Andrew Blauvelt

Dupilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against interleukin-4 receptor alpha, inhibits signaling of interleukin-4 and interleukin-13, type 2 cytokines that may be important drivers of atopic or allergic diseases such as atopic dermatitis.In two randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials of identical design (SOLO 1 and SOLO 2), we enrolled adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis whose disease was inadequately controlled by topical treatment. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive, for 16 weeks, subcutaneous dupilumab (300 mg) or placebo weekly or the same dose of dupilumab every other week alternating with placebo. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had both a score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear) on the Investigator's Global Assessment and a reduction of 2 points or more in that score from baseline at week 16.We enrolled 671 patients in SOLO 1 and 708 in SOLO 2. In SOLO 1, the primary outcome occurred in 85 patients (38%) who received dupilumab every other week and in 83 (37%) who received dupilumab weekly, as compared with 23 (10%) who received placebo (P<0.001 for both comparisons with placebo). The results were similar in SOLO 2, with the primary outcome occurring in 84 patients (36%) who received dupilumab every other week and in 87 (36%) who received dupilumab weekly, as compared with 20 (8%) who received placebo (P<0.001 for both comparisons). In addition, in the two trials, an improvement from baseline to week 16 of at least 75% on the Eczema Area and Severity Index was reported in significantly more patients who received each regimen of dupilumab than in patients who received placebo (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Dupilumab was also associated with improvement in other clinical end points, including reduction in pruritus and symptoms of anxiety or depression and improvement in quality of life. Injection-site reactions and conjunctivitis were more frequent in the dupilumab groups than in the placebo groups.In two phase 3 trials of identical design involving patients with atopic dermatitis, dupilumab improved the signs and symptoms of atopic dermatitis, including pruritus, symptoms of anxiety and depression, and quality of life, as compared with placebo. Trials of longer duration are needed to assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of dupilumab. (Funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; SOLO 1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02277743 ; SOLO 2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02277769 .).

Dupilumab (an anti-interleukin-4-receptor-α monoclonal antibody) blocks signalling of interleukin 4 and interleukin 13, type 2/Th2 cytokines implicated in numerous allergic diseases ranging from asthma to atopic dermatitis. Previous 16-week monotherapy studies showed that dupilumab substantially improved signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with acceptable safety, validating the crucial role of interleukin 4 and interleukin 13 in atopic dermatitis pathogenesis. We aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of dupilumab with medium-potency topical corticosteroids versus placebo with topical corticosteroids in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.In this 1-year, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study (LIBERTY AD CHRONOS), adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and inadequate response to topical corticosteroids were enrolled at 161 hospitals, clinics, and academic institutions in 14 countries in Europe, Asia-Pacific, and North America. Patients were randomly assigned (3:1:3) to subcutaneous dupilumab 300 mg once weekly (qw), dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks (q2w), or placebo via a central interactive voice/web response system, stratified by severity and global region. All three groups were given concomitant topical corticosteroids with or without topical calcineurin inhibitors where inadvisable for topical corticosteroids. Topical corticosteroids could be tapered, stopped, or restarted on the basis of disease activity. Coprimary endpoints were patients (%) achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1 and 2-point or higher improvement from baseline, and Eczema Area and Severity Index 75% improvement from baseline (EASI-75) at week 16. Week 16 efficacy and week 52 safety analyses included all randomised patients; week 52 efficacy included patients who completed treatment by US regulatory submission cutoff. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02260986.Between Oct 3, 2014, and July 31, 2015, 740 patients were enrolled: 319 were randomly assigned to dupilumab qw plus topical corticosteroids, 106 to dupilumab q2w plus topical corticosteroids, and 315 to placebo plus topical corticosteroids. 623 (270, 89, and 264, respectively) were evaluable for week 52 efficacy. At week 16, more patients who received dupilumab plus topical corticosteroids achieved the coprimary endpoints of IGA 0/1 (39% [125 patients] who received dupilumab plus topical corticosteroids qw and 39% [41 patients] who received dupilumab q2w plus topical corticosteroids vs 12% [39 patients] who received placebo plus topical corticosteroids; p<0·0001) and EASI-75 (64% [204] and 69% [73] vs 23% [73]; p<0·0001). Week 52 results were similar. Adverse events were reported in 261 (83%) patients who received dupilumab qw plus topical corticosteroids, 97 (88%) patients who received dupilumab q2w, and 266 (84%) patients who received placebo, and serious adverse events in nine (3%), four (4%), and 16 (5%) patients, respectively. No significant dupilumab-induced laboratory abnormalities were noted. Injection-site reactions and conjunctivitis were more common in patients treated with dupilumab plus topical corticosteroids-treated patients than in patients treated with placebo plus topical corticosteroids.Dupilumab added to standard topical corticosteroid treatment for 1 year improved atopic dermatitis signs and symptoms, with acceptable safety.Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Guselkumab, an interleukin-23 blocker, was superior to adalimumab in treating moderate to severe psoriasis in a phase II trial.We sought to compare efficacy and safety of guselkumab with adalimumab and placebo in patients with psoriasis treated for 1 year.Patients were randomized to guselkumab 100 mg (weeks 0 and 4, then every 8 weeks; n = 329); placebo→guselkumab (weeks 0, 4, and 12 then guselkumab at weeks 16 and 20, then every 8 weeks; n = 174); or adalimumab (80 mg week 0, 40 mg week 1, then 40 mg every 2 weeks through week 47; n = 334). Physician-reported outcomes (Investigator Global Assessment, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI]), patient-reported outcomes (Dermatology Life Quality Index, Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary), and safety were evaluated through week 48.Guselkumab was superior (P < .001) to placebo at week 16 (85.1% vs 6.9% [Investigator Global Assessment score of 0/1 (cleared/minimal)] and 73.3% vs 2.9% [90% or greater improvement in PASI score from baseline (PASI 90)]). Guselkumab was also superior (P < .001) to adalimumab for Investigator Global Assessment 0/1 and PASI 90 at week 16 (85.1% vs 65.9% and 73.3% vs 49.7%), week 24 (84.2% vs 61.7% and 80.2% vs 53.0%), and week 48 (80.5% vs 55.4% and 76.3% vs 47.9%). Furthermore, guselkumab significantly improved patient-reported outcomes through week 48. Adverse event rates were comparable between treatments.Analyses were limited to 48 weeks.Guselkumab demonstrated superior efficacy compared with adalimumab and was well tolerated in patients with psoriasis through 1 year.

Staphylococcus aureus is the most common cause of skin and soft tissue infections, and rapidly emerging antibiotic-resistant strains are creating a serious public health concern.If immune-based therapies are to be an alternative to antibiotics, greater understanding is needed of the protective immune response against S. aureus infection in the skin.Although neutrophil recruitment is required for immunity against S. aureus, a role for T cells has been suggested.Here, we used a mouse model of S. aureus cutaneous infection to investigate the contribution of T cells to host defense.We found that mice deficient in γδ but not αβ T cells had substantially larger skin lesions with higher bacterial counts and impaired neutrophil recruitment compared with WT mice.This neutrophil recruitment was dependent upon epidermal Vγ5 + γδ T cell production of IL-17, but not IL-21 and IL-22.Furthermore, IL-17 induction required IL-1, TLR2, and IL-23 and was critical for host defense, since IL-17R-deficient mice had a phenotype similar to that of γδ T cell-deficient mice.Importantly, γδ T cell-deficient mice inoculated with S. aureus and treated with a single dose of recombinant IL-17 had lesion sizes and bacterial counts resembling those of WT mice, demonstrating that IL-17 could restore the impaired immunity in these mice.Our study defines what we believe to be a novel role for IL-17-producing epidermal γδ T cells in innate immunity against S. aureus cutaneous infection.

Th17, Th22, and Th1 cells are detected in psoriatic skin lesions and implicated in psoriasis pathogenesis, but inflammatory T cell numbers in blood, as well as the relative importance of each cell type, is unclear. Using 7-color flow cytometry, circulating Th17, Th22, and Th1 cells were quantified in 21 untreated psoriatics and 17 healthy individuals. CCR6 was the best cell surface marker for IL-17A+ cells when compared with IL-23R or CD161. CCR6+, IL-17A+, IL-22+, CCR6+IL-17A+, CCR6+IL-22+, CCR6+tumor necrosis factor-alpha+, IL-17A+IFN-gamma-, IL-17A+IL-22+IFN-gamma-, and IL-17A+IL-22-IFN-gamma- cells were increased in psoriatics (all values P<0.001), indicating elevations in circulating Th17 cells, using multiple criteria to define these cells. Th22 (IL-17A-IL-22+IFN-gamma-, P<0.05) and Th1 (IL-17A-IFN-gamma+, P<0.05) cells were also increased in psoriatics, but to a lesser extent. Inhibition of either NF-kappaB or STAT3 in vitro blocked cytokine production by both Th17 and Th1 cells. Circulating levels of Th17 and Th1 cells decreased in a subset of five psoriasis patients serially evaluated following induction therapy with infliximab. In summary, elevated numbers of circulating inflammatory T cells may contribute to cutaneous inflammation and systemic inflammatory disease that occurs in individuals with psoriasis.

Secukinumab, a fully human anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, has shown superior efficacy to etanercept with similar safety in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (FIXTURE study).We sought to directly compare efficacy and safety of secukinumab versus ustekinumab.In this 52-week, double-blind study (NCT02074982), 676 subjects were randomized 1:1 to subcutaneous injection of secukinumab 300 mg or ustekinumab per label. Primary end point was 90% or more improvement from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score (PASI 90) at week 16.Secukinumab (79.0%) was superior to ustekinumab (57.6%) as assessed by PASI 90 response at week 16 (P < .0001). The 100% improvement from baseline PASI score at week 16 was also significantly greater with secukinumab (44.3%) than ustekinumab (28.4%) (P < .0001). The 75% or more improvement from baseline PASI score at week 4 was superior for secukinumab (50.0%) versus ustekinumab (20.6%) (P < .0001). Percentage of subjects with the Dermatology Life Quality Index score 0/1 (week 16) was significantly higher with secukinumab (71.9%) than ustekinumab (57.4%) (P < .0001). The safety profile of secukinumab was comparable with ustekinumab and consistent with pivotal phase III secukinumab studies.The study was not placebo-controlled and of short-term duration.Secukinumab is superior to ustekinumab in clearing skin of subjects with moderate to severe psoriasis and improving health-related quality of life with a comparable safety profile over 16 weeks.

Data from early-stage studies suggested that interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 are requisite drivers of atopic dermatitis, evidenced by marked improvement after treatment with dupilumab, a fully-human monoclonal antibody that blocks both pathways. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of several dose regimens of dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis inadequately controlled by topical treatments.In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, we enrolled patients aged 18 years or older who had an Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score of 12 or higher at screening (≥16 at baseline) and inadequate response to topical treatments from 91 study centres, including hospitals, clinics, and academic institutions, in Canada, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Japan, Poland, and the USA. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1:1), stratified by severity (moderate or severe, as assessed by Investigator's Global Assessment) and region (Japan vs rest of world) to receive subcutaneous dupilumab: 300 mg once a week, 300 mg every 2 weeks, 200 mg every 2 weeks, 300 mg every 4 weeks, 100 mg every 4 weeks, or placebo once a week for 16 weeks. We used a central randomisation scheme, provided by an interactive voice response system. Drug kits were coded, providing masking to treatment assignment, and allocation was concealed. Patients on treatment every 2 weeks and every 4 weeks received volume-matched placebo every week when dupilumab was not given to ensure double blinding. The primary outcome was efficacy of dupilumab dose regimens based on EASI score least-squares mean percentage change (SE) from baseline to week 16. Analyses included all randomly assigned patients who received one or more doses of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01859988.Between May 15, 2013, and Jan 27, 2014, 452 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 380 patients were randomly assigned. 379 patients received one or more doses of study drug (300 mg once a week [n=63], 300 mg every 2 weeks [n=64], 200 mg every 2 weeks [n=61], 300 mg every 4 weeks [n=65], 100 mg every 4 weeks [n=65]; placebo [n=61]). EASI score improvements favoured all dupilumab regimens versus placebo (p<0·0001): 300 mg once a week (-74% [SE 5·16]), 300 mg every 2 weeks (-68% [5·12]), 200 mg every 2 weeks (-65% [5·19]), 300 mg every 4 weeks (-64% [4·94]), 100 mg every 4 weeks (-45% [4·99]); placebo (-18% [5·20]). 258 (81%) of 318 patients given dupilumab and 49 (80%) of 61 patients given placebo reported treatment-emergent adverse events; nasopharyngitis was the most frequent (28% and 26%, respectively).Dupilumab improved clinical responses in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in a dose-dependent manner, without significant safety concerns. Our findings show that IL-4 and IL-13 are key drivers of atopic dermatitis.Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.

Background Risankizumab is a humanised IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds to the p19 subunit of interleukin-23, inhibiting this key cytokine and its role in psoriatic inflammation. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of risankizumab compared with placebo or ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Methods UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2 were replicate phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active comparator-controlled trials done at 139 sites in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Japan, Mexico, Poland, Portugal, South Korea, Spain, and the USA. Eligible patients were 18 years or older, with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. In each study, patients were stratified by weight and previous exposure to tumour necrosis factor inhibitor and randomly assigned (3:1:1) by use of interactive response technology to receive 150 mg risankizumab, 45 mg or 90 mg ustekinumab (weight-based per label), or placebo. Following the 16-week double-blind treatment period (part A), patients initially assigned to placebo switched to 150 mg risankizumab at week 16; other patients continued their originally randomised treatment (part B, double-blind, weeks 16–52). Study drug was administered subcutaneously at weeks 0 and 4 during part A and at weeks 16, 28, and 40 during part B. Co-primary endpoints were proportions of patients achieving a 90% improvement in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI 90) and a static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) score of 0 or 1 at week 16 (non-responder imputation). All efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT02684370 (UltIMMa-1) and NCT02684357 (UltIMMa-2), and have been completed. Findings Between Feb 24, 2016, and Aug 31, 2016, 506 patients in UltIMMa-1 were randomly assigned to receive 150 mg risankizumab (n=304), 45 mg or 90 mg ustekinumab (n=100), or placebo (n=102). Between March 1, 2016, and Aug 30, 2016, 491 patients in UltIMMa-2 were randomly assigned to receive 150 mg risankizumab (n=294), 45 mg or 90 mg ustekinumab (n=99), or placebo (n=98). Co-primary endpoints were met for both studies. At week 16 of UltIMMa-1, PASI 90 was achieved by 229 (75·3%) patients receiving risankizumab versus five (4·9%) receiving placebo (placebo-adjusted difference 70·3% [95% CI 64·0–76·7]) and 42 (42·0%) receiving ustekinumab (ustekinumab-adjusted difference 33·5% [22·7–44·3]; p<0·0001 vs placebo and ustekinumab). At week 16 of UltIMMa-2, PASI 90 was achieved by 220 (74·8%) patients receiving risankizumab versus two (2·0%) receiving placebo (placebo-adjusted difference 72·5% [95% CI 66·8–78·2]) and 47 (47·5%) receiving ustekinumab (ustekinumab-adjusted difference 27·6% [16·7–38·5]; p<0·0001 vs placebo and ustekinumab). In UltIMMa-1, sPGA 0 or 1 at week 16 was achieved by 267 (87·8%) patients receiving risankizumab versus eight (7·8%) receiving placebo (placebo-adjusted difference 79·9% [95% CI 73·5–86·3]) and 63 (63·0%) receiving ustekinumab (ustekinumab-adjusted difference 25·1% [15·2–35·0]; p<0·0001 vs placebo and ustekinumab). In UltIMMa-2, 246 (83·7%) patients receiving risankizumab versus five (5·1%) receiving placebo (placebo-adjusted difference 78·5% [95% CI 72·4–84·5]) and 61 (61·6%) receiving ustekinumab achieved sPGA 0 or 1 at week 16 (ustekinumab-adjusted difference 22·3% [12·0–32·5]; p<0·0001 vs placebo and ustekinumab). The frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events in UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2 was similar across risankizumab (part A: 151 [49·7%] of 304 and 134 [45·6%] of 294; part B: 182 [61·3%] of 297 and 162 [55·7%] of 291), placebo (part A: 52 [51·0%] of 102 and 45 [45·9%] of 98), ustekinumab (part A: 50 [50·0%] of 100 and 53 [53·5%] of 99; part B: 66 [66·7%] of 99 and 70 [74·5%] of 94), and placebo to risankizumab (part B: 65 [67·0%] of 97 and 61 [64·9%] of 94) treatment groups throughout the study duration. Interpretation Risankizumab showed superior efficacy to both placebo and ustekinumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Treatment-emergent adverse event profiles were similar across treatment groups and there were no unexpected safety findings. Funding AbbVie and Boehringer Ingelheim.

Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated, inflammatory disease that is pathogenically driven by proinflammatory cytokines. This article reviews the immunologic role of interleukin (IL)-17, the major effector cytokine in the pathogenesis of psoriatic disease, along with the rationale for targeting the IL-17 cytokine family (IL-17A, IL-17F, and IL-17 receptor A) in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Emerging evidence indicates that major sources of IL-17A in patients with psoriatic disease are mast cells, γδ T cells, αβ T cells, and innate lymphoid cells in lesional skin and synovial fluid. Within the skin and joints, IL-17A acts on cellular targets, including keratinocytes, neutrophils, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, osteoclasts, chondrocytes, and osteoblasts, to stimulate production of various antimicrobial peptides, chemokines, and proinflammatory and proliferative cytokines, which, in turn, promote tissue inflammation and bone remodeling. The critical importance of the IL-23/IL-17A axis to the pathogenesis of psoriatic disease has resulted in many new biologic treatments targeting these cytokines. These biologics dramatically improve skin and joint symptoms in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.

T helper (Th) 17 cells have recently been implicated in psoriasis pathogenesis, but mechanisms of how these cells traffic into inflamed skin are unknown. By immunostaining for interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-22, we show numerous cells present in psoriasis lesions that produce these cytokines. We next found that Th17 cytokines (IL-17A, IL-22, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α) markedly increased the expression of CC chemokine ligand (CCL) 20, a CC chemokine receptor (CCR)6 ligand, in human keratinocyte monolayer and raft cultures in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Lastly, we showed in mice that subcutaneous injection with recombinant IL-17A, IL-22, or TNF-α led to the upregulation of both CCL20 and CCR6 expression in skin as well as cutaneous T-cell infiltration. Taken together, these data show that Th17 cytokines stimulate CCL20 production in vitro and in vivo, and thus provide a potential explanation of how CCR6-positive Th17 cells maintain their continual presence in psoriasis through a positive chemotactic feedback loop. T helper (Th) 17 cells have recently been implicated in psoriasis pathogenesis, but mechanisms of how these cells traffic into inflamed skin are unknown. By immunostaining for interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-22, we show numerous cells present in psoriasis lesions that produce these cytokines. We next found that Th17 cytokines (IL-17A, IL-22, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α) markedly increased the expression of CC chemokine ligand (CCL) 20, a CC chemokine receptor (CCR)6 ligand, in human keratinocyte monolayer and raft cultures in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Lastly, we showed in mice that subcutaneous injection with recombinant IL-17A, IL-22, or TNF-α led to the upregulation of both CCL20 and CCR6 expression in skin as well as cutaneous T-cell infiltration. Taken together, these data show that Th17 cytokines stimulate CCL20 production in vitro and in vivo, and thus provide a potential explanation of how CCR6-positive Th17 cells maintain their continual presence in psoriasis through a positive chemotactic feedback loop. basal KC medium CC chemokine ligand CC chemokine receptor human keratinocyte growth supplement interferon immunohistochemistry interleukin human keratinocytes reconstructed human epidermis T helper tumor necrosis factor

Tildrakizumab is a high-affinity, humanised, IgG1 κ antibody targeting interleukin 23 p19 that represents an evolving treatment strategy in chronic plaque psoriasis. Previous research suggested clinical improvement with inhibition of interleukin 23 p19. We did two phase 3 trials to investigate whether tildrakizumab is superior to placebo and etanercept in the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis.We did two three-part, parallel group, double-blind, randomised controlled studies, reSURFACE 1 (at 118 sites in Australia, Canada, Japan, the UK, and the USA) and reSURFACE 2 (at 132 sites in Europe, Israel, and the USA). Participants aged 18 years or older with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis (body surface area involvement ≥10%, Physician's Global Assessment [PGA] score ≥3, and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] score ≥12) were randomised (via interactive voice and web response system) to tildrakizumab 200 mg, tildrakizumab 100 mg, or placebo in reSURFACE 1 (2:2:1), or to tildrakizumab 200 mg, tildrakizumab 100 mg, placebo, or etanercept 50 mg (2:2:1:2). Randomisation was done by region and stratified for bodyweight (≤90 kg or >90 kg) and previous exposure to biologics therapy for psoriasis. Investigators, participants, and study personnel were blinded to group allocation and remained blinded until completion of the studies. Assigned medication was identical in appearance and packaging. Tildrakizumab was administered subcutaneously at weeks 0 and 4 during part 1 and at week 16 during part 2 (weeks 12 and 16 for participants re-randomised from placebo to tildrakizumab; etanercept was given twice weekly in part 1 of reSURFACE 2 and once weekly during part 2). The co-primary endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving PASI 75 and PGA response (score of 0 or 1 with ≥2 grade score reduction from baseline) at week 12. Safety was assessed in the all-participants-as-treated population, and efficacy in the full-analysis set. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT01722331 (reSURFACE 1) and NCT01729754 (reSURFACE 2). These studies are completed, but extension studies are ongoing.reSURFACE 1 ran from Dec 10, 2012, to Oct 28, 2015. reSURFACE 2 ran from Feb 12, 2013, to Sept 28, 2015. In reSURFACE 1, 772 patients were randomly assigned, 308 to tildrakizumab 200 mg, 309 to tildrakizumab 100 mg, and 155 to placebo. At week 12, 192 patients (62%) in the 200 mg group and 197 patients (64%) in the 100 mg group achieved PASI 75, compared with 9 patients (6%) in the placebo group (p<0·0001 for comparisons of both tildrakizumab groups vs placebo). 182 patients (59%) in the 200 mg group and 179 patients (58%) in the 100 mg group achieved PGA responses, compared with 11 patients (7%) in the placebo group (p<0·0001 for comparisons of both tildrakizumab groups vs placebo). In reSURFACE 2, 1090 patients were randomly assigned, 314 to tildrakizumab 200 mg, 307 to tildrakizumab 100 mg, 156 to placebo, and 313 to etanercept. At week 12, 206 patients (66%) in the 200 mg group, and 188 patients (61%) in the 100 mg group achieved PASI 75, compared with 9 patients (6%) in the placebo group and 151 patients (48%) in the etanercept group (p<0·0001 for comparisons of both tildrakizumab groups vs placebo; p<0·0001 for 200 mg vs etanercept and p=0·0010 for 100 mg vs etanercept). 186 patients (59%) in the 200 mg group, and 168 patients (59%) [corrected] in the 100 mg group achieved a PGA response, compared with 7 patients (4%) in the placebo group and 149 patients (48%) in the etanercept group (p<0·0001 for comparisons of both tildrakizumab groups vs placebo; p=0·0031 for 200 mg vs etanercept and p=0·0663 for 100 mg vs etanercept). Serious adverse events were similar and low in all groups in both trials. One patient died in reSURFACE 2, in the tildrakizumab 100 mg group; the patient had alcoholic cardiomyopathy and steatohepatitis, and adjudication was unable to determine the cause of death.In two phase 3 trials, tildrakizumab 200 mg and 100 mg were efficacious compared with placebo and etanercept and were well tolerated in the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis.Merck & Co.

