed surveys related to implementation climate, leadership, and attitudes toward EBP. Data were collected throughout California at the Special Education Local Plan Areas, County Office of Education, and district and school levels from educators and administrators working in public schools supporting autistic students. Multi-level modeling was conducted to characterize implementation readiness. Results Overall, implementation climate and leadership scores are low across levels with regional levels rated more positively than districts or schools. Attitudes toward EBP were moderate, with those working in schools having the poorest ratings and specialists/trainers and related service providers (e.g., speech-language pathologists) having the highest ratings. Conclusions Outcomes provide a unique opportunity to compare implementation factors across organizational levels with a large, statewide sample. These data provide guidance for developing implementation interventions at multiple levels of the education system to increase readiness for effective scale-up of autism EBP in schools. Personnel and leaders at different organizational levels may need differentiated training targeting improved implementation climate and leadership. Personnel within districts and schools may experience a particular benefit from leadership support for EBP implementation.

Public programs have been charged with implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) to improve outcomes for children with autism. However, research indicates that scale-up of EBPs poses challenges. This study identifies perceived variables linked to effective statewide scale-up of EBPs in special education by exploring implementation climate and leadership across special education organization types (e.g., schools, districts, and regional consortiums). A simultaneous QUAL + QUAN mixed methods design was employed with the primary function of convergence and triangulation. Data were drawn from focus groups with 30 special educators and a statewide survey completed by 656 school personnel in one U.S. state. In general, perceptions of implementation climate and leadership are weak in special education organizations, with strengths at regional levels focused on special education and increased challenges at the school and district levels. Implications for practice and future research are identified.

Supporting use of evidence-based practice in public service programs for autistic individuals is critical. The California Autism Professional Training and Information Network (CAPTAIN) brings together best practices from intervention and implementation research to support scale up of autism services. The current study was designed to evaluate the impact of CAPTAIN on provider-level outcomes including attitude toward, knowledge, fidelity, and use of autism EBPs and overall classroom quality. Overall, results indicated variability across measures, with some significant differences between CAPTAIN-trained and non-CAPTAIN-trained providers. These preliminary findings show promise for the efficacy of the CAPTAIN model to increase dissemination and implementation of EBP at the classroom level.

This study examines how system-wide (i.e., region, district, and school) mechanisms such as leadership support, training requirements, structure, collaboration, and education affect the use of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in schools and how this affects the outcomes for students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Despite growing evidence for the positive effects of EBPs for ASD, these practices are not consistently or effectively used in schools. Although special education programs are mandated to use EBPs, there are very few evidence-based methods for selecting, implementing, and sustaining EBPs. Research focuses primarily on teacher training, without attention to contextual factors (e.g., implementation climate, attitudes toward EBPs, resource allocation, and social networks) that may impact outcomes. Using an implementation science framework, this project will prospectively examine relations between system-wide factors and teachers’ use of EBPs and student education outcomes. Survey data will be collected from approximately 85 regional special education directors, 170 regional program specialists, 265 district special education directors, 265 behavior specialists, 925 school principals, 3538 special education teachers, and 2700 paraprofessionals. Administrative data for the students with ASD served by participating teachers will be examined. A total of 79 regional-, district-, and school-level personnel will also participate in social network interviews. Mixed methods, including surveys, administrative data, and observational checklists, will be used to gather in-depth information about system-wide malleable factors that relate to positive teacher implementation of EBPs and student outcomes. Multi-level modeling will be used to assess system-wide malleable factors related to EBP implementation which will be linked to the trainer, teacher, and student outcomes and examined based on moderators (e.g., district size, Special Education Local Plan Area structure, teachers’ ASD experience). Finally, a dynamic social network approach will be used to map EBP-related connectivity across all levels of the system for selected regions. Dynamic network analysis will be used to gauge the degree to which and ways that EBP trainings, resources, and interventions are shared (or not shared) among school staff. Results are expected to inform the development of system-wide interventions to improve the school-based implementation of EBPs for students with ASD.

After publication of the original article [1] it was brought to our attention that author Elizabeth McGhee Hassrick was erroneously included as Elizabeth McGee Hassrick. The correct spelling of the author's name is included in the author list of this erratum.

Autistic students benefit from child-centered goals that align with evidence-based practices (EBPs) that meet their individualized needs, however, most teachers are not trained in how to implement autism-specific EBPs. The challenges do not lie with teachers alone. Professional development (PD) providers, such as district or regional autism experts who train and coach teachers on how to implement autism-specific EBPs, face barriers accessing the needed supports to conduct high-quality PD and lack experience with individualizing their methods for training and coaching teachers. When PD providers have networks of professional support, they can potentially gain access to resources to provide successful individualized coaching for teachers. No research has measured the impact of the social networks of PD providers on their performance as coaches in classrooms for teachers of autistic students. To test the hypothesis that social network resources can impact the performance of PD providers who coach teachers how to use EBPs for their autistic students, we conducted social network analysis with PD providers. Findings suggest that network factors were associated with the self-reported performance for PD providers. PD providers who have more people in their networks who were autism EBP experts, as well as more people in their networks who supported them with how to individualize their PD efforts to specific teachers or districts, had higher performance as teacher coaches. We discuss future research about how to support network development for PD providers and policy implications.