Grazia Arpino

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) comprises approximately 10% of breast cancers and appears to have a distinct biology. Because it is less common than infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC), few data have been reported that address the biologic features of ILC in the context of their clinical outcome. In the present study we undertook an extensive comparison of ILC and IDC using a large database to provide a more complete and reliable assessment of their biologic phenotypes and clinical behaviors.The clinical and biological features of 4140 patients with ILC were compared with those of 45,169 patients with IDC (not otherwise specified). The median follow-up period was 87 months.In comparison with IDC, ILC was significantly more likely to occur in older patients, to be larger in size, to be estrogen and progesterone receptor positive, to have lower S-phase fraction, to be diploid, and to be HER-2, p53, and epidermal growth factor receptor negative. It was more common for ILC than for IDC to metastasize to the gastrointestinal tract and ovary. The incidence of contralateral breast cancer was higher for ILC patients than for IDC patients (20.9% versus 11.2%; P < 0.0001). Breast preservation was modestly less frequent in ILC patients than in IDC patients. The 5-year disease-free survival was 85.7% for ILC and 83.5% for IDC (P = 0.13). The 5-year overall survival was 85.6% for ILC and 84.1% for IDC (P = 0.64).Despite the fact that the biologic phenotype of ILC is quite favorable, these patients do not have better clinical outcomes than do patients with IDC. At present, management decisions should be based on individual patient and tumor biologic characteristics, and not on lobular histology.

To determine whether progesterone receptor (PgR) status provides additional value to estrogen receptor (ER) status and improves prediction of benefit from endocrine treatment among patients with primary breast cancer.Clinical outcomes of patients in two large databases were analyzed as a function of steroid receptor status. The first database (PP), contained 3,739 patients who did not receive any systemic adjuvant therapy and 1,688 patients who received adjuvant endocrine therapy but no chemotherapy. The second database (SPORE), contained 10,444 patients who received adjuvant endocrine therapy but no chemotherapy. Biochemical ER and PgR assays were identically performed in two different central laboratories.In univariate and multivariate analyses, the prognostic significance of PgR status among systemically untreated patients is modest. Among endocrine-treated patients, however, multivariate analyses, including lymph-node involvement, tumor size, and age, demonstrate that PgR status is independently associated with disease-free and overall survival. For recurrence, the reduction in relative risk (RR) was 25% for ER-positive/PgR-negative patients and 53% for ER-positive/PgR-positive patients, compared with ER-negative/PgR-negative patients (P <.0001, PP patients). Patients with ER-positive/PgR-negative tumors have a reduction in RR of death of 30% (SPORE patients) and 38% (PP patients), compared with patients with ER-negative/PgR-negative tumors (P <.0001). For ER-positive/PgR-positive tumors, the reduction of the risk of death was greater than 46% in SPORE patients and 58% in PP patients, indicating that ER-positive/PgR-positive patients derive more benefit from endocrine therapy (P <.0001).When accurately measured, PgR status is an independent predictive factor for benefit from adjuvant endocrine therapy. Therefore, PgR status should be taken into account when discussing RR reductions expected from endocrine treatment with individual patients.

Breast cancer evolution and tumor progression are governed by the complex interactions between steroid receptor [estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor] and growth factor receptor signaling. In recent years, the field of cancer therapy has witnessed the emergence of multiple strategies targeting these specific cancer pathways and key molecules (ER and growth factor receptors) to arrest tumor growth and achieve tumor eradication; treatment success, however, has varied and both de novo (up front) and acquired resistance have proven a challenge. Recent studies of ER biology have revealed new insights into ER action in breast cancer and have highlighted the role of an intimate crosstalk between the ER and HER family signaling pathways as a fundamental contributor to the development of resistance to endocrine therapies against the ER pathway. The aim of this review article is to summarize the current knowledge on mechanisms of resistance of breast cancer cells to endocrine therapies due to the crosstalk between the ER and the HER growth factor receptor signaling pathways and to explore new available therapeutic strategies that could prolong duration of response and circumvent endocrine resistant tumor growth.

The response to endocrine therapy in breast cancer correlates with estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status. ER-positive/PR-negative breast cancers respond less well to selective ER modulator (SERM) therapy than ER-positive/PR-positive tumors. The predictive value of PR has long been attributed to the dependence of PR expression on ER activity, with the absence of PR reflecting a nonfunctional ER and resistance to hormonal therapy. However, recent clinical and laboratory evidence suggests that ER-positive/PR-negative breast cancers may be specifically resistant to SERMs, whereas they may be less resistant to estrogen withdrawal therapy with aromatase inhibitors, which is a result inconsistent with the nonfunctional ER theory. Novel alternative molecular mechanisms potentially explaining SERM resistance in ER-positive/PR-negative tumors have been suggested by recent experimental indications that growth factors may downregulate PR levels. Thus, the absence of PR may not simply indicate a lack of ER activity, but rather may reflect hyperactive cross talk between ER and growth factor signaling pathways that downregulate PR even as they activate other ER functions. Therefore, ER-positive/PR-negative breast tumors might best be treated by completely blocking ER action via estrogen withdrawal with aromatase inhibitors, by targeted ER degradation, or by combined therapy targeting both ER and growth factor signaling pathways. In this review, we will discuss the biology and etiology of ER-positive/PR-negative breast cancer, highlighting recent data on molecular cross talk between ER and growth factor signaling pathways and demonstrating how PR might be a useful marker of these activities. Finally, we will consider the clinical implications of these observations.

Clinical data indicate that estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-negative (ER+/PR-) breast cancers are less sensitive to tamoxifen than are ER+/PR+ tumors. It has also been reported that tamoxifen may be less effective in tumors that overexpress either HER-2 or HER-1 (epidermal growth factor receptor) and that signaling through these receptors reduces PR expression in experimental models. We hypothesized that ER+/PR- breast tumors are more likely than ER+/PR+ breast tumors to have an aggressive phenotype, to express HER-1 and overexpress HER-2, and are less likely to benefit from tamoxifen adjuvant therapy.Clinical and biological features of 31 415 patients with ER+/PR+ tumors were compared with those of 13,404 patients with ER+/PR- tumors. Association between disease-free survival (DFS) and HER-1 and HER-2 status was analyzed in a subset of 11,399 patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox regression or Kaplan-Meier analyses, and all statistical tests were two-sided.ER+/PR- tumors were more frequent in older patients, were larger in size, had a higher S-phase fraction, and were more likely to be aneuploid than ER+/PR+ tumors. Furthermore, three times as many ER+/PR- tumors as ER+/PR+ tumors expressed HER-1 (25% versus 8%; P < .001) and 50% more overexpressed HER-2 (21% versus 14%; P < .001). Among all tamoxifen-treated women, recurrence was higher among women with HER-1-expressing tumors than with HER-1-negative tumors (HR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.0 to 3.5; P = .05); a stronger association between worse DFS and HER-2 overexpression was observed (HR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.2 to 4.3; P = .006). However, results varied by PR status. Among tamoxifen-treated women with ER+/PR+ tumors, HER-1 or HER-2 status was not associated with worse DFS. Among women with ER+/PR- tumors, however, both HER-1 expression (HR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.0 to 5.4; P = .036) and HER-2 overexpression (HR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.1 to 6.0; P = .022) were associated with a higher likelihood of recurrence.ER+/PR- tumors express higher levels of HER-1 and HER-2 and display more aggressive features than ER+/PR+ tumors. As in laboratory models, lack of PR expression in ER+ tumors may be a surrogate marker of aberrant growth factor signaling that could contribute to the tamoxifen resistance observed in these tumors.

Experimental data suggest a complex cross-talk between HER-2 and estrogen receptor, and it has been hypothesized that HER-2-positive tumors may be less responsive to certain endocrine treatments. Clinical data, however, have been conflicting. We have conducted a meta-analysis on the interaction between the response to endocrine treatment and the overexpression of HER-2 in metastatic breast cancer.Studies have been identified by searching the Medline, Embase, and American Society of Clinical Oncology abstract databases. Selection criteria were (a) metastatic breast cancer, (b) endocrine therapy (any line of treatment), and (c) evaluation of HER-2 expression (any method). For each study, the relative risk for treatment failure for HER-2-positive over HER-2-negative patients with 95% confidence interval was calculated as an estimate of the predictive effect of HER-2. Pooled estimates of the relative risk were computed by the Mantel-Haenszel method.Twelve studies (n = 2,379 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall relative risk was 1.42 (95% confidence interval, 1.32-1.52; P < 0.00001; test for heterogeneity = 0.380). For studies involving tamoxifen, the pooled relative risk was 1.33 (95% confidence interval, 1.20-1.48; P < 0.00001; test for heterogeneity = 0.97); for studies involving other hormonal drugs, a pooled relative risk of 1.49 (95% confidence interval, 1.36-1.64; P < 0.00001; test for heterogeneity = 0.08) was estimated. A second meta-analysis limited to tumors that were either estrogen receptor positive, estrogen receptor unknown, or estrogen receptor negative/progesterone receptor positive yielded comparable results.HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer is less responsive to any type of endocrine treatment. This effect holds in the subgroup of patients with positive or unknown steroid receptors.

Studies on well characterized, large populations of estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PgR)/HER2-negative [triple-negative (TN)] breast cancer (BC) patients with long-term follow-up are lacking. In this study, we analyze clinical outcomes of TN BC and implications of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression. Clinical and biologic features, time to first recurrence (TTFR), and overall survival (OS) were compared in 253 TN versus 1,036 ER positive, PgR positive, HER2-negative [estrogen-driven (ED)] BC. Compared to ED, TN tumors were larger (p = 0.02), more proliferative (high S-phase 54 vs. 17 %, p < 0.0001), more aneuploid (64 vs. 43 %, p < 0.0001) and more likely EGFR positive (≥10 fmol/mg by radioligand-binding assay, 49 vs. 7 %, p < 0.0001). Among TN, EGFR-positive BC were larger (p = 0.0018), more proliferative (p < 0.0001), and more aneuploid, (p < 0.0001) than EGFR-negative BC. Adjuvant-treated TN patients had shorter TTFR (p = 0.0003), and OS (p = 0.0017), than ED patients. However, in untreated patients, no differences in TTFR and OS were observed at 8 years median follow-up. Among TN patients, EGFR expression was not associated with worse outcome. TN tumors have a worse outcome in systemically treated patients but not in untreated patients. EGFR expression, does not predict for worse long-term survival.

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents the 15-20% of all breast cancers (BC) and is characterized by a very aggressive behavior. Recent data suggest that TNBC is not a single disease, but it is rather an umbrella for different ontology-profiles such as basal like 1 and 2, mesenchymal, and the luminal androgen receptor (LAR). The LAR subtype is characterized by the expression of the Androgen Receptor (AR) and its downstream effects. Notwithstanding the role of the AR in several signaling pathways, its impact on a biological and clinical standpoint is still controversial. The LAR subtype has been associated with better prognosis, less chemotherapy responsiveness and lower pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant treatment. Clinical evidence suggests a role for anti-androgen therapies such as bicalutamide, enzalutamide and abiraterone, offering an interesting chemo-free alternative for chemo-unresponsive patients, and therefore potentially shifting current treatment strategies.

Circulating tumor cell (CTC) clusters may represent one of the key mechanisms initiating the metastasis process. However, the series of pathophysiologic events by which CTC clusters originate, enter the circulation, and reach the distant sites remain to be identified. The cellular and molecular mechanisms that provide survival advantage for CTC clusters during the transit in the blood stream are also still largely unknown. Understanding the biology of CTC clusters is critical to assess this unified scheme employed by cancer and to device strategies to overcome key pathways responsible for their improved metastatic potential. CTC clusters remain an underdeveloped area of research begging the attention of multidisciplinary cancer research teams. Here, we provide insight on existing preclinical evidence on the potential mechanisms leading to CTC cluster formation and dissemination and on processes that may offer survival advantage. We also offer our perspective on future directions to delineate the role of CTC clusters in metastatic cascade and discuss their clinical significance. Cancer Res; 78(4); 845-52. ©2018 AACR.

Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors, namely abemaciclib, palbociclib and ribociclib, interfere with cell cycle progression, induce cell senescence and might promote cancer cell disruption by a cytotoxic T cells-mediated effect. Phase III randomized clinical trials have proven that CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with several endocrine agents improve treatment efficacy over endocrine agents alone for hormone receptor positive (HR+) HER2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Based on such results, these combinations have been approved for clinical use. Preclinical studies in cell cultures and mouse models proved that CDK4/6i are active against a broad spectrum of solid tumors other than breast cancer, including liposarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, non-small cell lung cancer, glioblastoma multiforme, esophageal cancer and melanoma. The role of CDK4/6i in monotherapy in several solid tumors is currently under evaluation in phase I, II and III trials. Nowadays, abemaciclib is the only of the three inhibitors that has received approval as single agent therapy for pretreated HR+ HER2- MBC. Here we review biological, preclinical and clinical data on the role of CDK4/6 inhibitors as single agents in advanced solid tumors.

Purpose To assess pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and an aromatase inhibitor (AI) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive and hormone receptor–positive metastatic/locally advanced breast cancer (MBC/LABC). Patients and Methods The PERTAIN trial (NCT01491737) is an ongoing randomized, open-label, multicenter—80 sites and eight countries—phase II trial. Patients have HER2-positive, hormone receptor–positive MBC/LABC and no prior systemic therapy with the exception of endocrine. Random assignment was 1:1 to intravenous pertuzumab (840 mg loading dose followed by 420 mg every 3 weeks) plus trastuzumab (8 mg/kg followed by 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks), and oral anastrozole (1 mg every day) or letrozole (2.5 mg every day), or trastuzumab and an AI. Induction intravenous docetaxel every 3 weeks or paclitaxel every week could be administered for 18 to 24 weeks at the investigator’s discretion (decided before but given after random assignment). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Patients were stratified by whether they received induction chemotherapy and their time since adjuvant hormone therapy. Results One hundred twenty-nine patients were randomly assigned per arm (February 2012 to October 2014; intent-to-treat populations); 75 in one arm and 71 in the other were chosen to receive induction chemotherapy. Stratified median PFS was 18.89 months (95% CI, 14.09 to 27.66 months) in the pertuzumab plus trastuzumab arm and 15.80 months (95% CI, 11.04 to 18.56 months) in the trastuzumab arm (stratified hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.89; P = .0070). Serious adverse events (AEs) were reported for 42 (33.1%) of 127 and 24 (19.4%) of 124 patients in the safety populations of the pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and trastuzumab arms, respectively. Rates of grade ≥ 3 AEs were 64 (50.4%) of 127 and 48 (38.7%) of 124, respectively. There were no deaths as a result of AEs. Conclusion PERTAIN met its primary PFS end point. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and an AI is effective for the treatment of HER2-positive MBC/LABC. The safety profile was consistent with previous trials of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab.

Although international guidelines support the administration of hormone therapies with or without targeted therapies in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, upfront use of chemotherapy remains common even in the absence of visceral crisis. Because first-line or second-line treatments, or both, based on chemotherapy and on hormone therapy have been scarcely investigated in head-to-head randomised controlled trials, we aimed to compare these two different approaches.We did a systematic review and network meta-analysis with a systematic literature search on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, Web of Science, and online archives of the most relevant international oncology conferences. We included all phase 2 and 3 randomised controlled trials investigating chemotherapy with or without targeted therapies and hormone therapies with or without targeted therapies as first-line or second-line treatments, or both, in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, published between Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2017. Additional recently published randomised controlled trials relevant to the topic were also subsequently added. No language restrictions were adopted for our search. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was done to compare hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (the primary outcome), and to compare odds ratios (ORs) for the proportion of patients achieving an overall response (the secondary outcome). All treatments were compared to anastrozole and to palbociclib plus letrozole. This study is registered in the Open Science Framework online public database, registration DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/496VR.We identified 2689 published results and 140 studies (comprising 50 029 patients) were included in the analysis. Palbociclib plus letrozole (HR 0·42; 95% credible interval [CrI] 0·25-0·70), ribociclib plus letrozole (0·43; 0·24-0·77), abemaciclib plus anastrozole or letrozole (0·42; 0·23-0·76), palbociclib plus fulvestrant (0·37; 0·23-0·59), ribociclib plus fulvestrant (0·48; 0·31-0·74), abemaciclib plus fulvestrant (0·44; 0·28-0·70), everolimus plus exemestane (0·42; 0·28-0·67), and, in patients with a PIK3CA mutation, alpelisib plus fulvestrant (0·39; 0·22-0·66), and several chemotherapy-based regimens, including anthracycline and taxane-containing regimens, were associated with better progression-free survival than was anastrozole alone. No chemotherapy or hormone therapy regimen was significantly better than palbociclib plus letrozole for progression-free survival. Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab was the only clinically relevant regimen that was significantly better than palbociclib plus letrozole in terms of the proportion of patients achieving an overall response (OR 8·95; 95% CrI 1·03-76·92).In the first-line or second-line setting, CDK4/6 inhibitors plus hormone therapies are better than standard hormone therapies in terms of progression-free survival. Moreover, no chemotherapy regimen with or without targeted therapy is significantly better than CDK4/6 inhibitors plus hormone therapies in terms of progression-free survival. Our data support treatment guideline recommendations involving the new combinations of hormone therapies plus targeted therapies as first-line or second-line treatments, or in both settings, in women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.None.