Interleukin-23 is thought to be critical to the pathogenesis of psoriasis. We compared risankizumab (BI 655066), a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that inhibits interleukin-23 by specifically targeting the p19 subunit and thus prevents interleukin-23 signaling, and ustekinumab, an interleukin-12 and interleukin-23 inhibitor, in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

The interleukin‐17 cytokine family plays a central role in psoriasis pathogenesis. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of brodalumab, a human anti‐interleukin‐17 receptor antibody, in treating patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis. In this phase III, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study (NCT01708590; AMAGINE‐1), adult patients in the U.S.A., Canada and Europe were randomized to brodalumab (140 or 210 mg) or placebo every 2 weeks (Q2W), with an additional dose at week 1, for a 12‐week induction phase. At week 12, patients receiving brodalumab who achieved static Physician's Global Assessment 0 or 1 (sPGA success) were rerandomized to the placebo or induction dose. After week 16, patients with sPGA ≥ 3 were re‐treated with the induction dose. After ≥ 12 weeks of retreatment, patients with sPGA 2 for ≥ 4 weeks or sPGA ≥ 3 were rescued with brodalumab 210 mg Q2W. At week 12, patients randomized to brodalumab with sPGA ≥ 2 or placebo received brodalumab 210 mg Q2W. Coprimary end points were the percentage of patients with ≥ 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI 75) and sPGA success at week 12. There were 661 patients randomized: 220 placebo, 219 brodalumab 140 mg and 222 brodalumab 210 mg. At week 12, 60% (140 mg) and 83% (210 mg) vs. 3% (placebo) achieved PASI 75, and 54% (140 mg) and 76% (210 mg) vs. 1% (placebo) achieved sPGA success. The safety profile was considered acceptable. Brodalumab therapy resulted in significant clinical benefit and an acceptable safety profile in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis.

Topical agents, such as microbicides, that can protect against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission are urgently needed. Using a chimeric simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV SF162), which is tropic for the chemokine receptor CCR5, we report that topical application of high doses of PSC-RANTES, an amino terminus-modified analog of the chemokine RANTES, provided potent protection against vaginal challenge in rhesus macaques. These experimental findings have potentially important implications for understanding vaginal transmission of HIV and the design of strategies for its prevention.

T helper (Th) 17 cells, a novel T-cell subset, have been implicated in the pathogenesis of psoriasis and other autoimmune inflammatory diseases. Interleukin (IL)-23 stimulates survival and proliferation of Th17 cells, and thus serves as a key master cytokine regulator for these diseases. In psoriasis, IL-23 is overproduced by dendritic cells and keratinocytes, and this cytokine stimulates Th17 cells within dermis to make IL-17A and IL-22. IL-22, in particular, drives keratinocyte hyperproliferation in psoriasis. Future targeting of these key cytokines is likely to lead to dramatic clinical improvement in patients with psoriasis. This review focuses on the numerous recent studies on the roles of IL-23 and Th17 cells in the pathogenesis of psoriasis.

<h3>Importance</h3> Adolescents with atopic dermatitis (AD) have high disease burden negatively affecting quality of life, with limited treatment options. The efficacy and safety of dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody, approved for treatment in adolescent patients with inadequately controlled AD, remain unknown in this patient population. <h3>Objective</h3> To assess the efficacy and safety of dupilumab monotherapy in adolescents with moderate to severe inadequately controlled AD. <h3>Design, Setting, and Participants</h3> A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 clinical trial was conducted at 45 US and Canadian centers between March 21, 2017, and June 5, 2018. A total of 251 adolescents with moderate to severe AD inadequately controlled by topical medications or for whom topical therapy was inadvisable were included. <h3>Interventions</h3> Patients were randomized (1:1:1; interactive-response system; stratified by severity and body weight) to 16-week treatment with dupilumab, 200 mg (n = 43; baseline weight &lt;60 kg), or dupilumab, 300 mg (n = 39; baseline weight ≥60 kg), every 2 weeks; dupilumab, 300 mg, every 4 weeks (n = 84); or placebo (n = 85). <h3>Main Outcomes and Measures</h3> Proportion of patients with 75% or more improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) (scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating greater severity) and Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) 0 or 1 on a 5-point scale (scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater severity) at week 16. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 251 patients were randomized (mean [SD] age, 14.5 [1.7] years; 148 [59.0%] male). Of 250 patients with data available on concurrent allergic conditions, most had comorbid type 2 diseases (asthma, 134 [53.6%]; food allergies, 60.8%; allergic rhinitis, 65.6%). A total of 240 patients (95.6%) completed the study. Dupilumab achieved both coprimary end points at week 16. The proportion of patients with EASI-75 improvement from baseline increased (every 2 weeks, 41.5%; every 4 weeks, 38.1%; placebo, 8.2%) with differences vs placebo of 33.2% (95% CI, 21.1%-45.4%) for every 2 weeks and 29.9% (95% CI, 17.9%-41.8%) for every 4 weeks (<i>P</i> &lt; .001). Efficacy of the every-2-week regimen was generally superior to the every-4-week regimen. Patients in the dupilumab arms had higher percentage values of conjunctivitis (every 2 weeks, 9.8%; every 4 weeks, 10.8%; placebo, 4.7%) and injection-site reactions (every 2 weeks, 8.5%; every 4 weeks, 6.0%; placebo, 3.5%), and lower nonherpetic skin infections (every 2 weeks, 9.8%; every 4 weeks, 9.6%; placebo, 18.8%). <h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3> In this study, dupilumab significantly improved AD signs, symptoms, and quality of life in adolescents with moderate to severe AD, with an acceptable safety profile. Placebo-corrected efficacy and safety of dupilumab were similar in adolescents and adults. <h3>Trial Registration</h3> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT03054428

Background Tralokinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, specifically neutralizes interleukin-13, a key cytokine driving peripheral inflammation in atopic dermatitis (AD). In phase II studies, tralokinumab combined with topical corticosteroids provided early and sustained improvements in AD signs and symptoms. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tralokinumab monotherapy in adults with moderate-to-severe AD who had an inadequate response to topical treatments. Methods In two 52-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trials, ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2, adults with moderate-to-severe AD were randomized (3 : 1) to subcutaneous tralokinumab 300 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) or placebo. Primary endpoints were Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 at week 16 and ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75) at week 16. Patients achieving an IGA score of 0 or 1 and/or EASI 75 with tralokinumab at week 16 were rerandomized to tralokinumab Q2W or every 4 weeks or placebo, for 36 weeks. The trials were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03131648 and NCT03160885. Results At week 16, more patients who received tralokinumab vs. placebo achieved an IGA score of 0 or 1: 15·8% vs. 7·1% in ECZTRA 1 [difference 8·6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4·1–13·1; P = 0·002] and 22·2% vs. 10·9% in ECZTRA 2 (11·1%, 95% CI 5·8–16·4; P < 0·001) and EASI 75: 25·0% vs. 12·7% (12·1%, 95% CI 6·5–17·7; P < 0·001) and 33·2% vs. 11·4% (21·6%, 95% CI 15·8–27·3; P < 0·001). Early improvements in pruritus, sleep interference, Dermatology Life Quality Index, SCORing Atopic Dermatitis and Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure were observed from the first postbaseline measurements. The majority of week 16 tralokinumab responders maintained response at week 52 with continued tralokinumab treatment without any rescue medication (including topical corticosteroids). Adverse events were reported in 76·4% and 61·5% of patients receiving tralokinumab in ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2, respectively, and in 77·0% and 66·0% of patients receiving placebo in ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2, respectively, in the 16-week initial period. Conclusions Tralokinumab monotherapy was superior to placebo at 16 weeks of treatment and was well tolerated up to 52 weeks of treatment.

Dupilumab blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin (IL)‐4 and IL‐13. It is approved in the U.S.A. for patients aged ≥ 12 years with moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis (AD) uncontrolled by topical prescription medicines or who cannot use topical medicines, for patients in Japan whose AD is uncontrolled with existing therapies, for patients with moderate‐to‐severe AD in Europe who are candidates for systemic therapy and for patients aged ≥ 12 years for maintenance treatment of moderate‐to‐severe asthma uncontrolled with their current medicines. AD trials have reported increased incidence of conjunctivitis for dupilumab vs. placebo. To characterize further the occurrence and risk factors of conjunctivitis in dupilumab clinical trials. We evaluated randomized placebo‐controlled trials of dupilumab in AD (n = 2629), asthma (n = 2876), chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) (n = 60) and eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) (n = 47). In most AD trials, dupilumab‐treated patients had higher conjunctivitis incidence than placebo controls. Higher baseline AD severity and previous history of conjunctivitis were associated with increased conjunctivitis incidence. Conjunctivitis was mostly mild to moderate. Most cases recovered or resolved during the treatment period; two patients permanently discontinued dupilumab due to conjunctivitis or keratitis. Common treatments included ophthalmic corticosteroids, antibiotics, and antihistamines or mast cell stabilizers. Most cases were diagnosed by the investigators. In asthma and CRSwNP trials, the incidence of conjunctivitis was lower for both dupilumab and placebo than in AD trials; dupilumab did not increase the incidence compared with placebo. In the EoE trial, no patients had conjunctivitis. Conjunctivitis was more frequent with dupilumab treatment in most AD trials. In dupilumab trials in other type 2 diseases, incidence of conjunctivitis was overall very low, and was similar for dupilumab and placebo. In AD, the incidence of conjunctivitis was associated with AD severity and prior history of conjunctivitis. The aetiology and treatment of conjunctivitis in dupilumab‐treated patients require further study. What's already known about this topic? Ocular disorders, including allergic conjunctivitis, are common in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). In most dupilumab AD trials, dupilumab‐treated patients had higher conjunctivitis incidence than those receiving placebo. Most cases were mild to moderate and recovered or were recovering during study treatment; study treatment discontinuation due to conjunctivitis was rare. Conjunctivitis incidence was very low and similar for dupilumab and placebo in clinical trials in asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and eosinophilic oesophagitis. What does this study add? This analysis confirms and extends the results of the individual clinical trials. Baseline disease‐related factors, including AD severity, prior conjunctivitis history and certain biomarkers (thymus and activation‐regulated chemokine, IgE, eosinophils), were associated with increased incidence of conjunctivitis. Patients who responded well to dupilumab had reduced incidence of conjunctivitis. Further study is needed to elucidate the aetiology and treatment of conjunctivitis in dupilumab‐treated patients with AD.

Journal Article Secukinumab administration by pre‐filled syringe: efficacy, safety and usability results from a randomized controlled trial in psoriasis (FEATURE) Get access A. Blauvelt, A. Blauvelt Oregon Medical Research Center 9495 SW Locust Street, Suite G Portland OR 97223 U.S.A Correspondence Andrew Blauvelt. E‐mail: ablauvelt@oregonmedicalresearch.com Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar J.C. Prinz, J.C. Prinz Department of Dermatology and Allergology Ludwig‐Maximilians‐University Munich Germany Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar A.B. Gottlieb, A.B. Gottlieb Tufts Medical Center Boston MA U.S.A Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar K. Kingo, K. Kingo Department of Dermatology and Venereology University of Tartu Tartu Estonia Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar H. Sofen, H. Sofen Department of Medicine/Dermatology UCLA School of Medicine Los Angeles CA U.S.A Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar M. Ruer‐Mulard, M. Ruer‐Mulard Le Bâteau Blanc‐Imm. A Centre Médical Martigues Bouches‐du‐Rhône France Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar V. Singh, V. Singh Novartis Healthcare Private Limited Hyderabad India Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar R. Pathan, R. Pathan Novartis Healthcare Private Limited Hyderabad India Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar C. Papavassilis, C. Papavassilis Novartis Pharma AG Basel Switzerland Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar S. Cooper, S. Cooper Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation East Hanover NJ U.S.A Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar ... Show more for the FEATURE Study Group for the FEATURE Study Group Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar British Journal of Dermatology, Volume 172, Issue 2, 1 February 2015, Pages 484–493, https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.13348 Published: 01 February 2015

Upadacitinib is an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor with greater inhibitory potency for JAK1 than JAK2, JAK3, and tyrosine kinase 2. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib compared with placebo for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2 were replicate multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials; Measure Up 1 was done at 151 clinical centres in 24 countries across Europe, North and South America, Oceania, and the Asia-Pacific region; and Measure Up 2 was done at 154 clinical centres in 23 countries across Europe, North America, Oceania, and the Asia-Pacific region. Eligible patients were adolescents (aged 12-17 years) and adults (aged 18-75 years) with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (≥10% of body surface area affected by atopic dermatitis, Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI] score of ≥16, validated Investigator's Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis [vIGA-AD] score of ≥3, and Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale score of ≥4). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) using an interactive response technology system to receive upadacitinib 15 mg, upadacitinib 30 mg, or placebo once daily for 16 weeks, stratified by baseline disease severity, geographical region, and age. Coprimary endpoints were the proportion of patients who had achieved at least a 75% improvement in EASI score from baseline (EASI-75) and the proportion of patients who had achieved a vIGA-AD response (defined as a vIGA-AD score of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear] with ≥2 grades of reduction from baseline) at week 16. Efficacy was analysed in the intention-to-treat population and safety was analysed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03569293 (Measure Up 1) and NCT03607422 (Measure Up 2), and are both active but not recruiting.Between Aug 13, 2018, and Dec 23, 2019, 847 patients were randomly assigned to upadacitinib 15 mg (n=281), upadacitinib 30 mg (n=285), or placebo (n=281) in the Measure Up 1 study. Between July 27, 2018, and Jan 17, 2020, 836 patients were randomly assigned to upadacitinib 15 mg (n=276), upadacitinib 30 mg (n=282), or placebo (n=278) in the Measure Up 2 study. At week 16, the coprimary endpoints were met in both studies (all p<0·0001). The proportion of patients who had achieved EASI-75 at week 16 was significantly higher in the upadacitinib 15 mg (196 [70%] of 281 patients) and upadacitinib 30 mg (227 [80%] of 285 patients) groups than the placebo group (46 [16%] of 281 patients) in Measure Up 1 (adjusted difference in EASI-75 response rate vs placebo, 53·3% [95% CI 46·4-60·2] for the upadacitinib 15 mg group; 63·4% [57·1-69·8] for the upadacitinib 30 mg group) and Measure Up 2 (166 [60%] of 276 patients in the upadacitinib 15 mg group and 206 [73%] of 282 patients in the upadacitinib 30 mg group vs 37 [13%] of 278 patients in the placebo group; adjusted difference in EASI-75 response rate vs placebo, 46·9% [39·9-53·9] for the upadacitinib 15 mg group; 59·6% [53·1-66·2] for the upadacitinib 30 mg group). The proportion of patients who achieved a vIGA-AD response at week 16 was significantly higher in the upadacitinib 15 mg (135 [48%] patients) and upadacitinib 30 mg (177 [62%] patients) groups than the placebo group (24 [8%] patients) in Measure Up 1 (adjusted difference in vIGA-AD response rate vs placebo, 39·8% [33·2-46·4] for the upadacitinib 15 mg group; 53·6% [47·2-60·0] for the upadacitinib 30 mg group) and Measure Up 2 (107 [39%] patients in the upadacitinib 15 mg group and 147 [52%] patients in the upadacitinib 30 mg group vs 13 [5%] patients in the placebo group; adjusted difference in vIGA-AD response rate vs placebo, 34·0% [27·8-40·2] for the upadacitinib 15 mg group; 47·4% [41·0-53·7] for the upadacitinib 30 mg group). Both upadacitinib doses were well tolerated. The incidence of serious adverse events and adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation were similar among groups. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events were acne (19 [7%] of 281 patients in the upadacitinib 15 mg group, 49 [17%] of 285 patients in the upadacitinib 30 mg group, and six [2%] of 281 patients in the placebo group in Measure Up 1; 35 [13%] of 276 patients in the upadacitinib 15 mg group, 41 [15%] of 282 patients in the upadacitinib 30 mg group, and six [2%] of 278 patients in the placebo group in Measure Up 2), upper respiratory tract infection (25 [9%] patients, 38 [13%] patients, and 20 [7%] patients; 19 [7%] patients, 17 [16%] patients, and 12 [4%] patients), nasopharyngitis (22 [8%] patients, 33 [12%] patients, and 16 [6%] patients; 16 [6%] patients, 18 [6%] patients, and 13 [5%] patients), headache (14 [5%] patients, 19 [7%] patients, and 12 [4%] patients; 18 [7%] patients, 20 [7%] patients, and 11 [4%] patients), elevation in creatine phosphokinase levels (16 [6%] patients, 16 [6%] patients, and seven [3%] patients; nine [3%] patients, 12 [4%] patients, and five [2%] patients), and atopic dermatitis (nine [3%] patients, four [1%] patients, and 26 [9%] patients; eight [3%] patients, four [1%] patients, and 26 [9%] patients).Monotherapy with upadacitinib might be an effective treatment option and had a positive benefit-risk profile in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.AbbVie.

Secukinumab, a fully human anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.We reviewed safety data from the secukinumab psoriasis phase II/III program.Data were pooled from 10 phase II/III secukinumab psoriasis studies.Analysis included 3993 subjects; 3430 received secukinumab, representing 2725 subject-years (SYs) of exposure. Over 52 weeks, for secukinumab 300 mg, 150 mg, and etanercept, respectively, exposure-adjusted incidence rates (IRs) per 100 SYs were comparable across treatments for total adverse events (AEs; 236.1, 239.9, and 243.4, respectively); infections (91.1, 85.3, and 93.7, respectively); serious AEs (7.4, 6.8, and 7.0, respectively); serious infections (1.4, 1.1, and 1.4, respectively); malignant or unspecified tumors (0.77, 0.97, and 0.68, respectively); and adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events (0.42, 0.35, and 0.34, respectively). AEs were not dose-related except for nonserious, mild/moderate, skin/mucosal candidiasis (IRs 3.55, 1.85, and 1.37 for secukinumab 300 mg, 150 mg, and etanercept, respectively).There was a limited number of patients in comparator groups and the exposure to placebo was short.Secukinumab had a favorable safety profile, had no meaningful difference between the 300- and 150-mg doses and, in terms of safety, was comparable to etanercept over 52 weeks in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Antibodies targeting interleukin (IL)-23 and IL-17A effectively treat moderate-to-severe psoriasis. ECLIPSE is the first comparator study of an IL-23p19 inhibitor, guselkumab, versus an IL-17A inhibitor, secukinumab. The primary objective of this study was to show superiority of clinical response at week 48 for guselkumab versus secukinumab.In this phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, comparator-controlled trial at 142 outpatient clinical sites in nine countries (Australia, Canada, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Spain, and the USA), eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis, and were candidates for phototherapy or systemic therapy. Eligible patients were randomly assigned with permuted block randomisation using an interactive web response system to receive either guselkumab (100 mg at weeks 0 and 4 then every 8 weeks) or secukinumab (300 mg at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, and then every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint, the proportion of patients in the intention-to-treat population who achieved 90% reduction or more from baseline of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90 response) at week 48, and major secondary endpoints (the proportions of patients in the guselkumab group and in the secukinumab group who achieved a PASI 75 response at both weeks 12 and 48, a PASI 90 response at week 12, a PASI 75 response at week 12, a PASI 100 response at week 48, an Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] score of 0 [cleared] at week 48, and an IGA score of 0 or 1 [minimal] at week 48) were to be tested in a fixed sequence to control type I error rate. Safety was evaluated in patients who received one or more doses of study drug from week 0 to 56. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03090100.This study was done between April 27, 2017, and Sept 20, 2018. 1048 eligible patients were enrolled and, of these, 534 were assigned to receive guselkumab and 514 to receive secukinumab. The proportion of patients with a PASI 90 response at week 48 was greater in the guselkumab group (451 [84%]) than in the secukinumab group (360 [70%]; p<0·0001). Although non-inferiority (margin of 10 percentage points) was established for the first major secondary endpoint (452 [85%] of patients in the guselkumab group vs 412 [80%] of patients in the secukinumab group achieving a PASI 75 response at both weeks 12 and 48), superiority was not established (p=0·0616). Consequently, formal statistical testing was not done for subsequent major secondary endpoints. Proportions of patients with adverse events, infections, and serious adverse events were similar between the two treatments and, in general, safety findings were consistent with registrational trial observations.Guselkumab showed superior long-term efficacy based on PASI 90 at week 48 when compared with secukinumab for treating moderate-to-severe psoriasis. This finding could assist health-care providers in their decision making process when selecting a biologic for treating moderate-to-severe psoriasis.This study was funded by Janssen Research & Development.

Secukinumab demonstrated superior efficacy to ustekinumab at week 4 and week 16 of the CLEAR study, with comparable safety, in subjects with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.To compare the efficacy and safety of secukinumab and ustekinumab use over 52 weeks.Analysis of 52-week data from CLEAR, a randomized, double-blind, phase 3b study.Among 676 randomized subjects, secukinumab demonstrated superiority to ustekinumab at week 52 in the proportion of subjects with ≥90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) (76% vs 61% [P < .0001]); PASI 100 responses were 46% versus 36% (P = .0103) and Investigator's Global Assessment responses of clear/almost clear skin were 80% versus 65% (P < .0001). Subjects on secukinumab reported greater reductions in psoriasis-related pain, itching, and scaling, and greater improvement across all quality-of-life measures evaluated (Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI], EuroQoL 5-Dimension Health Questionnaire, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Psoriasis, and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index). At week 52, 72% of subjects on secukinumab versus 59% on ustekinumab (P = .0008) reported no impact of skin disease on their lives (DLQI 0/1 response). Safety and tolerability was comparable.There was no placebo arm.In this head-to-head, double-blind study, secukinumab demonstrated sustained superior efficacy in comparison with ustekinumab in clearing skin through week 52, greater improvement in quality of life, and a favorable and comparable safety profile.

