ϟ
MAG: 1531919700

Managing knowledge in policy networks. Organising joint fact-finding in the Scheldt Estuary.

Arwin van Buuren,Jurian Edelenbos,Erik-Hans Klijn

Joint (building)
Business
Archaeology
2007
textabstractIn this paper we analyse the role of knowledge management in the policy process about the Development Plan 2010 for the Scheldt Estuary (a Dutch-Flemish river basin). The conflicts of interests around this package of measures are sharp. Therefore, knowledge is often strategically used in order to defend stakeholders’ own preferences. The project organisation (ProSes) that prepares the Development Plan organised a joint fact-finding process in order to reach ‘shared knowledge’. In this paper we evaluate this process. Especially the relations between the joint fact-finding process and the traditional democratic decision-making process and the separate organisations, which form part of the policy network, seem to be problematic. We formulate some conclusions about the possibilities and limitations of knowledge management within complex policy processes.
    Cite this:
Generate Citation
Powered by Citationsy*
Papers that cite this paper:
DOI: 10.3920/978-90-8686-724-0_11
¤ Open Access
2011
Limpopo case: the role of research in conflict over natural resources; informing resettlement negotiations in Limpopo National Park, Mozambique
Working in a tense political climate with a village to be resettled from a national park in Mozambique, this research looked for a way to be relevant to the complex situation at hand. The objective of the research at the outset was to improve post-resettlement food security. While intending to carry out a formal cycle of action research focused on agricultural practices, the research found its niche in contributing to negotiations of post-resettlement conditions between park staff and village residents. Working interactively with multiple actors, the researcher inquired about and presented information that could increase leverage in negotiations for the village residents while maintaining a balanced perspective about the challenges and limitations encountered by other actors in the process. Although the tangible influence of the research on the outcome of negotiations was subtle, we believe that untraceable consequences may have been more profound. Lessons learned include firstly, an understanding that the process of research can potentially contribute more to problemsolving than polished research results. This potential contribution is dependent on investing in relationships with key actors and being present to witness, document, inquire about and support the process as opportunities arise. Secondly, our experience suggests that research is more likely to bring about change if it is explicitly socially-engaged, interdisciplinary, well-grounded with actors on multiple levels and coupled with information intermediation. Finally, in the type of conflictive context common in landscape development, we suggest that the role of the researcher differs from that in a non-conflictive setting. In the context of conflict, the potential for the researcher to contribute to social change hinges on managing a balancing act between actors in conflict and the researcher, tailoring the research to the people, culture and specificities of each situation, and exploring creative modes of interaction.
MAG: 23719302
2012
Knowledge Integration in Taiwanese Environmental Impact Assessment
MAG: 384381110
2011
Adaptive governance in fire management: exploring the role of bureaucrats in reflexive learning
If public policy sectors like fire management are to support the adaptive capacity and adaptation of our social-economic-ecological systems, they themselves require a considerable adaptive capacity. Yet when arguing for adaptive approaches to policies and
Managing knowledge in policy networks. Organising joint fact-finding in the Scheldt Estuary.” is a paper by Arwin van Buuren Jurian Edelenbos Erik-Hans Klijn published in 2007.You can read and download a PDF Full Text of this paper here.