A novel class of drugs, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), are now rapidly emerging as highly effective treatments for solid tumours. ADCs conjugate conventional chemotherapeutics with highly selective targeted monoclonal antibodies. Anti-HER2 therapies selectively target cancer cells expressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), among them trastuzumab has been the first HER2-targeting monoclonal antibody to achieve successful results that made it the backbone of anti-HER2 therapies. Trastuzumab drug conjugates (T-DCs), use trastuzumab as a selective antibody to lead cytotoxic drugs inside cancer cells. Trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-Dxd) are the two approved T-DCs. T-Dxd along with other five T-DCs represents "second generation ADCs" that has been firstly tested in HER2 positive breast cancer (BC) and then in HER2-low BC and other cancers showing promising results thanks to extraordinary and innovative pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics. The evidence generated so far are establishing them as a completely new class of agents effective in solid cancer treatments but also warrants physicians against unconventional toxicity profiles. The role of T-DCs in HER2-positive BC has been largely reviewed, while in this review, we provided for the first time in literature an overview of trastuzumab drug conjugates (T-DCs) approved and/or in clinical development with a specific focus on their efficacy and safety profile in HER2-low BC and other solid tumours different from BC. We started by analysing T-DCs biological characteristics that underly the differences in T-DCs pharmacodynamics and safety profile, then presented the main evidence on the activity and efficacy of these emerging T-DCs in HER2-low BC and other HER2 overexpressing and/or mutated solid tumours and lastly, we provided an overview of the complex and still evolving scenario in which these compounds should be allocated. A specific focus on possible combination strategies with other drugs such as immunotherapy, chemotherapy and target therapy, to increase T-DCs activity and eventually overcome future upcoming resistance mechanisms, are here also critically reviewed.

Preclinical data indicate that expression of the ErbB family of receptors, such as HER-2 and HER-1 (EGFR) may be involved in endocrine resistance. Evidence of resistance from clinical studies has been inconsistent. The present study examined whether HER-2 gene amplification or HER-1 expression predicted response to tamoxifen.Three hundred and forty nine patients had estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer and received daily tamoxifen as initial therapy for advanced disease. HER-2 gene amplification, detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization, and HER-1 expression, evaluated by immunohistochemistry, was determined on 136 and 204 patients, respectively.HER-2 amplification was correlated with lower ER (P = 0.02), HER-1 positivity (P = 0.004), and HER-2 protein overexpression (P < 0.00001). The response rate was 56% for HER-2 non-amplified versus 47% for HER-2 amplified tumors (P = 0.38), and 58% for HER-1-negative versus 36% for HER-1-positive (P = 0.05). Time to treatment failure (TTF) was 7 months for non-amplified HER-2 tumors and 5 months (P = 0.007) for amplified HER-2 tumors, and there was a trend toward a better overall survival (OS) in patients with non-amplified HER-2 tumors (median 31 versus 25 months, respectively, P = 0.07). For positive versus negative HER-1 tumors, TTF was 4 versus 8 months (P = 0.08) and median survival was 24 versus 31 months (P = 0.41). Combining HER-1 expression and HER-2 gene status, patients with both negative HER-1 expression and non-amplified HER-2 had longer TTF (P = 0.001) and OS (P = 0.03) than if either were positive. In multivariate analysis, HER-2 was not an independent factor for TTF and OS, although HER-1 was significant for TTF only (P </= 0.001).Patients with HER-2 amplification and HER-1 expression had lower ER levels and were modestly less responsive to tamoxifen, suggesting that molecular events in addition to those involving the ErbB receptors are important in determining the endocrine-resistant phenotype.

The objective of this study was to comprehensively characterize the clinical and biologic features of adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) and to assess the implications for management in a large cohort of patients.From a database of 50,000 patients, 28 were identified with ACC for which clinical follow-up and biologic information was available. The biologic features examined included estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status, DNA ploidy, and S-phase fraction. Median follow-up was 83 months with a range of 29 to 144 months. Overall survival and disease free survival curves were drawn using Kaplan and Meier estimates and were compared by the log-rank test.All but one patient were postmenopausal with a median age at diagnosis of 66 years (range, 40-96 years). One patient had macroscopic metastatic disease at diagnosis. Median tumor size was 1.9 cm (range, 0.5-7.0 cm). Axillary lymph node dissection was performed in 23 patients. Only 1 patient (4%) had histologic positive lymph nodes (2 of 10), and no recurrence was detected for this patient. Forty-six percent were ER positive (median, 16 fmol/mg protein; range, 5-1017 fmol/mg), and 35% were PgR positive (median, 61 fmol/mg protein; range, 6-854 fmol/mg). S-phase fraction and DNA ploidy were assessable in 24 cases. Ninety percent of tumors had low S-phase (median, 3.3%; range, 0.1-34.2%), and 92% were diploid. Simple or modified radical mastectomy was performed in 22 patients, and 6 patients were treated by lumpectomy. Five of these six patients also received radiation therapy after lumpectomy. Despite the different surgical approaches, there were no local recurrences. The 5-year disease free survival rate was 100%, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 85% (95% confidence interval, 71.7-98.6%).Adenoid cystic carcinomas of the breast have very favorable biologic characteristics and, consistent with this, an excellent prognosis. Good local control can be achieved by lumpectomy with radiation or by simple mastectomy. Axillary lymph node dissection is not helpful in clinical management.

Most types of invasive breast cancer are thought to evolve over long periods from specific preexisting benign lesions. Of the many types of benign entities found in the human breast, only a few have clinically significant premalignant potential. Currently, the best-characterized premalignant lesions are atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, and lobular carcinoma in situ. Ductal carcinoma in situ is considered to be a preinvasive malignant lesion. Two additional lesions, unfolded lobules and usual ductal hyperplasia, are sometimes considered to be very early premalignant epithelial abnormalities. Premalignant lesions are currently defined by their histologic features, and not all necessarily progress to invasive cancer. This suggests that although lesions within specific categories look alike, they must possess underlying genetic differences that cause some to remain stable and others to advance. The development of modern molecular genetic techniques has allowed breast cancer researchers to clarify the multistep model of breast carcinogenesis. Recent studies indicate that cancer evolves by highly diverse genetic mechanisms, and research into these altered pathways may identify specific early defects that might be targeted to prevent progression of premalignant lesions to invasive cancer. Current clinical management is heterogeneous and depends on histologic examination and individual patient factors. Options for breast cancer risk reduction and prevention are available.

Breast cancer is not considered anymore a unique disease. Microarray gene expression analysis led to the identification of 4 major breast cancer "intrinsic" subtypes, including hormone receptor (HR)-positive luminal A and B, human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and basal-like breast cancer (BLBC). These subtypes have distinct phenotypes, molecular profiles, clinical behaviour and response to therapy, with the BLBC carrying the worst outcome. Microarray analysis is not feasible in routine practice and therefore oncologists rely on a simpler immunohistochemical (IHC) classification to identify relevant breast cancer subtypes. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is defined by the absence of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 expression at IHC analysis. TNBC is strictly related to BLBC and, given the lack of common therapeutic targets, represent a major challenge for breast oncologist. In this review we will summarize the updated knowledge on TNBC, with emphasis on its current treatment and on the new therapeutic options under development.

2D echocardiography is limited for identifying chemotherapy-related cardiotoxicity. This study compared standard echo, 2D, and 3D speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) for detection of subclinical anthracycline (ANT) cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients. One-hundred consecutive breast cancer patients free of cardiac symptoms were treated by multiple protocols including ANT and cyclophosphamide and/or 5-fluorouracil for 3–4 cycles. Both before and after treatment, patients underwent standard echo, 2D STE-derived left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS), 3D volumetric echo and 3D STE with measurements of GLS, global circumferential strain (GCS), global area strain (GAS), and global radial strain (GRS). The follow-up period from the beginning of cancer therapy was 129 ± 18 days. All patients completed the chemotherapy cycles, without experiencing symptoms/signs of heart failure. 2D ejection fraction (EF) was not significantly changed after treatment, whereas E/e’ ratio was higher than baseline (from 6.9 ± 2.2 to 7.3 ± 2.1, P = 0.006). 2D GLS was reduced after treatment (from −22.2 ± 2.3% to − 20.1 ± 6.6%, P = 0.004). 3D derived LV end-systolic volume was increased (P < 0.01) and 3D EF (from 62.4 ± 6.5% to 60.3 ± 7.3%, P < 0.01), 3D GLS (P < 0.001) GRS (P < 0.002), GCS, and GAS (both P < 0.0001) were reduced after ANT. Post-ANT 2D GLS was feasible in 90%, 3D EF in 66%, and 3D STE in 60% of patients. Our study demonstrates potential superiority but also suboptimal feasibility of 3D EF and 3D strain in diagnosing subclinical ANT cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients. 2D GLS is superior to standard echo and presents a good feasibility. E/e’ ratio also offers advantages in revealing cardiotoxicity.

<h3>Abstract</h3> Recent data show a significant benefit from combining an anti-HER-2 agent with endocrine therapy in HER2-positive and hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer. However, as the clinical outcomes achieved by these combinations do not favourably match those with chemotherapy, clinicians still perceive HER2-positive breast cancer as an homogeneous group and consider chemotherapy with anti-HER2 agents as the preferred treatment option, regardless of the HR status. Indeed, in HR-positive HER2-positive tumours, chemotherapy with anti-HER2 agents is the backbone of treatment, while endocrine therapy is commonly used in sequence when HR and HER2 are co-expressed rather than as a real alternative. Emerging biological and clinical data challenge this paradigm, suggesting that HER2-positive tumours are rather heterogeneous that HRs co-expression may account for part of this heterogeneity and, finally, that chemotherapy may represent an overtreatment in selected cases. The present review aims to summarise the biological features of HER2-positive breast cancer according to HR status, the role of the bi-directional cross-talk between HER2 and HR pathways on resistance development to anti-HER2 and endocrine therapy, and finally, the novel therapeutic strategies, including but not limited to chemotherapy, targeting these two pathways.

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are associated with inferior prognosis in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We hypothesized that the relationship between CTCs and disease subtype would provide a better understanding of the clinical and biologic behavior of MBC.We retrospectively analyzed 517 MBC patients treated at a single institution. Subtypes of primary tumors were analyzed by immunohistochemical (IHC) or fluorescent in situ hybridization analyses and CTCs were enumerated by CellSearch(®) at starting a new therapy. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival durations for each IHC subtype were determined.At a median follow-up of 24.6 months, 276 of 517 (53%) patients had died. The median OS for patients with <5 and ≥ 5 CTCs were 32.4 and 18.3 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Except in HER2+ patients, the prognostic value of CTCs was independent of disease subtype and disease site.In this large retrospective study, CTCs were strongly predictive of survival in all MBC subtypes except HER2+ patients who had been treated with targeted therapy. Our results clearly demonstrate the value of enumerating CTCs in MBC and strongly suggest an interesting biological implication in the HER2+ subset of patients that need to be further explored.

Precision Medicine is becoming the new paradigm in healthcare as it enables better resources allocation, treatment optimization with a potential side-effects reduction and consequent impact on quality of life and survival. This revolution is being catalyzed by liquid biopsy technologies, which provide prognostic and predictive information for advanced cancer patients, without the analytical and procedural drawbacks of tissue-biopsy. In particular, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is gaining momentum as a clinically feasible option capable to capture both spatial and temporal tumor heterogeneity.Several techniques are currently available for ctDNA extraction and analysis, each with its preferential case scenarios and preanalytical implications which must be taken into consideration to effectively support clinical decision-making and to better highlight its clinical utility.Aim of this review is to summarize both analytical developments and clinical evidences to offer a comprehensive update on the deployment of ctDNA in breast cancer’s (BC) characterization and treatment.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for ∼10-20% of breast cancers and is associated with relatively poor prognosis, earlier disease recurrence and higher number of visceral metastases. Despite an increasing understanding of the molecular heterogeneity of TNBC, clinical trials of targeted agents have thus far been disappointing; chemotherapy, in particular with anthracycline and taxanes, remains the backbone medical management for both early and metastatic TNBC. Nab-paclitaxel is a solvent-free, albumin-bound, nanoparticle formulation of paclitaxel and represents a novel formulation of an established, effective chemotherapeutic agent. Nab-paclitaxel has been specifically designed to overcome the limitations of conventional taxane formulations, including the barriers to effective drug delivery of highly lipophilic agents. It has shown significant efficacy and better tolerability than conventional taxanes in metastatic breast cancer and is approved for use in this setting. Increasing evidence suggests that nab-paclitaxel is effective in patients with more aggressive tumours, as seen in TNBC. Indeed, results of Phase II/III studies indicate that nab-paclitaxel may be effective as neoadjuvant treatment of TNBC. This article reviews the rationale and evidence supporting a role for nab-paclitaxel in the treatment of TNBC, including ongoing studies such as ADAPT-TN and tnAcity. In addition, the article reviews ongoing research into targeted therapies and immuno-oncology for the treatment of TNBC, and explores the potential role, current evidence and ongoing studies of nab-paclitaxel as the chemotherapy partner in combination with immunotherapy, where the unique properties of this taxane, including the lack of requirement for steroid pre-medication, may present an advantage.

BackgroundThe activity of palbociclib as a single agent in advanced breast cancer has not been extensively studied, with the only available clinical data limited to heavily pretreated patients. Preclinical data suggests palbociclib may partially reverse endocrine resistance, though this hypothesis has not been evaluated in previous clinical studies. This phase II, open-label, multicenter study examined the activity of palbociclib monotherapy, as well as palbociclib given in combination with the same endocrine therapy (ET) that was received prior to disease progression, in postmenopausal women with moderately pretreated, estrogen receptor-positive, HER2 negative advanced breast cancer.Patients and methodsEligible women with advanced disease which had progressed on one or two prior ETs were randomized 1 : 1 to receive either palbociclib alone, or palbociclib in combination with the ET as previously received. Primary end point was clinical benefit rate (CBR); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsBetween October 2012 and July 2016, a total of 115 patients were randomized. The CBR was 54% [95% confidence interval (CI): 41.5–63.7] for combination therapy, and 60% (95% CI: 47.8–72.9) for monotherapy. Median PFS was 10.8 months (95% CI: 5.6–12.7) for combination therapy, and 6.5 months (95% CI: 5.4–8.5) for monotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.69; 95% CI: 0.4–1.1, exploratory P-value = 0.12]. Exploratory analyses revealed the PFS advantage for combination therapy was seen in the subgroup of patients who received prior ET for >6 months (HR 0.53; 95% CI: 0.3–0.9, exploratory P-value = 0.02), but not in those who received prior ET for ≤6 months.ConclusionPalbociclib has clinical activity as a single agent in women with moderately pretreated, oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Palbociclib may have potential to reverse endocrine resistance in patients with a history of previous durable response to ET.Clinical trial informationNCT02549430

Abstract Objectives: Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies in women. Hormonal treatment and chemotherapy induce a transient or permanent menopause status. Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is a frequent debilitating symptom of menopause that is best treated with local or systemic estrogen formulations. Because estrogens drive the growth of the majority of breast cancers, most effective VVA therapies are precluded. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of fractional microablative CO 2 laser on sexual function and in relieving symptoms in women with breast cancer and VVA induced or exacerbated by iatrogenic menopause. Methods: This retrospective study included 26 women affected by hormone-receptor positive breast tumors and treated for VVA symptoms with the fractional microablative CO 2 laser system. Every 30 to 40 days, women underwent a cycle of treatment for a total of three cycles. During each cycle, women underwent a gynecological examination and completed visual analog scale questionnaires designed to assess (1) the degree of symptoms and (2) procedure-related discomfort. Results: Treatment resulted in a significant regression of VVA symptoms and procedure-related discomfort versus baseline ( P &lt; 0.001 in almost all cases). No adverse reactions were observed nor reported by women. Conclusions: Fractional microablative CO 2 laser treatment is associated with a significant improvement of VVA symptoms in women affected by hormone-driven breast cancer. This procedure has the advantage of relieving iatrogenic/physiological VVA symptoms without resorting to contraindicated estrogen preparations, which have been the most effective therapy thus far.

Abstract Background Cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors + endocrine therapy (ET) prolonged progression-free survival as first- or second-line therapy for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer prognosis. Given the recent publication of overall survival (OS) data for the 3 CDK4/6-inhibitors, we performed a meta-analysis to identify a more precise and reliable benefit from such treatments in specific clinical subgroups. Methods We conducted a systematic literature search to select all available phase II or III randomized clinical trials of CDK4/6-inhibitors + ET reporting OS data in first- or second-line therapy of HR+/HER2-negative pre- or postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer. A random effect model was applied for the analyses. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2statistic. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore the effect of study-level factors. The project was registered in the Open Science Framework database (doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/TNZQP). Results Six studies were included in our analyses (3421 patients). A clear OS benefit was observed in patients without (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.54 to 0.85, I2 = 0.0%) and with visceral involvement (HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.89, I2 = 0.0%), with at least 3 metastatic sites (HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.94, I2 = 11.6%), in an endocrine-resistant (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.93, I2 = 0.0%) and sensitive subset (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.88, I2 = 0.0%), for younger than 65 years (HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.95, I2 = 0.0%) and 65 years or older (HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.95, I2 = 44.4%), in postmenopausal (HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.86, I2 = 0.0%) and pre- or perimenopausal setting (HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.96, I2 = 0.0%) as well as in chemotherapy-naïve patients (HR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.93, I2 = 0.0%). Conclusions CDK4/6-inhibitors + ET combinations compared with ET alone improve OS independent of age, menopausal status, endocrine sensitiveness, and visceral involvement and should be preferred as upfront therapy instead of endocrine monotherapy.