<h3>Importance</h3> Interleukin 13 (IL-13) is a central pathogenic mediator driving multiple features of atopic dermatitis (AD) pathophysiology. <h3>Objective</h3> To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab, a novel, high-affinity, monoclonal antibody targeting IL-13 that selectively prevents formation of the IL-13Rα1/IL-4Rα heterodimer receptor signaling complex, in adults with moderate to severe AD. <h3>Design, Setting, and Participants</h3> A phase 2b, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging randomized clinical trial of lebrikizumab injections every 4 weeks or every 2 weeks was conducted from January 23, 2018, to May 23, 2019, at 57 US centers. Participants were adults 18 years or older with moderate to severe AD. <h3>Interventions</h3> Patients were randomized 2:3:3:3 to placebo every 2 weeks or to subcutaneous injections of lebrikizumab at the following doses: 125 mg every 4 weeks (250-mg loading dose [LD]), 250 mg every 4 weeks (500-mg LD), or 250 mg every 2 weeks (500-mg LD at baseline and week 2). <h3>Main Outcomes and Measures</h3> The primary end point was percentage change in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) (baseline to week 16). Secondary end points for week 16 included proportion of patients achieving Investigator’s Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (IGA 0/1); EASI improvement of at least 50%, 75%, or 90% from baseline; percentage change in the pruritus numeric rating scale (NRS) score; and pruritus NRS score improvement of at least 4 points. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 280 patients (mean [SD] age, 39.3 [17.5] years; 166 [59.3%] female) were randomized to placebo (n = 52) or to lebrikizumab at doses of 125 mg every 4 weeks (n = 73), 250 mg every 4 weeks (n = 80), or 250 mg every 2 weeks (n = 75). Compared with placebo (EASI least squares mean [SD] percentage change, −41.1% [56.5%]), lebrikizumab groups showed dose-dependent, statistically significant improvement in the primary end point vs placebo at week 16: 125 mg every 4 weeks (−62.3% [37.3%],<i>P</i> = .02), 250 mg every 4 weeks (−69.2% [38.3%],<i>P</i> = .002), and 250 mg every 2 weeks (−72.1% [37.2%],<i>P</i> &lt; .001). Differences vs placebo-treated patients (2 of 44 [4.5%]) in pruritus NRS improvement of at least 4 points were seen as early as day 2 in the high-dose lebrikizumab group (9 of 59 [15.3%]). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 24 of 52 placebo patients (46.2%) and in lebrikizumab patients as follows: 42 of 73 (57.5%) for 125 mg every 4 weeks, 39 of 80 (48.8%) for 250 mg every 4 weeks, and 46 of 75 (61.3%) for 250 mg every 2 weeks; most were mild to moderate and did not lead to discontinuation. Low rates of injection-site reactions (1 of 52 [1.9%] in the placebo group vs 13 of 228 [5.7%] in all lebrikizumab groups), herpesvirus infections (2 [3.8%] vs 8 [3.5%]), and conjunctivitis (0% vs 6 [2.6%]) were reported. <h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3> During 16 weeks of treatment, lebrikizumab provided rapid, dose-dependent efficacy across a broad range of clinical manifestations in adult patients with moderate to severe AD and demonstrated a favorable safety profile. These data support the central role of IL-13 in AD pathophysiology. If these findings replicate in phase 3 studies, lebrikizumab may meaningfully advance the standard of care for moderate to severe AD. <h3>Trial Registration</h3> ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT03443024

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, recurrent, inflammatory skin disease with an unmet need for treatments that provide rapid and high levels of skin clearance and itch improvement.To assess the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib vs dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe AD.Heads Up was a 24-week, head-to-head, phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, double-dummy, active-controlled clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib with dupilumab among 692 adults with moderate-to-severe AD who were candidates for systemic therapy. The study was conducted from February 21, 2019, to December 9, 2020, at 129 centers located in 22 countries across Europe, North and South America, Oceania, and the Asia-Pacific region. Efficacy analyses were conducted in the intent-to-treat population.Patients were randomized 1:1 and treated with oral upadacitinib, 30 mg once daily, or subcutaneous dupilumab, 300 mg every other week.The primary end point was achievement of 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) at week 16. Secondary end points were percentage change from baseline in the Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (weekly average), proportion of patients achieving EASI100 and EASI90 at week 16, percentage change from baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at week 4, proportion of patients achieving EASI75 at week 2, percentage change from baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS (weekly average) at week 1, and Worst Pruritus NRS (weekly average) improvement of 4 points or more at week 16. End points at week 24 included EASI75, EASI90, EASI100, and improvement of 4 points or more in Worst Pruritus NRS from baseline (weekly average). Safety was assessed as treatment-emergent adverse events in all patients receiving 1 or more dose of either drug.Of 924 patients screened, 348 (183 men [52.6%]; mean [SD] age, 36.6 [14.6] years) were randomized to receive upadacitinib and 344 were randomized to receive dupilumab (194 men [56.4%]; mean [SD] age, 36.9 [14.1] years); demographic and disease characteristics were balanced among treatment groups. At week 16, 247 patients receiving upadacitinib (71.0%) and 210 patients receiving dupilumab (61.1%) achieved EASI75 (P = .006). All ranked secondary end points also demonstrated the superiority of upadacitinib vs dupilumab, including improvement in Worst Pruritus NRS as early as week 1 (mean [SE], 31.4% [1.7%] vs 8.8% [1.8%]; P < .001), achievement of EASI75 as early as week 2 (152 [43.7%] vs 60 [17.4%]; P < .001), and achievement of EASI100 at week 16 (97 [27.9%] vs 26 [7.6%]; P < .001). Rates of serious infection, eczema herpeticum, herpes zoster, and laboratory-related adverse events were higher for patients who received upadacitinib, whereas rates of conjunctivitis and injection-site reactions were higher for patients who received dupilumab.During 16 weeks of treatment, upadacitinib demonstrated superior efficacy vs dupilumab in patients with moderate-to-severe AD, with no new safety signals.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03738397.

Secukinumab, a fully human immunoglobulin G1-kappa monoclonal antibody that directly inhibits interleukin (IL)-17A, has been shown to have robust efficacy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) demonstrating a rapid onset of action and sustained long-term clinical responses with a consistently favorable safety profile in multiple Phase 2 and 3 trials. Here, we report longer-term pooled safety and tolerability data for secukinumab across three indications (up to 5 years of treatment in PsO and PsA; up to 4 years in AS).The integrated clinical trial safety dataset included data pooled from 21 randomized controlled clinical trials of secukinumab 300 or 150 or 75 mg in PsO (14 Phase 3 trials and 1 Phase 4 trial), PsA (3 Phase 3 trials), and AS (3 Phase 3 trials), along with post-marketing safety surveillance data with a cut-off date of June 25, 2017. Adverse events (AEs) were reported as exposure-adjusted incident rates (EAIRs) per 100 patient-years. Analyses included all patients who received ≥ 1 dose of secukinumab.A total of 5181, 1380, and 794 patients from PsO, PsA, and AS clinical trials representing secukinumab exposures of 10,416.9, 3866.9, and 1943.1 patient-years, respectively, and post-marketing data from patients with a cumulative exposure to secukinumab of ~ 96,054 patient-years were included in the analysis. The most frequent AE was upper respiratory tract infection. EAIRs across PsO, PsA, and AS indications were generally low for serious infections (1.4, 1.9, and 1.2, respectively), Candida infections (2.2, 1.5, and 0.7, respectively), inflammatory bowel disease (0.01, 0.05, and 0.1, respectively), and major adverse cardiac events (0.3, 0.4, and 0.6, respectively). No cases of tuberculosis reactivation were reported. The incidence of treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies was low with secukinumab across all studies, with no discernible loss of efficacy, unexpected alterations in pharmacokinetics, or association with immunogenicity-related AEs.Secukinumab demonstrated a favorable safety profile over long-term treatment in patients with PsO, PsA, and AS. This comprehensive assessment demonstrated that the safety profile of secukinumab was consistent with previous reports in patients with PsO, PsA, and AS, supporting its long-term use in these chronic conditions.

Abstract IL-23 and Th17 cells producing IL-17A and IL-22 are found in excess in skin affected by psoriasis. Previous studies showed that IL-22, but not IL-17A, mediates psoriasis-like epidermal hyperplasia following recombinant murine (rm)IL-23 injections into skin. To further investigate the role of IL-17A, ears of mice were injected with rmIL-23. Investigators blinded to treatment conditions and mouse genotypes measured ear swelling, epidermal thickness, and cytokine expression. In wild-type (WT) mice, rmIL-23 induced ear swelling (p &amp;lt; 0.001, all p values versus saline), epidermal hyperplasia by histology (p &amp;lt; 0.001) and confocal microscopy (p &amp;lt; 0.004), and expression of both IL-17A and IL-22. As expected, rmIL-23 injections into IL-22−/− mice resulted in relatively little ear swelling (p &amp;lt; 0.09) and epidermal hyperplasia (p &amp;lt; 0.51 by histology and p &amp;lt; 0.75 by confocal microscopy). Notably, rmIL-23 injections into IL-17A−/− mice produced little ear swelling (p &amp;lt; 0.001, versus IL-23–injected WT mice) and epidermal hyperplasia (p &amp;lt; 0.001 by histology and p &amp;lt; 0.005 by confocal microscopy), even though IL-22 was readily induced in these mice. Furthermore, systemic delivery of blocking Abs directed against either IL-22 or IL-17A completely inhibited IL-23–induced epidermal hyperplasia in WT mice. These results demonstrate that IL-17A, like IL-22, is a downstream mediator for IL-23–induced changes in murine skin and that both of these Th17 cytokines are necessary to produce IL-23–mediated skin pathology. IL-17A may represent an attractive therapeutic target in individuals with psoriasis by blocking downstream effects of IL-23.

Bimekizumab is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits both interleukin-17A and interleukin-17F. The efficacy and safety of bimekizumab as compared with secukinumab, which selectively inhibits interleukin-17A alone, in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis have not been extensively examined.

To evaluate the possibility that switching from reference biologic medicines to biosimilars could lead to altered clinical outcomes, including enhanced immunogenicity, compromised safety, or diminished efficacy for patients, a systematic literature review was conducted of all switching studies between related biologics (including biosimilars). A systematic search was conducted using the Medline® and Embase® databases up to 30 June 2017 employing specific medical subject heading terms. Additionally, the snowball method and a hand search were also applied. Publications were considered if they contained efficacy or safety information related to a switch from a reference medicine to a biosimilar. Non-English, non-human studies, editorials, notes, and short surveys were excluded. Primary data were available from 90 studies that enrolled 14,225 unique individuals. They included protein medicines used in supportive care as well as those used as therapeutic agents. The medicines contained seven different molecular entities that were used to treat 14 diseases. The great majority of the publications did not report differences in immunogenicity, safety, or efficacy. The nature and intensity of safety signals reported after switching from reference medicines to biosimilars were the same as those already known from continued use of the reference medicines alone. Three large multiple switch studies with different biosimilars did not show differences in efficacy or safety after multiple switches between reference medicine and biosimilar. Two publications reported a loss of efficacy or increased dropout rates. While use of each biologic must be assessed individually, these results provide reassurance to healthcare professionals and the public that the risk of immunogenicity-related safety concerns or diminished efficacy is unchanged after switching from a reference biologic to a biosimilar medicine.

Significant unmet need exists for long-term treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD).To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of dupilumab in patients with AD.This ongoing, multicenter, open-label extension study (NCT01949311) evaluated long-term dupilumab treatment in adults who had previously participated in phase 1 through 3 clinical trials of dupilumab for AD. This analysis examined patients given 300 mg dupilumab weekly for up to 76 weeks at data cutoff (April 2016). Safety was the primary outcome; efficacy was also evaluated.Of 1491 enrolled patients (1042.9 patient-years), 92.9% were receiving treatment at cutoff. The safety profile was consistent with previously reported trials (420.4 adverse events/100 patient-years and 8.5 serious adverse events/100 patient-years), with no new safety signals; common adverse events included nasopharyngitis, conjunctivitis, and injection-site reactions. Sustained improvement was seen up to 76 weeks in all efficacy outcomes, including measures of skin inflammation, pruritus, and quality of life.Lack of control arm, limited number of patients with 76 weeks or longer of treatment (median follow-up, 24 weeks), and patients not receiving the approved dose regimen of 300 mg every 2 weeks.The safety and efficacy profile from this study supports the role of dupilumab as continuous long-term treatment for patients with moderate to severe AD.

BackgroundNeutralizing interleukin (IL) 17F in addition to IL-17A might provide a more complete and specific approach to inhibiting inflammation.ObjectiveAssess the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab, a monoclonal antibody that potently and selectively neutralizes IL-17A and IL-17F, in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.MethodsDouble-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 2b study (NCT02905006). Patients (randomized 1:1:1:1:1:1) received subcutaneous bimekizumab every 4 weeks at doses of 64 mg, 160 mg, 160 mg with 320 mg loading dose, 320 mg, 480 mg, or placebo. Primary endpoint was ≥90% reduction in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI90) at week 12.ResultsThere was a significant (P < .0001) dose-dependent response for PASI90 (week 12); more patients achieved PASI90 in the bimekizumab groups (46.2%-79.1%) than patients in the placebo group (0%; P < .0001 all doses). Across all doses, there were significant improvements from baseline for all secondary endpoints (PASI90 week 8, PASI75 week 12, PASI100 week 12, and Investigators Global Assessment clear or almost clear weeks 8 and 12; P ≤ .0003) compared with placebo. More bimekizumab-treated patients than placebo-treated patients achieved PASI100 (week 12) (27.9%-60.0% vs 0%; P ≤ .0002 all doses). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 126 of 208 (61%) bimekizumab-treated patients and 15 of 42 (36%) placebo-treated patients.LimitationsNo active comparator.ConclusionDual neutralization of IL-17A and IL-17F with bimekizumab provided rapid and substantial clinical improvements in patients with psoriasis, with no unexpected or dose-related safety findings. Neutralizing interleukin (IL) 17F in addition to IL-17A might provide a more complete and specific approach to inhibiting inflammation. Assess the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab, a monoclonal antibody that potently and selectively neutralizes IL-17A and IL-17F, in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 2b study (NCT02905006). Patients (randomized 1:1:1:1:1:1) received subcutaneous bimekizumab every 4 weeks at doses of 64 mg, 160 mg, 160 mg with 320 mg loading dose, 320 mg, 480 mg, or placebo. Primary endpoint was ≥90% reduction in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI90) at week 12. There was a significant (P < .0001) dose-dependent response for PASI90 (week 12); more patients achieved PASI90 in the bimekizumab groups (46.2%-79.1%) than patients in the placebo group (0%; P < .0001 all doses). Across all doses, there were significant improvements from baseline for all secondary endpoints (PASI90 week 8, PASI75 week 12, PASI100 week 12, and Investigators Global Assessment clear or almost clear weeks 8 and 12; P ≤ .0003) compared with placebo. More bimekizumab-treated patients than placebo-treated patients achieved PASI100 (week 12) (27.9%-60.0% vs 0%; P ≤ .0002 all doses). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 126 of 208 (61%) bimekizumab-treated patients and 15 of 42 (36%) placebo-treated patients. No active comparator. Dual neutralization of IL-17A and IL-17F with bimekizumab provided rapid and substantial clinical improvements in patients with psoriasis, with no unexpected or dose-related safety findings.

Background There is an unmet need for a treatment for psoriasis that results in complete skin clearance with a reliably quick response. Bimekizumab is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F in addition to IL-17A. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab with placebo and ustekinumab in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis over 52 weeks. Methods BE VIVID was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, active comparator and placebo controlled phase 3 trial done across 105 sites (clinics, hospitals, research units, and private practices) in 11 countries in Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America. Adults aged 18 years or older with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] score ≥12, ≥10% body surface area affected by psoriasis, and Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] score ≥3 on a five point scale) were included. Randomisation was stratified by geographical region and previous exposure to biologics; patients, investigators, and sponsors were masked to treatment assignment. Patients were randomly assigned (4:2:1) using an interactive response technology to bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks, ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg (baseline weight-dependent dosing) at weeks 0 and 4, then every 12 weeks, or placebo every 4 weeks. At week 16, patients receiving placebo switched to bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks. All study treatments were administered as two subcutaneous injections. Coprimary endpoints were the proportion of patients with 90% improvement in the PASI (PASI90) and the proportion of patients with an IGA response of clear or almost clear (score 0 or 1) at week 16 (non-responder imputation). Efficacy analyses included the intention-to-treat population; safety analysis included patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03370133 (completed). Findings Between Dec 6, 2017, and Dec 13, 2019, 735 patients were screened and 567 were enrolled and randomly assigned (bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks n=321, ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg every 12 weeks n=163, placebo n=83). At week 16, 273 (85%) of 321 patients in the bimekizumab group had PASI90 versus 81 (50%) of 163 in the ustekinumab group (risk difference 35 [95% CI 27–43]; p<0·0001) and four (5%) of 83 in the placebo group (risk difference 80 [74–86]; p<0·0001). At week 16, 270 (84%) patients in the bimekizumab group had an IGA response versus 87 (53%) in the ustekinumab group (risk difference 30 [95% CI 22–39]; p<0·0001) and four (5%) in the placebo group (risk difference 79 [73–85]; p<0·0001). Over 52 weeks, serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 24 (6%) of 395 patients in the bimekizumab group (including those who switched from placebo at week 16) and 13 (8%) of 163 in the ustekinumab group. Interpretation Bimekizumab was more efficacious than ustekinumab and placebo in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The bimekizumab safety profile was consistent with that observed in previous studies. Funding UCB Pharma.

Background Bimekizumab is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F in addition to IL-17A. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, the effects of treatment withdrawal, and two maintenance dosing schedules over 56 weeks. Methods BE READY was a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial done at 77 sites (hospitals, clinics, private doctor's practices, and dedicated clinical research centres) in nine countries across Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America. Adult patients aged 18 years or older with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were stratified by region and previous biologic exposure, and randomly assigned (4:1) to receive bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks or placebo every 4 weeks by use of interactive response technology. Coprimary endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving 90% or greater improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI90) and the proportion of patients achieving a score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) on the five-point Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) scale at week 16 (non-responder imputation). Bimekizumab-treated patients achieving PASI90 at week 16 were re-allocated (1:1:1) to receive bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks, every 8 weeks, or placebo for weeks 16–56. Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population; the safety analysis set comprised all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03410992), and is now completed. Findings Between Feb 5, 2018, and Jan 7, 2020, 435 patients were randomly assigned to receive either bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks (n=349) or placebo every 4 weeks (n=86). Coprimary endpoints were met: at week 16, 317 (91%) of 349 patients receiving bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks achieved PASI90, compared with one (1%) of 86 patients receiving placebo (risk difference 89·8 [95% CI 86·1–93·4]; p<0·0001); and 323 (93%) of 349 patients receiving bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks achieved an IGA score of 0 or 1 versus one (1%) of 86 patients receiving placebo (risk difference 91·5 [95% CI 88·0–94·9]; p<0·0001). Responses were maintained through to week 56 with bimekizumab 320 mg every 8 weeks and every 4 weeks. Treatment-emergent adverse events in the initial treatment period (up to week 16) were reported in 213 (61%) of 349 patients receiving bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks and 35 (41%) of 86 patients receiving placebo every 4 weeks. From week 16 to week 56, treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 78 (74%) of 106 patients receiving bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks, 77 (77%) of 100 patients receiving bimekizumab 320 mg every 8 weeks, and 72 (69%) of 105 patients receiving placebo. Interpretation Bimekizumab showed high levels of response, which were durable over 56 weeks, with both maintenance dosing schedules (every 4 weeks and every 8 weeks). Moreover, bimekizumab was well tolerated, with no unexpected safety findings. Data presented here further support the therapeutic value of bimekizumab and inhibition of IL-17F in addition to IL-17A for patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Funding UCB Pharma.

Certolizumab pegol, the only Fc-free, PEGylated anti-tumor necrosis factor biologic, demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements suggestive of a positive risk-benefit balance in phase 2 studies in adults with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis.Assess certolizumab efficacy and safety versus placebo in phase 3 studies.Patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis were randomized 2:2:1 to certolizumab 400 mg, certolizumab 200 mg, or placebo every 2 weeks. At week 16, certolizumab-treated patients achieving a 50% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index continued treatment through week 48. Coprimary endpoints were week 16 responder rates, defined as a 75% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and Physician's Global Assessment 0/1 (clear/almost clear) and ≥2-point improvement. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events.Week-16 endpoints were significantly greater for both doses of certolizumab versus placebo, and the responses were maintained through week 48. For most measures, improvement was numerically greater for certolizumab 400 mg. No unexpected safety signals were identified.There was no active comparator.Treatment with either certolizumab 400 mg or 200 mg every 2 weeks was associated with significant and clinically meaningful improvements in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. The 400-mg dose could provide additional clinical benefit. The safety profile was consistent with the therapeutic class.

Background Individuals with psoriasis are at increased risk for psychiatric comorbidities, including suicidal ideation and behavior (SIB). Objective To distinguish between the underlying risk and potential for treatment-induced psychiatric adverse events in patients with psoriasis being treated with brodalumab, a fully human anti–interleukin 17 receptor A monoclonal antibody. Methods Data were evaluated from a placebo-controlled, phase 2 clinical trial; the open-label, long-term extension of the phase 2 clinical trial; and three phase 3, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trials (AMAGINE-1, AMAGINE-2, and AMAGINE-3) and their open-label, long-term extensions of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Results The analysis included 4464 patients with 9161.8 patient-years of brodalumab exposure. The follow-up time–adjusted incidence rates of SIB events were comparable between the brodalumab and ustekinumab groups throughout the 52-week controlled phases (0.20 vs 0.60 per 100 patient-years). In the brodalumab group, 4 completed suicides were reported, 1 of which was later adjudicated as indeterminate; all patients had underlying psychiatric disorders or stressors. Limitations There was no comparator arm past week 52. Controlled study periods were not powered to detect differences in rare events such as suicide. Conclusions Comparison with controls and the timing of events do not indicate a causal relationship between SIB and brodalumab treatment. Individuals with psoriasis are at increased risk for psychiatric comorbidities, including suicidal ideation and behavior (SIB). To distinguish between the underlying risk and potential for treatment-induced psychiatric adverse events in patients with psoriasis being treated with brodalumab, a fully human anti–interleukin 17 receptor A monoclonal antibody. Data were evaluated from a placebo-controlled, phase 2 clinical trial; the open-label, long-term extension of the phase 2 clinical trial; and three phase 3, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trials (AMAGINE-1, AMAGINE-2, and AMAGINE-3) and their open-label, long-term extensions of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. The analysis included 4464 patients with 9161.8 patient-years of brodalumab exposure. The follow-up time–adjusted incidence rates of SIB events were comparable between the brodalumab and ustekinumab groups throughout the 52-week controlled phases (0.20 vs 0.60 per 100 patient-years). In the brodalumab group, 4 completed suicides were reported, 1 of which was later adjudicated as indeterminate; all patients had underlying psychiatric disorders or stressors. There was no comparator arm past week 52. Controlled study periods were not powered to detect differences in rare events such as suicide. Comparison with controls and the timing of events do not indicate a causal relationship between SIB and brodalumab treatment.

<h3>Importance</h3> Risankizumab selectively inhibits interleukin 23, a cytokine that contributes to psoriatic inflammation. <h3>Objective</h3> To evaluate the efficacy and safety of risankizumab vs placebo and continuous treatment vs withdrawal in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. <h3>Design, Setting, and Participants</h3> Multinational, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted from March 6, 2016, to July 26, 2018. A total of 507 eligible patients had stable moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis for 6 months or longer, body surface area involvement greater than or equal to 10%, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) greater than or equal to 12, and a static Physician’s Global Assessment (sPGA) score greater than or equal to 3. Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted. <h3>Interventions</h3> Patients were randomized (4:1, interactive response technology) to risankizumab, 150 mg, subcutaneously, or placebo at weeks 0 and 4 (part A1). All patients received risankizumab at week 16. At week 28, patients randomized to risankizumab who achieved an sPGA score of 0/1 were rerandomized 1:2 to risankizumab or placebo every 12 weeks (part B). <h3>Main Outcomes and Measures</h3> Co-primary end points for the part A1 phase included proportions of patients achieving greater than or equal to 90% improvement in PASI (PASI 90) and sPGA score of 0/1 at week 16. The PASI measures severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation weighted by area of skin involvement over the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities; scores range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease activity). The sPGA assesses average thickness, erythema, and scaling of all psoriatic lesions; scores range from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe), with 0/1 indicating clear or almost clear. Primary and secondary end points in part B included proportion of rerandomized patients achieving an sPGA score of 0/1 at week 52 (primary) and week 104 (secondary). <h3>Results</h3> Of 563 patients screened, 507 were randomized to risankizumab (n = 407) or placebo (n = 100). Most patients were men (356 [70.2%]); median age was 51 years (interquartile range, 38-60 years). At week 16, 298 patients (73.2%) in the treatment group vs 2 patients (2.0%) receiving placebo achieved a PASI 90 response, and 340 patients (83.5%) receiving risankizumab vs 7 patients (7.0%) receiving placebo achieved sPGA 0/1 scores (placebo-adjusted differences: PASI 90: 70.8%; 95% CI, 65.7%-76.0%; sPGA 0/1: 76.5%; 95% CI, 70.4%-82.5%;<i>P</i> &lt; .001 for both). At week 28, 336 responders were rerandomized to risankizumab (n = 111) or treatment withdrawal (n = 225). At week 52, the sPGA 0/1 score was achieved by 97 patients (87.4%) receiving risankizumab vs 138 patients (61.3%) receiving placebo. At week 104, the sPGA 0/1 score was achieved by 90 patients (81.1%) receiving risankizumab vs 16 patients (7.1%) receiving placebo (placebo-adjusted differences: week 52: 25.9%; 95% CI, 17.3%-34.6%; week 104: 73.9%; 95% CI, 66.0%-81.9%;<i>P</i> &lt; .001 for both). Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between risankizumab (186 [45.7%]) and placebo (49 [49.0%]) in part A1 and remained stable over time. <h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3> Risankizumab showed superior efficacy compared with placebo through 16 weeks and treatment withdrawal through 2 years. Risankizumab was well tolerated, with no unexpected safety findings during the 2-year trial. <h3>Trial Registration</h3> ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT02672852

Patients with plaque psoriasis treated with biologic therapies need more efficacious, safe and convenient treatments to improve quality of life. Risankizumab and secukinumab inhibit interleukin-23 and interleukin-17A, respectively, and are effective in adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis but have different dosing regimens.To compare directly the efficacy and safety of risankizumab vs. secukinumab over 52 weeks.IMMerge was an international, phase III, multicentre, open-label, efficacy-assessor-blinded, active-comparator study, in which adult patients with chronic, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were randomized in a 1 : 1 ratio to treatment with risankizumab 150 mg or secukinumab 300 mg. Primary efficacy endpoints were the proportions of patients achieving ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) at week 16 (noninferiority comparison with margin of 12%) and week 52 (superiority comparison).In total 327 patients from nine countries were treated with risankizumab (n = 164) or secukinumab (n = 163). Risankizumab was noninferior to secukinumab in the proportion of patients achieving PASI 90 at week 16 [73·8% vs. 65·6%; difference of 8·2%, 96·25% confidence interval (CI)-2·2 to 18·6; within the 12% noninferiority margin] and superior to secukinumab at week 52 (86·6% vs. 57·1%; difference of 29·8%, 95% CI 20·8-38·8; P < 0·001), thus meeting both primary endpoints. All secondary endpoints (PASI 100, static Physician's Global Assessment 0 or 1, and PASI 75) at week 52 demonstrated superiority for risankizumab vs. secukinumab (P < 0·001). No new safety concerns were identified.At week 52, risankizumab demonstrated superior efficacy and similar safety with less frequent dosing compared with secukinumab.

