Alexandria P. Cogdill

Preclinical mouse models suggest that the gut microbiome modulates tumor response to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy; however, this has not been well-characterized in human cancer patients. Here we examined the oral and gut microbiome of melanoma patients undergoing anti-programmed cell death 1 protein (PD-1) immunotherapy (n = 112). Significant differences were observed in the diversity and composition of the patient gut microbiome of responders versus nonresponders. Analysis of patient fecal microbiome samples (n = 43, 30 responders, 13 nonresponders) showed significantly higher alpha diversity (P < 0.01) and relative abundance of bacteria of the Ruminococcaceae family (P < 0.01) in responding patients. Metagenomic studies revealed functional differences in gut bacteria in responders, including enrichment of anabolic pathways. Immune profiling suggested enhanced systemic and antitumor immunity in responding patients with a favorable gut microbiome as well as in germ-free mice receiving fecal transplants from responding patients. Together, these data have important implications for the treatment of melanoma patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Treatment with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has revolutionized cancer therapy. Until now, predictive biomarkers1-10 and strategies to augment clinical response have largely focused on the T cell compartment. However, other immune subsets may also contribute to anti-tumour immunity11-15, although these have been less well-studied in ICB treatment16. A previously conducted neoadjuvant ICB trial in patients with melanoma showed via targeted expression profiling17 that B cell signatures were enriched in the tumours of patients who respond to treatment versus non-responding patients. To build on this, here we performed bulk RNA sequencing and found that B cell markers were the most differentially expressed genes in the tumours of responders versus non-responders. Our findings were corroborated using a computational method (MCP-counter18) to estimate the immune and stromal composition in this and two other ICB-treated cohorts (patients with melanoma and renal cell carcinoma). Histological evaluation highlighted the localization of B cells within tertiary lymphoid structures. We assessed the potential functional contributions of B cells via bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing, which demonstrate clonal expansion and unique functional states of B cells in responders. Mass cytometry showed that switched memory B cells were enriched in the tumours of responders. Together, these data provide insights into the potential role of B cells and tertiary lymphoid structures in the response to ICB treatment, with implications for the development of biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Clinical trials in melanoma patients carrying B-RAF gene mutations have shown promising results with the B-RAF kinase inhibitor PLX4032, but many patients go on to become resistant. Two papers now uncover possible mechanisms for this resistance. Nazarian et al. report that melanomas can acquire resistance due to mutations of N-RAS or increased expression of PDGFRβ, and Johannessen et al. report resistance due to upregulation of MAP3K8/COT. Each of these mechanisms seems to apply to some patients in the recent PLX4032 trial, yet surprisingly, no secondary B-RAF mutations were observed. Recent data from early clinical trials in melanoma patients carrying mutations in the B-RAF gene have shown promising results with the B-RAF kinase inhibitor PLX4032; however, many patients eventually develop resistance to this treatment. Two papers now uncover possible mechanisms of resistance to PLX4032. One paper shows that upregulation of MAP3K8 (which encodes COT) can confer resistance of melanoma cells to B-RAF inhibitors, whereas another paper found that melanomas can acquire resistance due to mutations of N-RAS or increased expression of PDGFRβ. Each of these resistance mechanisms seems to apply to at least some patients on recent PLX4032 trial, whereas, surprisingly, so far no secondary B-RAF mutations have been observed. Oncogenic mutations in the serine/threonine kinase B-RAF (also known as BRAF) are found in 50–70% of malignant melanomas1. Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated that the B-RAF(V600E) mutation predicts a dependency on the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling cascade in melanoma2,3,4,5,6—an observation that has been validated by the success of RAF and MEK inhibitors in clinical trials7,8,9. However, clinical responses to targeted anticancer therapeutics are frequently confounded by de novo or acquired resistance10,11,12. Identification of resistance mechanisms in a manner that elucidates alternative ‘druggable’ targets may inform effective long-term treatment strategies13. Here we expressed ∼600 kinase and kinase-related open reading frames (ORFs) in parallel to interrogate resistance to a selective RAF kinase inhibitor. We identified MAP3K8 (the gene encoding COT/Tpl2) as a MAPK pathway agonist that drives resistance to RAF inhibition in B-RAF(V600E) cell lines. COT activates ERK primarily through MEK-dependent mechanisms that do not require RAF signalling. Moreover, COT expression is associated with de novo resistance in B-RAF(V600E) cultured cell lines and acquired resistance in melanoma cells and tissue obtained from relapsing patients following treatment with MEK or RAF inhibitors. We further identify combinatorial MAPK pathway inhibition or targeting of COT kinase activity as possible therapeutic strategies for reducing MAPK pathway activation in this setting. Together, these results provide new insights into resistance mechanisms involving the MAPK pathway and articulate an integrative approach through which high-throughput functional screens may inform the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