The benefit of extending aromatase inhibitor therapy beyond 5 years in the context of previous aromatase inhibitors remains controversial. We aimed to compare extended therapy with letrozole for 5 years versus the standard duration of 2-3 years of letrozole in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer who have already received 2-3 years of tamoxifen.This multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial was done at 69 hospitals in Italy. Women were eligible if they were postmenopausal at the time of study entry, had stage I-III histologically proven and operable invasive hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, had received adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for at least 2 years but no longer than 3 years and 3 months, had no signs of disease recurrence, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 2-3 years (control group) or 5 years (extended group) of letrozole (2·5 mg orally once a day). Randomisation, with stratification by centre, with permuted blocks of size 12, was done with a centralised, interactive, internet-based system that randomly generated the treatment allocation. Participants and investigators were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was invasive disease-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analysis was done for patients who received at least 1 month of study treatment. This trial was registered with EudraCT, 2005-001212-44, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01064635.Between Aug 1, 2005, and Oct 24, 2010, 2056 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive letrozole for 2-3 years (n=1030; control group) or for 5 years (n=1026; extended group). After a median follow-up of 11·7 years (IQR 9·5-13·1), disease-free survival events occurred in 262 (25·4%) of 1030 patients in the control group and 212 (20·7%) of 1026 in the extended group. 12-year disease-free survival was 62% (95% CI 57-66) in the control group and 67% (62-71) in the extended group (hazard ratio 0·78, 95% CI 0·65-0·93; p=0·0064). The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were arthralgia (22 [2·2%] of 983 patients in the control group vs 29 [3·0%] of 977 in the extended group) and myalgia (seven [0·7%] vs nine [0·9%]). There were three (0·3%) serious treatment-related adverse events in the control group and eight (0·8%) in the extended group. No deaths related to toxic effects were observed.In postmenopausal patients with breast cancer who received 2-3 years of tamoxifen, extended treatment with 5 years of letrozole resulted in a significant improvement in disease-free survival compared with the standard 2-3 years of letrozole. Sequential endocrine therapy with tamoxifen for 2-3 years followed by letrozole for 5 years should be considered as one of the optimal standard endocrine treatments for postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.Novartis and the Italian Ministry of Health.For the Italian translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a novel and evolving class of antineoplastic agents, constituted by monoclonal antibody linked to biologically active drugs, delivering cytotoxic compounds at the tumor site, reducing the likelihood of systemic exposure and toxicity. They are generally well tolerated, nevertheless some predictable adverse reactions need careful monitoring and timely approach. These include neutropenia, nausea and vomiting, alopecia, diarrhea, left ventricular dysfunction, ILD/pneumonitis. The mechanisms leading to drug-associated toxicities are summarized, and prophylaxis protocols and appropriate management strategies are proposed, based on current literature. This review aims to collect the most updated evidence on toxicities potentially occurring during breast cancer treatment with approved or under clinical investigation (advanced stage) ADCs. A focus is dedicated to monitoring protocols and clinical management, aimed at preventing and/or promptly address relevant problems, in order to avoid premature discontinuation or improper dose reduction.

Abstract Purpose: In PERTAIN's primary analysis (31 months’ median follow-up), adding pertuzumab to trastuzumab and an aromatase inhibitor (AI) with/without chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with previously untreated HER2-positive and hormone receptor–positive metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer (M/LABC). A potentially enhanced treatment effect was observed in patients with no induction chemotherapy. We present the final analysis (&amp;gt;6 years’ median follow-up). Patients and Methods: Patients (N = 258) were randomized 1:1 to pertuzumab (loading/maintenance: 840/420 mg) plus trastuzumab (loading/maintenance: 8/6 mg/kg) every 3 weeks and an AI (1 mg anastrozole or 2.5 mg letrozole daily; Arm A), or trastuzumab and an AI (Arm B). Induction chemotherapy was at investigator discretion. Primary endpoint: PFS. Key secondary endpoints: overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: Median PFS was 20.6 versus 15.8 months in Arms A and B, respectively (stratified HR, 0.67; P = 0.006). Median OS was 60.2 versus 57.2 months (stratified HR, 1.05; P = 0.78). Pertuzumab treatment effect was potentially enhanced in patients with no induction chemotherapy (26.6 vs. 12.5 months). Any-grade adverse events (AE) occurred in 122 patients per arm (96.1% vs. 98.4%); grade ≥ 3 AEs in 72 (56.7%) and 51 (41.1%); serious AEs in 46 (36.2%) and 28 (22.6%). Conclusions: The PFS benefit of pertuzumab was maintained and OS was similar between arms at final analysis. Adding pertuzumab may enhance activity in patients who do not require first-line chemotherapy for M/LABC. No new safety concerns were reported. These data provide additional evidence of the role of first-line pertuzumab and trastuzumab in HER2-positive M/LABC.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a novel class of molecules composed of a recombinant monoclonal antibody targeted to a specific cell surface antigen, conjugated to a cytotoxic agent through a cleavable or non-cleavable synthetic linker. The rationale behind the development of ADCs is to overcome the limitations of conventional chemotherapy, such as the narrow therapeutic window and the emergence of resistance mechanisms. ADCs had already revolutionized the treatment algorithm of HER2-positive breast cancer. Currently, emergent non-HER2 targeted ADCs are gaining momentum, with special focus on triple-negative disease therapeutic landscape. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is an ADC consisting of a humanized monoclonal antibody hRS7 targeting trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (Trop2), linked to the topoisomerase I inhibitor SN-38 by a hydrolysable linker. It currently stands as the only non-HER2 targeted ADC that already received approval for the treatment of unresectable locally advanced or metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) in patients who had received two or more prior systemic therapies, with at least one for advanced disease. The purpose of these review is to analyze the available evidence regarding ADCs in TNBC, alongside with providing an overview on the ongoing and future research horizons in this field.

Approximately 25% of all cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) diagnosed on core biopsy of the breast are associated with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive malignancy at the same site. As a result, surgical excision has become the standard of care for patients with ADH. In contrast, because data on the relation between breast malignancy and lobular neoplasia (LN) detected on core biopsy are limited, clinical management of patients with LN remains controversial. The goal of the current study was to determine the incidence of breast carcinoma at sites of core biopsy exhibiting LN compared with sites of core biopsy exhibiting ADH.The results of 2053 core biopsies were reviewed to identify cases of LN and cases of ADH. Follow-up findings on excisional biopsy were categorized as malignancy (DCIS or invasive malignancy) or no malignancy and were compared between the LN group and the ADH group. Mammograms and medical records were reviewed for patients with atypical findings on core biopsy.One hundred six (5.2%) of 2053 biopsy samples exhibited atypia on core biopsy. Among these 106 samples, ADH was found in 49 (46%), LN was found in 45 (42%), and both ADH and LN were found in 12 (12%). Malignant disease was detected on follow-up excisional biopsy in 22% of patients with ADH (9 of 41), 14% of patients with LN (3 of 21), and 33% of patients with both ADH and LN (4 of 12) on core biopsy. In the LN group, two cases of malignant disease were associated with lobular carcinoma in situ, and the third case was associated with atypical lobular hyperplasia. Mammographic and clinical features were unable to distinguish patients with malignant findings on excisional biopsy from patients without malignant findings.Malignant disease was found in a substantial percentage of excisional biopsy samples (14%) following the detection of LN on core biopsy. Thus, like patients with ADH, patients with LN on core biopsy could be considered candidates for surgical excision, which would allow full assessment of breast carcinoma risk and thereby facilitate the planning of prevention strategies.

<h2>Abstract</h2> Gene expression profiling tests are used in an attempt to determine the right treatment for the right person with early-stage breast cancer that may have spread to nearby lymph nodes but not to distant parts of the body. These new diagnostic approaches are designed to spare people who do not need additional treatment (adjuvant therapy) the side effects of unnecessary treatment, and allow people who may benefit from adjuvant therapy to receive it. In the present review we discuss in detail the major diagnostic tests available such as MammaPrint dx, Oncotype dx, PAM50, Mammostrat, IHC4, MapQuant DX, Theros-Breast Cancer Gene Expression Ratio Assay, and their potential clinical applications.

We have shown that incomplete blockade of the human epidermal growth factor (HER) pathway is a mechanism of resistance to treatment with trastuzumab (T) in HER2-overexpressing tumor xenografts. We now investigate whether the addition of lapatinib (L), a dual HER1/2 kinase inhibitor, to T results in more potent inhibition of the pathway and therefore inhibition of tumor growth, and whether reduced dose and intermittent treatment with the combination is equally effective.Nude mice bearing HER2-overexpressing MCF7/HER2-18 or BT-474 xenograft tumors were treated with L and T, alone or in various combinations with other HER inhibitors. L + T for short duration (14 and 42 days), intermittent administration (14 days on/off), and reduced dosing (half dose) was also investigated. Inhibition of tumor growth, downstream signaling, proliferation, and induction of apoptosis were assessed. All statistical tests were two-sided.L + T was the most effective regimen in both MCF7/HER2-18 and BT-474 xenografts with complete regression (CR) of tumor observed in all mice. Intermittent and reduced dose treatment (½ dose) resulted in high rates of CR and low rates of tumor recurrence that were comparable to full dose continuous treatment. L + T resulted in significantly reduced downstream signaling and proliferation, and increased apoptosis.L + T is a potent and effective combination even when given in reduced dose or intermittent schedule potentially resulting in lower toxicity and reduced cost if translated to patients. These findings warrant timely clinical testing.

Abstract Objective: Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is a condition frequently observed in menopause. Its symptoms can significantly affect the quality of life of patients. Since VVA is related to estrogen deficiency, chemotherapy and hormone therapy for breast cancer (BC) might cause VVA by inducing menopause. Given the lack of effective treatment for VVA in BC survivors, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of fractional microablative CO 2 laser therapy in these patients. Methods: We treated 82 BC survivors with three cycles of CO 2 laser after failure of topical nonestrogenic therapy. The severity of symptoms was assessed with a visual analog scale (VAS) at baseline and after completion of laser therapy. Differences in mean VAS scores of each symptom before and after treatment were assessed with multiple t tests for pairwise comparisons. Multivariate analyses were used to adjust the final mean scores for the main confounding factors. Results: Pre versus post-treatment differences in mean VAS scores were significant for sensitivity during sexual intercourse, vaginal dryness, itching/stinging, dyspareunia and dysuria ( P &lt; 0.001 for all), bleeding ( P = 0.001), probe insertion ( P = 0.001), and movement-related pain ( P = 0.011). Multivariate analyses confirmed that results were significant, irrespective of patients’ age and type of adjuvant therapy. Conclusion: This study shows that CO 2 laser treatment is effective and safe in BC patients with iatrogenic menopause. However, the optimal number of cycles to administer and the need for retreatment remain to be defined. Prospective trials are needed to compare CO 2 laser therapy with therapeutic alternatives.

<h2>Summary</h2><h3>Background</h3> Uncertainty exists about the optimal schedule of adjuvant treatment of breast cancer with aromatase inhibitors and, to our knowledge, no trial has directly compared the three aromatase inhibitors anastrozole, exemestane, and letrozole. We investigated the schedule and type of aromatase inhibitors to be used as adjuvant treatment for hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. <h3>Methods</h3> FATA-GIM3 is a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial of six different treatments in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed invasive hormone receptor-positive breast cancer that had been completely removed by surgery, any pathological tumour size, and axillary nodal status. Key exclusion criteria were hormone replacement therapy, recurrent or metastatic disease, previous treatment with tamoxifen, and another malignancy in the previous 10 years. Patients were randomly assigned in an equal ratio to one of six treatment groups: oral anastrozole (1 mg per day), exemestane (25 mg per day), or letrozole (2·5 mg per day) tablets upfront for 5 years (upfront strategy) or oral tamoxifen (20 mg per day) for 2 years followed by oral administration of one of the three aromatase inhibitors for 3 years (switch strategy). Randomisation was done by a computerised minimisation procedure stratified for oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status; previous chemotherapy; and pathological nodal status. Neither the patients nor the physicians were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival. The minimum cutoff to declare superiority of the upfront strategy over the switch strategy was assumed to be a 2% difference in disease-free survival at 5 years. Primary efficacy analyses were done by intention to treat; safety analyses included all patients for whom at least one safety case report form had been completed. Follow-up is ongoing. This trial is registered with the European Clinical Trials Database, number 2006-004018-42, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00541086. <h3>Findings</h3> Between March 9, 2007, and July 31, 2012, 3697 patients were enrolled into the study. After a median follow-up of 60 months (IQR 46–72), 401 disease-free survival events were reported, including 211 (11%) of 1850 patients allocated to the switch strategy and 190 (10%) of 1847 patients allocated to upfront treatment. 5-year disease-free survival was 88·5% (95% CI 86·7–90·0) with the switch strategy and 89·8% (88·2–91·2) with upfront treatment (hazard ratio 0·89, 95% CI 0·73–1·08; p=0·23). 5-year disease-free survival was 90·0% (95% CI 87·9–91·7) with anastrozole (124 events), 88·0% (85·8–89·9) with exemestane (148 events), and 89·4% (87·3 to 91·1) with letrozole (129 events; p=0·24). No unexpected serious adverse reactions or treatment-related deaths occurred. Musculoskeletal side-effects were the most frequent grade 3–4 events, reported in 130 (7%) of 1761 patients who received the switch strategy and 128 (7%) of 1766 patients who received upfront treatment. Grade 1 musculoskeletal events were more frequent with the upfront schedule than with the switch schedule (924 [52%] of 1766 patients <i>vs</i> 745 [42%] of 1761 patients). All other grade 3–4 adverse events occurred in less than 2% of patients in either group. <h3>Interpretation</h3> 5 years of treatment with aromatase inhibitors was not superior to 2 years of tamoxifen followed by 3 years of aromatase inhibitors. None of the three aromatase inhibitors was superior to the others in terms of efficacy. Therefore, patient preference, tolerability, and financial constraints should be considered when deciding the optimal treatment approach in this setting. <h3>Funding</h3> Italian Drug Agency.

Abstract Aims This study assessed the impact of the strain-guided therapeutic approach on cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) and rate of cancer therapy (CT) interruption in breast cancer. Methods and results We enrolled 116 consecutive female patients with HER2-positive breast cancer undergoing a standard protocol by EC (epirubicine + cyclophosphamide) followed by paclitaxel + trastuzumab (TRZ). Coronary artery, valvular and congenital heart disease, heart failure, primary cardiomyopathies, permanent or persistent atrial fibrillation, and inadequate echo-imaging were exclusion criteria. Patients underwent an echo-Doppler exam with determination of ejection fraction (EF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) at baseline and every 3 months during CT. All patients developing subclinical (GLS drop &gt;15%) or overt CTRCD (EF reduction &lt;50%) initiated cardiac treatment (ramipril+ carvedilol). In the 99.1% (115/116) of patients successfully completing CT, GLS and EF were significantly reduced and E/e′ ratio increased at therapy completion. Combined subclinical and overt CTRCD was diagnosed in 27 patients (23.3%), 8 at the end of EC and 19 during TRZ courses. Of these, 4 (3.4%) developed subsequent overt CTRCD and interrupted CT. By cardiac treatment, complete EF recovery was observed in two of these patients and partial recovery in one. These patients with EF recovery re-started and successfully completed CT. The remaining patient, not showing EF increase, permanently stopped CT. The other 23 patients with subclinical CTRCD continued and completed CT. Conclusion These findings highlight the usefulness of ‘strain oriented’ approach in reducing the rate of overt CTRCD and CT interruption by a timely cardioprotective treatment initiation.

<h2>Summary</h2> The receptor for the female hormone progesterone (PR), like that for estrogen (ER), is an important predictive marker for response to endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancer. PR exists as two isoforms, A and B. PR is important in mammary gland development and excess production of PRB is associated with breast cancer risk. Overabundance of PRA is related to resistance to tamoxifen. Total loss of PR is linked to reduced benefit from tamoxifen in both the adjuvant and metastatic settings. The predictive significance of PR expression was originally explained on the basis that PR is an ER-regulated gene and its presence indicates a functioning ER pathway and, therefore, an endocrine-responsive tumor. More recent data, however, suggest an alternative explanation. While many studies show that loss of PR predicts relative resistance to the antiestrogen tamoxifen, a recent study suggests that PR loss may not indicate resistance to aromatase inhibition. The finding that PR loss may not correlate with resistance to aromatase inhibition may be related to crosstalk between ER and PR and growth factor receptor pathways such as HER2. PR loss in some tumors is due to excessive growth factor receptor signaling (overexpression of HER2), which downregulates expression of the PR gene. Neoadjuvant studies also show that HER2 signaling is associated with tamoxifen resistance, but not resistance to aromatase inhibitors. Therefore, high HER2 signaling could explain both PR loss and resistance to tamoxifen while the response to aromatase inhibitors is maintained. In this way, PR loss in some tumors may be a surrogate marker for increased signaling through the growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase pathway and it may help clinicians decide between initial use of an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen in the individual patient.

Aggressive breast cancer is a term commonly used in literature to describe breast cancer with a poor prognosis. Identifying and understanding the factors associated with aggressiveness could be helpful to the management of patients with breast cancer. Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, both clinically and biologically, which may be responsible for the wide range of survival durations for patients with metastatic disease.The goal of this study was to identify the factors most often described in association with aggressive metastatic breast cancer (MBC).A systematic review was performed by querying PubMed from January 1, 2012 to June 1, 2014 for "metastatic breast cancer" ("aggressive" or "poor prognosis" or "high risk"). The level of evidence to support each potential prognostic factor of aggressive MBC was also reviewed.The identified factors were grouped into 3 principle categories: clinical, biological, and patient related. Because patient-related factors may not be indicative of inherent cancer aggressiveness, this review focused only on clinical and biological factors. The factors with the highest levels of evidence to support associations with survival in metastatic breast cancer were visceral metastases, number of metastatic sites, disease-free interval, presence of CTCs, triple-negative disease, and tumour grade.Identification of these factors and understanding their contribution to the aggressiveness of MBC and disease progression may lead to more personalized treatment in this patient population.