Psoriasis severity categories have been important tools for clinicians to use in treatment decisions as well as to determine eligibility criteria for clinical studies. However, owing to the heterogeneity of severity classifications and their lack of consideration for the impact of psoriasis involvement of special areas or past treatment history, patients may be miscategorized, which can lead to undertreatment of psoriasis.To develop a consensus statement on the classification of psoriasis severity.A modified Delphi approach was developed by the International Psoriasis Council to define psoriasis severity.After completion of the exercise, 7 severity definitions were preferentially ranked. This most preferred statement rejects the mild, moderate, and severe categories in favor of a dichotomous definition: Psoriasis patients should be classified as either candidates for topical therapy or candidates for systemic therapy; the latter are patients who meet at least one of the following criteria: (1) body surface area >10%, (2) disease involving special areas, and (3) failure of topical therapy.This effort might have suffered from a lack of representation by all relevant stakeholders, including patients.The consensus statement describes 2 categories of psoriasis severity, while accounting for special circumstances where patients may require systemic therapy.

Patients with psoriasis value rapid and complete skin clearance. No head‐to‐head studies have focused on early responses to interleukin (IL)‐17 vs. IL‐23 inhibitors. To compare early and complete skin clearance by the IL‐17A inhibitor ixekizumab vs. the IL‐23p19 inhibitor guselkumab. IXORA‐R, a 24‐week, randomized, double‐blinded study, enrolled adults with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis [static Physician's Global Assessment of Disease (sPGA) score of ≥ 3, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≥ 12, and ≥ 10% body surface area]. Patients were randomized (1 : 1) to receive the approved dose of subcutaneous ixekizumab or guselkumab. Primary end point was 100% improvement in PASI (PASI 100) at week 12. Major secondary end points included other levels of improved PASI and sPGA at different time points. Comparisons were made using the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test with a multiple testing strategy. Nonresponder imputation was used for missing data. After the completion of the study, the final secondary end point (PASI 100 at 24 weeks) and safety data through week 24 will be reported. In total, 1027 patients were randomized. The primary end point PASI 100 at week 12 was met [215/520 ixekizumab (41%); 126/507 guselkumab (25%); P < 0·001]. All major secondary end points measured up to week 12 were met, including PASI 50 at week 1 and PASI 75 at week 2. Serious adverse event frequency was 3% for each group; no new safety signals were identified. Ixekizumab was superior to guselkumab for rapidly improving signs and symptoms in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis by week 12. Adverse events were similar to previous ixekizumab and guselkumab studies. Compared with the IL‐23 inhibitor guselkumab, ixekizumab can offer complete skin clearance more rapidly to patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis. What's already known about this topic? Patients with plaque psoriasis desire both high levels of clearance and rapid onset of treatment effects. Ixekizumab, a high‐affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin (IL)‐17A, has demonstrated greater and faster skin clearance than etanercept and ustekinumab, with consistent long‐term efficacy, safety and durability of response. Clinical trial data and systematic reviews have suggested that IL‐17 inhibitors can improve a patient's psoriasis more rapidly than IL‐23 inhibitors. What does this study add? The head‐to‐head study design directly compares the efficacy and speed of response of ixekizumab and the IL‐23 inhibitor guselkumab in moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis. The primary end point was met, showing superiority of ixekizumab over guselkumab for achieving complete skin clearance at week 12. The safety profile of ixekizumab was consistent with previous studies. Ixekizumab can deliver patients complete skin clearance and improved quality of life more rapidly than guselkumab.

Effective, well-tolerated oral psoriasis treatments are needed.To compare the efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, versus placebo and apremilast in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.Participants were randomized 2:1:1 to deucravacitinib 6 mg every day (n = 332), placebo (n = 166), or apremilast 30 mg twice a day (n = 168) in the 52-week, double-blinded, phase 3 POETYK PSO-1 trial (NCT03624127). Coprimary end points included response rates for ≥75% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) and static Physician's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (sPGA 0/1) with deucravacitinib versus placebo at week 16.At week 16, response rates were significantly higher with deucravacitinib versus placebo or apremilast for PASI 75 (194 [58.4%] vs 21 [12.7%] vs 59 [35.1%]; P < .0001) and sPGA 0/1 (178 [53.6%] vs 12 [7.2%] vs 54 [32.1%]; P < .0001). Efficacy improved beyond week 16 and was maintained through week 52. Adverse event rates with deucravacitinib were similar to those with placebo and apremilast.One-year duration, limited racial diversity.Deucravacitinib was superior to placebo and apremilast across multiple efficacy end points and was well tolerated in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Bimekizumab is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin-17A and interleukin-17F. The efficacy and safety of bimekizumab as compared with the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis have not been extensively examined.

Primary results from the Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2 studies demonstrated upadacitinib efficacy and safety through 16 weeks in patients with atopic dermatitis. Longer-term outcomes remain unknown.To evaluate long-term (52 weeks) efficacy and safety of upadacitinib treatment in patients with atopic dermatitis.Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2 are ongoing double-blind, placebo-controlled, replicate phase 3 randomized clinical trials that include adults and adolescents with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis at 151 and 154 centers, respectively. Cutoffs for this analysis were December 21, 2020 (Measure Up 1), and January 15, 2021 (Measure Up 2).Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive once-daily oral upadacitinib 15 mg, 30 mg, or placebo. At week 16, patients randomized at baseline to receive upadacitinib 15 mg (273 and 260 patients in Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2, respectively) and 30 mg (270 and 268 patients) continued assigned treatment; placebo-treated patients were rerandomized 1:1 to receive upadacitinib 15 mg (121 and 120 patients in Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2, respectively) or 30 mg (123 and 121 patients) in a double-blinded manner.Safety and efficacy, including 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index and Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) with 2 or greater grades of improvement, were assessed.Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2 included a total of 1609 patients (mean [SD] age, 33.8 [15.6] years; 727 women [45.2%]; 882 men [54.8%]). Efficacy at week 16 was maintained through week 52. At week 52, 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index was achieved by 82.0% (95% CI, 77.0%-86.9%) and 79.1% (95% CI, 73.9%-84.4%) of patients continuing the 15-mg dose and 84.9% (95% CI, 80.3%-89.5%) and 84.3% (95% CI, 79.6%-89.0%) of patients continuing the 30-mg dose (for Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2, respectively); Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) with 2 or greater grades of improvement was achieved by 59.2% (95% CI, 52.9%-65.5%) and 52.6% (95% CI, 46.2%-59.1%) and 62.5% (95% CI, 56.3%-68.7%) and 65.1% (95% CI, 58.9%-71.2%) of patients in the Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2 studies, respectively. Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was low overall but was slightly higher for the upadacitinib 30-mg dose. Both upadacitinib doses were well tolerated with no new safety signals.In this analysis of follow-up data from 2 randomized clinical trials, longer-term treatment of adolescents and adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis with upadacitinib demonstrated a favorable benefit-risk profile, with sustained efficacy responses through 52 weeks.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03569293 (Measure Up 1) and NCT03607422 (Measure Up 2).

To update guidance regarding the management of psoriatic disease during the COVID-19 pandemic.The task force (TF) includes 18 physician voting members with expertise in dermatology, rheumatology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and critical care. The TF was supplemented by nonvoting members, which included fellows and National Psoriasis Foundation staff. Clinical questions relevant to the psoriatic disease community were informed by inquiries received by the National Psoriasis Foundation. A Delphi process was conducted.The TF updated evidence for the original 22 statements and added 5 new recommendations. The average of the votes was within the category of agreement for all statements, 13 with high consensus and 14 with moderate consensus.The evidence behind many guidance statements is variable in quality and/or quantity.These statements provide guidance for the treatment of patients with psoriatic disease on topics including how the disease and its treatments affect COVID-19 risk, how medical care can be optimized during the pandemic, what patients should do to lower their risk of getting infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (including novel vaccination), and what they should do if they develop COVID-19. The guidance is a living document that is continuously updated by the TF as data emerge.

The tubulin polymerization and Src kinase signaling inhibitor tirbanibulin is being investigated as a topical treatment for actinic keratosis, a precursor of squamous-cell carcinoma.

Phase 3 trials have assessed efficacy of abrocitinib versus placebo in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, a common immunoinflammatory skin disease. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib versus dupilumab.This randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-treatment, phase 3 trial enrolled adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis who requir=ed systemic therapy or had inadequate response to topical medications. Participants were enrolled from 151 sites, located in Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Poland, Slovakia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, and the USA. These participants were then randomly assigned (1:1) with block randomisation to receive oral abrocitinib (200 mg per day) or subcutaneous dupilumab (300 mg every 2 weeks) for 26 weeks. Participants were required to apply topical corticosteroids (medium or low potency), topical calcineurin inhibitors, or a topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor to active lesion areas. Primary endpoints were response based on achieving a 4 point or higher improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4) at week 2 and a 90% or better improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-90) at week 4. Family-wise type 1 error was controlled via a sequential multiple-testing procedure (two sided, α=0·05). Randomly assigned participants who received at least one dose of study intervention were included in the efficacy and safety analysis sets. This trial was completed on July 13, 2021 (NCT04345367).Between June 11, 2020, and Dec 16, 2020, 940 patients were screened and 727 were enrolled (362 in the abrocitinib group and 365 in the dupilumab group). Compared with dupilumab, a larger proportion of patients treated with abrocitinib reached the primary outcomes, PP-NRS4 at week 2 (172 [48%] of 357, 95% CI 43·0-53·4 vs 93 [26%] of 364, 21·1-30·0; difference 22·6%, 15·8-29·5; p<0·0001), and EASI-90 at week 4 (101 [29%] of 354, 23·8-33·2 vs 53 [15%] of 364, 10·9-18·2; difference 14·1%, 8·2-20·0; p<0·0001). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 268 (74%) of 362 patients treated with abrocitinib and by 239 (65%) of 365 patients treated with dupilumab. Two non-treatment-related deaths occurred in the abrocitinib group.Abrocitinib 200 mg per day was more efficacious than dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis on background topical therapy in inducing early reductions of itch and atopic dermatitis disease signs. Both treatments were well tolerated over 26 weeks.Pfizer.

The heterogeneous course of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis necessitates treatment flexibility.We evaluated the maintenance of abrocitinib-induced response with continuous abrocitinib treatment, dose reduction or withdrawal, and response to treatment reintroduction following flare (JAK1 Atopic Dermatitis Efficacy and Safety [JADE] REGIMEN: National Clinical Trial 03627767).Patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis responding to open-label abrocitinib 200 mg monotherapy for 12 weeks were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to blinded abrocitinib (200 or 100 mg) or placebo for 40 weeks. Patients experiencing flare received rescue treatment (abrocitinib 200 mg plus topical therapy).Of 1233 patients, 798 responders to induction (64.7%) were randomly assigned. The flare probability during maintenance was 18.9%, 42.6%, and 80.9% with abrocitinib 200 mg, abrocitinib 100 mg, and placebo, respectively. Among patients with flare in the abrocitinib 200 mg, abrocitinib 100 mg, and placebo groups, 36.6%, 58.8%, and 81.6% regained investigator global assessment 0/1 response, respectively, and 55.0%, 74.5%, and 91.8% regained eczema area and severity index response, respectively, with rescue treatment. During maintenance, 63.2% and 54.0% of patients receiving abrocitinib 200 and 100 mg, respectively, experienced adverse events.The definition of protocol-defined flare was not established, limiting the generalizability of findings.Induction treatment with abrocitinib was effective; most responders continuing abrocitinib did not flare. Rescue treatment with abrocitinib plus topical therapy effectively recaptured response.

Plaque psoriasis is a common, chronic, systemic, immune-mediated inflammatory disease. The Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway plays a major role in intracellular cytokine signaling in inflammatory processes involved in psoriasis. Although Janus kinase (JAK) 1-3 inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, safety concerns persist and no JAK inhibitor has received regulatory approval to treat psoriasis. Thus, an opportunity exists for novel oral therapies that are safe and efficacious in psoriasis. Tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) is a member of the JAK family of kinases and regulates signaling and functional responses downstream of the interleukin 12, interleukin 23, and type I interferon receptors. Deucravacitinib, which is an oral, selective inhibitor that binds to the regulatory domain of TYK2, and brepocitinib (PF-06700841) and PF-06826647, which are topical and oral TYK2 inhibitors, respectively, that bind to the active (adenosine triphosphate-binding) site in the catalytic domain, are in development for psoriasis. Selective, allosteric inhibition of TYK2 signaling may reduce the potential for toxicities associated with pan-JAK inhibitors. This article reviews Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription and TYK2 signaling and the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in psoriasis to date, focusing specifically on TYK2 inhibitors.

Lebrikizumab, a high-affinity IgG4 monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-13, prevents the formation of the interleukin-4Rα–interleukin-13Rα1 heterodimer receptor signaling complex. Download a PDF of the Research Summary. We conducted two identically designed, 52-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials; both trials included a 16-week induction period and a 36-week maintenance period. Eligible patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (adults [≥18 years of age] and adolescents [12 to <18 years of age, weighing ≥40 kg]) were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either lebrikizumab at a dose of 250 mg (loading dose of 500 mg at baseline and week 2) or placebo, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks. Outcomes for the induction period were assessed up to 16 weeks and are included in this report. The primary outcome was an Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 (indicating clear or almost clear skin; range, 0 to 4 [severe disease]) with a reduction (indicating improvement) of at least 2 points from baseline at week 16. Secondary outcomes included a 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index score (EASI-75 response) and assessments of itch and of itch interference with sleep. Safety was also assessed. In trial 1, the primary outcome was met in 43.1% of 283 patients in the lebrikizumab group and in 12.7% of 141 patients in the placebo group (P<0.001); an EASI-75 response occurred in 58.8% and 16.2%, respectively (P<0.001). In trial 2, the primary outcome was met in 33.2% of 281 patients in the lebrikizumab group and in 10.8% of 146 patients in the placebo group (P<0.001); an EASI-75 response occurred in 52.1% and 18.1%, respectively (P<0.001). Measures of itch and itch interference with sleep indicated improvement with lebrikizumab therapy. The incidence of conjunctivitis was higher among patients who received lebrikizumab than among those who received placebo. Most adverse events during the induction period were mild or moderate in severity and did not lead to trial discontinuation. In the induction period of two phase 3 trials, 16 weeks of treatment with lebrikizumab was effective in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. (Funded by Dermira; ADvocate1 and ADvocate2 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT04146363 and NCT04178967, respectively.) QUICK TAKE VIDEO SUMMARYLebrikizumab for Atopic Dermatitis 02:10

Lebrikizumab (LEB), a high-affinity monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin (IL)-13, demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) during 16 weeks of monotherapy in a phase 2b trial, and two 52-week phase 3 trials.To evaluate efficacy and safety of LEB combined with low- to mid-potency topical corticosteroids (TCS) in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.The ADhere trial was a 16-week randomized, double-blinded, placebo (PBO)-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial conducted from February 3, 2020, to September 16, 2021. The study was conducted at 54 outpatient sites across Germany, Poland, Canada, and the US and included adolescent (aged ≥12 to <18 years weighing ≥40 kg) and adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD. The treatment allocation ratio was 2:1 (LEB:PBO).Overall, 211 patients were randomized to subcutaneous LEB (loading dose of 500 mg at baseline and week 2, followed by 250 mg every 2 weeks [Q2W] thereafter) or PBO Q2W in combination with TCS for 16 weeks.Efficacy analyses at week 16 included proportions of patients achieving Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (IGA [0,1]) with 2 or more points improvement from baseline, and 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75). Key secondary end points included evaluation of itch, itch interference on sleep, and quality of life. Safety assessments included monitoring adverse events (AEs).The mean (SD) age of patients was 37.2 (19.3) years, 103 (48.8%) patients were women, 31 (14.7%) patients were Asian, and 28 (13.3%) patients were Black/African American. At week 16, IGA (0,1) was achieved by 145 (41.2%) patients in the LEB+TCS group vs 66 (22.1%) receiving PBO+TCS (P = .01); corresponding proportions of patients achieving EASI-75 were 69.5% vs 42.2% (P < .001). The LEB+TCS group showed statistically significant improvements in all key secondary end points. Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were nonserious, mild or moderate in severity, and did not lead to study discontinuation. The TEAEs frequently reported in the LEB+TCS group included conjunctivitis (7 [4.8%]), headache (7 [4.8%]), hypertension (4 [2.8%]), injection site reactions (4 [2.8%]), and herpes infection (5 [3.4%]) vs 1.5% or less patient-reported frequencies in the PBO+TCS group. Similar frequencies of patient-reported serious AEs following LEB+TCS (n = 2, 1.4%) and PBO+TCS (n = 1, 1.5%).In this randomized phase 3 clinical trial, LEB+TCS was associated with improved outcomes in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD compared with TCS alone, and safety was consistent with previously reported AD trials.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04250337.

Safe and effective long-term treatments for adolescents with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) are limited.To evaluate the efficacy and safety of interleukin-13-targeted treatment with tralokinumab monotherapy in adolescents with AD.The 52-week, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 3 ECZTRA 6 trial was conducted from July 17, 2018, through March 16, 2021, at 72 centers across 10 countries in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Enrolled patients were 12 to 17 years old with moderate to severe AD (Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] score ≥3; Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI] ≥16).Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to tralokinumab (150 or 300 mg) or placebo every 2 weeks for 16 weeks. Patients with an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and/or 75% or higher improvement in EASI (EASI 75) at week 16 without rescue medication received maintenance treatment; other patients switched to open-label tralokinumab, 300 mg, every 2 weeks.Primary end points at week 16 were an IGA score of 0 or 1 and/or achieving EASI 75. Key secondary end points were a reduction of Adolescent Worst Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale of 4 or more, change in SCORing AD, and change in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index from baseline to week 16. Safety end points were the number of adverse events and serious adverse events.Of 301 patients randomized, 289 comprised the full analysis set (median [IQR] age, 15.0 [13.0-16.0] years; 149 [51.6%] male). More patients receiving tralokinumab, 150 mg, (n = 98), and tralokinumab, 300 mg (n = 97), achieved an IGA score of 0 or 1 without rescue medication at week 16 (21 [21.4%] and 17 [17.5%], respectively) vs placebo (n = 94; 4 [4.3%]) (adjusted difference, 17.5% [95% CI, 8.4%-26.6%]; P < .001 and 13.8% [95% CI, 5.3%-22.3%]; P = .002, respectively). More patients receiving tralokinumab, 150 mg (28 [28.6%]), and tralokinumab, 300 mg, (27 [27.8%]) vs placebo (6 [6.4%]) achieved EASI 75 without rescue at week 16 (adjusted difference, 22.5% [95% CI, 12.4%-32.6%]; P < .001 and 22.0% [95% CI, 12.0%-32.0%]; P < .001, respectively). Proportions of patients with Adolescent Worst Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale reduction of 4 or more from baseline were greater with tralokinumab, 150 mg (23.2%), and tralokinumab, 300 (25.0%), vs placebo (3.3%), and adjusted mean changes were greater in SCORing AD with tralokinumab, 150 mg (-27.5), and tralokinumab, 300 mg (-29.1), vs placebo (-9.5) and in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index with tralokinumab, 150 mg (-6.1), and tralokinumab, 300 mg (-6.7), vs placebo (-4.1) at week 16. At week 52, tralokinumab efficacy was maintained without rescue in more than 50% of patients meeting primary end point(s) at week 16. In the open-label phase, IGA score of 0 or 1 and EASI 75 were achieved in 33.3% and 57.8%, respectively, at week 52. Tralokinumab was well tolerated, without frequency of conjunctivitis increasing through week 52.In this randomized clinical trial, tralokinumab was efficacious and well tolerated, supporting its value for treating adolescents with moderate to severe AD.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03526861.

Abstract Background Lebrikizumab is a novel, high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to interleukin (IL)-13. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab monotherapy in adolescent and adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) over 52 weeks of treatment in ADvocate1 (NCT04146363) and ADvocate2 (NCT04178967). Methods Patients who responded to lebrikizumab 250 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) at the end of the 16-week induction period were re-randomized 2 : 2 : 1 to receive lebrikizumab Q2W, lebrikizumab 250 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) or placebo Q2W (lebrikizumab withdrawal) for 36 additional weeks. Response at week 16 was defined as achieving a 75% reduction in Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI 75) or an Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1, with a ≥ 2-point improvement and no rescue medication use. Multiple imputation was used to handle missing data. Intermittent use of topical therapy was permitted during the maintenance period. Results After 52 weeks, an IGA of 0 or 1 with a ≥ 2 point improvement was maintained by 71.2% of patients treated with lebrikizumab Q2W, 76.9% of patients treated with lebrikizumab Q4W and 47.9% of patients in the lebrikizumab withdrawal arm. EASI 75 was maintained by 78.4% of patients treated with lebrikizumab Q2W, 81.7% of patients treated with lebrikizumab Q4W and 66.4% of patients in the lebrikizumab withdrawal arm at week 52. Across treatment arms, proportions of patients using any rescue therapy were 14.0% (ADvocate1) and 16.4% (ADvocate2). During the combined induction and maintenance periods of ADvocate1 and ADvocate2, 63.0% of lebrikizumab-treated patients reported any treatment emergent adverse event, with most events (93.1%) being mild or moderate in severity. Conclusions After a 16-week induction period with lebrikizumab Q2W, lebrikizumab Q2W and Q4W maintained similar improvement of the signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe AD, with a safety profile consistent with previously published data.