Gene therapy of human cancer using genetically engineered lymphocytes is dependent on the identification of highly reactive T-cell receptors (TCRs) with antitumor activity. We immunized transgenic mice and also conducted high-throughput screening of human lymphocytes to generate TCRs highly reactive to melanoma/melanocyte antigens. Genes encoding these TCRs were engineered into retroviral vectors and used to transduce autologous peripheral lymphocytes administered to 36 patients with metastatic melanoma. Transduced patient lymphocytes were CD45RA(-) and CD45RO(+) after ex vivo expansion. After infusion, the persisting cells displayed a CD45RA(+) and CD45RO(-) phenotype. Gene-engineered cells persisted at high levels in the blood of all patients 1 month after treatment, responding patients with higher ex vivo antitumor reactivity than nonresponders. Objective cancer regressions were seen in 30% and 19% of patients who received the human or mouse TCR, respectively. However, patients exhibited destruction of normal melanocytes in the skin, eye, and ear, and sometimes required local steroid administration to treat uveitis and hearing loss. Thus, T cells expressing highly reactive TCRs mediate cancer regression in humans and target rare cognate-antigen-containing cells throughout the body, a finding with important implications for the gene therapy of cancer. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as NCI-07-C-0174 and NCI-07-C-0175.

Profiling tumor bacteria Bacteria are well-known residents in human tumors, but whether their presence is advantageous to the tumors or to the bacteria themselves has been unclear. As an initial step toward addressing this question, Nejman et al. produced an exhaustive catalog of the bacteria present in more than 1500 human tumors representing seven different tumor types (see the Perspective by Atreya and Turnbaugh). They found that the bacteria within tumors were localized within both cancer cells and immune cells and that the bacterial composition varied according to tumor type. Certain biologically plausible associations were identified. For example, breast cancer subtypes characterized by increased oxidative stress were enriched in bacteria that produce mycothiol, which can detoxify reactive oxygen species. Science , this issue p. 973 ; see also p. 938

Immune-checkpoint blockade is able to achieve durable responses in a subset of patients; however, we lack a satisfying comprehension of the underlying mechanisms of anti-CTLA-4- and anti-PD-1-induced tumor rejection. To address these issues, we utilized mass cytometry to comprehensively profile the effects of checkpoint blockade on tumor immune infiltrates in human melanoma and murine tumor models. These analyses reveal a spectrum of tumor-infiltrating T cell populations that are highly similar between tumor models and indicate that checkpoint blockade targets only specific subsets of tumor-infiltrating T cell populations. Anti-PD-1 predominantly induces the expansion of specific tumor-infiltrating exhausted-like CD8 T cell subsets. In contrast, anti-CTLA-4 induces the expansion of an ICOS+ Th1-like CD4 effector population in addition to engaging specific subsets of exhausted-like CD8 T cells. Thus, our findings indicate that anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 checkpoint-blockade-induced immune responses are driven by distinct cellular mechanisms.

BRAF mutations occur in 10-15% of colorectal cancers (CRCs) and confer adverse outcome. While RAF inhibitors such as vemurafenib (PLX4032) have proven effective in BRAF mutant melanoma, they are surprisingly ineffective in BRAF mutant CRCs, and the reason for this disparity remains unclear. Compared to BRAF mutant melanoma cells, BRAF mutant CRC cells were less sensitive to vemurafenib, and P-ERK suppression was not sustained in response to treatment. Although transient inhibition of phospho-ERK by vemurafenib was observed in CRC, rapid ERK re-activation occurred through EGFR-mediated activation of RAS and CRAF. BRAF mutant CRCs expressed higher levels of phospho-EGFR than BRAF mutant melanomas, suggesting that CRCs are specifically poised for EGFR-mediated resistance. Combined RAF and EGFR inhibition blocked reactivation of MAPK signaling in BRAF mutant CRC cells and markedly improved efficacy in vitro and in vivo. These findings support evaluation of combined RAF and EGFR inhibition in BRAF mutant CRC patients.BRAF valine 600 (V600) mutations occur in 10% to 15% of colorectal cancers, yet these tumors show a surprisingly low clinical response rate (~5%) to selective RAF inhibitors such as vemurafenib, which have produced dramatic response rates (60%–80%) in melanomas harboring the identical BRAF V600 mutation. We found that EGFR-mediated MAPK pathway reactivation leads to resistance to vemurafenib in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancers and that combined RAF and EGFR inhibition can lead to sustained MAPK pathway suppression and improved efficacy in vitro and in tumor xenografts.

To evaluate the effects of BRAF inhibition on the tumor microenvironment in patients with metastatic melanoma.Thirty-five biopsies were collected from 16 patients with metastatic melanoma pretreatment (day 0) and at 10 to 14 days after initiation of treatment with either BRAF inhibitor alone (vemurafenib) or BRAF + MEK inhibition (dabrafenib + trametinib) and were also taken at time of progression. Biopsies were analyzed for melanoma antigens, T-cell markers, and immunomodulatory cytokines.Treatment with either BRAF inhibitor alone or BRAF + MEK inhibitor was associated with an increased expression of melanoma antigens and an increase in CD8+ T-cell infiltrate. This was also associated with a decrease in immunosuppressive cytokines [interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8] and an increase in markers of T-cell cytotoxicity. Interestingly, expression of exhaustion markers TIM-3 and PD1 and the immunosuppressive ligand PDL1 was increased on treatment. A decrease in melanoma antigen expression and CD8 T-cell infiltrate was noted at time of progression on BRAF inhibitor alone and was reversed with combined BRAF and MEK inhibition.Together, these data suggest that treatment with BRAF inhibition enhances melanoma antigen expression and facilitates T-cell cytotoxicity and a more favorable tumor microenvironment, providing support for potential synergy of BRAF-targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Interestingly, markers of T-cell exhaustion and the immunosuppressive ligand PDL1 are also increased with BRAF inhibition, further implying that immune checkpoint blockade may be critical in augmenting responses to BRAF-targeted therapy in patients with melanoma.