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Background</h3> According to current guidelines, endocrine therapy (ET) is recommended as first-line treatment of luminal-like metastatic breast cancer (MBC), whereas chemotherapy (CT) should be considered in presence of life-threatening disease. In daily practice, CT is often used outside of this clinical circumstance. Factors influencing first-line choice and the relative impact on outcome are unknown. <h3>Methods</h3> A consecutive series of luminal-like HER2-negative MBC patients treated from 2004 to 2014 was analyzed to test the association of disease- and patient-related factors with the choice of first-line treatment (ET vs. CT). A propensity score method was used to estimate impact of first-line strategy on outcome. <h3>Results</h3> Of 604 consecutive luminal-like MBC patients identified, 158 cases were excluded due to unknown or positive HER2-status. Among 446 HER2-negative cases, 171 (38%) received first-line CT. On multivariate analysis, the only factors significantly associated with lower CT use were old age (OR 0.25, 95%C.I. 0.13–0.49) or presence of bone metastases only (OR 0.26, 95%C.I. 0.13–0.53). In propensity score matched population, no differences were observed between CT and ET as first-line treatment either in terms of overall survival (37.5 months and 33.4 months respectively, log-rank test, P = 0.62) or progression-free survival (13.3 months and 9.9 months respectively, log-rank test, P = 0.92). <h3>Conclusions</h3> High percentage of patients with luminal-like MBC received CT as first-line therapy in real-life. The choice was mainly driven by age and site of metastases. With the limitations of a non-randomized comparison, no differences on patients' outcome were observed depending on the first-line strategy.

We reported the results of an Italian large retrospective analysis that evaluated the effectiveness and safety of T-DM1 in 'field-practice' breast cancer patients. We performed a sub-analysis to investigate the clinical activity of T-DM1 in patients with brain metastases (BMs).The records of 87 adult women with HER2-positive breast cancer and BMs treated with T-DM1 were reviewed. Their clinical outcomes were compared with those of 216 patients without central nervous system (CNS) involvement.Response to T-DM1 treatment in BMs was available for 53 patients in the BM group (60.9%): two patients reported a complete response (3.8%), 11 patients obtained partial response (20.7%; overall response rate: 24.5%), 16 patients had a stable disease (30.1%). Regarding extracranial disease, a total of 77 and 191 patients were evaluable for response in BM group and non-BM group, respectively. The overall response rate was 35.1% in the BM group and 38.3% in the non-BM group; disease control rate was 53.3% and 66.6%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 16 months (range: 1-55), median cumulative progression-free survival (PFS) was 7 months (95% CI: 5.4-8.6) in the BM group and 8 months (95% CI: 5.7-10.3) in the non-BM group. In the second-line setting, PFS was 5 (95% CI: 3.1-6.9) versus 11 (95% CI: 7.1-14.9) months (p = 0.01). Overall survival was 14 months (95% CI: 12.2-15.8) in the BM group and 32 months (95% CI: 24.4-39.6) in the non-BM group (p < 0.0001).T-DM1 is active in breast cancer patients with BMs.

Background T-DM1 improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer progressing on prior trastuzumab plus a taxane. A paucity of data is available on T-DM1 efficacy after dual anti-HER2 blockade with pertuzumab and trastuzumab plus a taxane, which represents the current first-line standard of care. The present study is a retrospective/prospective evaluation of the efficacy and activity of second-line T-DM1 after front-line pertuzumab-based therapy. Patients and Methods Eligible patients were identified within the Gruppo Italiano Mammella (GIM) 14/BIOMETA study, a retrospective/prospective multicenter study on treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with metastatic breast cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02284581). We searched for patients who received second-line T-DM1 after taxane plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab between November 15, 2013 and May 31, 2018. We calculated median PFS, median time to treatment failure (TTF), prolonged duration of therapy (PDT), objective response rate (ORR), and 1-year OS. Results Of 445 patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, 77 were eligible for the analysis. At a median follow-up of 7 months, median PFS was 6.3 months (95% confidence intervals [CI], 4.8-7.7 months), and median TTF was 6.2 months (95% CI, 4-8.6 months). More than one-third of patients (37.6%; n = 29) experienced PDT with an ORR of 27.1%. At data cutoff, the median OS was not reached, and the 1-year OS was 82%. Conclusions Our results show meaningful activity of T-DM1 after front-line pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and a taxane, with about 27% of patients having an objective response and 40% of patients achieving durable disease control.

Abstract Purpose Obesity and insulin resistance have been associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer (BC). The present prospective study aimed to investigate the impact of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components on early BC (eBC) patients’ outcome. Methods MetS was defined by the presence of 3 to 5 of the following components: waist circumference &gt; 88 cm, blood pressure ≥ 130/≥ 85 mmHg, serum levels of triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dL, high density lipoprotein &lt; 50 mg/dL and fasting glucose ≥ 110 mg/dL. Seven hundred and seventeen patients with data on ≥ 4 MetS components at BC diagnosis were enrolled. Study population was divided into two groups: patients with &lt; 3 (non-MetS) vs. ≥ 3 components (MetS). Categorical variables were analyzed by Chi-square test and survival data by log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression model . Results Overall, 544 (75.9%) and 173 (24.1%) women were categorized as non-MetS and MetS, respectively. MetS patients were more likely to be older, postmenopausal, and insulin-resistant compared to non-MetS patients ( p &lt; 0.05). In multivariate analysis, MetS patients had a numerically higher risk of relapse [disease-free survival (DFS), hazard ratio (HR) 1.51, p = 0.07] and a significantly higher risk of death compared to non-MetS patients [overall survival (OS), HR 3.01, p &lt; 0.0001; breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), HR 3.16, p = 0.001]. Additionally, patients with 1 to 2 components of MetS had an increased risk of dying compared to patients with 0 components (OS, HR 4.90, p = 0.01; BCSS, HR 6.07, p = 0.02). Conclusions MetS correlated with poor outcome in eBC patients. Among patients without full criteria for MetS diagnosis, the presence of 1 or 2 components of the syndrome may predict for worse survival.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for breast cancer (BC) increases surgical and conservative surgery chances. However, a significant proportion of patients will not be eligible for conservative surgery following NACT because of large tumor size and/or low chemosensitivity, especially for hormone receptor (HR)-positive/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative tumors, for which pathological complete response rates are lower than for other BC subtypes. On the other hand, for luminal BC neoadjuvant endocrine therapy could represent a valid alternative. Several gene expression assays have been introduced into clinical practice in last decades, in order to define prognosis more accurately than clinico-pathological features alone and to predict the benefit of adjuvant treatments. A series of studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using core needle biopsy for gene expression risk testing, finding a high concordance rate in the risk result between biopsy sample and surgical samples. Based on these premises, recent efforts have focused on the utility of gene expression signatures to guide therapeutic decisions even in the neoadjuvant setting. Several prospective and retrospective studies have investigated the correlation between gene expression risk score from core needle biopsy before neoadjuvant therapy and the likelihood of 1) clinical and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, 2) conservative surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, and 3) survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the potential clinical utility of the main commercially available gene expression panels (Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, EndoPredict, Prosigna/PAM50 and Breast Cancer Index) in the neoadjuvant setting, in order to better inform decision making for luminal BC beyond the exclusive contribution of clinico-pathological features.

Triple-negative (TN) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) represents the most challenging scenario withing mBC framework, and it has been only slightly affected by the tremendous advancements in terms of drug availability and survival prolongation we have witnessed in the last years for advanced disease. However, although chemotherapy still represents the mainstay of TN mBC management, in the past years, several novel effective agents have been developed and made available in the clinical practice setting. Within this framework, a panel composed of a scientific board of 17 internationally recognized breast oncologists and 42 oncologists working within local spoke centers, addressed 26 high-priority statements, including grey areas, regarding the management of TN mBC. A structured methodology based on a modified Delphi approach to administer the survey and the Nominal Group Technique to capture perceptions and preferences on the management of TN mBC within the Italian Oncology community were adopted. The Panel produced a set of prioritized considerations/consensus statements reflecting the Panel position on diagnostic and staging approach, first-line and second-line treatments of PD-L1-positive/germline BRCA (gBRCA) wild-type, PD-L1-positive/gBRCA mutated, PD-L1-negative/gBRCA wild-type and PD-L1-negative/gBRCA mutated TN mBC. The Panel critically and comprehensively discussed the most relevant and/or unexpected results and put forward possible interpretations for statements not reaching the consensus threshold.

Endocrine therapy, the first targeted therapy in oncology, is the most successful systemic therapy in the management of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. Approximately 50% of patients with advanced disease do not respond to first-line treatment with tamoxifen, and many women who receive tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy experience tumor relapse and die from their disease. Aromatase inhibitors are proving superior to tamoxifen, at least in certain patient subsets. However, the response rate to these compounds is only slightly higher than that to tamoxifen in patients with advanced breast cancer, and both de novo or acquired resistance also occur, limiting the efficacy of the treatment. Advanced studies of ER biology have highlighted the role of an intimate cross talk between the ER and HER2/growth factor signaling pathways as a fundamental contributor to the development of resistance to hormone therapies. The aim of this review article is to summarize the current knowledge on mechanisms of resistance of breast cancer cells to endocrine therapies due to the cross talk between the ER and growth factor signaling pathways, and to explore newly available therapeutic strategies that could prolong duration of response and circumvent endocrine-resistant tumor growth.

Weight gain and metabolic changes have been related to survival of early breast cancer patients (EBC). ‘’However, factors influencing metabolism post-diagnosis are not fully understood. We measured anthropometric [body mass index (BMI), body weight, waist and hip circumferences, and waist-to-hip ratio] and metabolic (levels of insulin, glucose, H1Ac, total, HDL, and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and the homeostasis model assessment score [HOMA]) parameters in 433 pre- and post-menopausal women with EBC at diagnosis and 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months thereafter. At diagnosis, compared with post-menopausal women, pre-menopausal patients were more likely to be leaner and to have a lower BMI, smaller waist and hip circumferences, and waist-to-hip ratio. They had also lower glucose, HbA1c, and triglyceride levels and a lower HOMA score. Furthermore, they were more likely to have an estrogen- and/or progesterone-positive tumor and a higher proliferating breast cancer. During the first two post-diagnosis years, all women showed a significant increase of weight (+0.72 kg/year, P < 0.001), waist circumference (+1.53 cm/year, P < 0.001), and plasma levels of LDL cholesterol (+5.4 mg/dl per year, P = 0.045) and triglycerides (+10.73 mg/dl per year, P = 0.017). In patients receiving chemotherapy only, there was a significant increase in hip circumference (+3.16 cm/year, P < 0.001) and plasma cholesterol levels (+21.26 mg/dl per year, P < 0.001). We showed that weight, body fat distribution, and lipid profile changed in EBC patients receiving adjuvant therapy. These changes occurred during the first 2 years after diagnosis and were not specifically related to chemotherapy, menopausal status, or initial body weight.

Male breast cancer (MBC) is rare. Given the paucity of randomized trials, treatment is generally extrapolated from female breast cancer guidelines.This is a retrospective analysis of all male patients presenting with MBC at the Department of Oncology at University Federico II of Naples between January 1989 and January 2014. We recorded the following data: baseline characteristics (age, height, weight, body mass index, risk factors, family history), tumor characteristics (side affected, stage, histotype, hormonal and HER2 status, and Ki-67 expression), treatment (type of surgery, chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and/or radiotherapy), BRCA1/2 mutation status (if available), other tumors, and long-term survival.Forty-seven patients were analyzed. Median age was 62.0 [55.0-72.0]. Among risk factors, obesity and family history of breast cancer were associated with 21 % and 30 % of MBC cases, respectively. The majority of tumors were diagnosed at an early stage: stage I (34.0 %) and stage II (44.7 %). Infiltrating ductal carcinoma was the most frequent histologic subtype (95.8 %). Hormone receptors were generally positive (88.4 % of cases were Estrogen receptor [ER] positive and 81.4 % Progesteron receptor [PgR] positive). Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) was positive in 26.8 % of cases; 7.0 % of MBCs were triple negative. The tumor had high proliferation index (Ki67 ≥ 20 %) in 64.7 %. Surgery was predominantly mastectomy (85.1 %), whereas quadrantectomy was performed in 14.9 % of patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 70.7 % of patients, endocrine therapy to 90.2 %, trastuzumab to 16.7 % and radiotherapy to 32.6 %. BRCA status was available for 17 patients: 10 wild-type, 1 BRCA1 carrier, 5 BRCA2 carriers, 1 unknown variant sequence. The overall estimated long-term survival was about 90 % at 5 years, 80 % at 10 years and 70 % at 20 years. Patients carrying a BRCA mutation had a significantly lower survival than patients with wild-type BRCA (p = 0.04).Long-term survival was high in MBC patients referred to our clinical unit. Survival was poorer in BRCA-mutated patients than in patients with wild-type BRCA.

Taxane-related peripheral neuropathy (TrPN) is a dose-limiting toxicity with important interindividual variability. Genetic polymorphisms in absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) genes may account for variability in drug efficacy and/or toxicity. By the use of Affymetrix drug-metabolizing enzyme and transporter microarray platform, in a retrospective case-control study, the correlation between ADME polymorphic variants and grades ≥ 2-3-TrPN was investigated. In a breast cancer (BC) training set, five single-nucleotide polymorphisms in NR1I3 and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)2B7 genes were correlated to grades ≥ 2-3-TrPN protection. By receiver operating characteristic curves, the grades ≥ 2-3-TrPN-related candidate biomarkers in an independent series of 54 patients with BC (17 cases and 37 controls) were validated. NR1I3 was correlated to paclitaxel-TrPN and UGT2B7 to docetaxel-TrPN. Moreover, a genetic signature of prognostic relevance for BC outcome was found. Our findings might have potential relevance for personalized management of patients with BC for prevention of treatment failure in ultrametabolizer genetic variants.

Abstract Background Ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) (US‐guided FNAB) is a rapid and cost‐effective procedure for the diagnosis of breast lesions. Our Institution has a long tradition in breast FNAB performed by cytopathologists; recently we adopted both US guidance and a five‐tiered classification system similar to that proposed by the International Academy of Cytology (IAC). The aim of this study was to demonstrate the continuing role of US‐guided FNAB in the diagnosis of breast lesions, despite the growing adoption of core‐needle biopsy (CNB). Methods The laboratory information database system was searched to obtain the breast FNAB diagnostic reports recorded from 2010 to 2017 and classified using a five‐tiered Classification System; each entry was matched with the available histology. Results A total of 4624 breast FNAB samples were retrieved. Of these, 1745/4624 cases (37.7%) had histological follow‐ups. The risk of malignancy (ROM) was 4.9% for benign, 20.7% for atypical, 78.7% for suspicious of malignancy, and 98.8% for malignant. When the atypical category was evaluated as a negative index, the positive predictive value was 93.73%, and the negative predictive value was 90.78%, reaching an overall diagnostic accuracy of 92.82%. Conclusions The IAC Yokohama System for Reporting Breast FNAB Cytopathology clearly identifies different diagnostic categories with increasing ROM. Most of the FNAB samples were classified as benign or malignant (65.3%), warranting prompt management for these patients. Moreover, the inclusion of the atypical category as a low‐risk indeterminate category avoided overtreatment of benign lesions. Thus, despite the well‐established merits of CNB, US‐guided FNAB still represents a cost‐effective and rapid nonoperative diagnostic approach.

Sarcopenia is a common finding in patients with cancer and potentially influences the patient’s outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of sarcopenia, according to the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People, in a sample of women with breast cancer (BC) and a BMI lower than 30 kg/m2. This cross-sectional study was conducted in patients with BC, stage 0-III, and receiving therapy for BC; the women were recruited at the Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy. A control group with similar age and BMI was selected from the internal database. Anthropometry, bioimpedance analysis (BIA) and hand grip strength (HGS) were measured to detect sarcopenia. A total of 122 patients (mean age 49.3 ± 11.0 years, BMI 24.6 ± 3.0 kg/m2) and 80 healthy controls were analyzed. Sarcopenia was found in 13.9% patients with BC, while none of the subjects in the control group was sarcopenic. By comparing BC patients with and without sarcopenia and the control group, the fat-free mass of sarcopenic BC patients were significantly lower than those of both non-sarcopenic BC patients and the control (p < 0.05). The phase angle was also significantly lower in sarcopenic patients (−0.5 degrees, p = 0.048) than in the control group. Considering the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with BC, our findings suggest the usefulness of body composition and HGS evaluation for early screening of sarcopenia to reduce the risk of associated complications.

In the past decade, nine antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have been approved for the treatment of various tumors, four of which specifically for solid malignancies. ADCs deliver the cytotoxic payload to the cancer site, thereby improving chemotherapy efficacy while reducing systemic drug exposure and toxicity. With their high selectivity, ADCs are associated with a manageable side-effect profile, with nausea and vomiting being among the most frequent toxicities, although this may vary according to the respective ADC and the associated payload. Information about the emetic risk of the new ADC compounds is limited. Three virtual focus groups of Italian oncologists were held to raise awareness on the importance of an antiemetic prophylaxis regimen to prevent and mitigate ADC-associated emesis and its sequelae. After reviewing published evidence and guidelines, the three expert panels shared their experience on the early use of ADCs gained through the participation in specific clinical trials and their clinical practice. The following issues were discussed: antiemetic therapy during trastuzumab deruxtecan treatment, with a protocol adopted at the San Raffaele Hospital (Milan, Italy); the use of steroids; the management of anticipatory nausea during trastuzumab deruxtecan therapy; nutritional counselling; and effective doctor-patient communication. The experts acknowledged that recommendations should be drug-specific, and formulated opinion-based advice intended to guide physicians in their daily practice until further evidence emerges.