Psoriasis affects 7 million people in the United States, causing substantial cost, social stigma, and disability.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the health effects of skin disease by comparing psoriasis to other primary medical disorders using 3 different scales of health-related quality of life.A self-administered questionnaire consisting of 3 health-related quality of life measures was given sequentially to 35 eligible patients with psoriasis presenting to the Dermatology Branch of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) for an investigational therapeutic protocol.All patients (100%) agreed to participate. The median Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score was 13.0. Overall, 82.9% at least often felt the need to hide their psoriasis, and 74.3% claimed their self-confidence was at least often affected by their psoriasis. The median EQ-5D health state utility score was 13.0% less than healthy individuals (P <.001). On the SF-36, the mean general health score was 13.2% less (P =.005) and the median social functioning score 18.7% less (P =.005) than that of patients with no chronic conditions.Individuals with psoriasis are significantly affected in their health state utility, perception of general health, and social functioning when compared with individuals without chronic disease and those with certain primary medical conditions.

Abstract There is substantial evidence that Kaposi sarcoma–associated herpesvirus (KSHV) plays an important role in the pathogenesis of all forms of Kaposi sarcoma (KS). It has been noted that KS commonly occurs in locations, such as the feet, where tissue may be poorly oxygenated. On the basis of this observation, the potential role of hypoxia in the reactivation of KSHV replication was explored by studying 2 KSHV-infected primary effusion lymphoma B-cell lines (BC-3 and BCBL-1) latently infected with KSHV. Acute and chronic exposure of these cells to hypoxia (1% O2) induced KSHV lytic replication, as indicated by an increase in intracellular lytic protein expression and detection of virus in cell supernatants by Western immunoblotting. In addition, hypoxia increased the levels of secreted viral interleukin-6. Moreover, hypoxia enhanced the lytic replication initiated by the viral inducer 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate. Desferoxamine and cobalt chloride, 2 compounds that increase the intracellular levels of hypoxia-inducible factor 1, were also able to induce KSHV lytic replication. These studies suggest that hypoxia is an inducer of KSHV replication. This process may play an important role in the pathogenesis of KS.

Langerhans cells (LCs) constitute a subset of DCs that initiate immune responses in skin.Using leprosy as a model, we investigated whether expression of CD1a and langerin, an LC-specific C-type lectin, imparts a specific functional role to LCs.LC-like DCs and freshly isolated epidermal LCs presented nonpeptide antigens of Mycobacterium leprae to T cell clones derived from a leprosy patient in a CD1a-restricted and langerin-dependent manner.LC-like DCs were more efficient at CD1a-restricted antigen presentation than monocyte-derived DCs.LCs in leprosy lesions coexpress CD1a and langerin, placing LCs in position to efficiently present a subset of antigens to T cells as part of the host response to human infectious disease.Nonstandard abbreviations used: Langerhans cell (LC)

IL-23 and Th17 cells play important roles in host defense against systemic infections with extracellular bacteria and fungi, although their roles in immunity against localized skin infections are less well defined. Here, the contributions of IL-23 and Th17 cytokines in host defense against cutaneous Candida albicans infection were evaluated. Mice deficient in IL-23 or IL-17A demonstrated delayed healing and decreased IL-17A production after skin infection with C. albicans compared with wild-type mice or mice deficient in IL-12 or IL-22. Histologic examination revealed epidermal hyperplasia overlying infected dermis four days postinoculation in wild-type mice. In IL-23-deficient mice, fungal burden was greater in skin, neither IL-17A nor IL-22 mRNAs were expressed postinfection, and these mice demonstrated only minimal epidermal hyperplasia. Exogenous recombinant IL-17A injected at the site of skin infection promoted more rapid healing of candidiasis in both wild-type mice and mice deficient in IL-23 and IL-12. Taken together, these results demonstrate that IL-23 and IL-17A, but not IL-12 and IL-22, are required for optimal host defense against cutaneous candidiasis. In addition, recombinant IL-17A may serve as a potential therapy to enhance healing in individuals with chronic cutaneous candidiasis.

ABSTRACT Continual human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) evolution and expansion within the human population have led to unequal distribution of HIV-1 group M subtypes. In particular, recent outgrowth of subtype C in southern Africa, India, and China has fueled speculation that subtype C isolates may be more fit in vivo. In this study, nine subtype B and six subtype C HIV-1 isolates were added to peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures for a complete pairwise competition experiment. All subtype C HIV-1 isolates were less fit than subtype B isolates ( P &lt; 0.0001), but intrasubtype variations in HIV-1 fitness were not significant. Increased fitness of subtype B over subtype C was also observed in primary CD4 + T cells and macrophages from different human donors but not in skin-derived human Langerhans cells. Detailed analysis of the retroviral life cycle during several B and C virus competitions indicated that the efficiency of host cell entry may have a significant impact on relative fitness. Furthermore, phyletic analyses of fitness differences suggested that, for a recombined subtype B/C HIV-1 isolate, higher fitness mapped to the subtype B env gene rather than the subtype C gag and pol genes. These results suggest that subtype B and C HIV-1 may be transmitted with equal efficiency (Langerhans cell data) but that subtype C isolates may be less fit following initial infection (T-cell and macrophage data) and may lead to slower disease progression.

Langerhans cells (LCs) are suspected to be initial targets for HIV after sexual exposure (by becoming infected or by capturing virus). Here, productive R5 HIV infection of LC ex vivo and LC-mediated transmission of virus to CD4 + T cells were both found to depend on CCR5. By contrast, infection of monocyte-derived dendritic cells and transfer of infection from monocyte-derived dendritic cells to CD4 + T cells were mediated by CCR5-dependent as well as DC-specific ICAM-3-grabbing nonintegrin-dependent pathways. Furthermore, in 62 healthy individuals, R5 HIV infection levels in LCs ex vivo were associated with CCR5 genotype. Specifically, genotyping for ORF Δ 32 revealed that LCs isolated from ORF Δ 32 / wt individuals were significantly less susceptible to HIV when compared with LCs isolated from ORFwt / wt individuals ( P = 0.016). Strikingly, further genetic analyses of the A-2459G CCR5 promoter polymorphism in ORF Δ 32 / wt heterozygous individuals revealed that LCs isolated from - 2459A / G + ORF Δ 32 / wt individuals were markedly less susceptible to HIV than were LCs from - 2459A / A + ORF Δ 32 / wt individuals ( P = 0.012). Interestingly, these genetic susceptibility data in LCs parallel those of genetic susceptibility studies performed in cohorts of HIV-infected individuals. Thus, we suggest that CCR5-mediated infection of LCs, and not capture of virus by LCs, provides a biologic basis for understanding certain aspects of host genetic susceptibility to initial HIV infection.

Human herpesvirus type 8 (HHV-8) has been associated with Kaposi's sarcoma, body cavity-based lymphoma (BCBL), and multicentric Castleman's disease through DNA, in situ hybridization, and serologic studies. HHV-8 has been visualized only in HHV-8-positive/Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-negative/ cytomegalovirus (CMV)-negative BCBL cell lines, but not in HHV-8-positive/EBV-negative/ CMV-negative Kaposi's sarcoma lesions.Kaposi's sarcoma of the skin, lymph node, and spleen from three patients with AIDS were analysed for HHV-8, EBV and CMV DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), for HHV-8 RNA (Tl.1 riboprobe) by in situ hybridization (ISH), for viral inclusions by light microscopy, and for herpesviruses by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Sections were also labeled with Tl.1 counterstained with CD34, an endothelial cell marker.The skin lesion was DNA PCR-positive for HHV-8 and CMV (nested, but not single PCR), the lymph node was positive for HHV-8 and EBV, and the spleen was positive for only HHV-8. TEM revealed infection by a virus displaying the typical morphology and cytopathicity of herpesviruses. Hexagonal nucleocapsids and mature enveloped virions were present in vasoformative spindle cells and mononuclear cells, often resembling lymphocytes. Extrapolating from TEM to standard light microscopy on hematoxylin and eosin-stained paraffin sections, eosinophilic, targetoid intranuclear inclusions were identified within spindle cells which often lined vascular lumina. The Tl.1-riboprobe labeled CD34+ spindle cells containing intranuclear inclusions, as well as mononuclear cells within Kaposi's sarcoma and residual lymphoid tissue.The herpesvirus visualized in Kaposi's sarcoma lesions has morphologic and cytopathic features typical of human herpesviruses, productively infects vasoformative spindle cells and mononuclear cells, and is consistent with HHV-8. It can also form intranuclear inclusions that are identifiable by light microscopy in hematoxylin and eosin sections and by ISH.

There is substantial evidence that dendritic cells (DC) residing within epithelial surfaces (e.g., Langerhans cells) are the initial cells infected with HIV after mucosal exposure to virus. To study DC-HIV interactions in detail, we propagated Langerhans cell-like DC from cord blood CD34(+) cells and from adult blood plastic-adherent PBMC in the presence of cytokines (GM-CSF, IL-4, and/or TNF-alpha). DC pulsed overnight with HIVBaL or HIVIIIB were infected productively with both viral subtypes (as assessed by PCR, supernatant p24 protein levels, electron microscopy, and antibody staining). Productive infection could be blocked by anti-CD4 mAbs, RANTES (regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted) (for HIVBaL), stromal cell-derived factor-1 (for HIVIIIB), or azidothymidine added during the HIV pulse, as well as by blocking DC proliferation. However, pulsing DC with HIV under these blocking conditions had no effect on the ability of DC to capture virus and transmit infection to cocultured antigen-stimulated CD4(+) T cells. Thus, we show by several criteria that (a) productive infection of DC and (b) the ability of DC to capture virus are mediated through separate pathways. We suggest that strategies designed to block mucosal transmission of HIV should consider interfering with both virus infection and virus capture by DC.

The lone CX3C chemokine, fractalkine (FK), is expressed in a membrane-bound form on activated endothelial cells and mediates attachment and firm adhesion of T cells, monocytes and NK cells. We now show that FK is associated with dendritic cells (DC) in epidermis and lymphoid organs. In normal human skin, dual-color fluorescence microscopy co-localized FK expression with Langerhans cells expressing CD1a. In tonsil, FK-positive DC expressed CD83, a marker for mature DC. Human and murine cultured DC up-regulated FK mRNA expression with maturation. Furthermore, CD40 ligation, but not TNF-α or lipopolysaccharide treatment, of activated, migratory DC that had migrated from skin explants resulted in a 2.5-fold increase of surface expression of FK without significant alterations of expression of CD80, CD86, CD54 or MHC class II. Since FK mediates adhesion of T cells to activated endothelial cells, the increased expression of FK during DC maturation (and particularly by CD40 ligation) may play a role in the ability of T cells and mature DC to form conjugates and engage in cell-cell communication.

Pityriasis rosea is a common skin disease that has been suspected to have a viral etiology. We performed nested polymerase chain reaction to detect human herpesvirus-7, human herpesvirus-6, and cytomegalovirus DNA in lesional skin, nonlesional skin, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, serum, and saliva samples isolated from 14 pityriasis rosea patients. Viral mRNA expression and virion visualization within lesional skin were studied by in situ hybridization and transmission electron microscopy, respectively. By nested polymerase chain reaction, human herpesvirus-7 DNA was present in lesional skin (93%), nonlesional skin (86%), saliva (100%), peripheral blood mononuclear cells (83%), and serum (100%) samples, whereas human herpesvirus-6 DNA was detected in lesional skin (86%), nonlesional skin (79%), saliva (80%), peripheral blood mononuclear cells (83%), and serum (88%) samples. By contrast, cytomegalovirus DNA was not detected in these tissues. Control samples from 12 healthy volunteers and 10 psoriasis patients demonstrated rare positivity for either human herpesvirus-7 or human herpesvirus-6 DNA in skin or serum. By in situ hybridization, infiltrating mononuclear cells expressing human herpesvirus-7 and human herpesvirus-6 mRNA were identified in perivascular and periappendageal areas in 100% and 75% pityriasis rosea skin lesions, respectively, compared to herpesviral mRNA positivity in only 13% normal skin and psoriasis skin controls. Transmission electron microscopy failed to reveal herpesviral virions in pityriasis rosea lesional skin. Nested polymerase chain reaction and in situ hybridization enabled detection of human herpesvirus-7 and human herpesvirus-6 in skin and other tissues isolated from patients with pityriasis rosea. These results suggest that pityriasis rosea is associated with systemic active infection with both human herpesvirus-7 and human herpesvirus-6.

Numerous studies have demonstrated that ultraviolet B (UVB) irradiation has profound effects on the skin and systemic immune systems. Because many of the effects of UVB result in suppression of contact sensitivity responses and because IL-10 induces a Th2 rather than a Th1 response, we sought to determine whether UVB irradiation induces IL-10 transcription and subsequent protein secretion by human epidermal cells. Skin of nine volunteers was exposed to UVB or sham irradiation, and epidermal cell suspensions were prepared from suction blister roofs 24 h thereafter. mRNA was extracted using oligo dT-coated magnetic beads, and IL-10 cDNA was amplified with a sensitive RT-PCR technique. We found that IL-10 was constitutively expressed by epidermal cells in 5 of 9 volunteers and that IL-10 message was up-regulated by UVB exposure in all experiments. Since epidermis consists of a heterogeneous cell population with distinct cytokine profiles, we determined whether UVB caused enhanced IL-10 transcription and protein secretion in human keratinocyte cultures. In these experiments, IL-10 was constitutively expressed by keratinocytes and UVB up-regulated IL-10 gene expression in a dose-dependent manner 24 h after in vitro irradiation, coinciding with IL-10 protein secretion into the culture supernatants. Taken together, the findings indicate that UVB irradiation induces IL-10 in human keratinocytes and suggest that keratinocyte-derived IL-10 may be an important component of the immunosuppression that results from UVB irradiation.