Targeted therapy against the BRAF/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is a promising new therapeutic approach for the treatment of melanoma. Treatment with selective BRAF inhibitors results in a high initial response rate but limited duration of response. To counter this, investigators propose combining this therapy with other targeted agents, addressing the issue of redundancy and signaling through different oncogenic pathways. An alternative approach is combining BRAF/MAPK-targeted agents with immunotherapy. Preliminary evidence suggests that oncogenic BRAF (BRAF(V600E)) contributes to immune escape and that blocking its activity via MAPK pathway inhibition leads to increased expression of melanocyte differentiation antigens (MDA). Recognition of MDAs is a critical component of the immunologic response to melanoma, and several forms of immunotherapy capitalize on this recognition. Among the various approaches to inhibiting BRAF/MAPK, broad MAPK pathway inhibition may have deleterious effects on T lymphocyte function. Here, we corroborate the role of oncogenic BRAF in immune evasion by melanoma cells through suppression of MDAs. We show that inhibition of the MAPK pathway with MAPK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors or a specific inhibitor of BRAF(V600E) in melanoma cell lines and tumor digests results in increased levels of MDAs, which is associated with improved recognition by antigen-specific T lymphocytes. However, treatment with MEK inhibitors impairs T lymphocyte function, whereas T-cell function is preserved after treatment with a specific inhibitor of BRAF(V600E). These findings suggest that immune evasion of melanomas mediated by oncogenic BRAF may be reversed by targeted BRAF inhibition without compromising T-cell function. These findings have important implications for combined kinase-targeted therapy plus immunotherapy for melanoma.

Cancer immunotherapy based on genetically redirecting T cells has been used successfully to treat B cell malignancies1–3. In this strategy, the T cell genome is modified by integration of viral vectors or transposons encoding chimaeric antigen receptors (CARs) that direct tumour cell killing. However, this approach is often limited by the extent of expansion and persistence of CAR T cells4,5. Here we report mechanistic insights from studies of a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia treated with CAR T cells targeting the CD19 protein. Following infusion of CAR T cells, anti-tumour activity was evident in the peripheral blood, lymph nodes and bone marrow; this activity was accompanied by complete remission. Unexpectedly, at the peak of the response, 94% of CAR T cells originated from a single clone in which lentiviral vector-mediated insertion of the CAR transgene disrupted the methylcytosine dioxygenase TET2 gene. Further analysis revealed a hypomorphic mutation in this patient’s second TET2 allele. TET2-disrupted CAR T cells exhibited an epigenetic profile consistent with altered T cell differentiation and, at the peak of expansion, displayed a central memory phenotype. Experimental knockdown of TET2 recapitulated the potency-enhancing effect of TET2 dysfunction in this patient’s CAR T cells. These findings suggest that the progeny of a single CAR T cell induced leukaemia remission and that TET2 modification may be useful for improving immunotherapies. Genetically engineered T cells that induced remission in a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia were found to have disruption of the TET2 gene, which caused T cell changes that potentiated their anti-tumour effects.

Target-mediated toxicity is a major limitation in the development of chimeric antigen T-cell receptors (CAR) for adoptive cell therapy of solid tumors. In this study, we developed a strategy to adjust the affinities of the scFv component of CAR to discriminate tumors overexpressing the target from normal tissues that express it at physiologic levels. A CAR-expressing T-cell panel was generated with target antigen affinities varying over three orders of magnitude. High-affinity cells recognized target expressed at any level, including at levels in normal cells that were undetectable by flow cytometry. Affinity-tuned cells exhibited robust antitumor efficacy similar to high-affinity cells, but spared normal cells expressing physiologic target levels. The use of affinity-tuned scFvs offers a strategy to empower wider use of CAR T cells against validated targets widely overexpressed on solid tumors, including those considered undruggable by this approach.

Another benefit of dietary fiber The gut microbiome can modulate the immune system and influence the therapeutic response of cancer patients, yet the mechanisms underlying the effects of microbiota are presently unclear. Spencer et al . add to our understanding of how dietary habits affect microbiota and clinical outcomes to immunotherapy. In an observational study, the researchers found that melanoma patients reporting high fiber (prebiotic) consumption had a better response to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy compared with those patients reporting a low-fiber diet. The most marked benefit was observed for those patients reporting a combination of high fiber consumption and no use of over-the-counter probiotic supplements. These findings provide early insights as to how diet-related factors may influence the immune response. —PNK

Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) are synthetic molecules designed to redirect T cells to specific antigens. CAR-modified T cells can mediate long-term durable remissions in B cell malignancies, but expanding this platform to solid tumors requires the discovery of surface targets with limited expression in normal tissues. The variant III mutation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRvIII) results from an in-frame deletion of a portion of the extracellular domain, creating a neoepitope. We chose a vector backbone encoding a second-generation CAR based on efficacy of a murine scFv-based CAR in a xenograft model of glioblastoma. Next, we generated a panel of humanized scFvs and tested their specificity and function as soluble proteins and in the form of CAR-transduced T cells; a low-affinity scFv was selected on the basis of its specificity for EGFRvIII over wild-type EGFR. The lead candidate scFv was tested in vitro for its ability to direct CAR-transduced T cells to specifically lyse, proliferate, and secrete cytokines in response to antigen-bearing targets. We further evaluated the specificity of the lead CAR candidate in vitro against EGFR-expressing keratinocytes and in vivo in a model of mice grafted with normal human skin. EGFRvIII-directed CAR T cells were also able to control tumor growth in xenogeneic subcutaneous and orthotopic models of human EGFRvIII(+) glioblastoma. On the basis of these results, we have designed a phase 1 clinical study of CAR T cells transduced with humanized scFv directed to EGFRvIII in patients with either residual or recurrent glioblastoma (NCT02209376).

Key Points Ibrutinib treatment of CLL enhances the generation of CAR T cells for adoptive immunotherapy. Concurrent ibrutinib therapy improves the engraftment and therapeutic efficacy of anti-CD19 CAR T cells in mouse models.

Immune checkpoint blockade therapy targets T cell-negative costimulatory molecules such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death-1 (PD-1). Combination anti–CTLA-4 and anti–PD-1 blockade therapy has enhanced efficacy, but it remains unclear through what mechanisms such effects are mediated. A critical question is whether combination therapy targets and modulates the same T cell populations as monotherapies. Using a mass cytometry-based systems approach, we comprehensively profiled the response of T cell populations to monotherapy and combination anti–CTLA-4 plus anti–PD-1 therapy in syngeneic murine tumors and clinical samples. Most effects of monotherapies were additive in the context of combination therapy; however, multiple combination therapy-specific effects were observed. Highly phenotypically exhausted cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8) T cells expand in frequency following anti–PD-1 monotherapy but not combination therapy, while activated terminally differentiated effector CD8 T cells expand only following combination therapy. Combination therapy also led to further increased frequency of T helper type 1 (Th1)-like CD4 effector T cells even though anti–PD-1 monotherapy is not sufficient to do so. Mass cytometry analyses of peripheral blood from melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade therapies similarly revealed mostly additive effects on the frequencies of T cell subsets along with unique modulation of terminally differentiated effector CD8 T cells by combination ipilimumab plus nivolumab therapy. Together, these findings indicate that dual blockade of CTLA-4 and PD-1 therapy is sufficient to induce unique cellular responses compared with either monotherapy.

Unprecedented advances have been made in the treatment of cancer through the use of immune checkpoint blockade, with approval of several checkpoint blockade regimens spanning multiple cancer types. However, responses to this form of therapy are not universal, and insights are clearly needed to identify optimal biomarkers of response and to combat mechanisms of therapeutic resistance. A working knowledge of the hallmarks of cancer yields insight into responses to immune checkpoint blockade, although the focus of this is rather tumour-centric and additional factors are pertinent, including host immunity and environmental influences. Herein, we describe the foundation for pillars and hallmarks of response to immune checkpoint blockade, with a discussion of their relevance to immune monitoring and mechanisms of resistance. Evolution of this understanding will ultimately help guide treatment strategies to enhance therapeutic responses.

Treatment with therapy targeting BRAF and MEK (BRAF/MEK) has revolutionized care in melanoma and other cancers; however, therapeutic resistance is common and innovative treatment strategies are needed1,2. Here we studied a group of patients with melanoma who were treated with neoadjuvant BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy ( NCT02231775 , n = 51) and observed significantly higher rates of major pathological response (MPR; ≤10% viable tumour at resection) and improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) in female versus male patients (MPR, 66% versus 14%, P = 0.001; RFS, 64% versus 32% at 2 years, P = 0.021). The findings were validated in several additional cohorts2–4 of patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma who were treated with BRAF- and/or MEK-targeted therapy (n = 664 patients in total), demonstrating improved progression-free survival and overall survival in female versus male patients in several of these studies. Studies in preclinical models demonstrated significantly impaired anti-tumour activity in male versus female mice after BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy (P = 0.006), with significantly higher expression of the androgen receptor in tumours of male and female BRAF/MEK-treated mice versus the control (P = 0.0006 and P = 0.0025). Pharmacological inhibition of androgen receptor signalling improved responses to BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy in male and female mice (P = 0.018 and P = 0.003), whereas induction of androgen receptor signalling (through testosterone administration) was associated with a significantly impaired response to BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy in male and female patients (P = 0.021 and P < 0.0001). Together, these results have important implications for therapy. Treatment with neoadjuvant BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy results in higher rates of major pathological response in female compared with male patients with melanoma, and pharmacological inhibition of androgen receptor signalling improved the responses of male and female mice to BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy.