Evaluation of health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) among cancer patients has gained an increasing importance and is now a key determinant of anticancer treatments' value. HR-QoL has been assessed in trials testing cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in breast cancer (BC), using various questionnaires at different timepoints. HR-QoL reports from BC patients treated with CDK4/6i in the real-world setting are also available.We systematically reviewed the literature, searching for full-length articles, and selected conference abstracts reporting data on HR-QoL in BC patients at any stage and of any molecular subtype treated with abemaciclib, palbociclib or ribociclib.A total of 533 full-length articles and 143 abstracts were retrieved. After screening for eligibility, 38 records were included (31 clinical trials; 7 real-world reports). Assessment methods were heterogeneous across studies in terms of questionnaires, evaluation timepoints and endpoints. Overall, adding CDK4/6i to endocrine therapy did not worsen patients' HR-QoL, with a positive trend towards pain improvement. Gastrointestinal scores (diarrhea, nausea and appetite loss) statistically favored the control arm among metastatic BC patients receiving abemaciclib, whereas they were superimposable in the early setting. The combination of palbociclib and endocrine therapy showed similar HR-QoL outcomes compared with endocrine therapy alone, but determined better scores compared with chemotherapy. HR-QoL was specifically assessed in premenopausal patients treated with ribociclib, showing similar scores compared with postmenopausal patients.Despite methodological heterogeneity does not allow a proper comparison, HR-QoL was generally maintained with CDK4/6i. However, differences between abemaciclib, palbociclib and ribociclib exist and mainly rely on the distinct safety profiles of the compounds. These differences should be acknowledged and taken into account in the clinical practice.

BackgroundThymidine kinase 1 (TK1) is an enzyme downstream of the CDK4/6 pathway, with a critical role in DNA synthesis; serum TK1 activity (sTKa) is a novel liquid biopsy biomarker of tumour cell proliferation.MethodsThe phase IIIb, BioItaLEE trial (NCT03439046) collected sera from postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor–positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with first-line ribociclib plus letrozole at baseline, day 15 of cycle 1 (C1D15), day 1 of cycle 2 (C2D1), and at first imaging. Associations between sTKa assessed at different time points or sTKa dynamic patterns, and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using multivariate Cox models.ResultsOverall, 287 patients were enroled. Median follow-up was 26.9 months. High sTKa (>median) at baseline was associated with higher risk of progression (hazard ratio [HR], 2.21; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.45, 3.37; P = 0.0002); similar results were observed for patients with high sTKa levels at C1D15 and C2D1. Early sTKa dynamic patterns were strongly predictive of PFS. The pattern with high sTKa levels at C2D1 following initial decrease at C1D15 was associated with higher risk of progression versus the pattern with low sTKa levels at both time points (HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.57, 5.31; P = 0.0006), while the pattern with high sTKa levels at C1D15 was associated with the shortest PFS (HR, 5.65; CI: 2.84, 11.2; P < 0.0001). Baseline and dynamic sTKa changes provided independent information.ConclusionssTKa appears to be a new promising prognostic and pharmacodynamic biomarker in patients with HR+/HER2– ABC treated with ribociclib plus letrozole as first-line therapy.

Laboratory evidence indicates that tumor growth depends on the balance between cell proliferation and cell death, and many anticancer agents may exert their therapeutic effect by decreasing proliferation and increasing apoptosis. Additionally, clinical observations indicate that overexpression of HER-2 or topoisomerase IIalpha (topo IIalpha) may be predictors of better response to anthracyclines in breast cancer. The objective of this study was to determine if proliferation (Ki-67), apoptosis (TUNEL), and expression of HER-2 and topo IIalpha are affected by anthracycline treatment, and if these molecular markers predict anthracycline responsiveness.Thirty-three women with primary breast tumors > or =3 cm received either doxorubicin (75 mg/m(2)) or epirubicin (120 mg/m(2)) for 4 cycles before surgery. Clinical response was evaluated after 4 cycles of treatment. Changes in molecular markers were assessed from core needle taken before treatment (D0), at 24-48 h (Dl) and on day 7 (D7) while on treatment, and from the surgical specimen excised on day 84 (D84) after the fourth cycle of chemotherapy.The overall response rate was 51% (17 of 33 patients), with a 12% complete clinical response rate (4 of 33 patients). There were trends for tumors with higher apoptosis and topo IIalpha at baseline (D0) to be more responsive to anthracyclines, p = 0.1 and p = 0.08, respectively. Median apoptosis increased from D0 to Dl (p = 0.06) while median Ki-67 decreased (p = 0.07). Overall, expression of HER-2 remained stable throughout the chemotherapy administration. By Day 84, topo IIalpha had significantly decreased from baseline in responders, while it increased in non-responders, p = 0.03.In human primary breast cancer, anthracycline treatment causes an early increase in apoptosis and a decrease in proliferation. In this pilot study, higher apoptosis and topo IIalphaa levels in primary tumors were associated with greater responsiveness to anthracyclines, and topo IIalpha levels declined in responsive tumors.

Approximately five percent of all breast cancer patients in developed countries present with distant metastases at initial diagnosis. Due to its incurability, metastatic breast cancer is generally treated with systemic therapies to achieve disease control and reduce tumor-related symptoms. Primary treatments for metastatic breast cancer are chemotherapy, endocrine- and biologic therapy, whereas surgery with or without radiotherapy is usually performed to treat impending wound issues. Since 2002, several retrospective non-randomized clinical studies have shown that extirpation of the primary tumor correlates with a significantly improved survival in patients with primary metastatic breast cancer. Others have argued that this survival benefit associated with surgery may be due to selection biases. Therefore, in the absence of published results from randomized controlled trials carried out in India and Turkey and completion of a trial in the United States, there is no clear conclusion on whether surgical excision of the primary breast cancer translates into a survival benefit for patients with de novo metastatic disease. Furthermore, timing and type of surgical procedure, as well as selection of patients who could benefit the most from this approach, represent additional points of uncertainty. Despite the epidemiological burden of this condition, there are no guidelines on how to manage breast cancer patients presenting with de novo metastatic breast cancer; and decisions are often left to provider and patient preferences. Here, we present a critical overview of the literature focusing on the rationale and potential role of primary tumour excision in patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer.

Given their inclusion and exclusion criteria, randomized clinical trials (RCT) might not include a population that truly mirrors real life (RL). This raises concerns about the applicability of RCT results in clinical practice. We evaluated the efficacy of anti-HER2 treatment with pertuzumab combined with trastuzumab and a taxane as first-line treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in a RL setting, and compared the safety results obtained in our population versus the experimental cohort of the CLEOPATRA RCT, which led to the approval of this therapy.Patients treated with trastuzumab, pertuzumab and a taxane were enrolled in this retrospective study. We compared the tumor features and the patients' characteristics of the RL cohort to those of the CLEOPATRA cohort. We also compared the median progression-free survival (PFS) in the RL population versus specific patients' subgroups.RL patients were more frequently HR-positive, less likely to have visceral metastases (P < .001 for both) and had more frequently received (neo)adjuvant hormone therapy or trastuzumab than CLEOPATRA patients (P = .004 and P < .001, respectively). The median number of anti-HER2 cycles was 8 vs 24 and the median number of cycles was 7 vs 8 for docetaxel in the RL versus CLEOPATRA population, respectively. Adverse reactions of all grades were less frequent in RL. Median PFS was 27.8 months in the RL population and the treatment was equally effective in all patients' subgroups.This study provides compelling evidence that pertuzumab, trastuzumab and a taxane are effective and safe also in a clinical scenario.

A precise assessment of the efficacy of first-/second-line endocrine therapies (ET) ± target therapies (TT) in clinically-relevant subgroups of hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has not yet been conducted. To improve our current knowledge and support clinical decision-making, we thus conducted a systematic literature search to identify all first-/second-line phase II/III randomized clinical trials (RCT) of currently approved or most promising ET ± TT. Then, we performed a meta-analysis to assess progression-free (PFS) and/or overall survival (OS) benefit in several clinically-relevant prespecified subgroups. Thirty-five RCT were included (17,595 patients). Pooled results show significant reductions in the risk of relapse or death of 26-41% and 12-27%, respectively, depending on the clinical subgroup. Combination strategies proved to be more effective than single-agent ET (PFS hazard ratio (HR) range for combinations: 0.60-0.65 vs. HR range for single agent ET: 0.59-1.37; OS HR range for combinations: 0.74-0.87 vs. HR range for single agent ET: 0.68-0.98), with CDK4/6-inhibitors(i) + ET being the most effective regimen. Single agent ET showed comparable efficacy with ET+TT combinations in non-visceral (p = 0.63) and endocrine sensitive disease (p = 0.79), while mTORi-based combinations proved to be a valid therapeutic option in endocrine-resistant tumors, as well as PI3Ki + ET in PIK3CA-mutant tumors. These results strengthen international treatment guidelines and can aid therapeutic decision-making.

Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is a poor prognostic disease with limited treatments and uncertain therapeutic algorithms. We performed a systematic review and multiple Bayesian network meta-analyses according to treatment line to establish an optimal therapeutic sequencing strategy for this lethal disease. We included 125 first-line trials (37,812 patients) and 33 s/further-lines trials (11,321 patients). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall response rates (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety, for first and further lines, separately. We also estimated separate treatment rankings for the first and subsequent lines according to each endpoint, based on (surface under the cumulative ranking curve) SUCRA values. No first-line treatment was associated with superior PFS and OS than paclitaxel ± bevacizumab. Platinum-based polychemotherapies were generally superior in terms of ORR, at the cost of higher toxicity.. PARP-inhibitors in germline-BRCA1/2-mutant patients, and immunotherapy + chemotherapy in PD-L1-positive mTNBC, performed similar to paclitaxel ± bevacizumab. In PD-L1-positive mTNBC, pembrolizumab + chemotherapy was better than atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel in terms of OS according to SUCRA values. In second/further-lines, sacituzumab govitecan outperformed all other treatments on all endpoints, followed by PARP-inhibitors in germline-BRCA1/2-mutant tumors. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-low mTNBC performed similarly and was the best advanced-line treatment in terms of PFS and OS after sacituzumab govitecan, according to SUCRA values. Moreover, comparisons with sacituzumab govitecan, talazoparib and olaparib were not statistically significant. The most effective alternatives or candidates for subsequent lines were represented by nab-paclitaxel (in ORR), capecitabine (in PFS) and eribulin (in PFS and OS).

Approximately 5-10% of breast cancers are hereditary and their biology and prognosis appear to differ from those of sporadic breast cancers. In this study we compared the biological features and clinical characteristics of non metastatic breast cancer in patients with BRCA mutations versus patients with a family history suggesting hereditary breast cancer but without BRCA mutations (BRCA wild type) versus patients with sporadic disease, and correlated these findings with clinical outcome.We retrieved the clinical and biological data of 33 BRCA-positive, 66 BRCA-wild type and 1826 sporadic breast cancer patients contained in a single institution clinical database between 1980 and 2012. Specifically, we recorded age, tumor size, nodal status, treatment type, pattern of relapse, second primary incidence, outcome (disease-free survival and overall survival), and biological features (estrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor [PgR], tumor grade, proliferation and c-erbB2 status). Median follow-up was 70 months.BRCA-positive patients were significantly younger than sporadic breast cancer patients, and less likely to be ER-, PgR- or c-erbB2-positive than women with BRCA-wild type or sporadic breast cancer. Tumor size and grade, nodal status and proliferation did not differ among the three groups. Rates of radical mastectomy were 58, 42 and 37%, and those of conservative surgery were 42, 58 and 63% in women with BRCA-positive, BRCA-wild type and sporadic breast cancer (p = 0.03), respectively. The incidence of contralateral breast cancer was 12, 14 and 0% (p <0.0001) and the incidence of second primary tumors (non breast) was 9, 1 and 2% (p <0.0001) in BRCA-positive, BRCA-wild type and sporadic breast cancer, respectively. Median disease-free survival in years was 29 in BRCA-wild type, 19 in BRCA-positive and 14 in sporadic breast cancer patients (log-rank = 0.007). Median overall survival in years was not reached for BRCA-wild type, 19 for BRCA-positive and 13 for sporadic breast cancer patients (log-rank <0.0001). At multivariate analyses only BRCA-wild type status was related to a significant improvement in overall survival versus the sporadic breast cancer group (HR = 0,51; 95% CI (0,28-0,93) p = 0.028).The biology and outcome of breast cancer differ between patients with BRCA mutations, patients with a family history but no BRCA mutations and patients with sporadic breast cancer.

Abstract Background Although use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) during chemotherapy is an established strategy to protect ovarian function in premenopausal breast cancer patients, no long-term safety data are available, raising some concerns in women with hormone receptor–positive disease. There are controversial data on its fertility preservation potential. Methods The Prevention of Menopause Induced by Chemotherapy: a Study in Early Breast Cancer Patients—Gruppo Italiano Mammella 6 (PROMISE-GIM6) trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III superiority trial conducted at 16 Italian centers from October 2003 to January 2008. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy alone (control arm) or combined with the GnRHa triptorelin (GnRHa arm). The primary planned endpoint was incidence of chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian insufficiency. Post hoc endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and post-treatment pregnancies. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results Of 281 randomly assigned patients, 80.4% had hormone receptor–positive breast cancer. Median follow-up was 12.4 years (interquartile range = 11.3-13.2 years). No differences in 12-year DFS (65.7% [95% CI = 57.0% to 73.1%] in the GnRHa arm vs 69.2% [95% CI = 60.3% to 76.5%] in the control arm; HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.76 to 1.77) or in 12-year OS (81.2% [95% CI = 73.6% to 86.8%] in the GnRHa arm vs 81.3% [95% CI = 73.1% to 87.2%] in the control arm; HR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.67 to 2.03) were observed. In patients with hormone receptor–positive disease, the hazard ratio was 1.02 (95% CI = 0.63 to 1.63) for DFS and 1.12 (95% CI = 0.59 to 2.11) for OS. In the GnRHa and control arms, 9 and 4 patients had a posttreatment pregnancy, respectively (HR = 2.14, 95% CI = 0.66 to 6.92). Conclusions Final analysis of the PROMISE-GIM6 trial provides reassuring results on the safety of GnRHa use during chemotherapy as a strategy to preserve ovarian function in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer, including those with hormone receptor–positive disease.

As the world population grows older, the co-existence of cancer and cardiovascular comorbidities becomes more common, complicating management of these patients. Here, we describe the impact of a large Cardio-Oncology unit in Southern Italy, characterizing different types of patients and discussing challenges in therapeutic management of cardiovascular complications.We enrolled 231 consecutive patients referred to our Cardio-Oncology unit from January 2015 to February 2020. Three different types were identified, according to their chemotherapeutic statuses at first visit. Type 1 included patients naïve for oncological treatments, Type 2 patients already being treated with oncological treatments, and Type 3 patients who had already completed cancer treatments. Type 2 patients presented the highest incidence of cardiovascular events (46.2% vs. 12.3% in Type 1 and 17.9% in Type 3) and withdrawals from oncological treatments (5.1% vs. none in Type 1) during the observation period. Type 2 patients presented significantly worse 48 month-survival (32.1% vs. 16.7% in Type 1 and 17.9% in Type 3), and this was more evident when in the three groups we focused on patients with uncontrolled cardiovascular risk factors or overt cardiovascular disease at the first cardiologic assessment. Nevertheless, these patients showed the greatest benefit from our cardiovascular assessments, as witnessed by a small, but significant improvement in ejection fraction during follow-up (Type 2b: from 50 [20; 67] to 55 [35; 65]; P = 0.04).Patients who start oncological protocols without an accurate baseline cardiovascular evaluation are at major risk of developing cardiac complications due to antineoplastic treatments.

Estrogen receptor (ER) signaling represents the main driver of tumor growth and survival in hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). Thus, endocrine therapy (ET) alone or in combination with targeted agents constitutes the mainstay of the treatment for this BC subtype. Despite its efficacy, intrinsic or acquired resistance to ET occurs in a large proportion of cases, mainly due to aberrant activation of ER signaling (i.e. through ligand-independent ER activation, in the presence of estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) gene aberration or ER protein phosphorylation) and/or the upregulation of escape pathways, such as the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Therefore, the development of new ER pathway targeting agents remains essential to delay and overcome ET resistance, enhance treatment efficacy and tolerability, and ultimately prolong patient survival and improve their quality of life. Several novel ER targeting agents are currently under investigation. Among these, the oral selective ER degraders (SERDs) represent the pharmacological class at the most advanced stage of development and promise to enrich the therapeutic armamentarium of HR+ BC in the next few years, as they showed promising results in several clinical trials, either as single ET agents or in combination with targeted therapies. In this manuscript, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview on the clinical development of novel ER targeting agents, reporting the most up-to-date evidence on oral SERDs and other compounds, including new selective ER modulators (SERMs), ER proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTACs), selective ER covalent antagonists (SERCAs), complete ER antagonists (CERANs), selective human ER partial agonists (ShERPAs). Furthermore, we discuss the potential implications of introducing these novel treatment strategies in the evolving and complex therapeutic scenario of HR+ BC.

The incidence of obesity, a known risk factor for several metabolic and chronic diseases, including numerous malignancies, has risen sharply in the world. Various clinical studies demonstrate that excessive Body Mass Index (BMI) may worsen the incidence, prognosis, and mortality rates of breast cancer. Thus, understanding the link tying up obesity and breast cancer onset and progression is critically important, as it can impact patients' survival and quality of life. Recently, circulating extracellular vesicle (EV) derived miRNAs have attracted much attention for their diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic potential in oncology research. Although the potential role of EV-derived miRNAs in the early detection of breast cancer has been repeatedly mentioned, screening of miRNAs packaged within serum EVs has not yet been reported in patients with obesity.Circulating EVs were isolated from normal weight (NW), and overweight/obese (OW/Ob) breast cancer patients and characterized by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA), and protein marker expression. Evaluation of EV-associated miRNAs was conducted in a screening (RNA-seq) and a validation (qRT-PCR) cohort. Bioinformatic analysis was performed to uncover significantly enriched biological processes, molecular functions and pathways. ROC and Kaplain-Meier survival analyses were used for clinical significance.Comparison of serum EV-derived miRNAs from NW and OW/Ob patients detected seven differentially expressed miRNAs (let-7a-5p, miR-122-5p, miR-30d-5p, miR-126-3p, miR-27b-3p, miR-4772-3p, and miR-10a-5p) in the screening cohort. GO analysis revealed the enrichment of protein phosphorylation, intracellular signal transduction, signal transduction, and vesicle-mediated transport among the top biological processes. In addition, the target genes were significantly enriched in pathways related to PI3K/Akt, growth hormones, and insulin signalings, which are all involved in obesity-related diseases and/or breast cancer progression. In the validation cohort, qRT-PCR confirmed a significant down-regulation of EV-derived let-7a in the serum of OW/Ob breast cancer patients compared to NW patients. Let-7a levels also exhibited a negative correlation with BMI values. Importantly, decreased let-7a miRNA expression was associated with higher tumor grade and poor survival in patients with breast cancer.These results suggest that serum-EV derived miRNAs may reflect a differential profile in relation to a patient's BMI, which, once validated in larger cohorts of patients, could provide insights into novel specific biomarkers and innovative targets to prevent the progression of obesity-mediated breast cancer.