T-helper 17 (Th17) cells are a newly appreciated T-cell subset, distinct from both Th1 and Th2 cells, that have been implicated in the pathogenesis of psoriasis and other autoimmune inflammatory diseases (Figure 1) (Fitch et al., 2007Fitch E. Harper E. Skorcheva I. Kurtz S.E. Blauvelt A. Pathophysiology of psoriasis: recent advances on IL-23 and Th17 cytokines.Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2007; 9: 461-467Crossref PubMed Scopus (258) Google Scholar; Kastelein et al., 2007Kastelein R.A. Hunter C.A. Cua D.J. Discovery and biology of IL-23 and IL-27: related but functionally distinct regulators of inflammation.Annu Rev Immunol. 2007; 25: 221-242Crossref PubMed Scopus (615) Google Scholar). IL-23 stimulates survival and proliferation of Th17 cells and thus serves as a key master cytokine regulator for these diseases. T-helper 17 (Th17) cells are a newly appreciated T-cell subset, distinct from both Th1 and Th2 cells, that have been implicated in the pathogenesis of psoriasis and other autoimmune inflammatory diseases (Figure 1) (Fitch et al., 2007Fitch E. Harper E. Skorcheva I. Kurtz S.E. Blauvelt A. Pathophysiology of psoriasis: recent advances on IL-23 and Th17 cytokines.Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2007; 9: 461-467Crossref PubMed Scopus (258) Google Scholar; Kastelein et al., 2007Kastelein R.A. Hunter C.A. Cua D.J. Discovery and biology of IL-23 and IL-27: related but functionally distinct regulators of inflammation.Annu Rev Immunol. 2007; 25: 221-242Crossref PubMed Scopus (615) Google Scholar). IL-23 stimulates survival and proliferation of Th17 cells and thus serves as a key master cytokine regulator for these diseases. Figure 1In psoriasis lesions, IL-23 is overproduced by dendritic cells (Lee et al., 2004Lee E. Trepicchio W.L. Oestreicher J.L. Pittman D. Wang F. Chamian F. et al.Increased expression of interleukin 23 p19 and p40 in lesional skin of patients with psoriasis vulgaris.J Exp Med. 2004; 199: 125-130Crossref PubMed Scopus (719) Google Scholar; Wilson et al., 2007Wilson N.J. Boniface K. Chan J.R. McKenzie B.S. Blumenschein W.M. Mattson J.D. et al.Development, cytokine profile and function of human interleukin 17-producing helper T cells.Nat Immunol. 2007; 8: 950-957Crossref PubMed Scopus (1549) Google Scholar) and keratinocytes (Piskin et al., 2006Piskin G. Sylva-Steenland R.M. Bos J.D. Teunissen M.B. In vitro and in situ expression of IL-23 by keratinocytes in healthy skin and psoriasis lesions: enhanced expression in psoriatic skin.J Immunol. 2006; 176: 1908-1915Crossref PubMed Scopus (343) Google Scholar), and this cytokine stimulates Th17 cells within dermis to make “Th17 cytokines,” which include IL-17A, IL-17F, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IL-21, and IL-22 (Figure 1) (Fitch et al., 2007Fitch E. Harper E. Skorcheva I. Kurtz S.E. Blauvelt A. Pathophysiology of psoriasis: recent advances on IL-23 and Th17 cytokines.Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2007; 9: 461-467Crossref PubMed Scopus (258) Google Scholar; Kastelein et al., 2007Kastelein R.A. Hunter C.A. Cua D.J. Discovery and biology of IL-23 and IL-27: related but functionally distinct regulators of inflammation.Annu Rev Immunol. 2007; 25: 221-242Crossref PubMed Scopus (615) Google Scholar). IL-22 – rather than IL-17A, for which Th17 cells are named – is emerging as the prototypic Th17 cytokine that is perhaps most specific for Th17 cells (Liang et al., 2006Liang S.C. Tan X.Y. Luxenberg D.P. Karim R. Dunussi-Joannopoulos K. Collins M. et al.Interleukin (IL)-22 and IL-17 are coexpressed by Th17 cells and cooperatively enhance expression of antimicrobial peptides.J Exp Med. 2006; 203: 2271-2279Crossref PubMed Scopus (1688) Google Scholar). Because it is a potent stimulus for keratinocyte proliferation (Wolk et al., 2006Wolk K. Witte E. Wallace E. Docke W.D. Kunz S. Asadullah K. et al.IL-22 regulates the expression of genes responsible for antimicrobial defense, cellular differentiation, and mobility in keratinocytes: a potential role in psoriasis.Eur J Immunol. 2006; 36: 1309-1323Crossref PubMed Scopus (716) Google Scholar; Sa et al., 2007Sa S.M. Valdez P.A. Wu J. Jung K. Zhong F. Hall L. et al.The effects of IL-20 subfamily cytokines on reconstituted human epidermis suggest potential roles in cutaneous innate defense and pathogenic adaptive immunity in psoriasis.J Immunol. 2007; 178: 2229-2240Crossref PubMed Scopus (388) Google Scholar; Zheng et al., 2007Zheng Y. Danilenko D.M. Valdez P. Kasman I. Eastham-Anderson J. Wu J. et al.Interleukin-22, a T(H)17 cytokine, mediates IL-23-induced dermal inflammation and acanthosis.Nature. 2007; 445: 648-651Crossref PubMed Scopus (1460) Google Scholar), IL-22 has also gained prominence in the pathogenesis of psoriasis as a key effector Th17 cytokine (Fitch et al., 2007Fitch E. Harper E. Skorcheva I. Kurtz S.E. Blauvelt A. Pathophysiology of psoriasis: recent advances on IL-23 and Th17 cytokines.Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2007; 9: 461-467Crossref PubMed Scopus (258) Google Scholar). In this issue, Krueger and his group of investigators at Rockefeller University show for the first time the discrete presence of IL-17A-producing cells within the dermis of psoriatic plaques (Lowes et al., 2008Lowes M.A. Kikuchi T. Fuentes-Duculan J. Cardinale I. Zaba L.C. Haider A.S. et al.Psoriasis vulgaris lesions contain discrete populations of Th1 and Th17 T Cells.J Invest Dermatol. 2008; 128: 1207-1211Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (775) Google Scholar). Previously, Krueger's and other groups had found increased levels of mRNA specific for the T-helper 17 (Th17) cytokines mentioned above, as well as increased mRNA levels for the IL-23 subunits, IL-12/23p40 and IL-23p19, in psoriasis (Lee et al., 2004Lee E. Trepicchio W.L. Oestreicher J.L. Pittman D. Wang F. Chamian F. et al.Increased expression of interleukin 23 p19 and p40 in lesional skin of patients with psoriasis vulgaris.J Exp Med. 2004; 199: 125-130Crossref PubMed Scopus (719) Google Scholar; Chan et al., 2006Chan J.R. Blumenschein W. Murphy E. Diveu C. Wiekowski M. Abbondanzo S. et al.IL-23 stimulates epidermal hyperplasia via TNF and IL-20R2-dependent mechanisms with implications for psoriasis pathogenesis.J Exp Med. 2006; 203: 2577-2587Crossref PubMed Scopus (514) Google Scholar; Wilson et al., 2007Wilson N.J. Boniface K. Chan J.R. McKenzie B.S. Blumenschein W.M. Mattson J.D. et al.Development, cytokine profile and function of human interleukin 17-producing helper T cells.Nat Immunol. 2007; 8: 950-957Crossref PubMed Scopus (1549) Google Scholar). To demonstrate IL-17A+ cells within psoriatic plaques, skin was biopsied, epidermis was separated from dermis using dispase, and leukocytes were allowed to spontaneously “crawl-out” of dermis placed into culture. These cells were then collected; stimulated for 4 hours with phorbol ester and ionomycin; labeled with antibodies directed against IL-17A, IFN-γ, and TNF-α; and analyzed by flow cytometry. Psoriasis plaque dermis contained a mean of 6.2% of cells secreting IL-17A, whereas dermis from normal-appearing skin contained a mean of 0.5% of cells making IL-17A. Dermal cells co-secreting IL-17A and TNF-α (5.1%) and dermal cells co-secreting IL-17A and IFN-γ (1.9%) were also significantly elevated in psoriasis as compared with normal-appearing skin (0.2 and 0.1%, respectively). The level of cells producing IFN-γ alone was statistically not higher in psoriatic dermis when compared with normal dermis. Taken together, these results suggest that there is a greater propensity for IL-17A-producing cells, rather than IFN-γ-producing cells, to be present in psoriatic plaques when compared to healthy skin. In a quantifiable manner, Th17 cytokine mRNA data in psoriatic plaques have now been linked with actual numbers of cells producing these cytokines within diseased tissue. One caveat of this work is that it has become clear that IL-17A production alone does not necessarily correlate with the presence of a Th17 cell. In addition to Th17 cells, IL-17A can be produced by a subset of Th1 cells (Acosta-Rodriguez et al., 2007Acosta-Rodriguez E.V. Rivino L. Geginat J. Jarrossay D. Gattorno M. Lanzavecchia A. et al.Surface phenotype and antigenic specificity of human interleukin 17-producing T helper memory cells.Nat Immunol. 2007; 8: 639-646Crossref PubMed Scopus (1355) Google Scholar), natural killer T cells (Michel et al., 2007Michel M.L. Keller A.C. Paget C. Fujio M. Trottein F. Savage P.B. et al.Identification of an IL-17-producing NK1.1(neg) iNKT cell population involved in airway neutrophilia.J Exp Med. 2007; 204: 995-1001Crossref PubMed Scopus (476) Google Scholar), γδ T cells (Lockhart et al., 2006Lockhart E. Green A.M. Flynn J.L. IL-17 production is dominated by gammadelta T cells rather than CD4 T cells during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.J Immunol. 2006; 177: 4662-4669Crossref PubMed Scopus (581) Google Scholar), and dendritic cells (Coury et al., 2008Coury F. Annels N. Rivollier A. Olsson S. Santoro A. Speziani C. et al.Langerhans cell histiocytosis reveals a new IL-17A-dependent pathway of dendritic cell fusion.Nat Med. 2008; 14: 81-87Crossref PubMed Scopus (155) Google Scholar). It will be important to perform additional multiparameter flow cytometric studies to more precisely identify the exact nature of the IL-17A-producing cells in psoriasis. IL-22, as mentioned above, may be a more specific marker for Th17 cells. Thus, future coexpression and localization studies examining both IL-17A- and IL-22-secreting cells in psoriatic plaques will add other important pieces to the evolving characterization of the IL-23/Th17 inflammatory pathway in psoriasis.New genetic and immunologic studies suggest new therapeutic targets in psoriasis In another paper in this issue, the genetics underpinning susceptibility to or protection from psoriasis was examined (Nair et al., 2008Nair R.P. Ruether A. Stuart P.E. Jenisch S. Tejasvi T. Hiremagalore R. et al.Polymorphisms of the IL12B and IL23R genes are associated with psoriasis.J Invest Dermatol. 2008https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jid.5701255Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (221) Google Scholar). Elder and his colleagues at the University of Michigan examined a cohort of North American and German Caucasians (1810 psoriatics, 2522 controls, and 509 pedigrees) for polymorphisms in a subset of IL-23- and IL-12-related genes, including those that encode for IL-23p19, IL-12/23p40, IL-12p35, IL-23R, IL-12Rβ1, and IL-12Rβ2. The choice of genes studied is important because IL-23 is a heterodimeric protein that consists of the unique IL-23p19 subunit paired with a second subunit called IL-12/23p40, whereas IL-12 is a related heterodimer consisting of the IL-12/23p40 subunit and a subunit called IL-12p35 (Figure 2) (Kastelein et al., 2007Kastelein R.A. Hunter C.A. Cua D.J. Discovery and biology of IL-23 and IL-27: related but functionally distinct regulators of inflammation.Annu Rev Immunol. 2007; 25: 221-242Crossref PubMed Scopus (615) Google Scholar). The receptors for IL-23 and IL-12 are also related heterodimers; the IL-23 receptor consists of IL-23R and IL-12Rβ1 subunits, whereas the IL-12 receptor is composed of IL-12Rβ1 and IL-12Rβ2 subunits (Figure 2) (Kastelein et al., 2007Kastelein R.A. Hunter C.A. Cua D.J. Discovery and biology of IL-23 and IL-27: related but functionally distinct regulators of inflammation.Annu Rev Immunol. 2007; 25: 221-242Crossref PubMed Scopus (615) Google Scholar). The conclusion of Nair and colleagues’ paper is that certain polymorphisms in genes that encode for IL-12/23p40 and IL-23R promote susceptibility to psoriasis, whereas other polymorphisms in the same two genes confer protection from developing psoriasis. This work confirms genetic associations first reported in 2002 for IL-12/23p40 and subsequently in two studies on IL-12/23p40 and IL-23R (Capon et al., 2007Capon F. Di Meglio P. Szaub J. Prescott N.J. Dunster C. Baumber L. et al.Sequence variants in the genes for the interleukin-23 receptor (IL23R) and its ligand (IL12B) confer protection against psoriasis.Hum Genet. 2007; 122: 201-206Crossref PubMed Scopus (339) Google Scholar; Cargill et al., 2007Cargill M. Schrodi S.J. Chang M. Garcia V.E. Brandon R. Callis K.P. et al.A large-scale genetic association study confirms IL12B and leads to the identification of IL23R as psoriasis-risk genes.Am J Hum Genet. 2007; 80: 273-290Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (874) Google Scholar). Thus, genes that encode for IL-12/23p40 and IL-23R are clearly linked to psoriasis. At least three ingredients are still lacking in the overall picture of genetics studies and psoriasis. First, the IL-12/23p40 and IL-23R genetics data in humans have not been compared and contrasted with functional data from biologic experiments. It is predicted that these in vitro studies will demonstrate that certain genetic changes in IL-12/23p40 and IL-23R will lead to enhanced IL-23 production and IL-23 receptor-mediated signaling and thus be correlative with psoriasis susceptibility in humans. In contrast, other mutations that result in decreased IL-23 production and IL-23 receptor-mediated signaling in vitro are predicted to be associated with protection from developing psoriasis in individuals who carry these particular polymorphisms. Second, genotype–phenotype studies have yet to be completed, although many are underway. For instance, will certain IL-12/23p40 and IL-23R polymorphisms correlate with certain disease presentations (e.g., guttate vs. pustular psoriasis) or with severity of disease? Third, do the polymorphisms described by Elder and others confer therapeutic responsiveness to drugs that target IL-12/23p40, such as ustekinumab (Krueger et al., 2007Krueger G.G. Langley R.G. Leonardi C. Yeilding N. Guzzo C. Wang Y. et al.A human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody for the treatment of psoriasis.N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 580-592Crossref PubMed Scopus (674) Google Scholar) and ABT-874 (Kimball et al., 2008Kimball A.B. Gordon K.B. Langley R.G. Menter A. Chartash E.K. Valdes J. Safety and efficacy of ABT-874, a fully human interleukin 12/23 monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.Arch Dermatol. 2008; 144: 200-207Crossref PubMed Scopus (200) Google Scholar)? Such pharmacogenomic studies now appear to be within reach of cutaneous biologists and investigative dermatologists. In the ongoing discussion of whether psoriasis represents a “Th1 disease” (as has been espoused for many years), a “Th17 disease,” or some combination of both, the most recent data emerging from many investigators studying various aspects of this immunologic puzzle suggest that IL-23 and Th17 cells are key mediators of disease pathogenesis (Fitch et al., 2007Fitch E. Harper E. Skorcheva I. Kurtz S.E. Blauvelt A. Pathophysiology of psoriasis: recent advances on IL-23 and Th17 cytokines.Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2007; 9: 461-467Crossref PubMed Scopus (258) Google Scholar; Lowes et al., 2007Lowes M.A. Bowcock A.M. Krueger J.G. Pathogenesis and therapy of psoriasis.Nature. 2007; 445: 866-873Crossref PubMed Scopus (1296) Google Scholar; Nickoloff, 2007Nickoloff B.J. Cracking the cytokine code in psoriasis.Nat Med. 2007; 13: 242-244Crossref PubMed Scopus (142) Google Scholar). In other words, IL-23, which makes Th17 cells survive and proliferate, has emerged as a master cytokine in the new paradigm of psoriasis pathogenesis. Although the IL-12/23p40 genetic data discussed above do not clearly implicate IL-23 more than IL-12, or vice versa, the IL-23R genetic data clearly point to IL-23 as a central cytokine in psoriasis (Capon et al., 2007Capon F. Di Meglio P. Szaub J. Prescott N.J. Dunster C. Baumber L. et al.Sequence variants in the genes for the interleukin-23 receptor (IL23R) and its ligand (IL12B) confer protection against psoriasis.Hum Genet. 2007; 122: 201-206Crossref PubMed Scopus (339) Google Scholar; Cargill et al., 2007Cargill M. Schrodi S.J. Chang M. Garcia V.E. Brandon R. Callis K.P. et al.A large-scale genetic association study confirms IL12B and leads to the identification of IL23R as psoriasis-risk genes.Am J Hum Genet. 2007; 80: 273-290Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (874) Google Scholar; Nair et al., 2008Nair R.P. Ruether A. Stuart P.E. Jenisch S. Tejasvi T. Hiremagalore R. et al.Polymorphisms of the IL12B and IL23R genes are associated with psoriasis.J Invest Dermatol. 2008https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jid.5701255Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (221) Google Scholar). Similarly, psoriasis patients treated with monoclonal antibodies directed against IL-12/23p40 demonstrate substantial clinical responses (Krueger et al., 2007Krueger G.G. Langley R.G. Leonardi C. Yeilding N. Guzzo C. Wang Y. et al.A human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody for the treatment of psoriasis.N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 580-592Crossref PubMed Scopus (674) Google Scholar; Kimball et al., 2008Kimball A.B. Gordon K.B. Langley R.G. Menter A. Chartash E.K. Valdes J. Safety and efficacy of ABT-874, a fully human interleukin 12/23 monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.Arch Dermatol. 2008; 144: 200-207Crossref PubMed Scopus (200) Google Scholar), yet the relative importance of IL-23 vs. IL-12 in disease maintenance is not distinguished. Of note, however, pharmaceutical companies’ interest in drugs that specifically target IL-23 and Th17 cells is high. New-age biologics that specifically block components of the IL-23/Th17 inflammatory pathway, such as IL-23p19, IL-23R, IL-17A, and IL-22, are examples of compounds that are making their way through the pharmaceutical industry's developmental pipelines. It will be interesting to learn whether the drugs that are targeted more to the IL-23/Th17 cell inflammatory pathway will be as effective for psoriasis as the less selective anti-IL-12/23p40 monoclonal antibodies. It is predicted that inhibition of IL-23 will lead to death of Th17 cells and long-lasting abrogation of psoriasis. Finally, determining the biologic effects of such drugs (both dual IL-23/IL-12 inhibitors and selective IL-23 inhibitors) on normal cellular processes and examining overall drug safety profiles will be important to ensure adequate risk–benefit ratios for patients. It is an exciting time to be working in psoriasis. Recent pioneering research in cellular immunology has led to the discovery of IL-23 and Th17 cells (Kastelein et al., 2007Kastelein R.A. Hunter C.A. Cua D.J. Discovery and biology of IL-23 and IL-27: related but functionally distinct regulators of inflammation.Annu Rev Immunol. 2007; 25: 221-242Crossref PubMed Scopus (615) Google Scholar). These seminal studies, in combination with new information on murine models of psoriasis (Gudjonsson et al., 2007Gudjonsson J.E. Johnston A. Dyson M. Valdimarsson H. Elder J.T. Mouse models of psoriasis.J Invest Dermatol. 2007; 127: 1292-1308Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (177) Google Scholar), data from human skin affected by psoriasis (Lowes et al., 2008Lowes M.A. Kikuchi T. Fuentes-Duculan J. Cardinale I. Zaba L.C. Haider A.S. et al.Psoriasis vulgaris lesions contain discrete populations of Th1 and Th17 T Cells.J Invest Dermatol. 2008; 128: 1207-1211Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (775) Google Scholar), advances in genetics (Nair et al., 2008Nair R.P. Ruether A. Stuart P.E. Jenisch S. Tejasvi T. Hiremagalore R. et al.Polymorphisms of the IL12B and IL23R genes are associated with psoriasis.J Invest Dermatol. 2008https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jid.5701255Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (221) Google Scholar), and the development of novel targeted therapeutics for patients with psoriasis (Krueger et al., 2007Krueger G.G. Langley R.G. Leonardi C. Yeilding N. Guzzo C. Wang Y. et al.A human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody for the treatment of psoriasis.N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 580-592Crossref PubMed Scopus (674) Google Scholar; Kimball et al., 2008Kimball A.B. Gordon K.B. Langley R.G. Menter A. Chartash E.K. Valdes J. Safety and efficacy of ABT-874, a fully human interleukin 12/23 monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.Arch Dermatol. 2008; 144: 200-207Crossref PubMed Scopus (200) Google Scholar), have converged into a fertile mix of new and useful knowledge about psoriasis. Although much work remains to be done, investigators studying psoriasis now appear poised to unravel many of the remaining mysteries of this enigmatic disease. The author is a scientific consultant, speaker, and clinical study principal investigator for Centocor and Abbott. I appreciate the many discussions on this topic with members of my laboratory, including Erin Fitch, Stephen E Kurtz, and Erin G Harper. This work was supported by a Veterans Affairs Merit Award and National Institutes of Health grant 1 R21 AR054495-01A1.

The Canadian Guidelines for the Management of Plaque Psoriasis were reviewed by the entire National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board and updated to include newly approved agents such as ustekinumab and to reflect practice patterns in the United States, where the excimer laser is approved for psoriasis treatment. Management of psoriasis in special populations is discussed. In the updated guidelines, we include sections on children, pregnant patients or pregnant partners of patients, nursing mothers, the elderly, patients with hepatitis B or C virus infections, human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients, and patients with malignant neoplasms, as well as sections on tumor necrosis factor blockers, elective surgery, and vaccinations.

<h3>Background</h3> Many studies have identified cardiovascular risk factors in patients with psoriasis. Some psoriasis therapies may increase cardiovascular disease (CVD) and others may decrease CVD. <h3>Objective</h3> We reviewed the literature to define the impact of common psoriasis therapies on cardiovascular measures and outcomes. <h3>Results</h3> Phototherapy has no major cardiovascular impact and may reduce levels of proinflammatory cytokines. Acitretin increases serum lipids and triglycerides, but has not been shown to increase cardiovascular risk. Cyclosporine A increases blood pressure, serum triglycerides, and total cholesterol. Methotrexate is associated with a decreased risk of CVD morbidity and mortality. Among the biologics, data for tumor necrosis factor inhibitors suggest an overall reduction in cardiovascular events. Most data on short-term ustekinumab use suggest no effect on major adverse cardiovascular events, however some authorities remain concerned. Nevertheless, ustekinumab use over a 4-year period shows a decrease in major adverse cardiovascular events when compared both with the general US population and with psoriatics in Great Britain. <h3>Limitations</h3> Most studies lack the power and randomization of large clinical trials and long-term follow-up periods. In addition, the increased risk of CVD associated with psoriasis itself is a confounding factor. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Some therapies for moderate to severe psoriasis, including methotrexate and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, may reduce cardiovascular events in psoriatic patients. Ustekinumab appears to be neutral but there may be a long-term benefit. Appropriate patient counseling and selection and clinical follow-up are necessary to maximize safety with these agents. Further long-term study is necessary to quantify the benefits and risks associated with biologic therapies.

Moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with substantial patient burden despite current therapies.We sought to evaluate dupilumab treatment on patient-reported outcomes in adults with moderate to severe AD.Adults (N = 380) with moderate to severe AD inadequately controlled by topical medications were randomized to 16 weeks of double-blind, subcutaneous treatment with dupilumab 100 mg every 4 weeks, 200 mg every 2 weeks, 300 mg every 2 weeks, 300 mg once weekly, or placebo. Patient-reported outcomes included pruritus numeric rating scale; patient-reported sleep item on Scoring AD scale; Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; Dermatology Life Quality Index; and 5-dimension 3-level EuroQol.Dupilumab reduced peak itch at 16 weeks relative to placebo by 1.1 to 3.2 points on numeric rating scale (P < .0001 all doses, except 100 mg every 4 weeks P < .05); improved sleep and health-related quality of life on Dermatology Life Quality Index and 5-dimension 3-level EuroQol (P < .05 all doses, except 100 mg every 4 weeks); and reduced anxiety and depression symptoms (P < .05 all doses). Dupilumab's effects appeared early and achieved clinically relevant improvements without significant safety concerns.There are potential cultural differences affecting patient-reported outcome responses. Outcomes were secondary or exploratory end points.Dupilumab produced early and sustained patient-reported and clinically relevant improvements in sleep, mental health, and health-related quality of life; the two 300-mg dose regimens resulted in greatest benefits.

BackgroundPhase 2 psoriasis studies with the Fc-free, PEGylated, anti–tumor necrosis factor biologic certolizumab pegol demonstrated meaningful clinical activity.ObjectiveAssess safety and efficacy of certolizumab in adults with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis.MethodsPatients were randomized 3:3:1:3 to certolizumab 400 mg, certolizumab 200 mg, or placebo every 2 weeks for 16 weeks or etanercept 50 mg twice weekly for 12 weeks. Certolizumab-treated patients achieving a ≥75% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at week 16 from baseline PASI were rerandomized to certolizumab or placebo for 32 weeks. The primary endpoint was responder rate (≥75% reduction in PASI from baseline PASI) versus placebo (primary analysis) and etanercept (secondary analysis) at week 12; secondary endpoints included responder rates on various measures versus placebo at weeks 12, 16, and 48. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events.ResultsAll endpoints were significantly greater for certolizumab versus placebo with the greatest response seen with 400 mg. Certolizumab 400 mg was superior to and 200 mg was noninferior to etanercept. Adverse events were consistent with the anti–tumor necrosis factor class of drugs.LimitationsEtanercept was administered by unblinded study staff or self-administered, but efficacy assessments were performed by a blinded assessor.ConclusionBoth certolizumab regimens improved psoriasis symptoms, with a greater response seen with the higher dose. No new safety signals were observed. Phase 2 psoriasis studies with the Fc-free, PEGylated, anti–tumor necrosis factor biologic certolizumab pegol demonstrated meaningful clinical activity. Assess safety and efficacy of certolizumab in adults with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Patients were randomized 3:3:1:3 to certolizumab 400 mg, certolizumab 200 mg, or placebo every 2 weeks for 16 weeks or etanercept 50 mg twice weekly for 12 weeks. Certolizumab-treated patients achieving a ≥75% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at week 16 from baseline PASI were rerandomized to certolizumab or placebo for 32 weeks. The primary endpoint was responder rate (≥75% reduction in PASI from baseline PASI) versus placebo (primary analysis) and etanercept (secondary analysis) at week 12; secondary endpoints included responder rates on various measures versus placebo at weeks 12, 16, and 48. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events. All endpoints were significantly greater for certolizumab versus placebo with the greatest response seen with 400 mg. Certolizumab 400 mg was superior to and 200 mg was noninferior to etanercept. Adverse events were consistent with the anti–tumor necrosis factor class of drugs. Etanercept was administered by unblinded study staff or self-administered, but efficacy assessments were performed by a blinded assessor. Both certolizumab regimens improved psoriasis symptoms, with a greater response seen with the higher dose. No new safety signals were observed.

Summary Background Adalimumab is used to treat several inflammatory diseases, including plaque psoriasis. GP2017 is a proposed adalimumab biosimilar. Objectives To assess the impact of multiple switches between GP2017 and reference adalimumab (ref-ADMB) following the demonstration of equivalent efficacy and similar safety and immunogenicity, in adult patients with active, clinically stable, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Methods This 51-week double-blinded, phase III study randomly assigned patients to GP2017 (n = 231) or ref-ADMB (n = 234) 80 mg subcutaneously at week 0, then 40 mg biweekly from week 1. At week 17, patients were rerandomized to switch (n = 126) or continue (n = 253) treatment. The primary end point was patients achieving ≥ 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) at week 16, with equivalence confirmed if the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in PASI 75 between treatments was ± 18%. The key secondary end point was the change from baseline to week 16 in continuous PASI. Other end points were PASI over time; PASI 50, 75, 90 and100; pharmacokinetics; safety; tolerability and immunogenicity for the switched and continued treatment groups. Results Equivalent efficacy between GP2017 and ref-ADMB was confirmed for the primary (66·8% and 65·0%, respectively; 95% CI −7·46 to 11·15) and key secondary end points (−60·7% and −61·5%, respectively; 95% CI –3·15 to 4·84). PASI improved over time and was similar between treatment groups at week 16, and the switched and continued groups from weeks 17 to 51. There were no relevant safety or immunogenicity differences between GP2017 and ref-ADMB at week 16, or the switched and continued groups from weeks 17 to 51. No hypersensitivity to adalimumab was reported upon switching. Conclusions Following the demonstration of GP2017 biosimilarity to ref-ADMB, switching up to four times between GP2017 and ref-ADMB had no detectable impact on efficacy, safety or immunogenicity.

Tildrakizumab is a specific anti-interleukin-23p19 monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of plaque psoriasis.To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis for up to 148 weeks.Pooled analysis from two double-blind, randomized controlled trials: reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2. Efficacy was assessed for responders (≥ 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PASI 75) and partial responders (PASI 50-75) to tildrakizumab 100 mg and 200 mg at week 28 who were maintained on the same dose (administered every 12 weeks), and for partial responders or nonresponders (PASI < 50) to etanercept 50 mg at week 28 who, after a 4-week washout, were switched to tildrakizumab 200 mg (administered at weeks 32 and 36, and every 12 weeks thereafter). Safety was assessed in the all-patients-as-treated population. Three different methods of imputing missing data were used: nonresponder imputation (NRI), multiple imputation and observed cases. The Clinicaltrials.gov numbers are NCT01722331 (reSURFACE 1) and NCT01729754 (reSURFACE 2).At week 148 (NRI), 72·6%, 53·8% and 28·9% of tildrakizumab 100-mg responders and 80·2%, 59·9% and 32·6% of tildrakizumab 200-mg responders had PASI 75, 90 and 100 responses, respectively. For partial responders to tildrakizumab 100 mg and 200 mg, the proportions of patients achieving PASI 75, 90 and 100 responses were 32·5%, 25·0% and 10·0%; and 47·1%, 27·5% and 12·8%, respectively. For patients who were partial responders or nonresponders to etanercept, the proportions of patients achieving PASI 75, 90 and 100 responses were 66·9%, 43·8% and 14·9% at week 148. Rates of discontinuations due to adverse events [tildrakizumab 100 mg: 1·7 per 100 patient-years (PYs); tildrakizumab 200 mg: 1·2 per 100 PYs] and exposure-adjusted rates of serious adverse events (5·9 per 100 PYs; 5·5 per 100 PYs), severe infections (1·1 per 100 PYs; 1·1 per 100 PYs), malignancies (0·6 per 100 PYs; 0·4 per 100 PYs) and major adverse cardiovascular events (0·4 per 100 PYs; 0·5 per 100 PYs) were low.Tildrakizumab was well tolerated and efficacy was well maintained in week 28 responders who continued tildrakizumab treatment through 3 years, or improved among etanercept partial responders or nonresponders who switched to tildrakizumab. What's already known about this topic? Tildrakizumab 100 mg and 200 mg are efficacious and well tolerated with short-term use in the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. What does this study add? High levels of efficacy are maintained for up to 3 years of psoriasis treatment with tildrakizumab. There is a favourable long-term safety profile with both tildrakizumab 100 mg and 200 mg, with a low incidence of adverse events of special interest through 3 years.

BackgroundIxekizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin 17A, is efficacious in treating moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis through 60 weeks.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab through 108 weeks of treatment in UNCOVER-3.MethodsPatients (N = 1346) were randomized 2:2:2:1 to 80 mg ixekizumab every 2 or 4 weeks, 50 mg etanercept twice weekly, or placebo. At week 12, patients switched to ixekizumab every 4 weeks during a long-term extension (LTE) period. Efficacy data were summarized using as-observed, multiple imputation (MI), and modified MI (mMI) methods.ResultsFor patients (N = 385) receiving the recommended dose (ixekizumab every 2 weeks on weeks 0-12 and every 4 weeks during LTE), the 108-week as-observed, MI, and mMI response rates were 93.4%, 88.3%, and 83.6%, respectively, for patients achieving ≥75% improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, and the 108-week as-observed, MI, and mMI response rates were 82.6%, 78.3%, and 74.1%, respectively, for patients with a static Physician's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1. During LTE, 1077 (84.5%) patients reported ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event, and 85% were mild or moderate in severity. Discontinuation because of adverse events occurred in 6.4% of patients.LimitationsThere was no comparison treatment group after week 12.ConclusionIxekizumab is well tolerated and demonstrates persistent efficacy through 108 weeks. Ixekizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin 17A, is efficacious in treating moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis through 60 weeks. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab through 108 weeks of treatment in UNCOVER-3. Patients (N = 1346) were randomized 2:2:2:1 to 80 mg ixekizumab every 2 or 4 weeks, 50 mg etanercept twice weekly, or placebo. At week 12, patients switched to ixekizumab every 4 weeks during a long-term extension (LTE) period. Efficacy data were summarized using as-observed, multiple imputation (MI), and modified MI (mMI) methods. For patients (N = 385) receiving the recommended dose (ixekizumab every 2 weeks on weeks 0-12 and every 4 weeks during LTE), the 108-week as-observed, MI, and mMI response rates were 93.4%, 88.3%, and 83.6%, respectively, for patients achieving ≥75% improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, and the 108-week as-observed, MI, and mMI response rates were 82.6%, 78.3%, and 74.1%, respectively, for patients with a static Physician's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1. During LTE, 1077 (84.5%) patients reported ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event, and 85% were mild or moderate in severity. Discontinuation because of adverse events occurred in 6.4% of patients. There was no comparison treatment group after week 12. Ixekizumab is well tolerated and demonstrates persistent efficacy through 108 weeks.