We generated two humanized interleukin-13 receptor α2 (IL-13Rα2) chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), Hu07BBz and Hu08BBz, that recognized human IL-13Rα2, but not IL-13Rα1. Hu08BBz also recognized canine IL-13Rα2. Both of these CAR T cell constructs demonstrated superior tumor inhibitory effects in a subcutaneous xenograft model of human glioma compared with a humanized EGFRvIII CAR T construct used in a recent phase 1 clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02209376). The Hu08BBz demonstrated a 75% reduction in orthotopic tumor growth using low-dose CAR T cell infusion. Using combination therapy with immune checkpoint blockade, humanized IL-13Rα2 CAR T cells performed significantly better when combined with CTLA-4 blockade, and humanized EGFRvIII CAR T cells' efficacy was improved by PD-1 and TIM-3 blockade in the same mouse model, which was correlated with the levels of checkpoint molecule expression in co-cultures with the same tumor in vitro. Humanized IL-13Rα2 CAR T cells also demonstrated benefit from a self-secreted anti-CTLA-4 minibody in the same mouse model. In addition to a canine glioma cell line (J3T), canine osteosarcoma lung cancer and leukemia cell lines also express IL-13Rα2 and were recognized by Hu08BBz. Canine IL-13Rα2 CAR T cell was also generated and tested in vitro by co-culture with canine tumor cells and in vivo in an orthotopic model of canine glioma. Based on these results, we are designing a pre-clinical trial to evaluate the safety of canine IL-13Rα2 CAR T cells in dog with spontaneous IL-13Rα2-positive glioma, which will help to inform a human clinical trial design for glioblastoma using humanized scFv-based IL-13Rα2 targeting CAR T cells.

Appreciation for genomic and immune heterogeneity in cancer has grown though the relationship of these factors to treatment response has not been thoroughly elucidated. To better understand this, we studied a large cohort of melanoma patients treated with targeted therapy or immune checkpoint blockade (n = 60). Heterogeneity in therapeutic responses via radiologic assessment was observed in the majority of patients. Synchronous melanoma metastases were analyzed via deep genomic and immune profiling, and revealed substantial genomic and immune heterogeneity in all patients studied, with considerable diversity in T cell frequency, and few shared T cell clones (<8% on average) across the cohort. Variables related to treatment response were identified via these approaches and through novel radiomic assessment. These data yield insight into differential therapeutic responses to targeted therapy and immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma, and have key translational implications in the age of precision medicine.

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), although revolutionary in improving long-term survival outcomes, are mostly effective in patients with immune-responsive tumors. Most patients with cancer either do not respond to ICIs at all or experience disease progression after an initial period of response. Treatment resistance to ICIs remains a major challenge and defines the biggest unmet medical need in oncology worldwide. In a collaborative workshop, thought leaders from academic, biopharma, and nonprofit sectors convened to outline a resistance framework to support and guide future immune-resistance research. Here, we explore the initial part of our effort by collating seminal discoveries through the lens of known biological processes. We highlight eight biological processes and refer to them as immune resistance nodes. We examine the seminal discoveries that define each immune resistance node and pose critical questions, which, if answered, would greatly expand our notion of immune resistance. Ultimately, the expansion and application of this work calls for the integration of multiomic high-dimensional analyses from patient-level data to produce a map of resistance phenotypes that can be utilized to guide effective drug development and improved patient outcomes.