Background HER2 is amplified or overexpressed in around 20% of breast cancers (BC). HER2-targeted therapies have significantly improved the prognosis of patients with HER2+ BC, however, de novo and acquired resistance to anti-HER2 treatment is common. Activating mutations in the PIK3CA gene are reported in ∼30% of HER2+ BC and are associated with resistance to anti-HER2 therapies and a poor prognosis. Here, we investigated the in vitro and in vivo antitumor efficacy of the alpha-specific PI3K inhibitor alpelisib alone or in combination with anti-HER2 therapy using a panel of HER2+ BC cell lines. We also generated models of acquired resistance to alpelisib to investigate the mechanisms underlying resistance to alpha-specific PI3K inhibition. Materials and methods PIK3CA mutant (HCC1954, KPL4 and JMT1) and wild-type (BT474 and SKBR3) HER2+ BC cell lines were used. The HCC1954 and KPL4 cells were chronically exposed to increasing concentrations of alpelisib or to alpelisib + trastuzumab in order to generate derivatives with acquired resistance to alpelisib (AR) and to alpelisib + trastuzumab (ATR). The transcriptomic profiles of HCC1954, KPL4 and their AR and ATR derivatives were determined by RNA sequencing. Cell growth was assessed by MTT assay. Changes in the protein levels of key PI3K pathway components were assessed by Western blotting. Gene expression, cellular and patients’ data from the Cancer Dependency Map (DepMap) and KMPlot datasets were interrogated. Results HER2+ BC cell lines harboring activating mutations in PIK3CA were less sensitive to single or dual anti-HER2 blockade compared to PIK3CA wild-type cells. Alpelisib treatment resulted in dose-dependent inhibition of the growth of cells with or without PIK3CA mutations and enhanced the antitumor efficacy of anti-HER2 therapies in vitro . In addition, alpelisib greatly delayed tumor growth of HCC1954 xenografts in vivo . Functional annotation of the significantly differentially expressed genes suggested the common activation of biological processes associated with oxidation reduction, cell proliferation, immune response and RNA synthesis in alpelisib-resistant models compared with native cells. Eight commonly upregulated genes (log2 fold-change &amp;gt;1, False Discovery Rate [FDR] &amp;lt;0.05) in models with acquired resistance to alpelisib or alpelisib + trastuzumab were identified. Among these, AKR1C1 was associated with alpelisib-resistance in vitro and with a poor prognosis in patients with HER2+ BC. Conclusions Our findings support the use of an alpha-selective PI3K inhibitor to overcome the therapeutic limitations associated with single or dual HER2 blockade in PIK3CA -mutant HER2+ breast cancer. Future studies are warranted to confirm the potential role of candidate genes/pathways in resistance to alpelisib.

Paclitaxel albumin (nab-paclitaxel) is a nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel formulation aimed at increasing therapeutic index in metastatic breast cancer. When compared to conventional paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel has a reported longer time to progression, higher response, lower incidence of neutropenia, no need for premedication, shorter time of administration, and in pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients, extended overall survival. This study investigates the cost-effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel versus conventional paclitaxel for pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients in Italy.A Markov model with progression-free, progressed, and dead states was developed to estimate costs, outcomes, and quality adjusted life years over 5 years from the Italian National Health Service viewpoint. Patients were assumed to receive nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m(2) three times weekly or conventional paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) three times weekly. Data on health care resource consumption was collected from a convenience sample of five Italian centers. Resources were valued at Euro (€) 2011. Published utility weights were applied to health states to estimate the impact of response, disease progression, and adverse events on quality adjusted life years. Three sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of the base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).Compared to conventional paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel gains an extra 0.165 quality adjusted life years (0.265 life years saved) and incurs additional costs of €2506 per patient treated. This translates to an ICER of €15,189 (95% confidence interval: €11,891-€28,415). One-way sensitivity analysis underscores that ICER for nab-paclitaxel remains stable despite varying taxanes cost. Threshold analysis shows that ICER for nab-paclitaxel exceeds €40,000 only if cost per mg of conventional paclitaxel is set to zero. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis highlights that nab-paclitaxel has a 0.99 probability to be cost-effective for a threshold value of €40,000 and is the optimal alternative from a threshold value of €16,316 onwards. Based on these findings, nab-paclitaxel can be considered highly cost-effective when compared to the acceptability range for ICER proposed by the Italian Health Economics Association (€25,000-€40,000).

Ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is an antibody-drug conjugate approved for the treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)positive, metastatic breast cancer (mBC). The aim of this 'field-practice' study was to Clinical Research PaperOncotarget

We evaluated the outcomes of patients treated with ado-trastuzumab emantasine (T-DM1) after first-line pertuzumab/trastuzumab, compared with those receiving a trastuzumab-only-based regimen.Patients who received second-line T-DM1 after pertuzumab/trastuzumab (n = 34) were compared with those who received only trastuzumab (n = 73).Overall response rate was 33.3% in patients with prior pertuzumab and 57.1% in the remaining subjects. Disease control rate was 47 and 43%, respectively, and the clinical benefit rate was 43.3 and 71.1%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 5.0 and 11.0 months, respectively (hazard ratio: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.14-3.58; p = 0.01).Patients treated with T-DM1 who previously received pertuzumab present poorer clinical outcomes compared with those receiving a trastuzumab-only-based regimen in the first-line setting.

Currently, there is limited data regarding the effectiveness of standard subsequent line therapies such as endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, or targeted agents after progression on CDK4/6 inhibitor-based regimens. This paper describes time-to-treatment failure beyond progression on palbociclib or palbociclib+endocrine therapy in patients enrolled in the phase II, multicenter TREnd trial. Our results indicate that there is limited benefit from post-palbociclib treatment, regardless of the type of therapy received. A small population of long responders were identified who demonstrated ongoing benefit from a subsequent line of endocrine therapy after progression to palbociclib-based regimens. A translational research program is ongoing on this population of outliers.

The current standard first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (+) metastatic breast cancer is the combination of pertuzumab, trastuzumab and a taxane (P + T + taxane), while standard second-line is ado-trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1). The registration trial of pertuzumab, however, did not include early-relapsing patients, defined as patients experiencing tumor relapse ≤12 months from the end of (neo)adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy. Conversely, the pivotal trial of T-DM1 included some patients relapsing ≤6 months after the end of (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab. Thus, a proportion of early-relapsing patients are currently eligible to receive T-DM1 as first-line treatment. Nevertheless, no direct comparison exists between the two regimens in this clinical setting.We retrospectively compared T-DM1 versus P + T + taxane as first-line treatment in two cohorts of early-relapsing patients in an Italian 'real-world' setting, involving 14 public health care institutions. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints included patients' characterization, overall survival and post-progression survival. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out. All tests were two-sided and a P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Among 1252 screened patients, 75 met the inclusion criteria. Forty-four (58.7%) received P + T + taxane and 31 (41.3%) received T-DM1. The two cohorts showed similar characteristics of aggressiveness and no significant differences in treatment history. T-DM1, compared with P + T + taxane was associated with worse progression-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.26, 95% confidence interval: 1.13-4.52, P = 0.021) and overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.95, 95% confidence interval: 1.38-11.32, P = 0.010), irrespective of previous (neo)adjuvant treatment, age, hormone receptors status, time-to-relapse (≤6 months or within 6-12 months) and presence of visceral/brain metastases. No differences were observed in post-progression survival (P = 0.095).Our study suggests superiority for P + T + taxane over T-DM1 as up-front treatment of early-relapsing HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, which merits further assessment in larger and prospective trials.

To determine whether the hormone receptor status of the primary breast cancer (PBC) is predictive of the hormone receptor status of the subsequent contralateral breast cancer (CBC).We identified patients in our database with known estrogen receptor (ER; n = 193) and/or progesterone receptor (PgR; n = 178) status in their PBC and in their subsequent CBC. One hundred twenty-six of these patients had received no adjuvant therapy, 34 had received adjuvant tamoxifen, and 33 had received adjuvant chemotherapy alone. The median interval between the first diagnosis of PBC and the development of the subsequent CBC was 3 years. ER and PgR assays were assessed biochemically in two central reference laboratories using identical quality-controlled ligand-binding methods.Among systemically untreated patients (n = 126), 88% of patients with ER-positive PBC and 75% of patients with ER-negative PBC developed an ER-positive CBC (P = .11). Among the tamoxifen-treated patients, those with an ER-positive PBC were almost equally likely to develop an ER-positive (47%) or ER-negative (53%) CBC (P = .99). PgR status was similar. In the untreated group (n = 112), 59% of patients with a PgR-positive PBC and 66% with a PgR-negative PBC developed a PgR-positive CBC (P = .48). Among tamoxifen-treated patients (n = 33), 50% of patients with a PgR-positive PBC versus 27% of patients with a PgR-negative PBC developed a PgR-positive CBC (P = .28).ER and PgR status of the primary tumor does not predict the hormone receptor status of the subsequent CBC in the absence of selective pressure of adjuvant therapy. Thus, other reasons should be considered to clarify the failure of tamoxifen to reduce the incidence of CBC in patients with a receptor-negative PBC.

Estrogen receptor (ER) signaling represents the main driver of tumor growth and survival in luminal breast cancer (BC). Despite the efficacy of endocrine agents, many patients with luminal BC do not respond to endocrine therapy and many others develop endocrine resistance over time, due to the activation of escape pathways such as the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling. Several clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of mTOR and PI3K inhibitors in overcoming endocrine resistance in hormone receptor-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic BC (MBC) patients. Nevertheless, to date, everolimus is the only agent targeting the PI3K/mTOR pathway that has been approved for clinical use. Recently, the introduction of CDK 4/6 inhibitors into clinical practice has significantly changed the therapeutic scenarios in luminal MBC. In the absence of direct comparisons among the new treatment combinations and predictive biomarkers of response, the choice of optimal therapeutic algorithms is very challenging. Future trials should focus on identifying more effective and safe combination therapies and defining the best treatment sequences in luminal BC.

Background: Previous studies suggested that obesity and diabetes were correlated with breast cancer outcome.The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic effect of obesity and diabetes on the outcome of early breast cancer patients.Materials and Methods: Overall, 841 early breast cancer patients were prospectively enrolled between January 2009 and December 2013.Study population was divided into four groups: (1) patients without obesity or diabetes; (2) patients with only diabetes; (3) patients with only obesity; and (4) patients with both diabetes and obesity.Categorical variables were analyzed by the chi-square test and survival data by the log-rank test.Results: At diagnosis, obese and diabetic patients were more likely to be older (p < 0.0001) and post-menopausal (p < 0.0001) and to have a tumor larger than 2 cm (p < 0.0001) than patients in groups 1-3.At univariate analyses, obese and diabetic patients had a worse disease-free survival (p = 0.01) and overall survival (p = 0.001) than did patients without obesity and diabetes.At multivariate analyses, the co-presence of obesity and diabetes was an independent prognostic factor for diseasefree survival (hazard ratio=2.62,95% CI 1.23-5.60)but not for overall survival.Conclusions: At diagnosis, patients with obesity and diabetes were older, had larger tumors and a worse outcome compared to patients without obesity or diabetes.These data suggest that metabolic health influences the prognosis of patients affected by early breast cancer.

Abstract Background: Preclinical and clinical evidence suggest that cross-talk between HER2 and estrogen receptor signaling pathways in breast cancer (BC) contributes to treatment resistance (Kaufman et al. J Clin Oncol 2009; Arpino et al. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007). First-line pertuzumab (P), in addition to trastuzumab (H) + docetaxel (T), significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with H + T in patients (pts) with HER2-positive metastatic BC (MBC) (Swain et al. N Engl J Med 2015; Baselga et al. N Engl J Med 2012). PERTAIN (NCT01491737) is the first study to assess first-line P + H + an aromatase inhibitor (AI) ± induction taxane therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive locally advanced (LA)/MBC. Methods: Pts with HER2-positive, hormone receptor-positive LA/MBC who had not received prior systemic therapy (except endocrine therapy) were randomized 1:1 to Arm A: P + H + AI or Arm B: H + AI. Study medication: P 840 mg loading dose followed by 420 mg every 3 weeks (q3w); H 8 mg/kg followed by 6 mg/kg q3w; anastrozole 1 mg daily (qd) or letrozole 2.5 mg qd. Induction T q3w or paclitaxel (PAC) weekly could be given for 18–24 weeks at the investigator's discretion before the start of endocrine therapy. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was PFS, stratified by induction chemotherapy (yes/no) and time since adjuvant hormone therapy (&amp;lt;12 months, ≥12 months, no prior hormone therapy) and estimated using Kaplan–Meier methodology. Secondary endpoints included OS, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), and safety and tolerability. Results: From February 2012 to October 2014, 129 pts were randomized to Arm A and 129 to Arm B (intent-to-treat populations; safety populations: 127 and 124, respectively) across 80 sites and 8 countries. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally balanced between arms. Induction T and PAC were received by 42 (32.6%) and 32 (24.8%) pts in Arm A, respectively, and 37 (28.7%) and 31 (24.0%) pts in Arm B. Median PFS was 18.9 months in Arm A and 15.8 months in Arm B (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.48–0.89; p=0.007). Median OS was not reached in either arm. ORR was 63.3% (95% CI 53.5–72.3) in Arm A and 55.7% in Arm B (95% CI 45.7–65.3; p=0.25). Median DoR was 27.1 months in Arm A and 15.1 months in Arm B (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.36–0.91; p=0.02). All grade adverse events (AEs) occurred in 122 pts in each arm (96.1% in Arm A and 98.4% in Arm B); grade ≥3 AEs in 64 (50.4%) and 48 (38.7%) pts. The most common grade ≥3 AEs (≥5%; Arm A vs. Arm B) were hypertension (10.2% vs. 11.3%), diarrhea (7.1% vs. 2.4%), and neutropenia (3.1% vs. 6.5%). Conclusions: PERTAIN met its primary endpoint: P + H + AI is effective and well tolerated, and may offer a novel treatment option for pts with HER2-positive/hormone receptor-positive LA/MBC. Citation Format: Arpino G, Ferrero J-M, de la Haba-Rodriguez J, Easton V, Schuhmacher C, Restuccia E, Rimawi M. Primary analysis of PERTAIN: A randomized, two-arm, open-label, multicenter phase II trial assessing the efficacy and safety of pertuzumab given in combination with trastuzumab plus an aromatase inhibitor in first-line patients with HER2-positive and hormone receptor-positive metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr S3-04.

The development of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4 and 6 inhibitors represented a substantial breakthrough in the treatment of estrogen receptor positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative metastatic breast cancer. These drugs showed a significant clinical benefit in pivotal clinical trials. However, resistance eventually occurs, leading to disease progression. Next Generation Sequencing methodologies have been employed to investigate predictive biomarkers of response or resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Whole exome and targeted sequencing of solid and liquid biopsies have revealed several possible genomic alterations associated with resistance. Notably, genomic alterations identified by DNA-sequencing did not fully recapitulate the entire landscape of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Gene expression analysis, such as RNA-Seq methodologies, have provided insights into transcriptional profiles and may need further application. Herein, we report the main findings derived from the use of NGS analysis in the context of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors in ER + breast cancer.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is usually an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. The neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are cancer type-agnostic emerging biomarkers approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), USA, for the selection of patients for targeted therapy. The main aim of our study was to investigate the frequency of NTRK aberrations, i.e. fusions, gene copy number gain, and amplification, in a series of TNBC using different methods. A total of 83 TNBCs were analyzed using pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS). Of 83 cases, 16 showed pan-TRK positivity although no cases had NTRK-fusions. Indeed, FISH showed four cases carrying an atypical NTRK1 pattern consisting of one fusion signal and one/more single green signals, but all cases were negative for fusion by NGS and RT-PCR testing. In addition, FISH analysis showed six cases with NTRK1 amplification, one case with NTRK2 copy number gain, and five cases with NTRK3 copy number gain, all negative for pan-TRK IHC. Our data demonstrate that IHC has a high false-positive rate for the detection of fusions and molecular testing is mandatory; there is no need to perform additional molecular tests in cases negativity for NTRK by IHC. In conclusion, the NTRK genes are not involved in fusions in TNBC, but both copy number gain and amplification are frequent events, suggesting a possible predictive role for other NTRK aberrations.

Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare malignancies associated with dysregulation of the immune system and humoral- and cell-mediated immunity abnormalities. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccine is effective in preventing coronavirus disease 2019 morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the seroconversion in patients with TET after two doses of mRNA vaccine.This is a prospective study in which consecutive patients with TET were enrolled before receiving the first dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2 by Pfizer-BioNTech). SARS-CoV-2 spike-binding immunoglobulin (Ig)G antibody serologic levels were analyzed at different time points, including before first vaccine dose (T0), 1 month after the second dose (T2), and 3 months after the second dose (T3).Overall, 39 patients were included in the analysis. All patients had negative antibody titer results at T0. There were 19 patients (48.7%) in the follow-up with no residual tumor lesion/s (referred as no evidence of disease), and 20 (51.3%) had evidence of disease (ED) and were receiving systemic treatment. Dysregulations of the immune system were diagnosed in 29 patients (74.4%) with Good syndrome (GS) being the most frequent immune disorder (48.7%). At univariate analysis, lack of seroconversion at T2 was significantly associated with ED (p < 0.001) and with GS (p = 0.043). A significant association with impaired seroconversion was confirmed at multivariate analysis for ED (p = 0.00101) but not for GS (p = 0.625).Our data revealed that patients with TET with ED had substantially higher probability of impaired seroconversion after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine as compared with patients with no evidence of disease.