Introduction: Secukinumab is a human monoclonal antibody that selectively targets and neutralizes interleukin (IL)-17A, a cytokine that is normally involved in mucocutaneous defense against extracellular organisms and is abnormally expressed in psoriasis. In 2015, secukinumab was the first IL-17A inhibitor approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.Areas covered: This review evaluates the safety profile of secukinumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis and its role in the clinical landscape. A literature search was performed for articles published through February 2016; additional data from a pooled safety analysis of 10 Phase II and III secukinumab studies were reviewed.Expert opinion: Collectively, these studies show that secukinumab demonstrates a highly favorable safety profile, especially compared with commonly used psoriasis treatments such as methotrexate and TNF-α blockers. More specifically, secukinumab carries no increased risks for end-organ toxicities, serious infection, multiple sclerosis, reactivation of latent tuberculosis or hepatitis B, leukemia/lymphoma, and nonmelanoma skin cancer. Mucocutaneous candidiasis is a common side effect and occurs at a rate of 3.55/100 subject-years with secukinumab 300 mg, yet these infections usually do not interfere with maintenance of secukinumab therapy. The combination of proven efficacy and safety make secukinumab an excellent new treatment choice for individuals with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Background Patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis demonstrated positive responses to ixekizumab, an anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, in a phase-II, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Objective We sought to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of ixekizumab. Methods After receiving 10, 25, 75, or 150 mg of ixekizumab or placebo during randomized, placebo-controlled trial, patients with less than 75% improvement from baseline on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score (PASI75) entered open-label extension (OLE); patients with PASI75 or higher entered a treatment-free period (weeks 20-32), then entered OLE after meeting response criteria. During OLE, patients received 120 mg of subcutaneous ixekizumab every 4 weeks. Results In all, 120 patients entered OLE; 103 completed 52 weeks or more of treatment. Overall, 77% of patients achieved PASI75 at week 52 (nonresponder imputation). Patients who responded to treatment in the randomized, placebo-controlled trial maintained a high-level response by week 52 of OLE (PASI75 = 95%; 90% improvement from baseline on the PASI score = 94%; 100% improvement from baseline on the PASI score = 82%). Irrespective of dose in the randomized, placebo-controlled trial, each group had similar response rates at week 52 of OLE. The exposure-adjusted incidence rate for adverse events was 0.47 and for serious adverse events was 0.06 per patient-year during OLE. Limitations No control group, small sample sizes, and bias toward retention of patients with positive responses limit interpretation. Conclusion A high proportion of patients responded to ixekizumab therapy and maintained clinical responses over 1 year of treatment with no unexpected safety signals. Patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis demonstrated positive responses to ixekizumab, an anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, in a phase-II, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. We sought to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of ixekizumab. After receiving 10, 25, 75, or 150 mg of ixekizumab or placebo during randomized, placebo-controlled trial, patients with less than 75% improvement from baseline on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score (PASI75) entered open-label extension (OLE); patients with PASI75 or higher entered a treatment-free period (weeks 20-32), then entered OLE after meeting response criteria. During OLE, patients received 120 mg of subcutaneous ixekizumab every 4 weeks. In all, 120 patients entered OLE; 103 completed 52 weeks or more of treatment. Overall, 77% of patients achieved PASI75 at week 52 (nonresponder imputation). Patients who responded to treatment in the randomized, placebo-controlled trial maintained a high-level response by week 52 of OLE (PASI75 = 95%; 90% improvement from baseline on the PASI score = 94%; 100% improvement from baseline on the PASI score = 82%). Irrespective of dose in the randomized, placebo-controlled trial, each group had similar response rates at week 52 of OLE. The exposure-adjusted incidence rate for adverse events was 0.47 and for serious adverse events was 0.06 per patient-year during OLE. No control group, small sample sizes, and bias toward retention of patients with positive responses limit interpretation. A high proportion of patients responded to ixekizumab therapy and maintained clinical responses over 1 year of treatment with no unexpected safety signals.

The impact of dupilumab, an anti-interleukin (IL) 4 receptor α antibody that inhibits IL-4 and IL-13 signaling, on vaccine responses of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) is unknown.To assess T-cell-dependent and T-cell-independent humoral immune responses to tetanus and meningococcal vaccines, IgE seroconversion to tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination, and dupilumab efficacy and safety.In a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study (NCT02210780), adults with moderate-to-severe AD received dupilumab (300 mg) or placebo weekly for 16 weeks, and single doses of Tdap and quadrivalent meningococcal polysaccharide vaccines at week 12. Primary endpoint was proportion of patients achieving satisfactory IgG response to tetanus toxoid at week 16.In total, 178 patients completed the study. Similar positive immune responses (≥4-fold increase in antibody titer, or an antibody titer of ≥8) were achieved in the dupilumab and placebo groups to tetanus (83.3% and 83.7%, respectively) and meningococcal polysaccharide (86.7% and 87.0%, respectively). Dupilumab significantly decreased total serum IgE; most dupilumab-treated patients were Tdap-IgE seronegative at week 32 (62.2% dupilumab and 34.8% placebo). Dupilumab improved key AD efficacy endpoints (P < .001). Injection-site reactions and conjunctivitis were more common with dupilumab; AD exacerbations more frequent with placebo.Patients' prior vaccination status was not available before enrollment.Dupilumab did not affect responses to the vaccines studied, significantly decreased IgE, and improved measures of AD severity versus placebo, with an acceptable safety profile.

Background New psoriasis therapies have increased the ability to achieve skin clearance. However, insufficient evidence exists on the impact of total skin clearance from the patient perspective. Objective We sought to determine if complete skin clearance is clinically meaningful compared with treatment responses without clearance. Methods Pooled data from 3 phase-III trials were used to compare results for patients with complete skin clearance (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] 100 or static Physician Global Assessment score 0) with patients without complete skin clearance (PASI 75 to <100 or static Physician Global Assessment score 1) based on Psoriasis Symptom Inventory and Dermatology Life Quality Index. Results Percentages of patients with Psoriasis Symptom Inventory score 0 were 45% for those achieving PASI 100 and 8% for PASI 75 to <100 (P < .001). Respective percentages with Dermatology Life Quality Index score 0/1 were 80% and 55% (P < .001). PASI 100 resulted in incremental improvement over PASI 90 to <100 (incremental differences of 28% for Psoriasis Symptom Inventory score 0 and 18% for Dermatology Life Quality Index score 0). Similar results were observed for static Physician Global Assessment scores 0 versus 1. Conclusions Complete skin clearance represents a clinically meaningful end point and outcome for patients, reflected in experiences of no psoriasis symptoms and no impairment on health-related quality of life. New psoriasis therapies have increased the ability to achieve skin clearance. However, insufficient evidence exists on the impact of total skin clearance from the patient perspective. We sought to determine if complete skin clearance is clinically meaningful compared with treatment responses without clearance. Pooled data from 3 phase-III trials were used to compare results for patients with complete skin clearance (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] 100 or static Physician Global Assessment score 0) with patients without complete skin clearance (PASI 75 to <100 or static Physician Global Assessment score 1) based on Psoriasis Symptom Inventory and Dermatology Life Quality Index. Percentages of patients with Psoriasis Symptom Inventory score 0 were 45% for those achieving PASI 100 and 8% for PASI 75 to <100 (P < .001). Respective percentages with Dermatology Life Quality Index score 0/1 were 80% and 55% (P < .001). PASI 100 resulted in incremental improvement over PASI 90 to <100 (incremental differences of 28% for Psoriasis Symptom Inventory score 0 and 18% for Dermatology Life Quality Index score 0). Similar results were observed for static Physician Global Assessment scores 0 versus 1. Complete skin clearance represents a clinically meaningful end point and outcome for patients, reflected in experiences of no psoriasis symptoms and no impairment on health-related quality of life.

Dupilumab [a monoclonal antibody blocking the shared receptor subunit for interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13] is approved for patients aged ≥ 12 years with inadequately controlled, moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Dupilumab trials of up to 52 weeks demonstrated efficacy and a favourable safety profile in patients with moderate-to-severe AD inadequately controlled with topical medications.To further characterize the safety of dupilumab by evaluating clinical laboratory findings from three randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase III trials (LIBERTY AD SOLO 1 & 2 and LIBERTY AD CHRONOS).Patients were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 (SOLO 1 & 2) or 3 : 1 : 3 (CHRONOS) for 16 and 52 weeks, respectively, to dupilumab weekly, every 2 weeks or placebo. CHRONOS patients received a standardized concomitant topical corticosteroid regimen. Laboratory outcomes were summarized descriptively in 1376 patients from SOLO 1 & 2 and 740 from CHRONOS.Treatment groups had similar results in baseline laboratory parameters. Platelets and neutrophils showed mild decreases from baseline in dupilumab vs. placebo groups. Some dupilumab-treated patients had small transient increases in eosinophils. Grade 3 eosinophilia was reported in < 1% of dupilumab-treated and placebo-treated patients; no adverse events were associated with eosinophilia. Lactate dehydrogenase levels decreased from baseline during dupilumab treatment in all trials. No clinically meaningful changes were observed between treatment groups in other haematology, chemistry or urinalysis parameters.There were no clinically important changes in routine laboratory parameters that could be attributed to dupilumab. This study supports the use of dupilumab as a systemic treatment for moderate-to-severe AD that does not require laboratory monitoring. What's already known about this topic? Long-term treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) with conventional immunosuppressive agents is limited by the risk of significant side-effects and a need for repeated tests to monitor haematological and/or organ (e.g. liver, kidney) toxicities. Dupilumab [a monoclonal antibody blocking the shared receptor subunit for interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13] is approved for the treatment of patients with inadequately controlled, moderate-to-severe AD. In 16-week and 52-week studies, dupilumab demonstrated a positive risk/benefit profile in moderate-to-severe AD. What does this study add? This study is the first comprehensive analysis of dupilumab laboratory safety data of the 16-week SOLO 1 & 2 (pooled N = 1376) and 52-week CHRONOS (N = 740) trials, demonstrating an absence of clinically important changes in haematology, serum chemistry and urinalysis parameters in patients with moderate-to-severe AD treated with dupilumab. Our data support the use of dupilumab as a systemic treatment for the long-term management of moderate-to-severe AD without routine laboratory monitoring in clinical practice.

Psoriasis of the scalp, palms and/or soles, and nails is challenging to treat.To evaluate the effect of guselkumab on psoriasis in specific body regions.VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 were, double-blind, placebo- and adalimumab-controlled studies of guselkumab conducted at 101 and 115 global sites, respectively, from November 3, 2014, to May 19, 2016. Patients had moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score ≥12, Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] score ≥3, and ≥10% body surface area with psoriasis). This post hoc data analysis was performed from February 10 through November 15, 2017.Patients were randomized to guselkumab, 100 mg (weeks 0 and 4, then every 8 weeks); placebo followed by guselkumab, 100 mg, starting at week 16; or adalimumab (80 mg [week 0] and 40 mg [week 1, then every 2 weeks]).Efficacy was assessed through week 24. End points included numbers of patients achieving scores of 0 or 1 (clear or near clear) or 0 (clear) on the scalp-specific IGA (ss-IGA), Physician's Global Assessment of the hands and/or feet (hf-PGA), and fingernail PGA (f-PGA) and percentage of improvement in target Nail Psoriasis Severity Index score.Of 1829 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 43.6 [12.4] years; 1300 [71.1%] male, 1498 [81.9%] white), 1576 (86.2%) had psoriasis of the scalp; 501 (27.4%), palms and/or soles; and 1049 (57.4%), fingernails. At baseline, 1512 (82.7%), 461 (25.2%), and 928 (50.7%) patients had a score of 2 or higher on the ss-IGA, hf-PGA, and f-PGA, respectively, and were included in the analysis. Guselkumab was superior to placebo based on the proportion of patients achieving an ss-IGA score of 0 or 1 (560 [81.8%] vs 43 [12.4%]) at week 16 and to adalimumab (582 [85.0%] vs 329 [68.5%]) at week 24 (both P < .001); 479 (69.9%) in the guselkumab group vs 270 (56.3%) in the adalimumab group achieved an ss-IGA score of 0 (all P < .001). An hf-PGA score of 0 or 1 was achieved by 154 patients (75.5%) in the guselkumab group vs 15 (14.2%) in the placebo group at week 16 and 164 (80.4%) in the guselkumab group vs 91 (60.3%) in the adalimumab group at week 24; 153 (75.0%) in the guselkumab group vs 76 (50.3%) in the adalimumab group achieved an hf-PGA score of 0 (all P < .001). An f-PGA score of 0 or 1 was achieved by 196 patients (46.7%) in the guselkumab group vs 32 (15.2%) in the placebo group at week 16 (P < .001) and 252 (60.0%) in the guselkumab group vs 191 (64.3%) in the adalimumab group at week 24 (P = .11); 115 (27.4%) in the guselkumab group vs 83 (27.9%) in the adalimumab group achieved an f-PGA score of 0 (P = .63).Compared with adalimumab, guselkumab was associated with significant improvement in psoriasis on the scalp and palms and/or soles; magnitude of improvement in fingernails did not differ between treatments. These results may help dermatologists make treatment decisions for patients with psoriasis in difficult-to-treat body regions.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02207231 and NCT02207244.

Genital psoriasis (GenPs) is a common, debilitating and difficult-to-treat manifestation of plaque psoriasis. However, few controlled, interventional studies of GenPs exist.To determine the efficacy of ixekizumab vs. placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe GenPs with ≥ 1% involved body surface area (BSA).Patients with moderate-to-severe GenPs, defined as a baseline static Physician's Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) score of ≥ 3, with BSA ≥ 1% were randomized 1 : 1 to receive placebo (n = 74) or the recommended dosing of ixekizumab (n = 75). Major outcomes included the percentage of patients achieving 0 or 1 scores on the sPGA-G (primary end point), overall sPGA, GenPs Sexual Frequency Questionnaire (GenPs-SFQ) item 2, and ≥ 3-point improvement from baseline on the GenPs itch numerical rating scale.At week 12, ixekizumab was superior to placebo for sPGA-G 0/1 (73% vs. 8%, P < 0·001), overall sPGA 0/1 (73% vs. 3%, P < 0·001), GenPs-SFQ item 2 score of 0 or 1 (78% vs. 21%, P < 0·001) and genital itch (60% vs. 8%, P < 0·001). No candidiasis was reported, no deaths occurred and one (1%) serious adverse event was reported in a patient receiving placebo.Ixekizumab was superior to placebo for the treatment of moderate-to-severe GenPs with BSA ≥ 1%. The safety profile of ixekizumab was consistent with previous studies in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Ixekizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin (IL)-17A, is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.This analysis represents an overview of the efficacy outcomes from three phase III psoriasis studies.Data were integrated from the 12-week induction period of three studies in which patients received ixekizumab 80 mg every 2 weeks (IXE Q2W; n = 1169) or every 4 weeks (IXE Q4W; n = 1165) after an initial 160-mg dose for both; etanercept (50 mg biweekly; n = 740; two studies) or placebo (n = 792). The coprimary end points were the percentages of patients with response of static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA; score 0 or 1) and ≥ 75% improvement in baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) at week 12. Response rates were compared between treatments using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by study. Treatment comparisons with placebo included data from three studies, whereas etanercept comparisons were based on two studies.Ixekizumab treatment was superior to placebo (P < 0·001) and etanercept (P < 0·001) on sPGA (0, 1) and PASI 75, with significant differences in PASI improvement at week 1. With IXE Q2W, at week 12, the frequencies of patients achieving PASI 75, 90 and 100 were nearly 90%, 70% and 40%, respectively. Ixekizumab-treated patients showed significantly greater improvement vs. placebo and etanercept in percentage body surface area involvement and fingernail psoriasis. IXE Q2W was superior to IXE Q4W on all treatment outcomes.Ixekizumab therapy at both dosing regimens demonstrated rapid onset and superior efficacy to placebo and etanercept, with IXE Q2W providing better outcomes than IXE Q4W during the first 12 weeks of treatment.

Management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) commonly requires long-term treatment. The aim of this study was to report the safety and efficacy of dupilumab treatment for up to 3 years in adults with moderate-to-severe AD. This ongoing, multicenter, open-label extension study (LIBERTY AD OLE; NCT01949311) assessed dupilumab treatment in adults previously enrolled in dupilumab trials. Patients received dupilumab 300 mg weekly up to 148 weeks. The primary outcome was safety. Of 2677 patients enrolled and treated, 347 reached week 148. Mean self-reported drug compliance was 98.2%. Safety data were consistent with previously reported trials (270.1 adverse events [AEs]/100 patient-years; 6.9 serious AEs/100 patient-years) and the known dupilumab safety profile. Common AEs (≥ 5% of patients) included nasopharyngitis, AD, upper respiratory tract infection, conjunctivitis, headache, oral herpes, and injection-site reactions. AD signs and symptoms showed sustained improvements during treatment with mean (standard deviation, mean percentage change from parent study baseline) Eczema Area and Severity Index 1.4 (3.2, − 95.4%) and weekly Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale 2.2 (1.8, − 65.4%) at week 148. No control arm; fewer patients at later time points; regimen different from the approved 300 mg every 2 weeks dose. These safety and efficacy results support dupilumab as a continuous long-term treatment for adults with moderate-to-severe AD. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01949311.

Long-term maintenance treatment is required for patients with psoriasis.To evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis through 3 years of treatment.In 2 ongoing, phase 3 trials of guselkumab (VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2), the proportions of patients achieving at least 90% and 100% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90 and PASI 100, respectively) and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) scores of 0/1 and 0 were summarized for the guselkumab group (including placebo-to-guselkumab crossover). Patients who met treatment failure rules were considered nonresponders. Safety outcomes (rates/100 patient-years [PY]) were evaluated based on data pooled across studies through week 156.Three-year response rates for the guselkumab group in VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2, respectively, were 82.8% and 77.2% for PASI 90, 50.8% and 48.8% for PASI 100, 82.1% and 83.0% for IGA score of 0/1, and 53.1% and 52.9% for IGA score of 0. Safety event rates across studies occurred through week 156 as follows: serious adverse events, 5.68/100 PY; serious infections, 1.15/100 PY; nonmelanoma skin cancers, 0.28/100 PY; malignancies other than nonmelanoma skin cancer, 0.47/100 PY; and major adverse cardiovascular events, 0.28/100 PY. Week 156 and week 100 rates were consistent.There was no comparator arm beyond 1 year.Guselkumab shows durable efficacy and a consistent safety profile in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis treated for up to 3 years.

Cellular sources of IL-23 and IL-17A driving skin inflammation in psoriasis remain unclear. Using high-dimensional unsupervised flow cytometry analysis, mononuclear phagocytes and T cells were examined in the same lesions of patients before and during guselkumab (IL-23p19 blocker) or secukinumab (IL-17A blocker) treatment. Among CD11c+HLA-DR+ mononuclear phagocytes, CD64brightCD163−CD14brightCD1c−CD1a‒ inflammatory monocyte‒like cells were the predominant IL-23–producing cells and, together with CD64−CD163−CD14−IL-23p19−TNF-α+ inflammatory dendritic cell‒like cells, were increased in lesional compared with those in nonlesional skin taken from the same patient. Within T cells, CD8+CD49a+ and/or CD103+ tissue-resident memory T cells, CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells, and CD4+CD49a−CD103− T cells were increased. Moreover, CD4+CD49a−CD103− T cells and the relatively rare CD8+ memory T cells equally contributed to IL-17A production. Both treatments decreased the frequencies of inflammatory monocyte‒like, inflammatory dendritic cell‒like, and CD4+CD49a−CD103− T cells. In contrast, guselkumab reduced memory T cells while maintaining regulatory T cells and vice versa for secukinumab. Neither drug modified the frequencies of IL-17A+IL‒17F+/– CD4+ or CD8+ T cells. This study reveals the identity of the major IL-23+ mononuclear phagocyte and IL-17+ T-cell subsets in psoriatic skin lesions and paves the way for a better understanding of the mode of action of drugs targeting the IL-23/IL-17A pathway in psoriasis. Cellular sources of IL-23 and IL-17A driving skin inflammation in psoriasis remain unclear. Using high-dimensional unsupervised flow cytometry analysis, mononuclear phagocytes and T cells were examined in the same lesions of patients before and during guselkumab (IL-23p19 blocker) or secukinumab (IL-17A blocker) treatment. Among CD11c+HLA-DR+ mononuclear phagocytes, CD64brightCD163−CD14brightCD1c−CD1a‒ inflammatory monocyte‒like cells were the predominant IL-23–producing cells and, together with CD64−CD163−CD14−IL-23p19−TNF-α+ inflammatory dendritic cell‒like cells, were increased in lesional compared with those in nonlesional skin taken from the same patient. Within T cells, CD8+CD49a+ and/or CD103+ tissue-resident memory T cells, CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells, and CD4+CD49a−CD103− T cells were increased. Moreover, CD4+CD49a−CD103− T cells and the relatively rare CD8+ memory T cells equally contributed to IL-17A production. Both treatments decreased the frequencies of inflammatory monocyte‒like, inflammatory dendritic cell‒like, and CD4+CD49a−CD103− T cells. In contrast, guselkumab reduced memory T cells while maintaining regulatory T cells and vice versa for secukinumab. Neither drug modified the frequencies of IL-17A+IL‒17F+/– CD4+ or CD8+ T cells. This study reveals the identity of the major IL-23+ mononuclear phagocyte and IL-17+ T-cell subsets in psoriatic skin lesions and paves the way for a better understanding of the mode of action of drugs targeting the IL-23/IL-17A pathway in psoriasis.

Psoriasis, a chronic immune-mediated disease, is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. Secukinumab selectively neutralizes IL-17A and has reported high efficacy with a favorable safety profile in various psoriatic disease manifestations. Subsequent to the 12-week randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind treatment period, patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis received secukinumab for 40 weeks. Vascular inflammation using 18F-2-fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging and blood-based cardiometabolic was assessed at week 0, 12, and 52. The difference in change in aortic inflammation from baseline to week 12 for secukinumab (n = 46) versus placebo (n = 45) was –0.053 (95% confidence interval = –0.169 to 0.064; P = 0.37). Small increases in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein particles, but no changes in markers of inflammation, adiposity, insulin resistance, or predictors of diabetes, were observed with secukinumab treatment compared with placebo. At week 52, reductions in TNF-α (P = 0.0063) and ferritin (P = 0.0354), and an increase in fetuin-A (P = 0.0024), were observed with secukinumab treatment compared with baseline. No significant changes in aortic inflammation or markers of advanced lipoprotein characterization, adiposity, or insulin resistance were observed with secukinumab treatment compared with baseline. Secukinumab exhibited a neutral impact on aortic vascular inflammation and biomarkers of cardiometabolic disease after 52 weeks of treatment. Psoriasis, a chronic immune-mediated disease, is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. Secukinumab selectively neutralizes IL-17A and has reported high efficacy with a favorable safety profile in various psoriatic disease manifestations. Subsequent to the 12-week randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind treatment period, patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis received secukinumab for 40 weeks. Vascular inflammation using 18F-2-fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging and blood-based cardiometabolic was assessed at week 0, 12, and 52. The difference in change in aortic inflammation from baseline to week 12 for secukinumab (n = 46) versus placebo (n = 45) was –0.053 (95% confidence interval = –0.169 to 0.064; P = 0.37). Small increases in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein particles, but no changes in markers of inflammation, adiposity, insulin resistance, or predictors of diabetes, were observed with secukinumab treatment compared with placebo. At week 52, reductions in TNF-α (P = 0.0063) and ferritin (P = 0.0354), and an increase in fetuin-A (P = 0.0024), were observed with secukinumab treatment compared with baseline. No significant changes in aortic inflammation or markers of advanced lipoprotein characterization, adiposity, or insulin resistance were observed with secukinumab treatment compared with baseline. Secukinumab exhibited a neutral impact on aortic vascular inflammation and biomarkers of cardiometabolic disease after 52 weeks of treatment.