Comprehensive and cost-effective characterization of gut and tumor microbiota can help understand dynamic association between commensal signatures and a phenotype. Efficacy of the therapeutic treatment is strongly influenced by the diversity and abundance of the resident commensal microbiota. The microbiota has a potential to both induce deleterious and beneficial effects on host immune responses. A perpetual and dynamic crosstalk between the microbial community and host immune responses can dictate therapeutic outcomes. Microbial metabolites represent functional capabilities of microbiota and play a key role in exerting distinct immunomodulatory effects. The microbiome has the potential to be utilized as both a diagnostic tool, as well as a therapeutic adjunct in the context of anticancer therapy. The human microbiome is a complex aggregate of microorganisms, and their genomes exert a number of influences crucial to the metabolic, immunologic, hormonal, and homeostatic function of the host. Recent work, both in preclinical mouse models and human studies, has shed light on the impact of gut and tumor microbiota on responses to systemic anticancer therapeutics. In light of this, strategies to target the microbiome to improve therapeutic responses are underway, including efforts to target gut and intratumoral microbes. Here, we discuss mechanisms by which microbiota may impact systemic and antitumor immunity, in addition to outstanding questions in the field. A deeper understanding of these is critical as we devise putative strategies to target the microbiome. The human microbiome is a complex aggregate of microorganisms, and their genomes exert a number of influences crucial to the metabolic, immunologic, hormonal, and homeostatic function of the host. Recent work, both in preclinical mouse models and human studies, has shed light on the impact of gut and tumor microbiota on responses to systemic anticancer therapeutics. In light of this, strategies to target the microbiome to improve therapeutic responses are underway, including efforts to target gut and intratumoral microbes. Here, we discuss mechanisms by which microbiota may impact systemic and antitumor immunity, in addition to outstanding questions in the field. A deeper understanding of these is critical as we devise putative strategies to target the microbiome. type of anti-infectious or antitumor therapy which involves the transfer of cells in a patient. These cells can be derived from the patient itself (autologous transfer) or from different individuals (allogeneic transfer). a cancer treatment uses cells originated from a patient or individual and generates tumor-specific immune cells infused into cancer patients with the goal of recognizing, targeting, and killing tumor cells. mean species diversity within a single microbiota sample. monoclonal antibody, mainly used as cancer immunotherapy. It blocks the programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint expressed on the surface of immune CD8+ T cells, thus rejuvenating them from exhaustion to sustain an antitumor response. a read refers to the sequence of a cluster that is obtained after the sequencing process is complete. Users receive sequencing data as unassembled reads. Sequence assemble refers to the aligning and merging of fragments from long DNA sequencing in order to reconstruct the original genome. a live attenuated strain of Mycobacterium bovis; FDA approved for primary therapy of in situ bladder carcinoma. mean species diversity across different microbiota samples. generally, antibodies that inhibit key checkpoint receptors such as PD-1. When these proteins are blocked, the ‘brakes’ on the immune system are released and cytotoxic T cells can kill certain cancer cells more effectively. an important component of genomic diversity; it is a type of structural variation, defined as a type of duplication or deletion event, of one kilobase (kb) or larger, in which sections of the genome are present in comparison with a reference genome. a precise method of PCR; can be used for direct quantification and clonally amplified nucleic acid strands such as DNA, cDNA, or RNA; target applications include mutation detection and copy number variations. also referred to as dysbacteriosis of the gut, in contrast to the eubiotic gut, wherein a microbial imbalance or maladaptation takes place. Dysbiosis can be caused by changes in diet, antibiotics, and/or chronic inflammation. characterized by a dominance of potentially beneficial microbial species, mainly belonging to two bacterial phyla, Firmicutes and Bacteroides. A healthy, or eubiotic gut, is a balanced but flexible ecosystem that tolerates pathogens from flora. significantly higher alpha-diversity and relative abundance of Ruminococcaceae bacteria relative to an ‘unfavorable’ microbiome. cytotoxic agent used in the treatment of multiple solid and hematological tumors. key component of the mucosa associated lymphoid tissue; works in tandem with the immune system to protect against infection in the gut. a series of protocols and techniques for the efficient screening of a large number of extinction culture attempts for growth and subsequent identification. United States National Institutes of Health research initiative to improve the understanding of the microbial flora involved in human health and disease. molecules which regulate the activity of the immune system and self-tolerance. These checkpoints can be stimulatory (e.g., CD28, CD40) or inhibitory (e.g., CTLA-4, PD-1). catalyzes the first and rate-limiting step in the oxidation of L-tryptophan to N-formylkynurenine. cytosolic protein complexes which activate inflammatory responses through the maturation and secretion of cytokines such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and interleukin-18 (IL-18). cytotoxic agent mostly used to treat colon cancer and small cell lung cancer. matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry is a rapid, accurate, and cost-effective method of microbial characterization and identification. refers to sequence similarities between foreign and self-peptides, which can lead to the crossactivation of autoreactive T or B cells by peptides derived from pathogens. a catch-all term to describe multiple modern high-throughput sequencing techniques (Illumnia Solexa, Roche 454, Proton/PGM, and SOLiD sequencing) and applies to genome sequencing, genome resequencing, transcriptome profiling (RNA-Seq), DNA–protein interactions (ChIP-sequencing), and epigenome characterization. All of these methods allow for sequencing of DNA and RNA quickly and accurately. used to classify groups of closely related species, a pragmatic proxy for microbial species at different taxonomic levels, often grouped by DNA sequence similarity of a specific taxonomic marker gene. cytotoxic agent mostly used to treat colon cancer. mainly expressed by innate immune cells; germline-encoded host receptors, which are specialized in the detection of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). a type of artifact common in whole-genome amplification; results when the end product of the amplification method does not dependably recapitulate the starting DNA. gene coding for a component of the 30S small subunit of a prokaryotic ribosome; used to reconstruct phylogenies. T cells with a TCR composed of two glycoprotein chains, alpha and beta TCR chains (95% of T cells). T cells with a T cell receptor on their surface made of one gamma chain and one delta chain. In high abundance in the gut and other mucosae. a subpopulation of T cells that modulate the immune system, maintaining self-tolerance and homeostasis. Generally, Tregs are immunosuppressive and downregulate induction and growth of effector CD8+ T cells. induced in parallel to Th17 cells and, like Th17, these polarized cells are proinflammatory; they produce INFγ and TNF-β. transforming growth factor β, interleukin 6 (IL6), IL21, and IL23 can differentiate naïve CD4+ T lymphocytes into the Th17 subtype. Can contribute to local and chronic inflammation through proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-17, IL-21, IL-22), which mainly recruit neutrophils. T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains; immune receptor found on T cells and natural killer (NK) cells. Toll-like receptors are single, membrane-spanning, noncatalytic receptors which are expressed on innate immune cells such as macrophages and dendritic cells. They recognize structurally conserved molecules derived from microbial pathogens. or shotgun metagenomics, allows for the comprehensive sampling of all genes in all organisms present in a given complex sample. Excellent tool to evaluate bacterial diversity and detect the abundance of microbes in various environments.