Breast cancer represents the most commonly diagnosed neoplasm worldwide and the HER2-positive subtype accounts for nearly 1 in 5 breast cancers. The majority of patients with breast cancer present with an early-stage disease upon diagnosis, which is thus susceptible to virtually curative treatment strategies. For a stage, I T1a/b N0 HER2-positive disease, upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy is the preferred approach. However, there is some uncertainty regarding the appropriate management of stage cT1c cN0, as both the neoadjuvant approach and upfront surgery have been proven to be feasible therapeutic options. The aim of this Delphi consensus was to define the best strategies for the treatment of early HER2-positive breast cancer. This work may help clinicians in the management of early HER2-positive breast cancer.

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Background</h3> The last years have seen unprecedented improvement in breast cancer (BC) survival rates. However, this entirely apply to female BC patients, since gender minorities (male, transgender/gender-diverse) are neglected in BC phase III registration clinical trials. <h3>Methods</h3> We conducted a scoping review of phase III clinical trials of agents with a current positioning within the therapeutic algorithms of BC. <h3>Results</h3> We selected 51 phase III trials. Men enrollment was allowed in 35.3% of trials. In none of the trial inclusion/exclusion criteria referred to transgender/gender-diverse people. A numerical higher rate of enrolled men was observed in the contemporary as compared to historical group. We found a statistically significant association between the drug class and the possibility of including men: 100%, 80%, 50%, 33.3%, 25%, 10% and 9.1% of trials testing ICI/PARP-i, ADCs, PI3K/AKT/mTOR-i, anti-HER2 therapy, CDK4/6-i, ET alone, and CT alone. Overall, 77409 patients were enrolled, including 112 men (0.2%). None of the trial reported transgender/gender-diverse people proportion. Studies investigating PARP-i were significantly associated with the highest rate of enrolled men (1.42%), while the lowest rates were observed for trials of CT (0.13%), ET alone (0.10%), and CDK 4/6-I (0.08%), p < 0.001. <h3>Conclusions</h3> We confirmed that gender minorities are severely underrepresented among BC registration trials. We observed a lower rate of men in trials envisaging endocrine manipulation or in less contemporary trials. This work sought to urge the scientific community to increase the awareness level towards the issue of gender minorities and to endorse more inclusive criteria in clinical trials.

The authors regret that the indications concerning the management of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) adverse events (AEs) outlined in the text (paragraph "Safety and adverse events management") and in the original Fig. 1 are referred to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) data sheet [https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2023/761115s035lbl.pdf, while the reference related to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) data sheet was cited by mistake].

Abstract Background: The exploration of heterogeneity in mBC has gained significant interest in optimizing therapeutic strategies. While the impact of differential HER2 IHC staining has been extensively studied in HER2-low neoplasms, limited data is available regarding IHC 2+ and IHC 3+ categories in HER2-pos mBC. The aim of our study is to compare, the clinical variables, metastatic patterns, and prognosis between patients classified as IHC 2+ and IHC 3+ in HER2-pos mBC. Methods: Pts with HER2 pos mBC, determined by HER2 IHC staining of 3+ or 2+ with amplification at the in situ hybridization assay, were selected from the GIM14 study database for analysis. Associations among variables were assessed by conducting logistic regression analyses. Additionally, prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) were evaluated using both uni- and multi-variable Cox regression models. Results: A total of 766 HER2-pos mBC pts were included in the analysis. Among them, 302 (39%) had IHC score of 2+ and 464 (61%) had a IHC score of 3+. Central nervous system (CSN) metastases (mts) were observed in 68 (9%) pts (32% IHC 2+; 68% IHC 3+), lymph node (LN) mts in 330 (43%) pts (46% IHC 2+; 54% IHC 3+), lung (LU) mts in 182 (24%) pts (46% IHC 2+; 54% IHC 3+), liver (LI) mts in 227 (30%) pts (45% IHC 2+, 55% IHC 3+), skin (SK) mts in 68 (9%) pts (28% IHC 2+; 72% IHC 3+) and pleural (PL) mts in 40 (5%) pts (47% IHC 2+, 53% IHC 3+). In univariable (uni) analysis, IHC 3+ compared to IHC 2+ was significantly associated with SK mts (OR 1.76, P=0.043) and less likely to be associated with LI (OR 0.71, P=0.031), LU (OR 0.70, P =0.036), and LN (OR 0.63, P=0.002) mts. In multivariable (multi) analysis, LN mts maintained statistical significance (OR 0.62, P=0.004). In subgroup analysis, among IHC 3+ patients, factors associated with worse OS pts were neo Tx (HR 1.55, P=0.032), adjuvant radiotherapy (HR 1.34, P=0.042), neo ChT (HR 1.63, P=0.002), CNS mts (HR 1.98, P=0.002), and LI mts (HR 1.68, P&amp;lt; 0.0001). In multi analysis, CNS mts (HR 1.73, P=0.028) and LI mts (HR 1.47, P=0.017) remained prognostic for IHC 3+ subgroup. The only factor associated with worse OS in IHC 2+ pts was LI mts (HR 1.67, P=0.005). Multi analysis in the overall HER2-pos population identified neo chemotherapy (ChT) (HR 1.49, P=0.009), CNS mts (HR 1.53, P=0.003) and PL mts (HR 1.50, P=0.036) as negative prognostic factors for OS, while PL mts (HR 1.74, P=0.048) were associated with a shorter time to treatment failure (TTF). Conclusions: Our exploratory data revealed that HER2-pos mBC with a IHC score of 3+ is less likely to be associated with LN mts and with visceral mts. The site of mts has prognostic significance, as CNS mts are associated with worse OS in pts with an IHC score of 3+ pts, while LI mts are associated with worse OS in both IHC 2+ and 3+ subgroups. However, the IHC score itself (2+ or 3+) does not have independent prognostic value. The relationship between HER2 IHC staining and treatment outcomes requires further investigation to better understand its potential impact on clinical practice. Citation Format: Arianna Dri, Eva Blondeaux, Claudia Bighin, Simona Gasparro, Stefania Russo, Lorenzo Foffano, Palma Pugliese, Andrea Fontana, Enrico Cortesi, Antonella Ferzi, Ferdinando Riccardi, Valentina Sini, Luca Boni, Alessandra Fabi, Filippo Montemurro, Michelino De Laurentiis, Grazia Arpino, Lucia Del Mastro, Lorenzo Gerratana, Fabio Puglisi. HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression in HER2-positive (HER2-pos) metastatic breast cancer (mBC): clinical and prognostic differences between IHC 2+ and IHC 3+ populations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-04-05.

Abstract Background: Estimating patient attrition across lines of treatment, i.e., the probability that upon failing one treatment the patient will be able to receive a subsequent treatment, may be a valuable tool for treatment sequencing. We sought to describe first-to-second line (1to2-line) and second-to third line (2to3-line) attrition rate and factors associated with attrition. Methods: The GIM14/BIO-META is an ongoing, ambispective observational multicenter study enrolling breast cancer patients receiving first-line therapy. In progressing patients, attrition was defined as no further anticancer treatment and death within 6 months from the end of the previous line. Attrition from 1to2-line and from 2to3-line was studied by descriptive analyses, factors associated with attrition by univariate ad multivariable logistic models. Results: From January 2000 to December 2021, 3,109 patients with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled in the GIM14/BIO-META study. After the exclusion of 611 patients with ongoing first-line treatment, we included 2,498 patients in the analysis of 1to2-line attrition. Considering tumor subtype, 1,650 (66.0%) patients were diagnosed with metastatic luminal-like, 622 (24.9%) with HER2-positive and 177 (7.1%) with triple negative (TN) tumors. At the time of diagnosis of advanced disease, almost half of the patients (52.0%) had only one involved metastatic site and 45.9% of the patients were diagnosed with visceral involvement. Overall, 1to2-line attrition was 9.0% (224/2,498) with similar attrition for patients with luminal-like (8.5%) and HER2-positive (7.1%) breast cancer. Patients with TN disease experience the highest 1to2-line attrition (13.0%). Age, disease-free interval from primary tumor diagnosis, and type of metastatic spread independently predicted 1to2-line attrition. Univariate analyses of factors associated with 1to2-line attrition among patients with luminal-like breast cancer were similar to those of the entire cohort. Overall, 2to3-line attrition was 14.0% (260/1,861) with higher attrition rates among patients with TN disease (22.7%) compared to patients with luminal-like (13.4%) and HER2-positive (13.0%) breast cancer. Age, tumor subtype, pattern of visceral spread and shorter time-to treatment discontinuation during first-line therapy were independent factors associated with 2to3-line attrition. Conclusions: Pending confirmation in independent series and integration with biomarkers of treatment failure, these results, may provide a valuable support for treatment decisions and clinical research on treatment sequencing. Citation Format: Eva Blondeaux, Luca Boni, Giovanna Chilà, Arianna Dri, Roberta Caputo, Francesca Poggio, Alessandra Fabi, Grazia Arpino, Federico Pravisano, Elena Geuna, Tommaso Ruelle, Irene Giannubilo, Michelino de Laurentiis, Fabio Puglisi, Claudia Bighin, Matteo Lambertini, Filippo Montemurro, Lucia Del Mastro. Factors associated with first- and second- line attrition among metastatic breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-06-01.

Abstract Objectives: Factors that influence treatment preferences of patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) are being investigated using discrete choice experiment (DCE) methodology. Appropriate attributes for the ongoing quantitative online survey phase were identified by this initial qualitative pilot study. Methods: To generate hypotheses and inform variables of the quantitative survey, the pilot phase consisted in online telephone interviews with patients with a diagnosis of Stage IV HR+/HER2- breast cancer at various stages of treatment. Interviews focused on exploring patients' perspectives on their interaction with physicians, preferences, and treatment experiences. Transcripts were coded using NVivo software to identify key themes. The ongoing DCE online survey aims to recruit patients meeting the same selection criteria as in the qualitative phase, also at various stages of treatment. Results: Fifteen mBC patients (median age, 43 years [range, 29-64]), including nine chemotherapy-treated and six without chemotherapy exposure, were enrolled in the pilot qualitative study. Eight and four patients reported receiving little information about their treatment plan and their risk status beyond the risk of relapse, respectively. Most participants did not know what to expect from their therapy but expressed trust in their physician’s decision in terms of treatment goals. Few patients (n=3) looked for a second opinion before starting treatment. Four out of fifteen patients declared that they were actively involved in their treatment plan decision, although all relied on their physician’s knowledge and decision. Reduced symptoms and improved quality of life (QoL) were patients’ main treatment goals, and side-effects and efficacy of treatment were their main concerns. When asked about the degree of acceptability of certain side effects, some participants considered hair loss and vomiting as unacceptable side effects, regardless of severity, while others considered them to be the most acceptable. This discrepancy is to be interpreted in the light of participants’ own treatment journey. Severity and duration of side-effects were mentioned by three patients as acceptability factors. In a choice task, patients were asked to express preferences between two hypothetical treatments. Efficacy (n=9) and administration mode (n=6) were spontaneously deemed important for treatment selection. While assessing the difference in risk between the two hypothetical treatments, ten patients explained that the main choice feature was extended progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Risk of infection and neutropenia (n=12) were concerns expressed by most patients in the post-COVID-19 period. Considering their substantial impact on QoL, alopecia (n=9) and vomiting (n=9) were presented by patients as particularly important, regardless of their degree of severity; whereas almost all patients reported that only severe fatigue (n=12), diarrhea (n=13) or nausea (n=13) would be an issue. These results allowed selection of the following attributes for further quantification of their preference weights in a DCE: PFS, risk of neutropenia, risk of alopecia, risk of vomiting, risk of diarrhea, risk of grade 3/4 side effects and mode of administration. Conclusions: This qualitative pilot study allowed for identification of what matters most to patients when selecting a treatment for mBC, which will be further assessed in the DCE. It also highlighted the need of patients with HR+/HER2- mBC for information about their treatment, potential side-effects, and health management. This research suggests that there is a need for patients to be more involved in treatment plans, and that taking patient preferences into account may help improve the treatment selection experiences. Citation Format: Grazia Arpino, Carmine De Angelis, Lorenzo Gerratana, Matteo Lambertini, Sarah Igidbashian, Martina Bellini, Serena Giuntoli, Xavier Guillaume, Julie Behillil, Claire Graziani-Taugeron. Patient Preferences for HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer Treatments in Italy: A Qualitative Assessment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-18-01.

Abstract Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is the preferred treatment approach for early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) after NACT is associated with improved event-free survival and overall survival in patients with TNBC. Major research efforts have been deployed to identify predictive biomarkers for pCR in TNBC. However, the values of chemotherapy (CT) relative dose intensity (RDI) in predicting pCR remain unclear. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted among 96 consecutive patients with early stage TNBC who received NACT between February 2018 and January 2023 at the University of Naples Federico II (Naples, Italy). Patients’ demographics, clinical-pathological features, and type of CT schedules were retrieved from electronic medical records. pCR was defined as the absence of residual invasive or in situ carcinoma in primary tumor and/or lymph nodes, upon chemotherapy administration. RDI was calculated as the ratio of delivered to planned CT dose intensity. RDI was defined as low if &amp;lt; 85% or high if ≥85%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between age, tumor stage, RDI, CT regimen dose type, and pCR. Results: All patients were included in the analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 51 years (range 28-75). Sixty-five (68%) and 31 (32%) patients were diagnosed with stage II and stage III TNBC, respectively. Nineteen (19%) patients received a sequential schedule of anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide (AC) and a taxane (T). Sixty-one (64%) patients received AC followed by concurrent carboplatin-paclitaxel (CaP). Sixteen (17%) patients received the anti-PD1 pembrolizumab in addition to ACCaP chemotherapy backbone (ACCaP-Pem). Fifty-four (56%) patients received a dose-dense AC-based CT. A pCR was achieved in 59 (61%) patients. Interestingly, patients who received a dose-dense AC based neoadjuvant CT had higher chance to achieve a pCR compared with those treated with a non dose-dense AC based CT (70% vs 46%, p = 0.03). Overall, 79 (82%) and 17 (18%) patients received a RDI high and RDI low CT, respectively. No difference in terms of age, body mass index, performance status, tumor stage, type of chemotherapy was observed between the two groups (Table 1). At univariate analysis RDI high (OR 5.18, 95%CI: 1.65-16.31, p=0.005) and dose dense AC-based CT (OR 2.42, 95%CI: 0.18-0.97, p=0.04) were significantly associated with pCR. In a multivariate model including RDI, age, tumor stage, and AC regimen dose type, RDI was the only variable independently associated with pCR (OR 4.60, 95% CI: 1.40-15.06, p = 0.01). Conclusion: A chemotherapy RDI≥ 85% independently predicts pCR in early stage TNBC patients treated with standard NACT. In our cohort, one in five patients received a suboptimal chemotherapy dose intensity affecting at least in part tumor response. Studies with larger TNBC patient populations are warranted to confirm the impact of RDI on pCR and long-term outcomes. Table 1 Citation Format: Roberto Buonaiuto, Giuseppe Neola, Aldo Caltavituro, Paola Trasacco, Federica Pia Mangiacotti, Giovanna Pecoraro, Matteo Lambertini, Erica Pietroluongo, Pietro De Placido, Sabino De Placido, Valeria Forestieri, Mario Giuliano, Grazia Arpino, Carmine De Angelis. The impact of chemotherapy relative dose intensity on pathological complete response in patients with triple negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-03-07.

<title>Abstract</title> <underline>Background</underline>: Up to 6-8% of patients with HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) experience a radiologic complete response (rCR) to a first line of therapy, but these results mostly derive from dated and/or limited cohorts. Currently, there is limited data regarding which variables could predictive of a rCR to anti-HER2 therapies. <underline>Methods</underline>: Patients were selected from the database of the GIM14 study (NCT02284581) and classified according to the best radiologic response obtained to the first line anti-HER2 therapy and upon time-to-treatment-discontinuation (TTD). rCR was defined as complete response (CR) with a TTD &gt; 3 months. The association across variables was tested through logistic regression and their prognostic impact in terms of overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. <underline>Results</underline>: Of the 3,423 patients included in the GIM14 study, 814 had HER2 positive MBC and data about best radiological response were available for 545 patients. Eighty patients (14.7%) experienced a rCR to first line anti-HER2 therapy with a TTD &gt; 3 months. At multivariable analysis, HER2 Immunohistochemistry score 3+ (OR 2.03, p-value=0.01), presence of non visceral metastases (OR 1.51, p-value=0.01) and 1 metastatic site (OR 2.49, p-value= 0.01) were significantly associated with higher odds of obtaining a CR. Furthermore, amongst the 80 patients achieving a rCR, 56 (73%) experienced a durable and sustained CR with a TTD &gt; 18 months. At multivariable analysis, only type of anti-HER2 therapy (OR 0.13 p-value&lt;0.01 for trastuzumab-based therapy and OR 0.08, p-value=0.04 for other anti-HER2 therapy) was associated with a higher probability of achieving a CR with a TTD &gt; 18 months. A median OS of 10.22 years was observed for patients that had achieved a CR to a first line anti-HER2 therapy and a TTD &gt; 3 months. For patients with a CR and TTD &gt; 18 months, a median OS of 12.73 years was observed. <underline>Conclusions</underline>: This study characterized a real-world cohort of HER2 positive MBC patients experiencing radiologic complete response to a first line treatment. Higher odds of achieving a complete response to a first-line anti-HER2 therapy with a TTD &gt; 3 months were observed for HER2 Immunohistochemistry score 3+, presence of visceral metastases and presence of a single metastatic site. Additionally, a sustained complete response with a TTD &gt; 18 months, was described in a subset of patients that had been exposed to a trastuzumab-based therapy.