Significantly more patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis treated with the interleukin (IL)‐17A inhibitor ixekizumab vs. the IL‐23p19 inhibitor guselkumab in the IXORA‐R head‐to‐head trial achieved 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 100) at week 12. To compare skin and nail clearance and patient‐reported outcomes for ixekizumab vs. guselkumab, up to week 24. IXORA‐R enrolled adults with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis, defined as static Physician’s Global Assessment ≥ 3, PASI ≥ 12 and involved body surface area ≥ 10%. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test stratified by pooled site. Time‐to‐first‐event comparisons were performed using Kaplan–Meier analysis, and P‐values were generated using adjusted log‐rank tests stratified by treatment group. Cumulative days at clinical and patient‐reported responses were compared by ancova. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03573323). Of the 1027 patients randomly assigned, 90% completed the trial (465 of 520 ixekizumab and 459 of 507 guselkumab). As early as week 2 and through week 16, more patients on ixekizumab achieved PASI 100 (P < 0·01). At week 24, ixekizumab was noninferior to guselkumab (50% vs. 52%, difference −2·3%), with no statistically significant difference in PASI 100 (P = 0·41). More patients receiving ixekizumab showed completely clear nails at week 24 (52% vs. 31%, P = 0·007). The median time to first PASI 50/75/90 and PASI 100 were 2 and 7·5 weeks shorter, respectively, for patients on ixekizumab vs. guselkumab (P < 0·001). Patients on ixekizumab also had a greater cumulative benefit, with more days at PASI 90 and 100, with Dermatology Life Quality Index of 0 or 1, and itch free (P < 0·05). The frequency of serious adverse events was 3% for each group, with no new safety signals. Ixekizumab was noninferior to guselkumab in complete skin clearance and superior in clearing nails at week 24. Ixekizumab cleared skin more rapidly in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis, with a greater cumulative benefit, than guselkumab. Overall, the safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile for ixekizumab.

Risankizumab has demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in randomized clinical trials.To evaluate safety data from risankizumab psoriasis phase I-III clinical trials.Short-term safety (through week 16) was analysed using integrated data from five phase II and III clinical trials. Long-term safety was evaluated using integrated data from 17 phase I-III completed and ongoing trials.Short-term safety analyses included 1306 patients receiving risankizumab 150 mg and 300 patients receiving placebo [402·2 and 92·0 patient-years (PY) of exposure, respectively]. Long-term analyses included 3072 risankizumab-treated patients (exposure: 7927 PY). The median (excluding four outliers) treatment duration was 2·9 years (range 2 days to 5·9 years). Exposure-adjusted adverse event rates did not increase with long-term treatment (318 vs. 171 events per 100 PY for short- and long-term analyses). With long-term risankizumab treatment, rates of serious adverse events were 7·8 per 100 PY, serious infections 1·2 per 100 PY, nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) 0·7 per 100 PY, malignant tumours excluding NMSC 0·5 per 100 PY, and adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events 0·3 per 100 PY, with no important identified risks. Limitations include that the study inclusion and exclusion criteria varied and that three studies enrolled ≤ 50 patients.Risankizumab demonstrated a favourable safety profile over short- and long-term treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

ObjectiveTo report the efficacy and safety of the approved ixekizumab (IXE) dose over 5 years from UNCOVER-3 (NCT01646177).MethodsPatients (N = 1346) were randomized 1:2:2:2 to receive subcutaneous injections of placebo, etanercept 50 mg twice weekly, or IXE 80 mg every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks after an initial dose of IXE 160 mg, respectively. At week 12, patients entered the long-term extension period with dosing of IXE every 4 weeks and could escalate to every 2 weeks after week 60. Efficacy was reported for the IXE every 2 weeks/every 4 weeks group of the intent-to-treat population. Safety was reported for patients who received at least 1 dose of IXE every 2 or every 4 weeks.ResultsUsing modified nonresponder imputation, 78.8%/67.1%/46.2% of patients receiving the approved dose of IXE every 2 weeks/every 4 weeks (n = 385) achieved ≥75%, ≥90%, or 100% improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, respectively, at week 264; static Physician's Global Assessment score of 0/1 and 0 responses were 69.2% and 45.3%, respectively. Infections were the most observed treatment-emergent adverse event (72.7% of patients).LimitationsLack of comparison treatment group after week 12.ConclusionIXE demonstrates sustained efficacy and consistent safety through 264 weeks in patients using the approved dose. To report the efficacy and safety of the approved ixekizumab (IXE) dose over 5 years from UNCOVER-3 (NCT01646177). Patients (N = 1346) were randomized 1:2:2:2 to receive subcutaneous injections of placebo, etanercept 50 mg twice weekly, or IXE 80 mg every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks after an initial dose of IXE 160 mg, respectively. At week 12, patients entered the long-term extension period with dosing of IXE every 4 weeks and could escalate to every 2 weeks after week 60. Efficacy was reported for the IXE every 2 weeks/every 4 weeks group of the intent-to-treat population. Safety was reported for patients who received at least 1 dose of IXE every 2 or every 4 weeks. Using modified nonresponder imputation, 78.8%/67.1%/46.2% of patients receiving the approved dose of IXE every 2 weeks/every 4 weeks (n = 385) achieved ≥75%, ≥90%, or 100% improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, respectively, at week 264; static Physician's Global Assessment score of 0/1 and 0 responses were 69.2% and 45.3%, respectively. Infections were the most observed treatment-emergent adverse event (72.7% of patients). Lack of comparison treatment group after week 12. IXE demonstrates sustained efficacy and consistent safety through 264 weeks in patients using the approved dose.

Guselkumab effectively treats moderate-to-severe psoriasis.To evaluate the cumulative safety experience of guselkumab using pooled data from the VOYAGE 1 and 2 studies through 5 years.Patients were randomized to guselkumab, placebo with crossover to guselkumab at week 16, or adalimumab. The studies were identical through week 24. VOYAGE 1 evaluated continuous guselkumab treatment (adalimumab-crossover-to-guselkumab at week 52), while VOYAGE 2 assessed randomized withdrawal/retreatment (weeks 28-76). Open-label guselkumab treatment was administered starting at week 52 in VOYAGE 1 and week 76 in VOYAGE 2 and continued through week 252. Pooled safety data were adjusted by exposure and analyzed in the guselkumab groups, including placebo-crossover-to-guselkumab (n = 1221) and adalimumab-crossover-to-guselkumab (n = 500), through week 264.Patients were followed for a total of 7166 patient-years (PY). Overall, 1349 of 1721 guselkumab-treated patients (78.4%) continued treatment through week 252. The rates of adverse and serious adverse events were 149/100 PY and 5.01/100 PY, respectively. Rates of adverse events of interest were low: serious infections (0.85/100 PY), nonmelanoma skin cancer (0.34/100 PY), malignancies other than nonmelanoma skin cancer (0.45/100 PY), and major adverse cardiovascular events (0.29/100 PY). Year-to-year variability was evident, but no increasing trend was observed.No direct treatment comparisons were possible after week 52.The safety profile remained consistent and favorable during 5 years of continuous guselkumab treatment of psoriasis.

For adolescent patients (aged ≥ 12 to < 18 years) with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), 16 weeks of treatment with dupilumab resulted in substantial clinical benefit compared with placebo, with an acceptable safety profile. However, long-term data on the approved dose regimens of dupilumab in adolescents with AD are lacking.This open-label extension study (LIBERTY AD PED-OLE, NCT02612454) reports the long-term safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of dupilumab in adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD who had participated in dupilumab parent trials.Patients enrolled under the original study protocol received subcutaneous dupilumab according to a weight-based regimen (2 or 4 mg/kg every week). Following protocol amendment, patients were switched to subcutaneous dupilumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (q4w) irrespective of weight, and newly enrolled patients were started on dupilumab 300 mg q4w. Patients with an inadequate clinical response (Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] score of 0/1 was not reached) to the q4w regimen could be uptitrated to the approved dupilumab dose regimens of 200 or 300 mg every 2 weeks (body weight < 60 or ≥ 60 kg, respectively). Patients whose IGA score of 0/1 was maintained continuously for a 12-week period after week 40 were discontinued from dupilumab, monitored for relapse, and re-initiated on dupilumab if required.Data for 294 patients (mean age 14.7 years) were analyzed, 102 (34.7%) of whom had completed the 52-week visit at the database lock. The dupilumab long-term safety profile was comparable to that seen in adults and consistent with the known safety profile. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild/moderate. By week 52, 42.7% of patients had an IGA score of 0/1 (clear/almost clear), and 93.1%, 81.2%, and 56.4%, respectively, had at least a 50%, 75%, or 90% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI). Most (70.9%) patients required uptitration to the approved dupilumab dose regimen. The proportions of uptitrated patients with an IGA score of 0/1 or 75% improvement in EASI increased over time, reaching 35.7% and 51.9%, respectively, 48 weeks after the first uptitration visit. By week 52, 29.4% of patients had clear/almost clear skin sustained for 12 weeks and had stopped medication; 56.7% relapsed and were subsequently re-initiated on treatment, with a mean time to re-initiation of 17.5 (± standard deviation 17.3) weeks.Consistent with results seen with short-term treatment, long-term treatment with dupilumab showed an acceptable safety profile while providing incremental clinical benefit with continued treatment over time. The high proportion of patients who needed uptitration because of inadequate response to q4w dosing supports the q2w dose regimen as optimal for this age group. Finally, the majority of patients who stopped medication after having clear/almost clear skin sustained over 12 weeks experienced disease recurrence, suggesting the need for continued dupilumab dosing to maintain efficacy.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02612454, NCT02407756, NCT03054428, and NCT03050151.Video abstract: What is the long-term safety and efficacy profile in adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis treated with the approved dupilumab dose regimen? (MP4 40,966 KB).Atopic dermatitis, or eczema, is a common chronic skin disease that can cause intense and persistent itching and rashes. Atopic dermatitis remains a problem for many adolescent patients, even if they use a number of different treatments. Dupilumab is a newer treatment for atopic dermatitis. In short-term clinical studies, dupilumab improved the disease with acceptable safety. In this study, adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis who had completed one of the short-term studies continued dupilumab treatment for 1 year. The patients started treatment with dupilumab once every 4 weeks. But if their atopic dermatitis did not improve sufficiently, they were given dupilumab every 2 weeks. Through a year of treatment, there were no unexpected side effects. The side effects that did occur were mild or moderate in severity and in most cases did not lead to interruption of treatment. Almost half of the patients achieved skin that was clear or almost clear of atopic dermatitis during the study. But their atopic dermatitis often returned if they stopped being treated, and about half of them needed to start treatment again. Most patients needed to be treated every 2 weeks. The positive effects of dupilumab generally increased the longer patients were treated.

Additional long-term treatments are needed for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). An ongoing, open-label, 5-year extension trial, ECZTEND (NCT03587805), assesses tralokinumab plus optional topical corticosteroids in participants from previous tralokinumab parent trials (PTs) with moderate-to-severe AD.To evaluate the safety and efficacy of up to 2 years tralokinumab treatment in a post hoc interim analysis.Safety analyses included adults from completed PTs enrolled in ECZTEND, regardless of tralokinumab exposure duration. Efficacy analyses included adult participants treated with tralokinumab in ECZTEND for ≥1 year and subgroup analyses of those on tralokinumab for 2 years (1 year from PT, 1 year in ECZTEND). Primary end point was the number of adverse events with additional efficacy end points.Participants on tralokinumab had an exposure-adjusted rate of 237.8 adverse events/100 patient-years' exposure (N = 1174) in the safety analysis set. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates of common adverse events were comparable to PTs, although at lower rates. With 2 years of tralokinumab, improvements in extent and severity of AD were sustained, with Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) in 82.5% of participants (N = 345).Possible selection bias; no placebo arm; some participants experienced treatment gaps between PTs and ECZTEND.Over 2 years, tralokinumab was well tolerated and maintained long-term control of AD signs and symptoms.

Patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) have increased risk of cutaneous and extracutaneous infections. Dupilumab has previously been associated with reduced risk of serious/severe infections and non-herpetic skin infections in adults with moderate-to-severe AD. This analysis assessed infection rates with dupilumab versus placebo in pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe and severe AD participating in clinical trials.This is a pooled analysis from two 16-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trials of dupilumab: monotherapy in adolescents aged 12-17 years with moderate-to-severe AD (LIBERTY AD ADOL, NCT03054428) and with concomitant topical corticosteroids in children aged 6-11 years with severe AD (LIBERTY AD PEDS, NCT03345914). Data were pooled according to treatment received: placebo/approved dupilumab doses/other studied dupilumab doses/all dupilumab doses. Exposure-adjusted rates (patients with ≥1 event per 100 patient-years [nP/100 PY]) were used to compare treatment groups.Overall, 612 patients were included: 205 received placebo and 407 received dupilumab (261 received approved dupilumab doses and 146 received other studied dupilumab doses). Overall infection rates were numerically lower with dupilumab versus placebo (nP/100 PY: placebo, 227; approved dupilumab, 173; other dupilumab, 206; all dupilumab, 184). Total skin infections were numerically less frequent in all dupilumab-treated groups versus placebo (nP/100 PY: placebo, 67; approved dupilumab, 30; other dupilumab, 46; all dupilumab, 36).These data suggest that dupilumab treatment in children and adolescents with AD does not increase infection risk overall and is associated with lower rates of skin infections compared with placebo.

Multiple switches (transitions) between biosimilars of the same reference biologic are now a reality, and they are expected to become more common in the future as more biosimilars enter the market. Switching between two biosimilars of the same reference biologic is generally driven by affordability, formulary requirements, or the relocation/travel of the patient. Evidence of whether switching between biosimilars of the same reference biologic provides similar safety and efficacy profiles is reviewed here.A systematic search was undertaken using electronic databases (to December 2021): Biosis, Embase, MEDLINE, and EBM Reviews/Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews via Ovid. Publications were evaluated for effectiveness and/or safety data linked to switching from one biosimilar to another.The systematic search yielded 982 citations. After eliminating duplicates, 626 citations remained for the initial title/abstract screening phase. Following the initial screening, 240 records were chosen; more thorough examination yielded 35 citations. After comprehensive screening and expert advice, 23 studies were selected, of which 13 were published in peer-reviewed journals; the remainder have been published as abstracts. Overall, 3657 patients were included in these studies. All studies were observational in nature; no randomized clinical trials were identified. The studies were heterogeneous in size, design, and endpoints. Across the studies, data are provided on safety, effectiveness, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, patient retention, patient and physician perceptions, and drug-use patterns. The majority of studies examined switches between biosimilar infliximabs, although switches between biosimilar adalimumabs, etanercepts, and rituximabs were also identified. Two use-pattern studies and one case report were also detected and are discussed.Within the limitations of this systematic review, available data suggests that biosimilar-to-biosimilar switching is a safe and effective clinical practice, although it is not covered by current health authority regulations or guidance. No reduction in effectiveness or increase in adverse events was detected in biosimilar-to-biosimilar switching studies conducted to date.

The approved biologics targeting interleukin (IL)-23 p19 for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, including guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab, have generally favorable safety profiles. The aim of the current review is to describe in detail the safety of these selective inhibitors. A literature search was performed using PubMed from inception to 1 November 2022, to identify clinical trials and real-world evidence publications using the keywords "guselkumab," "tildrakizumab," and "risankizumab." Overall, the most common adverse events (AEs) associated with IL-23 p19 inhibitors in clinical trials were nasopharyngitis, headache, and upper respiratory tract infections. Rates of serious AEs and AEs of interest, including serious infections, nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), malignancies excluding NMSC, major adverse cardiovascular events, and serious hypersensitivity reactions, were not increased with long-term use in clinical trials. Selectively targeting IL-23 p19 was also not associated with elevated risk of opportunistic infections, tuberculosis reactivation, oral candidiasis, or inflammatory bowel disease. Results from real-world studies were similar, supporting the safe long-term use of these biologics in a wider population of patients with psoriasis, including older patients, patients for whom multiple biologics failed, and those with comorbidities such as obesity, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, dyslipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, and psoriatic arthritis. This review is limited by the lack of direct comparisons among therapeutic agents due to differences among study designs and safety data reporting methods. In conclusion, the favorable safety profiles of IL-23 p19 inhibitors support their long-term use in the management of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

To the Editor: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare, potentially life-threatening pustular dermatosis. Over half of patients with GPP require hospitalization, and the mortality rate due to complications is 33 per 1,000 person-years.1 The in-hospital mortality rate of patients with GPP, however, is lower for those who receive treatment with biologics (1%) versus treatment with corticosteroids (9.1%) or oral agents alone (3.7%).2

Patients with psoriasis have increased risk of suicidal ideation and behavior (SIB) and depression. Bimekizumab, a biologic that inhibits interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-17F, received Food and Drug Administration approval in 2023 for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, following 2021 European Medicines Agency approval.To report SIB and depression in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis treated in bimekizumab clinical trials.Mental health changes, including neuropsychiatric events, were actively monitored across 9 bimekizumab clinical trials in psoriasis phase 2/3 trials. The patient-reported electronic Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (measuring SIB) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (measuring depression) were administered, monitored by an independent Neuropsychiatric Adjudication Committee.Throughout 7166 patient-years (PY) of bimekizumab exposure, the adjudicated SIB rate was 0.13/100PY; SIB ranges for the general psoriasis population and patients receiving anti-IL-17A/anti-IL-23 therapies are 0.09 to 0.54/100PY and 0.09 to 0.19/100PY, respectively. At week 16, 92.9% vs 81.1% of bimekizumab- vs placebo-treated patients had no/minimal depression. Newonset positive electronic Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale responses and mean Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores were low for bimekizumab-treated patients.Patient exclusion for significant/severe prespecified SIB/depression history.The long-term adjudicated SIB rate with bimekizumab was low and within ranges reported in the general psoriasis patient population and psoriasis patients treated with anti-IL-17A/anti-IL-23 biologics. Screening/monitoring questionnaires reported low SIB and depression levels.

Initial biologic events that underlie sexual transmission of HIV-1 are poorly understood. To model these events, we exposed human immature Langerhans cells (LCs) within epithelial tissue explants to two primary and two laboratory-adapted HIV-1 isolates. We detected HIV-1Ba-L infection in single LCs that spontaneously emigrated from explants by flow cytometry (median of infected LCs = 0.52%, range = 0.08–4.77%). HIV-1–infected LCs downregulated surface CD4 and CD83, whereas MHC class II, CD80, and CD86 were unchanged. For all HIV-1 strains tested, emigrated LCs were critical in establishing high levels of infection (0.1–1 μg HIV-1 p24 per milliliter) in cocultured autologous or allogeneic T cells. HIV-1Ba-L (an R5 HIV-1 strain) more efficiently infected LC–T cell cocultures when compared with HIV-1IIIB (an X4 HIV-1 strain). Interestingly, pretreatment of explants with either aminooxypentane-RANTES (regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted) or cellulose acetate phthalate (potential microbicides) blocked HIV-1 infection of LCs and subsequent T cell infection in a dose-dependent manner. In summary, we document HIV-1 infection in single LCs after exposure to virus within epithelial tissue, demonstrate that relatively low numbers of these cells are capable of inducing high levels of infection in cocultured T cells, and provide a useful explant model for testing of agents designed to block sexual transmission of HIV-1.

Abstract Kaposi sarcoma (KS) is an angioproliferative inflammatory condition that occurs commonly in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Inflammatory cytokines and growth factors promote the development of KS. Because physiologically important cytokine polymorphisms modulate host inflammatory responses, we investigated the association between KS and common regulatory polymorphisms in 5 proinflammatory cytokine genes encoding interleukin (IL) IL-1α, IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α, TNF-β, and IL-6 and in the IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL1RN). We also examined the contribution of stromal-derived factor 1 and chemokine receptor 5 (Δ32) polymorphisms to KS development. The population consisted of 115 HIV-infected men with KS and 126 deceased HIV-infected men without KS. The only strong association was observed between an IL6promoter polymorphism (G-174C) and susceptibility to KS in HIV-infected men (P = .0035). Homozygotes for IL6 allele G, associated with increased IL6 production, were overrepresented among patients with KS (P = .0046), whereas allele C homozygotes were underrepresented (P = .0062). Substantial in vitro evidence indicates that IL-6 contributes to the pathogenesis of KS. Our results show thatIL6 promoter genotypes associated with altered gene expression are risk factors for development of KS. Identification of a genetic risk factor for development of KS has important clinical implications for prevention and therapy.

Interleukin (IL)-15 is a recently described cytokine that shares many functional activities with IL-2; however, unlike IL-2, IL-15 is produced by monocytes/macrophages, and not by lymphocytes. In this report, we assessed IL-15 mRNA expression by freshly isolated human epidermal cells, as well as by negatively selected keratinocytes and positively selected Langerhans cells, utilizing reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction. In addition, cultured keratinocytes, immortalized keratinocytes (HaCaT cells), and dendritic cells expanded from adult peripheral blood in the presence of granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor and IL-4 were examined for IL-15 transcripts. Using cultured keratinocytes, we also studied the regulation of IL-15 mRNA expression by ultraviolet B radiation in vitro. Freshly isolated keratinocytes, HaCaT cells, and cultured keratinocytes all constitutively expressed IL-15 mRNA, and IL-15 expression was downregulated by ultraviolet B radiation in cultured keratinocytes in a time- and dose-dependent manner. In addition, IL-15 transcripts were constitutively expressed by freshly isolated Langerhans cells. IL-15 produced by keratinocytes, Langerhans cells, and other tissue-specific dendritic cells may be important in attracting and activating antigen-specific Th1 T cells. Furthermore, ultraviolet B-induced downregulation of keratinocyte IL-15 production may contribute to the relative state of immunosuppression induced by sun exposure.

Langerhans cells (LCs) constitute a subset of DCs that initiate immune responses in skin. Using leprosy as a model, we investigated whether expression of CD1a and langerin, an LC-specific C-type lectin, imparts a specific functional role to LCs. LC-like DCs and freshly isolated epidermal LCs presented nonpeptide antigens of Mycobacterium leprae to T cell clones derived from a leprosy patient in a CD1a-restricted and langerin-dependent manner. LC-like DCs were more efficient at CD1a-restricted antigen presentation than monocyte-derived DCs. LCs in leprosy lesions coexpress CD1a and langerin, placing LCs in position to efficiently present a subset of antigens to T cells as part of the host response to human infectious disease.

An association between obesity and psoriasis has been reported. For a variety of reasons, obese persons with psoriasis are often more difficult to treat. We sought to review the literature on obesity and psoriasis and to discuss efficacy and safety data that could be utilized by clinicians who are making treatment decisions for obese persons with psoriasis. We performed a literature review using the terms "obesity and psoriasis" and "metabolic syndrome and psoriasis." Evidence from relevant literature was evaluated and categorized according to the criteria of Shekelle et al (published 1999). Numerous reports cite an association between obesity and psoriasis. When compared with non-obese patients with psoriasis, obese patients with psoriasis are more likely to experience certain adverse effects to medications and are less likely to respond favorably to systemic therapies. The amount of category I evidence for objectively determining the best treatment choices for obese patients with psoriasis was scarce and thus did not allow for the development of a treatment algorithm that could be generally applied for all psoriasis patients who are obese. Efficacy and safety concerns affected by obesity are important considerations for clinicians who are making decisions on proper treatment of psoriasis.