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has revolutionized cancer treatment, yet quality of life and continuation of therapy can be constrained by immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Limited understanding of irAE mechanisms hampers development of approaches to mitigate their damage. To address this, we examined whether mice gained sensitivity to anti-CTLA-4 (αCTLA-4)-mediated toxicity upon disruption of gut homeostatic immunity. We found αCTLA-4 drove increased inflammation and colonic tissue damage in mice with genetic predisposition to intestinal inflammation, acute gastrointestinal infection, transplantation with a dysbiotic fecal microbiome, or dextran sodium sulfate administration. We identified an immune signature of αCTLA-4-mediated irAEs, including colonic neutrophil accumulation and systemic interleukin-6 (IL-6) release. IL-6 blockade combined with antibiotic treatment reduced intestinal damage and improved αCTLA-4 therapeutic efficacy in inflammation-prone mice. Intestinal immune signatures were validated in biopsies from patients with ICB colitis. Our work provides new preclinical models of αCTLA-4 intestinal irAEs, mechanistic insights into irAE development, and potential approaches to enhance ICB efficacy while mitigating irAEs.

Unprecedented advances in the treatment of cancer have occurred through the use of immunotherapy, with several agents currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of widespread metastatic disease across cancer types. Immune checkpoint blockade represents a particularly promising class of agents that block inhibitory molecules on the surface of T cells, resulting in their activation and propagation of an immune response. Treatment with these agents may re-invigorate anti-tumor immunity, resulting in therapeutic responses, and use of these agents currently is being studied in the adjuvant setting. Additionally, a strong rationale exists for their use in the neoadjuvant setting for high-risk resectable disease (e.g., regional nodal disease in the case of melanoma). This rationale is based on the relatively high risk of relapse for these patients, as well as on scientific evidence suggesting that long-term immunologic memory and tumor control may be superior in the setting of treatment for an intact tumor (i.e., neoadjuvant therapy) as opposed to treatment in the setting of micrometastatic disease (e.g., adjuvant treatment). The potential advantages of this approach and the current landscape for neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade is discussed in this report, as well as caveats that should be considered by clinicians contemplating this strategy.

Melanoma antigen gene family (MAGE)-A4, a member of the cancer testis antigen family, has been reported in various cancers including melanoma, bladder, head and neck, oral, and lung, and is a potential target for T-cell-receptor-based immunotherapy. Baseline expression levels of the MAGE-A4 gene in thyroid cancer cell lines have not been previously studied thoroughly.Human thyroid cancer cell lines (8505c, HTh7, BCPAP, and TPC-1) were treated with either 10 μmol/L 5'-azacytidine (Aza) or 10 μmol/L 5-AZA-2'deoxycytidine (DAC) and evaluated for various MAGEA gene expression. Later melanoma cell lines A375 and 8505c were treated with PLX4720 in combination with DAC and evaluated for MAGE-A4 expression.Only BCPAP cells expressed moderate levels of MAGE-A3 and MAGE-A6 at baseline. Treatment with DAC/Aza induced the expression of MAGE-A4 and MAGE-A1 in 8505c cells. PLX4720 treatment did not affect MAGE-A4 expression in 8505c cells, but increased its expression in A375 cells. In contrast, addition of PLX4720 to DAC-treated 8505c cells decreased the previously induced MAGE-A4 expression by DAC in these cells. A similar decrease in MAGE-A4 expression by DAC was also seen in 8505cBRAF(-/-) cells. Although DAC treatment resulted in demethylation of the MAGE-A4 promoter in 2 CpG sites, PLX addition to DAC did not affect the demethylation status.Demethylating agents increased the expression of MAGE genes in thyroid cancer cells. The effect of BRAFV600E inhibitors on MAGE-A4 expression suggest the role of downstream MEK/BRAF signaling in its expression apart from promoter demethylation being the sole requirement. Expression of MAGE-A4 may make immunotherapeutic intervention possible in selected patients with thyroid cancer.

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth-leading cause of death in the United States and one of the most aggressive known malignancies. New and innovative advances in treatment are desperately needed. One promising area of investigational treatment for pancreatic cancer involves the use of immunotherapy. The development of immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer has been hampered by difficulty in generating tumor-reactive lymphocytes from resected specimens and by a lack of appropriate target antigens expressed on tumor cells. Innovative strategies have been developed with the use of peripheral blood lymphocytes that are genetically engineered to express T-cell receptors targeting common tumor antigens, including cancer-testis antigens, such as the MAGE-A3 antigen. Cancer-testis antigens pose excellent targets for immunotherapy because they are expressed in cancer and in the testis, an immune-privileged site, but have limited expression in normal tissue. An additional advantage in targeting cancer-testis antigens for immunotherapy is that their expression can be selectively up-regulated in tumor cells via epigenetic regulation with chromatin remodeling agents. Current interest in targeting cancer-testis antigens in pancreatic cancer is well-founded because cancer-testis antigens have been shown to be expressed in pancreatic cancer as potential targets for therapy. In our studies, we validated the expression pattern of cancer-testis antigens in resected specimens of pancreatic cancer and tested the hypothesis that treatment of pancreatic cancer cells with chromatin remodeling agents would render them more sensitive to antigen-specific T lymphocytes. We focused predominately on the MAGE-A3 antigen because it is highly expressed in pancreatic cancer, and several immunotherapeutic strategies are in clinical trials targeting this specific antigen. The results of these studies have important translational implications and provide the rationale for combined treatment with chromatin remodeling agents and immunotherapeutic approaches for pancreatic cancer.