BackgroundMore efficacious and safer hormonal agents are needed for breast cancer treatment and prevention. Idoxifene is a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) that, in preclinical models, has greater antiestrogenic but lower estrogenic activity than tamoxifen.Patients and methodsThree hundred and twenty-one postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive or -unknown metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive either tamoxifen or idoxifene as initial endocrine therapy for advanced disease. Data were analyzed based on intention to treat and all the responses were subject to independent review.ResultsAt the time of a second planned interim analysis, the trial was stopped for economic considerations, not for reasons related to safety or efficacy. Complete data for the 219 patients included in the second interim analysis are fully available and reported here. Median age was 59.1 years for idoxifene patients and 59.9 years for tamoxifen patients. Complete response (CR) plus partial response (PR) rates were as follows: tamoxifen, 9%; idoxifene, 13% (P = 0.39). Clinical benefit rate [CR + PR + stable disease (SD) ≥6 months] was 34.3% for idoxifene and 38.7% for tamoxifen (P = 0.31). Median time to progression and duration of response were 140 days and 151.5 days, respectively, for tamoxifen compared with 166 days and 218 days for idoxifene. None of these endpoints was significantly different for the two drugs, nor was survival. Adverse events(lethal, serious but not lethal and important but not life threatening) were similar in the two arms.ConclusionsIdoxifene was both active and well tolerated in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. Idoxifene had similar efficacy and toxicity to tamoxifen in this randomized comparison.

Metastases to the thyroid gland are more frequent than previously thought, although most of them are occult or not clinically relevant. Overall, only 42 cases of metastases to thyroid from breast cancer have been reported thus far. Here we report the case of a patient with breast cancer metastatic to the thyroid. We also review the 42 previously reported cases (published between 1962 and 2012). This is the first review about metastases to thyroid gland from breast cancer.A 64-year-old woman of Caucasian origin was diagnosed with a lobular invasive carcinoma of the breast (luminal A, stage II). She received adjuvant chemotherapy, followed by endocrine therapy. During follow-up, fine-needle cytology of a thyroid nodule revealed malignant cells that were estrogen-positive, which suggested a diagnosis of metastases to the thyroid. Imaging did not reveal any other metastatic site and showed only enlargement of the left thyroid lobe and an inhomogeneous pattern of colloid and cystic degeneration and calcifications. The patient underwent left hemithyroidectomy. Histology of thyroid tissue showed a colloid goitre containing dispersed small atypical neoplastic cells with eccentric nuclei. Immunohistochemistry showed cytokeratin-19 and oestrogen receptor, but not tireoglobulin, e-cadherin or cytokeratin-7, thereby confirming metastases from a lobular breast carcinoma. Hormonal treatment is ongoing.This case report and first review of the literature on metastases to thyroid from breast cancer highlight the importance of a correct early diagnostic work-up in such cases. Indeed, a primary lesion should be distinguished from metastases given the different treatment protocol related to primary cancer and the clinical impact on prognosis.

Abstract Background The role of bidirectional cross talk between the HER2 and estrogen receptors in resistance to anti-HER2 and endocrine therapy has been studied extensively (Kaufman et al. J Clin Oncol 2009; Arpino et al. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007). The CLEOPATRA study showed that first-line pertuzumab (P) + trastuzumab (H) + docetaxel (T) improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) significantly compared with placebo + H + T in patients (pts) with HER2-positive metastatic BC (MBC) (Baselga et al. N Engl J Med 2012; Swain et al. Lancet Oncol 2013; N Engl J Med 2015; N Engl J Med 2020). PERTAIN (NCT01491737) was the first randomized phase II trial to assess the addition of P to H + an aromatase inhibitor (AI) ± induction chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of pts with HER2-positive and hormone receptor-positive MBC or locally advanced BC (LABC). PERTAIN met its primary PFS endpoint at 31 months’ median follow-up, with a potentially enhanced effect in some groups, such as pts who did not receive induction chemotherapy (Rimawi et al. J Clin Oncol 2018). We present the final analysis at more than 6 years’ median follow-up, including updated PFS, mature OS (secondary endpoint), and updated safety. Methods Pts were randomized 1:1 to P + H + AI (Arm A) or H + AI (Arm B). P was given as an 840 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose followed by 420 mg every 3 weeks (q3w); H IV, at 8 mg/kg followed by 6 mg/kg q3w; anastrozole, at 1 mg daily; or letrozole, at 2.5 mg daily. Induction IV chemotherapy with T q3w or weekly paclitaxel could be given for 18-24 weeks at the investigator’s discretion before the start of endocrine therapy. Treatment was given until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pts were stratified by induction chemotherapy (yes/no) and time since adjuvant hormone therapy (&amp;lt;12 months, ≥12 months, no adjuvant hormone therapy). Time-to-event endpoints were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results Pts were randomized across 71 sites and 8 countries between Feb 2012 and Oct 2014. Intent-to-treat populations were 129 pts per arm; safety populations, 127 and 124 in Arms A and B, respectively; induction chemotherapy was received by 75 and 71 pts, respectively. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally balanced between arms. Efficacy results are shown in the table. One hundred twenty-two pts per arm reported adverse events (AEs) at any grade (96.1% in Arm A; 98.4% in Arm B); 72 (56.7%) and 51 pts (41.1%) had grade ≥3 AEs, the most common grade ≥3 AEs (≥5.0%; Arm A vs. Arm B) being hypertension (11.8% vs. 10.5%), diarrhea (9.4% vs. 2.4%), and neutropenia (3.1% vs. 7.3%). Conclusions With a median follow-up of more than 6 years at final analysis, the PFS benefit of adding P to H + an AI was maintained. OS was similar between arms. A potentially enhanced treatment effect was observed by addition of P to H + an AI in pts who did not receive induction chemotherapy after randomization. There were no new safety concerns at final analysis. Overall, PERTAIN provides additional evidence on the role of P + H in the first-line treatment of HER2-positive MBC/LABC and suggests that some pts benefit from P + H + AI without induction chemotherapy. Arm AArm BMedian PFS, mo HR (95% CI)ITT21160.7 (0.5-0.9) p=0.006With induction17170.7 (0.5-1.0) p=0.08No induction27120.7 (0.4-1.0) p=0.07Median OS, mo HR (95% CI)ITT60571.1 (0.7-1.5) p=0.8With induction59661.2 (0.7-1.9) p=0.5No induction65540.9 (0.5-1.6) p=0.7CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intent-to-treat; mo, months. Citation Format: Grazia Arpino, Juan de la Haba-Rodriguez, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Sabino De Placido, Dirk Klingbiel, Valentine Revelant, Christine Wohlfarth, Raf Poppe, Mothaffar F Rimawi. Final analysis of PERTAIN: A randomized, two-arm, open-label, multicenter phase II trial assessing the efficacy and safety of first-line pertuzumab given in combination with trastuzumab plus an aromatase inhibitor in patients with HER2-positive and hormone receptor-positive metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-02.

Leptin is a peptide hormone, mainly known for its role as a mediator of adipose tissue endocrine functions, such as appetite control and energy homeostasis. In addition, leptin signaling is involved in several physiological processes as modulation of innate and adaptive immune responses and regulation of sex hormone levels. When adipose tissue expands, an imbalance of adipokines secretion may occur and increasing leptin levels contribute to promoting a chronic inflammatory state, which is largely acknowledged as a hallmark of cancer. Indeed, upon binding its receptor (LEPR), leptin activates several oncogenic pathways, such as JAK/STAT, MAPK, and PI3K/AKT, and seems to affect cancer immune response by inducing a proinflammatory immune polarization and eventually enhancing T-cell exhaustion. In particular, obesity-associated hyperleptinemia has been related to breast cancer risk development, although the underlying mechanism is yet to be completely clarified and needs to be deemed in light of multiple variables, such as menopausal state and immune response. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the potential role of leptin as a bridge between obesity and breast cancer and to establish the physio-pathological basis of the linkage between these major health concerns in order to identify appropriate and novel therapeutic strategies to adopt in daily clinical practice.

Proliferative fasciitis is a benign lesion that usually has a self-limited course and rarely recurs after excision. In the literature, the multifocal occurrence of PF in different anatomic sites has not been reported so far. In this report, we describe the clinical case of a 30-year-old woman with two metachronous proliferative fasciitis occurring firstly in the orbit and, after 18 months, in the forearm; we also review the available literature on this topic, outlining guidelines for therapy and the follow-up of these patients.

Mortality data by geographic area and trend-based surveillance are particularly relevant in orienting public health decisions targeting specific populations. We analyzed overall and site-specific cancer mortality between 1988 and 2009 in the metropolitan area of Naples and Caserta in southern Italy. Age-standardized mortality rates (SMR) were computed for each 5-y age group, by gender, primitive cancer site and specific Province in the overall population and age-defined subgroups. Cancer mortality trends were quantified by annual percent change (APC) and 95% confidence interval (CI). From Naples and Caserta, the reduction observed between 1988 and 2009 in SMR in males, but not in females, was significantly lower compared with the decrease reported at a national level (-11.4% and -28.4%, respectively). In elderly men, differences between local and national SMR were more pronounced (+13.6% compared with -2.7%). In males, the joinpoint regression analysis showed the following APC and 95% CI: -0.9%/year (-1.2; -0.7) and -0.6%/year (-1.0; -0.2) for Naples and Caserta, respectively. In females, estimates were -0.6%/year (-0.8; -0.5) and -0.7%/year (-1.2; -0.3). The overall orientation toward declining cancer mortality trends appeared in antithesis with the slight, but significant, increase for some tumors (e.g., pancreatic cancer in both genders). A complex mixture of heterogeneous factors concurs to explain the evidence observed including lifestyle, access to screening procedures, advancements in cancer diagnosis and treatment. Further details might eventually derive from biomonitoring studies for ascertaining the causal link between exposure to potential contaminants in air, water, and soil and cancer-related outcomes in the area of interest.

Although guidelines do not recommend computerised tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the staging or follow-up of asymptomatic patients with non-metastatic breast cancer, they are often requested in routine clinical practice. The aim of this study was to determine the staging and follow-up patterns, and relative costs in a large population of breast cancer patients living and treated in a Southern Italian region.We analysed the clinical computerised information recorded by 567 primary-care physicians assisting about 650 000 inhabitants in the Campania region. Patients with non-metastatic breast cancer were identified and divided into calendar years from 2001 to 2010. The number of diagnostic tests prescribed per 100 patients (N/Pts) and the mean cost per patient was determined 3 months before diagnosis and up to 1 year after diagnosis. Costs are expressed in constant 2011 euros.We identified 4680 newly diagnosed cases of asymptomatic non-metastatic breast cancer. N/Pts increased significantly (P<0.0001) from 2001 to 2010. The mean number of prescribed mammograms, bone scans, abdominal ultrasound and chest X-rays ('routine tests'), and costs was unchanged. However, the number of CT, PET scans and MRI ('new tests')prescriptions almost quadrupled and the mean cost per patient related to these procedures significantly increased from [euro ]357 in 2001 to [euro ]830 in 2010 (P<0.0001).New test prescriptions and relative costs significantly and steadily increased throughout the study period. At present there is no evidence that the delivery of new tests to asymptomatic patients improves breast cancer outcome. Well-designed clinical trials are urgently needed to shed light on the impact of these tests on clinical outcome and overall survival.

Abstract Background: ctDNA analysis is emerging as an attractive non-invasive approach to characterize tumor biology, describe its evolution over time, and predict treatment benefit. Here, we assessed the prognostic and predictive role of baseline and dynamic ctDNA analysis in HR+/HER2- aBC patients (pts) treated with R+L. Methods: 287 postmenopausal pts were enrolled in the BioItaLEE trial (NCT03439046). Liquid biopsies were collected at baseline (D0; n=263), day 15 of cycle 1 (D15; n=238), day 1 of cycle 2 (C2D1; n=241) and at first imaging (FI, at approximately 12 weeks; n=206). ctDNA analysis was carried out using a 533-amplicon Custom AmpliSeq HD Panel, with amplicons covering the coding exons of 39 BC-related genes (limit of detection: 0.1%). Target mutations were defined as single-nucleotide variant (SNV) or Insertion/Deletion detected at D0. When multiple target mutations were detected, the one with the highest variant allele frequency (VAF) was considered. The association between pre-treatment and on-treatment ctDNA dynamics with progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed using Multivariate Cox models. VAF clearance was defined as 100% decrease in a target mutation. Results: Median follow-up was 26.9 months and median PFS was 23.39 (20.8-NE) months. At baseline, target mutations were detected in 113 pts (43.0%), whereas 150 pts were wild-type (wt). Mean (SD) pre-treatment VAF at D0 was 11.3% (14.4). The absence of a target mutation at D0 was associated with good prognosis (HR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.27–0.61; p&amp;lt;0.0001). Considering early ctDNA dynamics, a significant VAF reduction was observed at D15 and C2D1 with a mean (SD) change of -64.3% (55.9) and -68.6% (52.2), respectively. In pts with a target mutation detected at baseline, early VAF clearance was observed in 47.1% of pts at D15 and in 52.4% of pts at C2D1. Clearance at D15 or C2D1 was associated with improved PFS (D15, HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.28-0.91, p=0.0228; C2D1, HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.25-0.78, p=0.0052). Pts achieving clearance at D15, which was maintained at C2D1 (39.4%) had the lowest risk of progression compared to those who had no clearance at any or both timepoints (HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.20-0.79; p=0.084). Monitoring of the 150 pts without a detectable target mutation at baseline revealed a new, detectable mutation at later timepoints (D15, C2D1 and FI) in 34 pts (22.7%). The absence of new mutations was associated with a lower risk of progression (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.24-0.85; p=0.0143). Considering all time points individually, D15 was the most informative of patient outcome. Indeed, pts without mutation at D15 (42.9%) had an extremely favorable outcome, either because they achieved early treatment-related clearance or maintained baseline absence of a target mutation (HR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.20-0.51; p&amp;lt;0.0001). Notably, in pts with detectable target mutation at D15, a VAF below the median showed a trend for better prognosis versus high VAF (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.30-1.04; p=0.065). Conclusions: The presence of a detectable mutation in baseline liquid biopsies appears to be a negative prognostic factor. Within this high-risk group, early VAF clearance during the first R+L cycle was informative of treatment benefit and associated with a lower risk of progression. Monitoring of ctDNA in patients without baseline mutations demonstrated that the detection of new mutations by FI assessment was associated with worse outcome. Overall, pre-treatment and early dynamics of ctDNA (assessed by NGS) represent promising prognostic and predictive biomarkers in patients with HR+/HER2- aBC treated with ribociclib/letrozole in the first-line. Further studies are warranted to validate the clinical utility of these biomarkers. Citation Format: Giampaolo Bianchini, Luca Malorni, Grazia Arpino, Alberto Zambelli, Fabio Puglisi, Lucia Del Mastro, Marco Colleoni, Filippo Montemurro, Giulia Bianchi, Ida Paris, Giacomo Allegrini, Marina Elena Cazzaniga, Michele Orditura, Claudio Zamagni, Stefano Tamberi, Daniela Castelletti, Matteo Benelli, Maurizio Callari, Angela Santoro, Michelino De Laurentiis. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics in patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (aBC) treated in first line with ribociclib (R) and letrozole (L) in the BioItaLEE trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-07.

Background Recent studies of the correlation between breast cancer (BC) and vitamin D yielded contrasting results. Although preclinical and clinical evidence has implicated vitamin D in BC prevention and outcome, little is known about the link between vitamin D and specific BC histologically defined subtypes. In the attempt to clarify this association we correlated vitamin D levels with BC characteristics. Patients and Methods We enrolled 220 pre- and postmenopausal women with early BC in this prospective observational trial. Data on the patients' clinical and specific BC pathological characteristics were collected and related to vitamin D levels, stratified in deficient (< 20 ng/mL), insufficient (20-30 ng/mL), and sufficient (> 30 ng/mL). BC subtypes were defined according to the 14th St Gallen Breast Cancer Conference. Results Deficient vitamin D levels were correlated with Grade 3 (P = .015) and node-positive (P = .043) BC, and with a higher body mass index (P = .017). Insufficient vitamin D levels were associated with estrogen receptor expression in the primary tumor (P = .033). Vitamin D levels were unrelated to the histological molecular subtypes of BC. Conclusion Deficient vitamin D levels were correlated with more aggressive disease, namely, node-positive high grade BC, and with obesity. Should our findings be confirmed in larger prospective studies, nutritional programs designed to reduce body weight, and vitamin D supplementation might be considered a BC prevention strategy.

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the nontaxane microtubule dynamics inhibitor eribulin plus the humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody bevacizumab in a novel second-line chemotherapy scheme in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients progressing after first-line paclitaxel and bevacizumab.This is a multicenter, single-arm, Simon's two-stage, phase II study. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate, considered as the sum of partial and complete response based on the best overall response rate (BORR). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and clinical benefit rate.A total of 58 of the 61 patients enrolled in the study were evaluable for efficacy. The BORR was 24.6% (95% CI 14.5-37.3). The clinical benefit rate was 32.8% (95% CI 21.3-46.0). The median PFS was 6.2 months (95% CI 4.0-7.8), and median OS was 14.8 months (95% CI 12.6-22.8). Overall, adverse events (AEs) were clinically manageable and the most common AEs were fatigue, paresthesia, and neutropenia. Quality of life was well preserved in most patients.The results of this study suggest that second-line therapy with bevacizumab in combination with eribulin has a meaningful clinical activity and may represent a potential therapeutic option for patients with HER2-negative MBC.