Accumulating evidence from preclinical studies and human trials demonstrated the crucial role of the gut microbiota in determining the effectiveness of anticancer therapeutics such as immunogenic chemotherapy or immune checkpoint blockade. In summary, it appears that a diverse intestinal microbiota supports therapeutic anticancer responses, while a dysbiotic microbiota composition that lacks immunostimulatory bacteria or contains overabundant immunosuppressive species causes treatment failure. In this review, we explore preclinical and translational studies highlighting how eubiotic and dysbiotic microbiota composition can affect progression-free survival in cancer patients.

Abstract Targeted therapy against oncogenic BRAF (BRAFV600E) is a promising new therapeutic approach for the treatment of melanoma with up to 80% of patients with stage IV melanoma responding to treatment. Despite these results, the median duration of response is only 8.5 months. Investigators propose combining this therapy with other targeted agents to address redundancy and signaling through different oncogenic pathways in hopes to improve the durability of response. An alternate approach is to combine BRAF-targeted agents with immunotherapy based on evidence that oncogenic BRAF contributes to immune escape. We recently reported data supporting this hypothesis, showing that treatment of melanoma cell lines with MEK or selective BRAFV600E inhibition results in increased expression of melanocyte differentiation antigens (MDAs) which is associated with enhanced recognition by antigen-specific T cells. The purpose of these studies was to validate these findings by assaying expression of MDAs in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with BRAFV600E inhibition. We also sought to test immune cell infiltrate in tumors to analyze host immune response. Patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing treatment with a selective BRAFV600E inhibitor were consented on a tissue procurement protocol approved through the IRB at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Patients underwent treatment with the BRAFV600E inhibitor (PLX4032) per protocol (960 mg given twice daily). Tumor biopsies and blood draws were performed pre-treatment and 10-14 days after initiation of treatment. RNA was harvested and expression of MDAs was assayed by quantitative RT-PCR. The level of MITF, the master transcriptional regulator of melanocyte which controls MDA expression, was also assayed. Immunohistochemistry was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissue for MDAs, as well as CD4 and CD8. The effect of BRAFV600E inhibition on T lymphocyte function was analyzed by assaying fold-expansion and viability in blood samples collected before and during treatment. Treatment with a selective inhibitor of BRAFV600E resulted in significantly increased levels of MDAs (up to 95-fold) which was associated with higher levels of MITF. In addition, CD8 T cell infiltrate also increased after treatment. Of note, T cell function was preserved after treatment with a specific inhibitor of BRAFV600E. These data provide in vivo correlates to our in vitro findings that selective BRAFV600E inhibition enhances MDA expression in melanoma and suggest a possible improved host immune response. The studies provide further support for potential synergy between BRAF-targeted therapy and immunotherapy in the treatment of melanoma. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 958. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-958

Abstract Appreciation of the immune effects of targeted agents has grown, and efforts to combine these agents with immunotherapy are underway to enhance therapeutic responses. Multiple ongoing trials are examining this concept; however, nuances exist with regard to timing, sequence, and combinatorial strategies. Clin Cancer Res; 23(2); 327–9. ©2016 AACR. See related article by Deniger et al., p. 351

We have seen major advances in cancer treatment through the use of immunotherapy and molecularly targeted therapy, and treatment regimens combining these strategies are now being tested in clinical trials across a range of cancer types. The initial rationale for this was empiric—hoping to complement the high response rates generally observed with molecularly targeted therapy with more durable responses seen with immunotherapy. However, there is now strong scientific evidence to support these combinations, as molecularly targeted therapy may induce favorable changes in the tumor immune microenvironment, thereby facilitating enhanced responses to immunotherapy. Nonetheless, nuances exist in such approaches and will be discussed herein. Ultimately, optimal combination strategies with targeted therapy and immunotherapy rely on a deep understanding of the mechanisms of response and resistance to these treatment modalities in isolation as well as in combination.

Abstract Treatment with molecularly-targeted therapy has revolutionized cancer care, including BRAF/MEK-targeted melanoma therapy. However responses are heterogenous and frequently not long-lasting. Novel strategies to target resistance are needed. We studied a cohort of patients with resectable metastatic melanoma treated with neoadjuvant BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy (n=52) and noted a strong sexual dimorphism in response to treatment, with female patients demonstrating significantly higher rates of a major pathologic response (MPR) (p=0.0001). RNA sequencing of tumors demonstrated enrichment of androgen-related genes in those failing to achieve MPR. Pre-clinical studies validated these findings, with significantly increased tumor growth in male vs female mice treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) (p=0.0005). Androgen receptor (AR) expression was upregulated in tumors of BRAF/MEKi-treated mice, and modulation of AR signaling via AR-blockade or castration was associated with significantly slower tumor growth (p=0.0001 and p=0.00004, respectively). Together, these results have important implications in the context of treatment with BRAF/MEKi-targeted therapy.